Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Romana JERKOVIĆ

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes185All roll calls1 755
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Romana JERKOVIĆ only. Show every member

Romana JERKOVIĆ’s votes against the line, 64

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Recital F — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstS&D
17 Sept 2026Recital F — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 57, adding text after recital D The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 72, adding text after recital B The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAbstainedForS&D
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 10 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstS&D
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 10 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstS&D
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAbstainedAgainstS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAbstainedForS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 64 to paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAbstainedForS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 63 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForS&D
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 4 — part 3 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upAgainstForS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 36 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027ForAgainstS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 35 The EU Youth Strategy 2019–2027ForAbstainedS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 11, adding text after citation 70 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 86 to paragraph 115 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedAgainstS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstS&D
15 Sept 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 1 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote on the draft Council decision EU–Mexico Interim Agreement on TradeAbstainedForS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote — text as a whole EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedForS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 17, adding text after recital M EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital J EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 39 to paragraph 59 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 38 to paragraph 56 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 37 to paragraph 54 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 52 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to paragraph 51 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 32 to paragraph 48 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 30 to paragraph 45 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 29 to paragraph 44 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 38 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 23 to paragraph 36 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 22 to paragraph 34 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)ForAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 33 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Amendment 18 to paragraph 5 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)AbstainedAgainstS&D
8 Jul 2026Final vote EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership AgreementAbstainedForS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 50 Competition policy – annual report 2025AbstainedAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 46 Competition policy – annual report 2025ForAbstainedS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 Competition policy – annual report 2025AbstainedAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 13 Competition policy – annual report 2025ForAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Competition policy – annual report 2025AbstainedAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 Competition policy – annual report 2025ForAbstainedS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 12 Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025AbstainedAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 3 to recital D Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilitiesForAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 2, point h Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilitiesForAgainstS&D
7 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 2, point f Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union: extending its term of office and adjusting its responsibilitiesForAgainstS&D
Show all 64 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
18 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandAbstainedAgainstS&D
18 Jun 2026Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaForAbstainedS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 2 to recital S Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAbstainedAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaAbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Paragraph 7 — part 2 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaAbstainedForS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 7 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaAbstainedAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 46 2025 Commission report on AlbaniaAbstainedAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendment 27, adding text after Recital 15 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedForAgainstS&D
17 Jun 2026Amendments 18 + 26 (voted as one), adding text after Recital 1 Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedForAgainstS&D
16 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAbstainedAgainstS&D
20 May 2026Amendment 59 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstS&D
20 May 2026Amendment 56 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAgainstS&D
20 May 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 1, point aa Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAbstainedS&D
20 May 2026Amendment 42 to paragraph 1, after point d Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyForAbstainedS&D

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Romana JERKOVIĆ , S&D · Croatia 6.6 %9652830660

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 755 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=112747&to=2026-09-25
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Romana JERKOVIĆ”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=112747&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 25 Mar 2026 – 25 Sept 2026 · Romana JERKOVIĆ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=112747&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-25&mep=112747&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}