Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Tomasz FROELICH

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
25 Mar 2026 – today
Votes Final votes185All roll calls1 755
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Tomasz FROELICH only. Show every member

Tomasz FROELICH’s votes against the line, 69

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstAbstainedESN
17 Sept 2026Amendment 23 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAbstainedESN
17 Sept 2026Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAbstainedESN
17 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 17 An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sectorAbstainedAgainstESN
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution An EU cardiovascular diseases strategyAbstainedAgainstESN
16 Sept 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-UK Agreement regarding cooperation on the application of their respective competition lawsForAbstainedESN
15 Sept 2026Amendment 80 to recital CL Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedForESN
15 Sept 2026Amendment 82 to paragraph 65 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedForESN
15 Sept 2026Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 24 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedAgainstESN
15 Sept 2026Final vote Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAgainstAbstainedESN
15 Sept 2026Amendment 120 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 2; Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAgainstForESN
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAbstainedAgainstESN
8 Jul 2026Paragraph 2 — part 1 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAbstainedAgainstESN
8 Jul 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 21 2025 Commission report on UkraineAbstainedAgainstESN
8 Jul 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 3 2025 Commission report on UkraineForAbstainedESN
8 Jul 2026Amendment 38 to paragraph 56 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstESN
18 Jun 2026Recital G — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAbstainedForESN
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaForAbstainedESN
18 Jun 2026Amendment 13, adding text after recital A Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedAgainstESN
18 Jun 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedForESN
18 Jun 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 4 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedAgainstESN
18 Jun 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedAgainstESN
18 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedAgainstESN
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedAgainstESN
18 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaForAgainstESN
18 Jun 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedAgainstESN
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaAbstainedAgainstESN
17 Jun 2026Amendment 2 to recital S Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAbstainedAgainstESN
17 Jun 2026Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 49 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedForESN
17 Jun 2026Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 46 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedForESN
17 Jun 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 46 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedAgainstESN
17 Jun 2026Separate vote on paragraph 42 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAgainstAbstainedESN
17 Jun 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedForESN
17 Jun 2026Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 35 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedForESN
17 Jun 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 22 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedForESN
21 May 2026Recital A — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstAbstainedESN
21 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital D Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAbstainedForESN
21 May 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 12 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAbstainedForESN
21 May 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAbstainedForESN
21 May 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAbstainedForESN
21 May 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 2 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranAbstainedAgainstESN
20 May 2026Amendment 41, adding text after recital P Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedAgainstESN
20 May 2026Amendment 9 to recital C Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedAgainstESN
20 May 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 1, point ag Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForESN
20 May 2026Amendments 25 + 38 (voted as one) to paragraph 1, after point af Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForESN
20 May 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 1, point ad Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedAgainstESN
20 May 2026Amendment 33 to paragraph 1, point ac Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedAgainstESN
20 May 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 1, after point r Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForESN
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point n — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedAgainstESN
20 May 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Lebanon Agreement on cooperation between Eurojust and the authorities of Lebanon competent for judicial cooperation in criminal mattersForAbstainedESN
Show all 69 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
20 May 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision United Nations Convention against CybercrimeForAbstainedESN
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 87 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstESN
29 Apr 2026Final vote Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical productsForAbstainedESN
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureAbstainedAgainstESN
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 5 The role of ocean diplomacy for the competitiveness of EU fisheries and aquacultureForAgainstESN
28 Apr 2026Recital AL — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedForESN
28 Apr 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 46 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AbstainedForESN
28 Apr 2026Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 40 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AbstainedForESN
28 Apr 2026Amendment 90, adding text after paragraph 39 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AbstainedForESN
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 26 — part 2 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AgainstAbstainedESN
26 Mar 2026Amendment 60, adding text after recital 9 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAbstainedAgainstESN
26 Mar 2026Amendment 59, adding text after recital 9 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAbstainedAgainstESN
26 Mar 2026Amendment 58, adding text after recital 4 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAbstainedAgainstESN
26 Mar 2026Amendment 56, adding text after recital 3 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAbstainedAgainstESN
26 Mar 2026Amendment 54, adding text after recital 2 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAbstainedAgainstESN
26 Mar 2026Amendment 51, adding text after recital 2 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAbstainedAgainstESN
26 Mar 2026Amendment 61 to Article 3 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAbstainedAgainstESN
26 Mar 2026Amendment 30, adding text before Article 1; Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 — part 1 Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of applicationAbstainedForESN
25 Mar 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE Group — Iran Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group – IranAbstainedForESN

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Tomasz FROELICH , ESN · Germany 4.2 %1 647353130

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 26 Sept 2026, 03:32 UTC (data stamp 579b2832c723, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=190574&to=2026-09-26
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Tomasz FROELICH”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=190574&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Tomasz FROELICH}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=190574&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=190574&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}