Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Jeannette BALJEU

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes185All roll calls1 755
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Jeannette BALJEU only. Show every member

Jeannette BALJEU’s votes against the line, 76

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital G The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Recital F — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 72, adding text after recital B The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 10 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstRenew
17 Sept 2026Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstRenew
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sectorAgainstForRenew
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForRenew
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 62 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedForRenew
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 62 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedForRenew
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 62 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedForRenew
16 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 60 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForRenew
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 6 — part 5 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForRenew
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 3 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForRenew
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAgainstForRenew
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 83 — part 3 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAgainstForRenew
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 83 — part 2 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAgainstForRenew
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 83 — part 1 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAgainstForRenew
15 Sept 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 55 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeForAgainstRenew
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 12 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedForRenew
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedForRenew
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 1 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedForRenew
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAgainstForRenew
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 10 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAgainstForRenew
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 2 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAbstainedForRenew
15 Sept 2026Amendment 35 to Article 3, paragraph 4 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAgainstForRenew
15 Sept 2026Amendment 39 — part 2 Establishing the Temporary Decarbonisation FundAgainstForRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4 Joint communication on humanitarian aidAgainstForRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 Joint communication on humanitarian aidAgainstForRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanAgainstAbstainedRenew
9 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a, after point 1 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directiveAgainstForRenew
8 Jul 2026Separate vote on recital J The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityForAgainstRenew
8 Jul 2026Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 2 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAgainstRenew
7 Jul 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 25 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025ForAgainstRenew
7 Jul 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 21 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025ForAgainstRenew
7 Jul 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 15 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025ForAgainstRenew
7 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 1/2026: entering the surplus of the financial year 2025AgainstForRenew
7 Jul 2026Separate vote on paragraph 7 Draft amending budget No 1/2026: entering the surplus of the financial year 2025AgainstForRenew
7 Jul 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Coordination of social security systemsAgainstForRenew
17 Jun 2026Amendment 5 to recital R Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAgainstForRenew
Show all 76 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Jun 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, point u Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAgainstForRenew
17 Jun 2026Paragraph 7 — part 2 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaAgainstForRenew
17 Jun 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 7 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaForAgainstRenew
17 Jun 2026Proposal to vote on amendments Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)AgainstForRenew
16 Jun 2026Recital AC — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAgainstForRenew
16 Jun 2026Paragraph 15 — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesAgainstForRenew
16 Jun 2026Separate vote on paragraph 41 Countering transnational repression – towards an EU strategy to protect Europe’s sovereignty and democratic valuesAgainstForRenew
16 Jun 2026Final vote on the provisional agreement Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAbstainedForRenew
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAgainstForRenew
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 1 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAgainstForRenew
21 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForRenew
21 May 2026Separate vote on recital AH Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForRenew
21 May 2026Recital S — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForRenew
21 May 2026Recital A — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForRenew
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 81 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForRenew
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 53 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForRenew
21 May 2026Paragraph 37 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForRenew
21 May 2026Paragraph 37 — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForRenew
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 22 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForRenew
21 May 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 14 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapForAgainstRenew
21 May 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 4 Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for CourtsAbstainedForRenew
20 May 2026Amendments 23 + 37 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, after point ad Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstRenew
20 May 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 1, point ad Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstForRenew
20 May 2026Amendments 22 + 36 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, point ad Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstRenew
20 May 2026Amendment 31 to paragraph 1, point aa Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForRenew
25 Mar 2026Thursday's agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group — Request for withdrawal from voting time Final vote Thursday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group – Request for withdrawal from voting timeAgainstForRenew

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Jeannette BALJEU , Renew · Netherlands 6.8 %1 1196510174

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257003&to=2026-09-25
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Jeannette BALJEU”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257003&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Jeannette BALJEU}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257003&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=257003&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}