Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Isilda GOMES

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Isilda GOMES only. Show every member

Isilda GOMES’s votes against the line, 30

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersForAgainstS&D
29 Apr 2026Amendment 14 to recital R The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportForAgainstS&D
12 Mar 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024ForAgainstS&D
21 Jan 2026Amendment 61 to paragraph 93 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025ForAgainstS&D
21 Jan 2026Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 78 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025AbstainedForS&D
23 Oct 2025Amendment 10 to paragraph 23 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitForAgainstS&D
23 Oct 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 9 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitAgainstAbstainedS&D
22 Oct 2025Amendment 157, adding text after paragraph 79 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsForAgainstS&D
21 Oct 2025Amendment 22 to Article 1 Standing Forest and Forestry Expert GroupAgainstForS&D
9 Sept 2025Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 Public procurementForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Security of energy supply in the EUForAgainstS&D
8 May 2025Amendment 11 to paragraph 14 Competition policy – annual report 2024AgainstAbstainedS&D
7 May 2025Separate vote on paragraph 57 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeAgainstForS&D
7 May 2025Amendment 10 to paragraph 49 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeAbstainedForS&D
12 Mar 2025Separate vote on paragraph 52 White paper on the future of European defenceAgainstForS&D
13 Feb 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 11 Escalation of violence in the eastern Democratic Republic of the CongoForAbstainedS&D
11 Feb 2025Amendment 26 to paragraph 18 European Central Bank – annual report 2024AbstainedAgainstS&D
13 Nov 2024Thursday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Thursday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupAgainstForS&D
23 Oct 2024Paragraph 1 — part 2 Urgent need to revise the Medical Devices RegulationForAgainstS&D
23 Oct 2024Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 43 — part 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsForAgainstS&D
23 Oct 2024Separate vote on paragraph 31 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAgainstForS&D
9 Oct 2024Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaForAbstainedS&D
9 Oct 2024Paragraph 1 — part 2 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaAgainstForS&D
9 Oct 2024Paragraph 1 — part 1 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaAgainstForS&D
19 Sept 2024Final vote — text as a whole Situation in VenezuelaForAgainstS&D
19 Sept 2024Amendment 3 to paragraph 3 Situation in VenezuelaForAbstainedS&D
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on paragraph 2 Situation in VenezuelaAbstainedAgainstS&D
19 Sept 2024Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 3 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesForAgainstS&D
19 Sept 2024Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 2 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesForAgainstS&D
19 Sept 2024Final vote — text as a whole The severe situation of political prisoners in BelarusAgainstForS&D

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Isilda GOMES , S&D · Portugal 0.6 %5 17121454

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=257075&to=2026-09-25
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Isilda GOMES”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=257075&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Isilda GOMES}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=257075&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=257075&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}