Skip to content

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Nathalie LOISEAU

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates

Showing Nathalie LOISEAU only. Show every member

Nathalie LOISEAU’s votes against the line, 64

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Dec 2025Amendment 7, adding text after recital P European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’AbstainedAgainstRenew
16 Dec 2025Amendment 81 to recital 2 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsForAgainstRenew
16 Dec 2025Amendment 85 to Article 9 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsForAgainstRenew
16 Dec 2025Amendment 84 to Article 6 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsForAgainstRenew
15 Dec 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE Group (preventing sexual harassment) Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group (preventing sexual harassment)ForAgainstRenew
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 74 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AgainstForRenew
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 72 — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025AbstainedForRenew
13 Nov 2025Amendment 83 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAgainstForRenew
22 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsAbstainedForRenew
22 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 5 Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsAbstainedForRenew
22 Oct 2025Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 26 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsForAgainstRenew
22 Oct 2025Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 22 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsForAgainstRenew
22 Oct 2025Amendment 667 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAgainstForRenew
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 10 — part 2 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentAgainstForRenew
8 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 29 EU political strategy on Latin AmericaAgainstForRenew
8 Oct 2025Amendment 146 to recital 15 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainForAgainstRenew
8 Oct 2025Amendment 145 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainForAgainstRenew
8 Oct 2025Amendment 141 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAgainstForRenew
8 Oct 2025Amendment 139 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAgainstForRenew
8 Oct 2025Amendment 138 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAgainstForRenew
8 Oct 2025Separate vote on Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainForAgainstRenew
8 Oct 2025Amendment 137 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAgainstForRenew
8 Oct 2025Amendment 144 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainForAgainstRenew
8 Oct 2025Amendment 135 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAgainstForRenew
8 Oct 2025Amendment 133 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAgainstForRenew
8 Oct 2025Amendment 132 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAgainstForRenew
8 Oct 2025Separate vote on Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainForAgainstRenew
8 Oct 2025Amendment 131 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAgainstForRenew
9 Jul 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 4 The human cost of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the urgent need to end Russian aggression: the situation of illegally detained civilians and prisoners of war, and the continued bombing of civiliansForAbstainedRenew
18 Jun 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 4 2023 and 2024 reports on MoldovaForAgainstRenew
17 Jun 2025Amendment 186 to Article 3, after paragraph 2 Combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA (recast)ForAgainstRenew
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeAbstainedForRenew
7 May 2025Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 18 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeAbstainedAgainstRenew
7 May 2025Amendment 24 to paragraph 131 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAbstainedAgainstRenew
7 May 2025Amendment 22 to paragraph 98 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAbstainedAgainstRenew
7 May 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote Amending of the ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term reviewAbstainedAgainstRenew
5 May 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the Verts/ALE Group — Gaza Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group – GazaForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 80 to paragraph 27 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024ForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 23 — part 2 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024AgainstForRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 24 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024ForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 84, adding text after paragraph 24 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024ForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 74 to paragraph 10 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024ForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 74 to paragraph 10 — part 1 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024ForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 69 to paragraph 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024ForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 76 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024AbstainedAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 76 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024ForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 64 to paragraph 76 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024ForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Paragraph 48 — part 2 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024AgainstForRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 30 to paragraph 8 — part 2 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024ForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 30 to paragraph 8 — part 1 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024ForAgainstRenew
Show all 64 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
2 Apr 2025Amendment 27 to paragraph 4, after indent 6 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024ForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 24 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 30 to paragraph 12 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIForAgainstRenew
2 Apr 2025Amendment 29 to paragraph 11 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIForAgainstRenew
13 Mar 2025Paragraph 16 — part 2 Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rightsForAgainstRenew
12 Mar 2025Amendment 66 to paragraph 62 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAbstainedAgainstRenew
12 Mar 2025Amendment 66 to paragraph 62 — part 1 White paper on the future of European defenceAbstainedAgainstRenew
12 Mar 2025Amendment 107, adding text after paragraph 17 — part 1 White paper on the future of European defenceForAgainstRenew
12 Mar 2025Amendment 13, adding text after recital K European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025ForAgainstRenew
12 Mar 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 35 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025ForAgainstRenew
23 Jan 2025Amendment 9 to paragraph 15 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineAbstainedAgainstRenew
23 Jan 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 14 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineAbstainedAgainstRenew
23 Jan 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 14 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineAbstainedAgainstRenew
23 Jan 2025Amendment 6 to paragraph 14 Russia’s disinformation and historical falsification to justify its war of aggression against UkraineAbstainedAgainstRenew

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Nathalie LOISEAU , Renew · France 2.9 %2 2244716153

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 2 891 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 78 of 371 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Nathalie LOISEAU”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=197494&to=2025-12-31 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2025 – 31 Dec 2025 · Nathalie LOISEAU}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=197494&to=2025-12-31}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2025-01-01&mep=197494&to=2025-12-31},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}