Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from adopted text to adopted text

TA-9-2024-0342 → TA-10-2026-0168

From
TA-9-2024-0342 Adopted text of 24 Apr 2024
To
TA-10-2026-0168 Adopted text of 19 May 2026
Changes
Not comparable
Paragraphs
+9 added · −682 removed · 5 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
Production and marketing of forest reproductive material
Title (to)
Production and marketing of forest reproductive material

These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph (under 15 % of their paragraphs match): they are different documents rather than versions of one — for example a group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted.

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 12 of 12: Paragraphs 661–701

Removed(a) Sampling of the FRM

Removed(i) The sample of the FRM for comparative testing shall be truly representative of the FRM derived from the basic material to be approved.

Removed(ii) Sexually produced FRM for comparative testing shall be:

Removed- harvested in years of good flowering and good fruit/seed production, and

Removed- harvested by methods that ensure that the samples obtained are representative.

RemovedArtificial pollination may be utilised for the production of such FRM.

Removed(b) Standards

Removed(i) The performance of standards used for comparative purposes in the tests shall, if possible, be known over a sufficiently long period in the region in which the test is to be carried out. The standards represent, in principle, basic material that has been shown to be useful for the intended purpose for forestry at the time that the test starts, and in ecological conditions for which it is proposed to certify the FRM. The standards used for comparative purposes in the tests shall be, as far as possible:

Removed- stands selected according to the criteria in Annex III; or

Removed- basic material officially approved for the production of FRM of the tested category.

Removed(ii) For comparative testing of artificial hybrids, both parent tree species shall, if possible, be included among the standards.

Removed(iii) Several standards shall be used whenever possible. When justified, standards may be replaced by the most suitable of the FRM under test or the mean of the components of the test.

Removed(iv) The same standards shall be used in all tests over as wide a range of site conditions as possible.

Removed(c) Interpretation

Removed(i) A statistically significant superiority as compared with the standards shall be demonstrated for at least one important characteristic.

Removed(ii) The professional operatorIt shall reportbe reported if there are any characteristics of economic or environmental importance which show significantly inferior results to the standards, and their effects shall be compensated for by favourable characteristics. [Am. 101]

Removed4. PROVISIONAL APPROVAL

RemovedPreliminary assessment of young trials may be the basis for provisional approval. Claims of superiority based on an early assessment shall be re-examined at a maximum interval of ten years.

Removed5. EARLY TESTS

RemovedNursery, greenhouse and laboratory tests may be accepted by the competent authority for provisional approval or for final approval, if it can be shown that there is a close correlation between the measured characteristic and the characteristics normally assessed in forest stage tests. Other characteristics to be tested shall meet the requirements set out in point 3.

RemovedAnnex VI

RemovedCATEGORIES UNDER WHICH FRM FROM THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF BASIC MATERIAL MAY BE MARKETED

RemovedAnnex VII

RemovedAmendment of Annex VII to Regulation (EU) 2016/2031

RemovedIn Annex VII to Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, the following parts are added:

Removed‘PART G

RemovedPlant passports for movement within the Union territory, combined with the official label, as referred to in Article 83(5), second subparagraph

Removed(1) The plant passport for movement within the Union territory, combined in a joint label with the official label referred to in Article 83(5), shall contain the following elements:

Removed(a) the words ‘Plant Passport’ in the upper right-hand corner of the joint label, in one of the official languages of the Union and in English, if different, separated by a slash;

Removed(b) the flag of the Union in the upper left-hand corner of the joint label printed in colour or in black and white. The plant passport shall be positioned in the joint label immediately above the official label and have the same width as that official label.

Removed(2) Point (2) of Part A shall apply accordingly.

RemovedPART H

RemovedPlant passports for introduction into and movement within protected zones, combined with the official label, as referred to in Article 83(5), third subparagraph

Removed(1) The plant passport for introduction into and movement within protected zones, combined in a joint label with the official label for FRM referred to in Article 83(5), shall contain the following elements:

Removed(a) the words ‘Plant Passport — PZ’ in the upper right-hand corner of the joint label in one of the official languages of the Union and in English, if different, separated by a slash;

Removed(b) immediately underneath those words, the scientific name(s) or code(s) of the protected zone quarantine pest(s) concerned;

Removed(c) the flag of the Union in the upper left-hand corner of the joint label printed in colour or in black and white.

RemovedThe plant passport shall be positioned in the joint label immediately above the official label and have the same width [as that official label.

Removed(2) Point (2) of Part B shall apply accordingly.’

RemovedAnnex VIII

RemovedCorrelation table

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
29 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Changes between TA-9-2024-0342 and TA-10-2026-0168”. Text, 19 May 2026. from TA-9-2024-0342, to TA-10-2026-0168. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/TA-9-2024-0342/compare/TA-10-2026-0168?all=1&part=12 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2026-05-19,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between TA-9-2024-0342 and TA-10-2026-0168}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/TA-9-2024-0342/compare/TA-10-2026-0168?all=1&part=12}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/TA-9-2024-0342/compare/TA-10-2026-0168?all=1&part=12},
  urldate = {2026-09-29},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from TA-9-2024-0342, to TA-10-2026-0168. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}