Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928
Abstentions Count as a positionIgnore (for and against only) ⓘ

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 2

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 1

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Barry ANDREWS and Jordan BARDELLA26.5 %1 1084 18429.2 %

Where they differed, 3 076

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteBarry ANDREWSJordan BARDELLA
21 May 2026 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAgainstFor
21 May 2026 Decision to open negotiations with the Council Periodic roadworthiness tests and technical roadside inspection (Roadworthiness package)ForAgainst
21 May 2026 Decision to open negotiations with the Council Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 on securitisation and a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisationForAgainst
21 May 2026 Decision to open negotiations with the Council Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposuresForAgainst
20 May 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 10, adding text after recital D Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Separate vote on citation 25 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseForAbstained
20 May 2026 Separate vote on citation 7 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 4 to paragraph 15 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 6 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 41, adding text after recital P Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 3 to recital M Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendment 29, adding text after recital F Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAbstained
20 May 2026 Amendment 9 to recital C Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAbstained
20 May 2026 Citation 5 — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAbstained
20 May 2026 Paragraph 1, point aq — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAbstained
20 May 2026 Amendment 65 to paragraph 1, point ap Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendment 28 to paragraph 1, point ap Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendments 27 + 39 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, after point ag Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendment 26 to paragraph 1, point ag Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendments 25 + 38 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, after point af Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Paragraph 1, point af — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 24 to paragraph 1, point af Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendments 23 + 37 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, after point ad Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendments 22 + 36 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, point ad Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendment 33 to paragraph 1, point ac Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAbstained
20 May 2026 Amendment 59 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 57 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 56 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 54 to paragraph 1, point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 52 to paragraph 1, point aa Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 31 to paragraph 1, point aa Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAbstained
20 May 2026 Paragraph 1, point v — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainst
20 May 2026 Amendment 2 to paragraph 1, point v Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, after point r Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendment 17 to paragraph 1, after point o Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Amendment 1 to paragraph 1, point o Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor
20 May 2026 Paragraph 1, point n — part 4 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainst
20 May 2026 Paragraph 1, point n — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainst
20 May 2026 Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainst
20 May 2026 Paragraph 1, point m — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAbstained
20 May 2026 Paragraph 1, point m — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAbstained
20 May 2026 Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, after point l Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstFor

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-26
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}