Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from adopted text to adopted text
TA-9-2023-0236 → TA-9-2024-0138
- From
- TA-9-2023-0236 Adopted text of 14 Jun 2023
- To
- TA-9-2024-0138 Adopted text of 13 Mar 2024
- Changes
- Not comparable
- Paragraphs
- +18 added · −772 removed · 2 changed
More facts (2)
- Title (from)
- Artificial Intelligence Act
- Title (to)
- Artificial Intelligence Act
These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph (under 15 % of their paragraphs match): they are different documents rather than versions of one — for example a group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted.
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 12 of 14: Paragraphs 661–720
RemovedArticle 70 – paragraph 1 – introductory part: 1. The Commission, national competent authorities and notified bodies, the AI Office and any other natural or legal person involved in the application of this Regulation shall respect the confidentiality of information and data obtained in carrying out their tasks and activities in such a manner as to protect, in particular;
RemovedArticle 70 – paragraph 1 – point a: (a) intellectual property rights, and confidential business information or trade secrets of a natural or legal person, in accordance with the provisions of Directives 2004/48/EC and 2016/943/EC, including source code, except the cases referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2016/943 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure apply;
RemovedArticle 70 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new): (b a) public and national security interests
RemovedArticle 70 – paragraph 1 a (new): 1 a. The authorities involved in the application of this Regulation pursuant to paragraph 1 shall minimise the quantity of data requested for disclosure to the data that is strictly necessary for the perceived risk and the assessment of that risk. They shall delete the data as soon as it is no longer needed for the purpose it was requested for. They shall put in place adequate and effective cybersecurity, technical and organisational measures to protect the security and confidentiality of the information and data obtained in carrying out their tasks and activities;
RemovedArticle 70 – paragraph 2 – introductory part: 2. Without prejudice to paragraphs 1 and 1a, information exchanged on a confidential basis between the national competent authorities and between national competent authorities and the Commission shall not be disclosed without the prior consultation of the originating national competent authority and the deployer when high-risk AI systems referred to in points 1, 6 and 7 of Annex III are used by law enforcement, immigration or asylum authorities, when such disclosure would jeopardise public or national security.
RemovedArticle 70 – paragraph 3: 3. Paragraphs 1, 1a and 2 shall not affect the rights and obligations of the Commission, Member States and notified bodies with regard to the exchange of information and the dissemination of warnings, nor the obligations of the parties concerned to provide information under criminal law of the Member States;
RemovedArticle 70 – paragraph 4: 4. The Commission and Member States may exchange, where strictly necessary and in accordance with relevant provisions of international and trade agreements, confidential information with regulatory authorities of third countries with which they have concluded bilateral or multilateral confidentiality arrangements guaranteeing an adequate level of confidentiality.
RemovedArticle 71 – title: Penalties
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 1: 1. In compliance with the terms and conditions laid down in this Regulation, Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties, applicable to infringements of this Regulation by any operator, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are properly and effectively implemented and aligned with the guidelines issued by the Commission and the AI Office pursuant to Article 82b. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate, and dissuasive. They shall take into account the interests of SMEs and start-ups and their economic viability;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 2: 2. The Member States shall notify the Commission and the Office by [ 12 months after the date of entry into force of this Regulation] of those rules and of those measures and shall notify them, without delay, of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 3 – introductory part: 3. Non compliance with the prohibition of the artificial intelligence practices referred to in Article 5 shall be subject to administrative fines of up to 40 000 000 EUR or, if the offender is a company, up to 7 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher:
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 3 – point a: deleted
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 3 – point b: deleted
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 3 a (new): 3 a. Non-compliance of the AI system with the requirements laid down in Article 10 and 13 shall be subject to administrative fines of up to EUR 20 000 000 or, if the offender is a company, up to 4% of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is the higher.
