Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 22 — part 1, after paragraph 35

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections

Vote
Amendment 22 — part 1, after paragraph 35
Result
190 for · 454 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
23 October 2024, 13:26
More facts (6)
Position
vote 41 of 152 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots, EPP · split vote: EPP
Official label
A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 35 – Am 22/1
Vote id
170093
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 190 for, 454 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Highlights that the Hungarian government conducted a series of negotiations with the Commission in order for Hungary to be able to access the cohesion funds it is rightfully entitled to; notes that, as a result of that dialogue, Hungary undertook to fulfil a package of measures; condemns the fact that the Commission is imposing more and more conditions to transfer development funds to Hungary;’, ‘and that the Commission disburse the financial resources immediately’ and ‘and to stop the politically selected ideological blackmailing of Member States.’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 122Abst. 0No vote 13 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 70Abst. 0No vote 7 of 77Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 16Against 154Abst. 1No vote 17 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
ECRFor 65Against 3Abst. 3No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 74Against 5Abst. 0No vote 7 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ESNFor 20Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 25Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 8Abst. 3No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France090
Greece040
Ireland020
Italy090
Netherlands010
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

No vote recorded, 68

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 68 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5 to paragraph 66 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment175 for, 436 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.94 565 voters
23 Oct 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 18 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitAmendment179 for, 395 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 524 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment194 for, 437 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.93 583 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 18 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment189 for, 471 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by S&D, ESNr · shared0.93 607 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 51 to paragraph 3 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment194 for, 460 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 602 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 5 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesAmendment194 for, 408 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 557 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 18, adding text after recital 1 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment171 for, 407 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 530 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 2 to recital A European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment187 for, 428 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.93 567 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 15 Second World Summit for Social DevelopmentAmendment188 for, 399 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 547 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 47 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment205 for, 433 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.92 584 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Amendment 22 — part 1, after paragraph 35 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections”. Vote, 23 October 2024. votingId 170093, reference 2024/0176(BUD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170093 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-23-170093,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 22 — part 1, after paragraph 35 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170093}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-23/170093},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170093, reference 2024/0176(BUD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}