Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

SEDE-PR-778252 → A-10-2026-0017

From
SEDE-PR-778252 report parliamentary committee draft of 15 Oct 2025
To
A-10-2026-0017 Plenary report of 6 Feb 2026
Changes
10 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+47 added · −16 removed · 16 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on ‘Tackling barriers to the single market for defence’
Title (to)
on tackling barriers to the single market for defence
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The report expands significantly, adding new recitals and paragraphs on barriers, reports, and specific measures.1256 It strengthens calls for a single market for defence, including references to the White Paper and urging member states to act.2347 It adds detailed provisions on export controls, Article 346, NATO cooperation, and support for SMEs and innovation.810 It introduces new paragraphs on democratic legitimacy, fair distribution, and the role of the EDA.5610 The other changes are formal: updated references and renumbering.1234

The notes class 7 changes as substance, 0 as formal, 3 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 3 of 3: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Europe is entering a decisive phase in restoring its deterrence and defence capabilities. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, combined with the United States’ growing focus on the Indo-Pacific, leaves no room for delay. Strengthening Europe’s deterrence requires action that is efficient, effective, and collaborative.

Both the Draghi and Letta Reports highlight the absence of a single market for defence goods as a key obstacle. While the Commission has proposed measures to stimulate joint procurement among EU Member States, progress has been limited the improvement of cross-border industrial cooperation. The Defence Omnibus Package includes some initial steps in these regards, which require further action. Without deeper reforms, current inefficiencies will persist—leading, for example, to defence equipment prices that are roughly 30 % higher than they would be under full EU-wide cooperation.

Besides economic advantages, building a genuine single market for defence would also improve interoperability among European armed forces, which today struggle with excessive diversity in equipment. Through such industrial policy measures, the EU can significantly reinforce Europe’s deterrence capabilities, which will continue to be coordinated and structured by NATO.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
28 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Changes between SEDE-PR-778252 and A-10-2026-0017”. Text, 6 February 2026. from SEDE-PR-778252, to A-10-2026-0017, reference 2025/2143(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/SEDE-PR-778252/compare/A-10-2026-0017?all=1&part=3 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2026-02-06,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between SEDE-PR-778252 and A-10-2026-0017}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-06},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/SEDE-PR-778252/compare/A-10-2026-0017?all=1&part=3}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/SEDE-PR-778252/compare/A-10-2026-0017?all=1&part=3},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from SEDE-PR-778252, to A-10-2026-0017, reference 2025/2143(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}