Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Marc ANGEL
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Marc ANGEL only. Show every member
Marc ANGEL’s votes against the line, 33
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026 | Monday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — ECB Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – ECB | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan | For | Against | S&D |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality | For | Against | S&D |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Paragraph 101 — part 1 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 46 Competition policy – annual report 2025 | For | Abstained | S&D |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 13 Competition policy – annual report 2025 | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 3 to recital D Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilities | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 5 to paragraph 2, point f Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilities | For | Against | S&D |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 4 to paragraph 2, point c Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilities | For | Against | S&D |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba | Against | For | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 4 to paragraph 46 2025 Commission report on Albania | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 96 to Article 12, after paragraph 4 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) | Abstained | For | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 19, adding text after Recital 18 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | For | Against | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 27, adding text after Recital 15 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | For | Against | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendments 18 + 26 (voted as one), adding text after Recital 1 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | For | Against | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 37 to Annex II, after point 2 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | For | Against | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendments 21 + 31 (voted as one), adding text after Article 4 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | For | Against | S&D |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendments 17 + 25 (voted as one) Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed | For | Against | S&D |
| 15 Jun 2026 | Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Middle East Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Middle East | For | Against | S&D |
| 21 May 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Against | Abstained | S&D |
| 30 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? | Against | For | S&D |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 45 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | For | Against | S&D |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 33 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Against | For | S&D |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union | Against | For | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 43 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | For | Against | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 57 to paragraph 16 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III | For | Against | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Against | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Against | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 121 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | Against | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 120 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Against | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 37 to paragraph 91 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Against | S&D |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 10 to paragraph 12 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | For | Against | S&D |
| 25 Mar 2026 | Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE Group — Iran Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group – Iran | Abstained | Against | S&D |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc ANGEL , S&D · Luxembourg | 2.0 % | 1 623 | 23 | 7 | 3 | 0 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Marc ANGEL”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=202073&scope=all&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Marc ANGEL}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=202073&scope=all&to=2026-09-26}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=202073&scope=all&to=2026-09-26},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}