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 4: 4. Non-compliance of the AI system or foundation model with any requirements or obligations under this Regulation, other than those laid down in Articles 5, 10 and 13, shall be subject to administrative fines of up to EUR 10 000 000 or, if the offender is a company, up to 2% of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 5: 5. The supply of incorrect, incomplete or misleading information to notified bodies and national competent authorities in reply to a request shall be subject to administrative fines of up to 5 000 000 EUR or, if the offender is a company, up to 1 % of its total worldwide annual turnover for the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 6 – introductory part: 6. Fines may be imposed in addition to or instead of non-monetary measures such as orders or warnings. When deciding on the amount of the administrative fine in each individual case, all relevant circumstances of the specific situation shall be taken into account and due regard shall be given to the following;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 6 – point a: (a) the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement and of its consequences, taking into account the purpose of the AI system, as well as, where appropriate, the number of affected persons and the level of damage suffered by them;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 6 – point b: (b) whether administrative fines have been already applied by other national supervisory authorities of one or more Member States to the same operator for the same infringement;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 6 – point c: (c) the size and annual turnover of the operator committing the infringement;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 6 – point c a (new): (c a) any action taken by the operator to mitigate the harm of damage suffered by the affected persons;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 6 – point c b (new): (c b) the intentional or negligent character of the infringement;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 6 – point c c (new): (c c) the degree of cooperation with the national competent authorities, in order to remedy the infringement and mitigate the possible adverse effects of the infringement;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 6 – point c d (new): (c d) the degree of responsibility of the operator taking into account the technical and organisational measures implemented by them;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 6 – point c e (new): (c e) the manner in which the infringement became known to the national competent authorities, in particular whether, and if so to what extent, the operator notified the infringement;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 6 – point c f (new): (c f) adherence to approved codes of conduct or approved certification mechanisms;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 6 – point c g (new): (c g) any relevant previous infringements by the operator;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 6 – point c h (new): (c h) any other aggravating or mitigating factor applicable to the circumstances of the case.
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 7: 7. each Member State shall lay down rules on administrative fines to be imposed on public authorities and bodies established in that Member State;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 8 a (new): 8 a. The penalties referred to in this article as well as the associated litigation costs and indemnification claims may not be the subject of contractual clauses or other form of burden-sharing agreements between providers and distributors, importers, deployers, or any other third parties;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 8 b (new): 8 b. National supervisory authorities shall, on an annual basis, report to the AI Office about the fines they have issued during that year, in accordance with this Article;
RemovedArticle 71 – paragraph 8 c (new): 8 c. The exercise by competent authorities of their powers under this Article shall be subject to appropriate procedural safeguards in accordance with Union and national law, including judicial remedy and due process;
RemovedArticle 72 – paragraph 1 – point a: (a) the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement and of its consequences;, taking into account the purpose of the AI system concerned as well as the number of affected persons and the level of damage suffered by them, and any relevant previous infringement;
RemovedArticle 72 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new): (a a) any action taken by the Union institution, agency or body to mitigate the damage suffered by affected persons;
RemovedArticle 72 – paragraph 1 – point a b (new): (a b) the degree of responsibility of the Union institution, agency or body, taking into account technical and organisational measures implemented by them;
RemovedArticle 72 – paragraph 1 – point b: (b) the degree of cooperation with the European Data Protection Supervisor in order to remedy the infringement and mitigate the possible adverse effects of the infringement, including compliance with any of the measures previously ordered by the European Data Protection Supervisor against the Union institution or agency or body concerned with regard to the same subject matter;
RemovedArticle 72 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new): (c a) the manner in which the infringement became known to the European Data Protection Supervisor, in particular whether, and if so to what extent, the Union institution or body notified the infringement;
RemovedArticle 72 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new): (c b) the annual budget of the body;
RemovedArticle 72 – paragraph 2 – introductory part: 2. Non compliance with the prohibition of the artificial intelligence practices referred to in Article 5 shall be subject to administrative fines of up to EUR 1 500 000.
RemovedArticle 72 – paragraph 2 – point a: deleted
RemovedArticle 72 – paragraph 2 a (new): 2 a. non-compliance of the AI system with the requirements laid down in Article 10 shall be subject to administrative fines of up to 1 000 000 EUR.
RemovedArticle 72 – paragraph 3: 3. the non-compliance of the AI system with any requirements or obligations under this Regulation, other than those laid down in Articles 5 and 10, shall be subject to administrative fines of up to EUR 750 000.
RemovedArticle 72 – paragraph 6: 6. Funds collected by imposition of fines in this Article shall contribute to the general budget of the Union. The fines shall not affect the effective operation of the Union institution, body or agency fined.
RemovedArticle 72 – paragraph 6 a (new): 6 a. the European Data Protection Supervisor shall, on an annual basis, notify the AI Office of the fines it has imposed pursuant to this Article.
RemovedArticle 73 – paragraph 2: 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 4, Article 7(1), Article 11(3), Article 43(5) and (6) and Article 48(5) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from … [the date of entry into force of the Regulation].The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than 9 months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
RemovedArticle 73 – paragraph 3 a (new): 3 a. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult with the relevant institutions, the Office, the Advisory Forum and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. / Once the Commission decides to draft a delegated act, it shall notify the European Parliament of this fact. This notification does not place an obligation on the Commission to adopt the said act.
RemovedArticle 81 a (new): Article 81 a / Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 / Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 is amended as follows: / in Article 14(4), the following paragraph is added: / “(l). the power to implement the powers provided for in this Article remotely, where applicable;”
RemovedArticle 82 a (new): Article 82 a / Better Regulation / in taking into account the requirements of this Regulation pursuant to the Amendments in Articles 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, and 82, the Commission shall conduct an analysis and consult relevant stakeholders to determine potential gaps as well as overlaps between existing sectoral legislation and the provisions of this Regulation.
