Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Lena SCHILLING

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes185 All roll calls1 755

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Lena SCHILLING only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Lena SCHILLING’s votes against the line, 15

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
16 Sept 2026	Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	For	Against	Greens
16 Sept 2026	Amendment 6, adding text after recital F Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure	Abstained	Against	Greens
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 32 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	Abstained	Against	Greens
8 Jul 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 14 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Abstained	For	Greens
8 Jul 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 13 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Abstained	For	Greens
8 Jul 2026	Final vote EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement	Abstained	For	Greens
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 3 to recital T Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace	Abstained	For	Greens
16 Jun 2026	Proposal to vote on amendments Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America	Abstained	Against	Greens
21 May 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 35 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward	Against	For	Greens
20 May 2026	Amendment 28 to paragraph 1, point ap Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly	For	Against	Greens
30 Apr 2026	Paragraph 11 — part 2 Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine	Against	For	Greens
29 Apr 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Auditors	For	Abstained	Greens
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 3, adding text after Recital B — part 2 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024	Abstained	For	Greens
28 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 36 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	Abstained	For	Greens
25 Mar 2026	Wednesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Australia Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Australia	For	Against	Greens

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Lena SCHILLING , Greens · Austria	0.9 %	1 723	5	9	1	8

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256833&to=2026-09-25
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Lena SCHILLING”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256833&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Lena SCHILLING}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256833&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256833&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}