Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Pietro FIOCCHI

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Pietro FIOCCHI only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Pietro FIOCCHI’s votes against the line, 23

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
15 Sept 2026	Final vote Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances	For	Against	ECR
9 Jul 2026	Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Establishment of the digital euro	For	Against	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9	Abstained	For	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25	Abstained	For	ECR
11 Feb 2026	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified cotton T304-40	Against	For	ECR
11 Feb 2026	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25	Against	For	ECR
11 Feb 2026	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2)	Against	For	ECR
11 Feb 2026	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6	Against	For	ECR
10 Feb 2026	Final vote on the provisional agreement Framework for achieving climate neutrality	For	Against	ECR
16 Dec 2025	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1	Against	For	ECR
16 Dec 2025	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize NK603	Against	For	ECR
13 Nov 2025	Final vote Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)	Abstained	Against	ECR
8 Oct 2025	Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP51291	Against	For	ECR
8 May 2025	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean MON 87705 × MON 87708 × MON 89788	Against	For	ECR
11 Mar 2025	Final vote — text as a whole European Social Fund Plus post-2027	For	Abstained	ECR
26 Nov 2024	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize MON 94804	Against	For	ECR
26 Nov 2024	Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP202216	Against	For	ECR
26 Nov 2024	Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP23211	Against	For	ECR
26 Nov 2024	Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP915635	Against	For	ECR
26 Nov 2024	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize MON 810	Against	For	ECR
26 Nov 2024	Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 88017 × 59122 and eight of its sub-combinations	Against	For	ECR
26 Nov 2024	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified cotton COT102	Against	For	ECR
26 Nov 2024	Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × NK603	Against	For	ECR

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 100 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Pietro FIOCCHI , ECR · Italy	5.2 %	442	19	3	1	3

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

620 votes considered (final votes matching the filters; scope).
174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 100 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=197607&scope=final&to=2026-09-26
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Pietro FIOCCHI”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=197607&scope=final&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Pietro FIOCCHI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=197607&scope=final&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=197607&scope=final&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}