Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928
Abstentions Count as a positionIgnore (for and against only) ⓘ

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 2

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 1

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Barry ANDREWS and Jordan BARDELLA26.5 %1 1084 18429.2 %

Where they differed, 3 076

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteBarry ANDREWSJordan BARDELLA
10 Feb 2026 Final vote on the provisional agreement Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsForAgainst
10 Feb 2026 Proposal to vote on amendments Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsAgainstFor
10 Feb 2026 Final vote on the provisional agreement Application of the ‘safe third country’ conceptAgainstFor
10 Feb 2026 Proposal to reject the text Application of the ‘safe third country’ conceptForAgainst
10 Feb 2026 Final vote on the provisional agreement Establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union levelAbstainedFor
9 Feb 2026 Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Israel Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – IsraelForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Separate vote on recital T Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Recital Q — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Recital P — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Recital O — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Recital O — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Recital L — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Separate vote on recital K Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Recital J — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Paragraph 11 — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Paragraph 10 — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 9 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 8 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 7 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 6 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Paragraph 5 — part 2 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Paragraph 5 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 4 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 12 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAgainstAbstained
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Brutal repression against protesters in IranForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 Brutal repression against protesters in IranForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 5 Brutal repression against protesters in IranForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 1 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAgainstFor
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 1 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAgainstAbstained
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 1 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAgainstFor
22 Jan 2026 Final vote — text as a whole European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureForAbstained
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 2 to recital A European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAgainstFor
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 115 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAgainstFor
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 103 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAgainstFor
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 103 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAgainstFor
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 7 to paragraph 103 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAgainstFor
22 Jan 2026 Separate vote on paragraph 98 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 92 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAgainstFor
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 5 to paragraph 66 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAgainstFor
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 4 to paragraph 59 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAgainstFor
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 11 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAgainstFor
22 Jan 2026 Paragraph 4 — part 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Final vote — text as a whole Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitivenessForAgainst
22 Jan 2026 Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 35 Choice of performance indicators for audit and budgetary control in the context of financing measures to support the implementation of future European competitivenessAgainstFor

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 30 Sept 2026, 03:27 UTC (data stamp 772c7b2d0380, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
30 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30 (retrieved 30 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-30,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 30 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-30},
  urldate = {2026-09-30},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 772c7b2d0380 (30 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}