Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Pietro FIOCCHI

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite

Export

Period Term 2024 2025 2026 Last 6 months

Custom dates

Votes Final votes185 All roll calls1 755

Order Highest rate first By name

Showing Pietro FIOCCHI only. Show every member

Group Country Lead committee Topic (model-assigned) Contested votes only (largest side under 80 %)

Pietro FIOCCHI’s votes against the line, 28

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

**Position**: the member’s vote. **Clear line**: the position of at least two thirds of **Group** (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
Date	Vote	Position	Clear line	Group
16 Sept 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 41 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Abstained	Against	ECR
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 9 to paragraph 87 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth Guarantee	Against	For	ECR
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 6 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	Against	Abstained	ECR
15 Sept 2026	Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 5 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield	Abstained	For	ECR
15 Sept 2026	Final vote Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances	For	Against	ECR
9 Jul 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4 Joint communication on humanitarian aid	For	Against	ECR
9 Jul 2026	Decision to open negotiations with the Council Final vote Establishment of the digital euro	For	Against	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9	Abstained	For	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25	Abstained	For	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 61 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Abstained	For	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 61 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Abstained	For	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 5 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Abstained	For	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 4 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Abstained	For	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 32 — part 3 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Abstained	For	ECR
8 Jul 2026	Amendment 19 to paragraph 29 2025 Commission report on Ukraine	Abstained	For	ECR
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 38 — part 2 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia	Against	For	ECR
17 Jun 2026	Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 46 2025 Commission report on Albania	Against	For	ECR
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 5 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Abstained	For	ECR
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 105 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products	For	Against	ECR
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 95 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products	For	Against	ECR
29 Apr 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Economic and Social Committee	Abstained	Against	ECR
29 Apr 2026	Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission	Abstained	For	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 31 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024	For	Against	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 61 to paragraph 26 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III	Abstained	For	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 4 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III	Abstained	For	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III	Abstained	For	ECR
28 Apr 2026	Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 120 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034	For	Against	ECR
26 Mar 2026	Amendment 108 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)	Abstained	For	ECR

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

**Against the line**: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ **clear-line votes** (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: **opposite** (for ↔ against), **abstained** against the line, **other** (for or against when the line was to abstain), and **with own party** — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
Member	Against the line	Clear-line votes	Opposite	Abstained	Other	With own party
Pietro FIOCCHI , ECR · Italy	2.3 %	1 238	10	17	1	16

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).

Export

Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197607&to=2026-09-25
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Pietro FIOCCHI”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197607&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Pietro FIOCCHI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197607&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=197607&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}