Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Aurelijus VERYGA
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Aurelijus VERYGA only. Show every member
Aurelijus VERYGA’s votes against the line, 113
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries | For | Against | ECR |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Impact of social media and the online environment on young people | For | Against | ECR |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 63 — part 3 Impact of social media and the online environment on young people | For | Against | ECR |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 3 Deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Recital J — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | For | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 63 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | For | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 48 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | For | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 16 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 8 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | For | Abstained | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 3 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Final vote Establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028-2034 | For | Abstained | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 40 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027 | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 3 to paragraph 55 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee | Against | For | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 12 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee | For | Against | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 108 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Against | For | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 104 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 101 — part 4 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 101 — part 3 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 101 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 101 — part 1 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Against | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 53 to paragraph 99 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 48 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 32 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Abstained | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 19 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | For | Abstained | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 1 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Against | For | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure | For | Abstained | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 7 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure | Against | For | ECR |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 2 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre | Against | For | ECR |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Amendment 19 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point vii Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Amendment 9 to Article 1, paragraph 2 Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Proposal to reject the text Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive | Against | For | ECR |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Establishment of the digital euro | For | Against | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after recital I The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | For | Against | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 7, adding text after recital V 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 3 to recital N 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after recital M 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 102 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Against | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 71 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 61, adding text after paragraph 52 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 33 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 31 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Paragraph 29 — part 1 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | For | Abstained | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 25 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Against | For | ECR |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 35 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning | For | Against | ECR |
Show all 113 votes
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 Jul 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 9 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning | For | Abstained | ECR |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 50 Competition policy – annual report 2025 | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 2025 Commission report on Georgia | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 46 2025 Commission report on Albania | Against | For | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 36 2025 Commission report on Türkiye | Against | For | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 35 2025 Commission report on Türkiye | Against | For | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 8 to paragraph 1 2025 Commission report on Türkiye | For | Against | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products | Against | For | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 4 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 1; Directive (EU) 2020/262 General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products | For | Against | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 93 to recital 18 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 92 to recital 15 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendments 67 + 70 (voted as one) to Article 20 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | Against | For | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendments 60 + 61 (voted as one) to Article 16 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | Against | For | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 96 to Article 12, after paragraph 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 95 to Article 12, paragraph 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 94 to Article 12, after paragraph 3 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | For | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Citation 5 — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Paragraph 1, point aq — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 65 to paragraph 1, point ap Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Against | For | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Paragraph 1, point al — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 35 to paragraph 1, point ae Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Paragraph 1, point v — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 2 to paragraph 1, point v Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Against | For | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 1, point o Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 1 to paragraph 1, point o Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Against | For | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Paragraph 1, point n — part 4 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Paragraph 1, point n — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Paragraph 1, point m — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Paragraph 1, point m — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, after point l Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Against | For | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 47 to paragraph 1, after point i Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after recital I EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution) | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 16 to paragraph 54 EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution) | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 15 to paragraph 49 EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution) | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 6 EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution) | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 16 The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment | For | Abstained | ECR |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 10, adding text after recital G Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 122 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 10 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: European Public Prosecutor’s Office | For | Against | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 3 to paragraph 41 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union | Against | For | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 149 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 138 — part 1 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 41 to paragraph 53 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament | Against | For | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 21 — part 2 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament | For | Against | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 21 — part 1 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament | For | Against | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 32 to paragraph 12 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 31 to paragraph 11 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 1 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 15 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission | Against | For | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 11 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission | Against | For | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 7 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 19 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | For | Against | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | For | Against | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 64 to paragraph 56 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | Against | For | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 54 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 36 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 26 Mar 2026 | Amendment 81 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) | Against | For | ECR |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aurelijus VERYGA , ECR · Lithuania | 8.5 % | 1 329 | 63 | 27 | 23 | 0 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256811&to=2026-09-25
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Aurelijus VERYGA”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256811&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Aurelijus VERYGA}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256811&to=2026-09-25}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=256811&to=2026-09-25},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}