Analysis
Members compared
All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 1 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted
How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?
Members compared
Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.
- Barry ANDREWS Renew · IE Remove
- Manfred WEBER EPP · DE Remove
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · FR Remove
The members, 3
Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.
- Barry ANDREWS Renew · Ireland
- Manfred WEBER EPP · Germany
- Jordan BARDELLA Patriots · France
Agreement, pair by pair, 3
Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.
| Members | Agreement | Same position | Shared votes | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barry ANDREWS and Manfred WEBER | 81.1 % | 3 266 | 4 025 | 81.6 % |
| Barry ANDREWS and Jordan BARDELLA | 26.5 % | 1 108 | 4 184 | 29.2 % |
| Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA | 34.1 % | 1 341 | 3 933 | 37.1 % |
Where they differed, 3 683
Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.
| Vote | Barry ANDREWS | Manfred WEBER | Jordan BARDELLA |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Jan 2026 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 15 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 | For | Against | Against |
| 21 Jan 2026 Paragraph 14 — part 3 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 | For | For | Abstained |
| 21 Jan 2026 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 13 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 | For | Against | For |
| 21 Jan 2026 Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 8 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 | Against | Against | For |
| 21 Jan 2026 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 | For | Against | Abstained |
| 21 Jan 2026 Final vote Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of a Loan for Ukraine | For | For | Against |
| 21 Jan 2026 Amendment 5 to paragraph 3, subparagraph 1, after point b Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025 | For | Against | For |
| 21 Jan 2026 Final vote on motion B10-0061/2026 Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) | Against | Against | For |
| 21 Jan 2026 Final vote on motion B10-0060/2026 Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after recital G Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | For | For | Against |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 4, adding text after recital Ea Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 12 to paragraph 22 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Against | For | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 10a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 9a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 8 to paragraph 7a Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Against | For | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 5 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Against | For | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 5 to paragraph 3 Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | For | For | Against |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 1 to recital H Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Separate vote on recital G Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | For | For | Against |
| 20 Jan 2026 Recital F — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | For | For | Against |
| 20 Jan 2026 Separate vote on recital C Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | For | For | Against |
| 20 Jan 2026 Recital B — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | For | For | Against |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 12 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Paragraph 3 — part 3 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | For | For | Against |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Paragraph 2 — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States | For | For | Against |
| 20 Jan 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises | For | For | Abstained |
| 20 Jan 2026 Paragraph 10 — part 2 Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises | For | No vote recorded | Against |
| 20 Jan 2026 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertainties | For | For | Abstained |
| 20 Jan 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | For | For | Against |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 10, adding text after recital F Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 3 to recital F Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 2 to recital E Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 1 to recital A Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Against | For | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 10 Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Final vote — text as a whole The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | For | For | Against |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 32, adding text after recital E The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 31, adding text after recital C The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Separate vote on citation 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Against | For | Against |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 30 to citation 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 27 to paragraph 41 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 35 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 26 to paragraph 40 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Against | Against | For |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Against | Against | Abstained |
| 20 Jan 2026 Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 2 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies | Against | Against | For |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 1 Oct 2026, 03:37 UTC (data stamp 7669c786bb14, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 1 October 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 1 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-01 (retrieved 1 October 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-10-01,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 1 Oct 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-01}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-10-01},
urldate = {2026-10-01},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 7669c786bb14 (1 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}