Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Udo BULLMANN

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes185 All roll calls1 755

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Udo BULLMANN only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Udo BULLMANN’s votes against the line, 39

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 58 to recital E The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	For	Against	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 62 to paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	For	Against	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after recital G Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	For	Against	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 22 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	Against	For	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 20 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	Against	For	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Paragraph 13 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	Against	For	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Paragraph 13 — part 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	Against	For	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Paragraph 5 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	Against	For	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Paragraph 4 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	Against	For	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Paragraph 4 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	Against	For	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	For	Against	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Paragraph 2 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	Against	For	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 4 to paragraph 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	For	Against	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Paragraph 1 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	Against	For	S&D
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up	For	Against	S&D
9 Jul 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan	Abstained	Against	S&D
9 Jul 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan	For	Against	S&D
9 Jul 2026	Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan	Abstained	Against	S&D
9 Jul 2026	Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan	Abstained	Against	S&D
9 Jul 2026	Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan	Abstained	Against	S&D
7 Jul 2026	Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 46 Competition policy – annual report 2025	For	Abstained	S&D
7 Jul 2026	Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Competition policy – annual report 2025	Abstained	Against	S&D
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 35 2025 Commission report on Türkiye	For	Against	S&D
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 19, adding text after Recital 18 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed	For	Against	S&D
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 27, adding text after Recital 15 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed	For	Against	S&D
17 Jun 2026	Amendments 18 + 26 (voted as one), adding text after Recital 1 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed	For	Against	S&D
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 37 to Annex II, after point 2 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed	For	Against	S&D
17 Jun 2026	Amendments 21 + 31 (voted as one), adding text after Article 4 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed	For	Against	S&D
17 Jun 2026	Amendments 17 + 25 (voted as one) Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed	For	Against	S&D
20 May 2026	Final vote — text as a whole The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins	Against	For	S&D
30 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 16 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment	Against	For	S&D
30 Apr 2026	Final vote — text as a whole How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?	Against	For	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 25 to paragraph 45 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Abstained	Against	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 13 to paragraph 26 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	For	Against	S&D
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 10 to paragraph 12 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	For	Against	S&D
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 103 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	For	Against	S&D
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 82 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	Against	For	S&D
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 81 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	Against	For	S&D
25 Mar 2026	Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE Group — Iran Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group – Iran	For	Against	S&D

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Udo BULLMANN , S&D · Germany	2.4 %	1 636	32	6	1	29

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=4267&scope=all&to=2026-09-25
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Udo BULLMANN”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=4267&scope=all&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Udo BULLMANN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=4267&scope=all&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=4267&scope=all&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}