Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928
Abstentions Count as a positionIgnore (for and against only) ⓘ

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 2

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 1

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Barry ANDREWS and Jordan BARDELLA26.5 %1 1084 18429.2 %

Where they differed, 3 076

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteBarry ANDREWSJordan BARDELLA
11 Mar 2025 Amendment 1 European Social Fund Plus post-2027AgainstFor
11 Mar 2025 Final vote on the provisional agreement Establishing the Reform and Growth Facility for the Republic of MoldovaForAgainst
12 Feb 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize MON 95275AgainstFor
12 Feb 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after recital M Genetically modified maize MON 95275AgainstFor
12 Feb 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after recital J Genetically modified maize MON 95275AgainstFor
12 Feb 2025 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 5 Genetically modified maize MON 95275AgainstFor
12 Feb 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 Genetically modified maize MON 95275AgainstFor
12 Feb 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP910521AgainstFor
12 Feb 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after recital V Genetically modified maize DP910521AgainstFor
12 Feb 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 Genetically modified maize DP910521AgainstFor
23 Jan 2025 Final vote — text as a whole Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025ForAbstained
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 8 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025AgainstFor
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 8 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025AgainstFor
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 7 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025AgainstFor
23 Jan 2025 Paragraph 5 — part 2 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025ForAgainst
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 2 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025AgainstFor
23 Jan 2025 Paragraph 2 — part 2 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025ForAbstained
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025AgainstFor
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 2 to recital I Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineAgainstFor
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 9 to paragraph 15 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineAgainstFor
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 14 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineAgainstAbstained
23 Jan 2025 Paragraph 14 — part 1 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineForAbstained
23 Jan 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 7 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineForAbstained
23 Jan 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 6 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineForAgainst
23 Jan 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 5 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineForAbstained
23 Jan 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 4 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineForAbstained
23 Jan 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 3 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineForAgainst
23 Jan 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 2 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineForAgainst
23 Jan 2025 Paragraph 10 — part 1 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineForAgainst
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 1, adding text after recital D Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAgainstFor
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAgainstFor
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 3 to paragraph 5 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAgainstFor
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 2 Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAgainstAbstained
23 Jan 2025 Paragraph 7 — part 2 Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostagesForAgainst
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 4 to paragraph 3 Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostagesAgainstFor
23 Jan 2025 Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 Case of Jean-Jacques Wondo in the Democratic Republic of the CongoAgainstFor
19 Dec 2024 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenForAgainst
19 Dec 2024 Amendment 1, adding text after recital K Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenAgainstFor
19 Dec 2024 Separate vote on recital K Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenForAbstained
19 Dec 2024 Amendment 9 to paragraph 1, after point ar Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenAgainstFor
19 Dec 2024 Paragraph 1, point al — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenForAgainst
19 Dec 2024 Paragraph 1, point al — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenForAgainst
19 Dec 2024 Amendment 17 to paragraph 1, point al Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenAgainstFor
19 Dec 2024 Amendment 8 to paragraph 1, point ak Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenAgainstFor
19 Dec 2024 Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, after point ag Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenAgainstFor
19 Dec 2024 Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, point ag Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenAgainstFor
19 Dec 2024 Amendment 5 to paragraph 1, after point af Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenAgainstFor
19 Dec 2024 Paragraph 1, point af — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenForAgainst
19 Dec 2024 Paragraph 1, point ae — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenForAgainst
19 Dec 2024 Paragraph 1, point ae — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenForAgainst

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-26
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}