Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes185All roll calls1 755
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN only. Show every member

Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN’s votes against the line, 78

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForS&D
16 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 11, adding text after citation 70 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 1 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 42 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstS&D
9 Jul 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanForAgainstS&D
9 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanForAgainstS&D
9 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanForAgainstS&D
9 Jul 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, SudanForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 3 2025 Commission report on UkraineAgainstForS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 23 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU–Mexico Interim Agreement on TradeAgainstForS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedForS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 17, adding text after recital M EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital J EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 39 to paragraph 59 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 52 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 49 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 32 to paragraph 48 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 30 to paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 28 to paragraph 41 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 24 to paragraph 37 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 23 to paragraph 36 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 34 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 33 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 20 to paragraph 33 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 18 to paragraph 5 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership AgreementAgainstForS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 50 Competition policy – annual report 2025AbstainedAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 13 Competition policy – annual report 2025ForAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Competition policy – annual report 2025AbstainedAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 Competition policy – annual report 2025ForAbstainedS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital Y Recommendation on the changing geopolitical situation in East Asia and the need for closer cooperation with like-minded partners in the regionForAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital Y Recommendation on the changing geopolitical situation in East Asia and the need for closer cooperation with like-minded partners in the regionForAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 25 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025ForAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 2, point c Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilitiesForAgainstS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 38 — part 1 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaForAbstainedS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 35 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 22 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 12 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstS&D
16 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedForAgainstS&D
21 May 2026Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 on securitisation and a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisationAgainstForS&D
21 May 2026Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions as regards requirements for securitisation exposuresAgainstForS&D
20 May 2026Amendment 63 to paragraph 1, after point aj Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForS&D
Show all 78 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
20 May 2026Amendment 57 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForS&D
20 May 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 42 The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsForAgainstS&D
30 Apr 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 20 Banking Union – annual report 2025ForAbstainedS&D
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?AbstainedForS&D
30 Apr 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 28 — part 2 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European ParliamentForAgainstS&D
30 Apr 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 5 Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in VenezuelaAbstainedForS&D
29 Apr 2026Amendment 96 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAbstainedS&D
29 Apr 2026Amendment 28 to paragraph 247, after point iv Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionForAgainstS&D
29 Apr 2026Amendment 40 to paragraph 160, after point vii Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionForAgainstS&D
28 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after Recital P Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstS&D
28 Apr 2026Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstS&D
28 Apr 2026Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstS&D
28 Apr 2026Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstS&D
28 Apr 2026Amendment 25 to paragraph 45 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstS&D
28 Apr 2026Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 37 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstS&D
28 Apr 2026Amendment 85, adding text after paragraph 11 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034ForAgainstS&D
26 Mar 2026Amendment 106 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)ForAgainstS&D
26 Mar 2026Amendment 105 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)ForAgainstS&D
26 Mar 2026Final vote Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goodsAgainstForS&D
26 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goodsForAgainstS&D
26 Mar 2026Motion for adjournment of vote Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goodsForAgainstS&D
26 Mar 2026Final vote Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAgainstForS&D
26 Mar 2026Amendment 56, adding text after recital 3 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAgainstS&D
26 Mar 2026Amendment 55, adding text after recital 2 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAgainstS&D
26 Mar 2026Amendment 54, adding text after recital 2 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAgainstS&D
26 Mar 2026Amendment 61 to Article 3 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAbstainedAgainstS&D
26 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAgainstS&D
26 Mar 2026Motion for adjournment of vote Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaForAgainstS&D

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN , S&D · France 4.7 %1 6686212460

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256903&to=2026-09-25
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256903&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Thomas PELLERIN-CARLIN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256903&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256903&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}