Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Terry REINTKE

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes620 All roll calls5 928

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Terry REINTKE only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Terry REINTKE’s votes against the line, 25

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
8 Jul 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 21 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Abstained	For	Greens
20 May 2026	Amendment 55 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly	Abstained	For	Greens
28 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 106 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Against	For	Greens
10 Mar 2026	Amendment 105, adding text after paragraph 49 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	For	Against	Greens
10 Mar 2026	Paragraph 42 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	For	Against	Greens
22 Jan 2026	Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National Assembly	Against	For	Greens
22 Oct 2025	Amendment 104 to paragraph 58 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections	Against	For	Greens
22 Oct 2025	Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 — part 2 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections	Abstained	Against	Greens
22 Oct 2025	Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 — part 1 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections	Abstained	Against	Greens
11 Sept 2025	Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 5 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution	Abstained	For	Greens
11 Sept 2025	Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution	Against	For	Greens
11 Sept 2025	Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution	Against	For	Greens
11 Sept 2025	Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution	Against	For	Greens
11 Sept 2025	Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution	Against	For	Greens
11 Sept 2025	Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution	Against	For	Greens
11 Sept 2025	Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 1 Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution	Abstained	For	Greens
2 Apr 2025	Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 12 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024	Against	For	Greens
2 Apr 2025	Amendment 88 to paragraph 69 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024	Against	For	Greens
1 Apr 2025	Amendment 19 to Article 2, paragraph 1 — part 2 Macro-financial assistance to Egypt	For	Against	Greens
23 Jan 2025	Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 7 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025	Abstained	Against	Greens
28 Nov 2024	Amendment 15 to paragraph 4 Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments	For	Against	Greens
26 Nov 2024	Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 Genetically modified maize DP202216	Against	Abstained	Greens
26 Nov 2024	Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 Genetically modified maize DP23211	Against	Abstained	Greens
26 Nov 2024	Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 Genetically modified maize DP915635	Against	Abstained	Greens
19 Sept 2024	Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 8 — part 1 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate change	Against	For	Greens

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Terry REINTKE , Greens · Germany	0.5 %	5 397	15	7	3	14

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=103381&to=2026-09-25
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Terry REINTKE”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=103381&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Terry REINTKE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=103381&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?mep=103381&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}