Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group
Result
158 for · 288 against · 34 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 October 2024, 18:27
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group
Vote id
170006
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 158 for, 288 against, 34 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 23Against 19Abst. 32No vote 62 of 136Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.15
RenewFor 53Against 0Abst. 0No vote 24 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 122Abst. 0No vote 66 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 55Abst. 0No vote 23 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 63Abst. 0No vote 23 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 14Abst. 0No vote 11 of 25Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 2Against 15Abst. 2No vote 11 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Diego SOLIER changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Milan MAZUREK changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Nora JUNCO GARCÍA changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany300
Denmark100
Finland200
France900
Greece300
Italy700
Netherlands100
Portugal200
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 480 members

No vote recorded, 239

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 239 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Feb 2025Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 13 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Amendment178 for, 358 against, 102 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 431 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 60 2023 and 2024 reports on MontenegroAmendment278 for, 349 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 432 voters
21 Oct 2025Amendment 19, adding text after citation 4 Standing Forest and Forestry Expert GroupAmendment260 for, 372 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 435 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 Oct 2025Amendment 143 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment282 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 425 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.86 458 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 397 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 394 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 23 to paragraph 10 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment252 for, 305 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 388 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.86 417 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 42 Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2026 – Section I – European ParliamentAmendment283 for, 298 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by EPP, Renew, S&Dr · shared0.86 392 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group”. Vote, 21 October 2024. votingId 170006. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-21/170006 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 October 2024 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2024-10-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2024-10-21-170006,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the Renew Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-10-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-21/170006}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2024-10-21/170006},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 170006. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2024-10-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2024-10-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}