Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Sergey LAGODINSKY

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Sergey LAGODINSKY only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Sergey LAGODINSKY’s votes against the line, 18

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
17 Sept 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	Abstained	Against	Greens
17 Sept 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro	Abstained	Against	Greens
9 Jul 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre	For	Abstained	Greens
20 May 2026	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Opportunities and challenges presented by a comprehensive artificial intelligence strategy for EU trade	Against	For	Greens
20 May 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly	For	Abstained	Greens
20 May 2026	Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement	Abstained	Against	Greens
28 Apr 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024	Abstained	Against	Greens
11 Feb 2026	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25	Abstained	For	Greens
11 Feb 2026	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2)	Abstained	For	Greens
11 Feb 2026	Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6	Abstained	For	Greens
10 Feb 2026	Final vote on the provisional agreement Amending regulations on agricultural products as regards market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products	Abstained	For	Greens
21 Jan 2026	Final vote on motion B10-0060/2026 Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)	Against	For	Greens
18 Dec 2025	Final vote — text as a whole Mass kidnapping of children in Nigeria, including from St Mary’s Catholic School in Papiri	For	Abstained	Greens
16 Dec 2025	Final vote — text as a whole Relations between the EU and Saudi Arabia	Abstained	Against	Greens
26 Nov 2025	Final vote — text as a whole Protection of minors online	Abstained	For	Greens
22 May 2025	Final vote Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus	Against	For	Greens
11 Mar 2025	Final vote — text as a whole European Social Fund Plus post-2027	Abstained	For	Greens
11 Mar 2025	Final vote Verification of credentials	Abstained	For	Greens

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 100 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Sergey LAGODINSKY , Greens · Germany	3.9 %	456	3	12	3	4

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

620 votes considered (final votes matching the filters; scope).
174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 100 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=197460&scope=final&to=2026-09-26
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Sergey LAGODINSKY”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=197460&scope=final&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — Final votes · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 26 Sept 2026 · Sergey LAGODINSKY}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=197460&scope=final&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=197460&scope=final&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}