RemovedArticle 82 b (new): Article 82 b / Guidelines from the Commission on the implementation of this Regulation / 1. The Commission shall develop, in consultation with the AI office, guidelines on the practical implementation of this Regulation, and in particular on: / (a) the application of the requirements referred to in Articles 8 - 15 and Article 28 to 28b; / (b) the prohibited practices referred to in Article 5; / (c) the practical implementation of the provisions related to substantial modification; / (d) the practical circumstances where the output of an AI system referred to in Annex III would pose a significant risk of harm to the health, safety or fundamental rights of natural persons as referred to in Article 6, paragraph 2, including examples in relation to high risk AI systems referred to in Annex III; / (e) the practical implementation of transparency obligations laid down in Article 52; / (f) the development of codes of conduct referred to in Article 69; / (g) the relationship of this Regulation with other relevant Union law, including as regards consistency in their enforcement. / (h) the practical implementation of Article 12, Article 28b on environmental impact of foundation models and Annex IV 3(b), particularly the measurement and logging methods to enable calculations and reporting of the environmental impact of systems to comply with the obligations in this Regulation, including carbon footprint and energy efficiency, taking into account state-of-the-art methods and economies of…
RemovedArticle 83 – paragraph 1 – introductory part: 1. Operators of the AI systems which are components of the large-scale IT systems established by the legal acts listed in Annex IX that have been placed on the market or put into service prior to ... [the date of entry into force of this Regulation] shall take the necessary steps to comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation by … [four years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
RemovedArticle 83 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1: The requirements laid down in this Regulation shall be taken into account in the evaluation of each large-scale IT systems established by the legal acts listed in Annex IX to be undertaken as provided for in those respective acts and whenever those legal acts are replaced or amended.
RemovedArticle 83 – paragraph 2: 2. This Regulation shall apply to operators of high-risk AI systems, other than the ones referred to in paragraph 1, that have been placed on the market or put into service before [date of application of this Regulation referred to in Article 85(2)], only if, from that date, those systems are subject to substantial modifications as defined in Article 3(23). In the case of high-risk AI systems intended to be used by public authorities, providers and deployers of such systems shall take the necessary steps to comply with the requirements of the present Regulation [two years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation].
RemovedArticle 84 – paragraph 1: 1. After consulting the AI Office, the Commission shall assess the need for amendment of the list in Annex III, including the extension of existing area headings or addition of new area headings in that Annex the list of prohibited AI practices in Article 5, and the list of AI systems requiring additional transparency measures in Article 52 once a year following the entry into force of this Regulation and following a recommendation of the Office. / the Commission shall submit the findings of that assessment to the European Parliament and the Council.
RemovedArticle 84 – paragraph 2: 2. By … [two years after the date of application of this Regulation referred to in Article 85(2)] and every two years thereafter, the Commission, together with the AI office, shall submit a report on the evaluation and review of this Regulation to the European Parliament and to the Council. The reports shall be made public.
RemovedArticle 84 – paragraph 3 – point a: (a) the status of the financial, technical and human resources of the national competent authorities in order to effectively perform the tasks assigned to them under this Regulation;
RemovedArticle 84 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new): (b a) the level of the development of harmonised standards and common specifications for Artificial Intelligence;
RemovedArticle 84 – paragraph 3 – point b b (new): (b b) the levels of investments in research, development and application of AI systems throughout the Union;
RemovedArticle 84 – paragraph 3 – point b c (new): (b c) the competitiveness of the aggregated European AI sector compared to AI sectors in third countries;
RemovedArticle 84 – paragraph 3 – point b d (new): (b d) the impact of the Regulation with regards to the resource and energy use, as well as waste production and other environmental impact;
RemovedArticle 84 – paragraph 3 – point b e (new): (b e) the implementation of the coordinated plan on AI, taking into account the different level of progress among Member States and identifying existing barriers to innovation in AI;
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/TA-9-2023-0236/compare/TA-9-2024-0138?all=1&part=12
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 30 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2024). “Changes between TA-9-2023-0236 and TA-9-2024-0138”. Text, 13 March 2024. from TA-9-2023-0236, to TA-9-2024-0138. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/TA-9-2023-0236/compare/TA-9-2024-0138?all=1&part=12 (retrieved 30 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-03-13,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between TA-9-2023-0236 and TA-9-2024-0138}},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-03-13},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/TA-9-2023-0236/compare/TA-9-2024-0138?all=1&part=12}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/TA-9-2023-0236/compare/TA-9-2024-0138?all=1&part=12},
urldate = {2026-09-30},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from TA-9-2023-0236, to TA-9-2024-0138. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}