Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Caterina CHINNICI
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Caterina CHINNICI only. Show every member
Caterina CHINNICI’s votes against the line, 24
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 55 to recital C The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after recital H Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after recital B Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 29 An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector | For | Against | EPP |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sector | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Amendment 6, adding text after recital F Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Amendment 8 to paragraph 56 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure | For | Against | EPP |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Amendment 7 to paragraph 35 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure | For | Against | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 12 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee | For | Against | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 104 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 94, adding text after paragraph 88 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 80 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 78 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 82 to paragraph 65 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 53 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure | For | Against | EPP |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Final vote Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances | Against | For | EPP |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Final vote on the motion for a resolution Lead in certain fishing tackle | For | Against | EPP |
| 21 May 2026 | Amendment 34 to paragraph 18 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward | For | Against | EPP |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 65 to paragraph 1, point ap Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | EPP |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 28 to paragraph 1, point ap Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | EPP |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caterina CHINNICI , EPP · Italy | 3.2 % | 753 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 1 752 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=124861&to=2026-09-26
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Caterina CHINNICI”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=124861&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Caterina CHINNICI}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=124861&to=2026-09-26}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=124861&to=2026-09-26},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}