Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report
SANT-PR-773198 → A-10-2025-0274
- From
- SANT-PR-773198 report parliamentary committee draft of 5 May 2025
- To
- A-10-2025-0274 Plenary report of 19 Dec 2025
- Changes
- Not comparable
- Paragraphs
- +177 added · −60 removed · 6 changed
More facts (2)
- Title (from)
- on public health aspects of biotechnology and life sciences
- Title (to)
- on public health aspects of biotechnology and life sciences
These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph (under 15 % of their paragraphs match): they are different documents rather than versions of one — for example a group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted.
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 6 of 6: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Biotechnology, grounded in the intrinsic properties of living organisms and complex biological processes, has emerged as a cornerstone of public health, providing tools that are transforming disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. From a human-centered and ethically rooted perspective, biotechnological innovations have proven essential in addressing previously untreatable conditions and in improving the quality of life for millions of persons by enabling early diagnosis and providing more effective treatment options. Advances in this field can significantly contribute to society improving the health of EU citizens, including vulnerable populations such as persons with disabilities.
The European cultural environment has always been oriented toward the development of science and the humanities. Europeans have consistently stood out for their talent and skills in these fields. Therefore, Europe has the responsibility to continue its leadership also in the field of technology, ensuring that this rapid innovation is guided by ethical principles and contributes to the common good.
Change 2
ChangedBeyond its medical applications, the sector can also play a strategic economic role: its expansion can drive job creation, reinforce Europe’s global competitiveness, by also reducing the dependencies on third countries’ imports, and contribute to enhancing EU strategic autonomy. With an economic growth rate of 5.3%, the sector’s productivity is nearly three times higher than the EU average, and its employment growth is six times higher than the overall EU economy. Therefore, the Commission has recognised biotechnologies as one of the ten critical technology areas in its Recommendation of 3 October 2023 on “Critical‘Critical technology areas for the EU’s economic security for further risk assessment with Member States”,States’, (COM(2023) 6689).
5 unchanged paragraphs
Biotechnology is a transformative discipline that has rapidly evolved, particularly following the sequencing of DNA structure and the development of new technologies. Its application spans various sectors, most notably healthcare and pharmaceuticals, where it enables the development of innovative products and therapeutic approaches. As a result, political attention is increasingly shifting towards this sector, not only in Europe but also in third countries such as the United States and China. In the context of the EU Competitiveness Compass, the forthcoming Strategy for European Life Sciences (2025) and the EU Biotech Act (2026) represent key opportunities to bolster Europe’s competitiveness, regulatory clarity, and investment capacity in this field.
The rapid evolution of biotechnological applications has not been matched by an equally adaptive regulatory framework. Despite the investments the EU has already made in these fields, the EU faces challenges in translating research into market-ready solutions. Structural obstacles—including fragmented support systems, lack of traceability, insufficient early-stage investment, and complex intellectual property and licensing regimes—continue to hamper effective technology transfer and commercialisation. This has led to a notable decline in its global share of pharmaceutical R&D. The complexity and fragmentation of the current EU regulatory framework, exacerbates this gap and lacks the agility to respond to emerging technologies. This regulatory uncertainty creates barriers for industry actors and delays the delivery of innovative treatments to patients. This disproportionately affects small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which constitute the majority of biotech actors in the EU and are responsible for much of the sector’s innovation. They often lack access to appropriate financing and face high regulatory and operational costs.
In light of the upcoming Biotech Act, it is essential to establish a coherent, streamlined, and flexible framework that facilitates innovation, while maintaining high standards of safety and ethical compliance. Such a framework must be future-oriented, adaptable to scientific developments, and designed to reduce administrative burdens, while ensuring legal clarity. A more integrated and supportive ecosystem is needed to strengthen IP protection, improve coordination between academia and industry, and provide tailored support across the entire innovation lifecycle, from research and development to market entry. Complementary measures, including tax incentives, simplified authorisation procedures, and improved access to infrastructure, will enhance the sector’s competitiveness.
At the same time, biotechnology raises important ethical, safety, and security concerns that must be carefully addressed, in line with the principles of the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome adopted by UNESCO. Given the profound societal and human implications of these technologies, their development must be firmly anchored in the respect for human dignity, the right to life, and fundamental rights. Consequently, all forms of discrimination based on genetic characteristics must be strictly prohibited. Human embryo manipulation and germline modifications are also banned due to their unpredictable impact on individuals and future generations. The regulatory framework should adopt a precautionary approach regarding the balance risk-benefit. Cooperation among independent and transparent national ethics committees should be facilitated, ensuring the involvement of affected communities and in full compliance with the subsidiarity principle and the competence of Member States.
Looking ahead, the EU Biotech Act should strike a balance between fostering innovation and upholding public health and ethical principles. A flexible, technology-neutral framework—based on a robust impact assessment and comprehensive stakeholder consultation—is crucial to ensure that scientific excellence is translated into tangible health benefits for European citizens.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/SANT-PR-773198/compare/A-10-2025-0274?all=1&part=6
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 28 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Changes between SANT-PR-773198 and A-10-2025-0274”. Text, 19 December 2025. from SANT-PR-773198, to A-10-2025-0274. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/SANT-PR-773198/compare/A-10-2025-0274?all=1&part=6 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-12-19,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between SANT-PR-773198 and A-10-2025-0274}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-12-19},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/SANT-PR-773198/compare/A-10-2025-0274?all=1&part=6}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/SANT-PR-773198/compare/A-10-2025-0274?all=1&part=6},
urldate = {2026-09-28},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from SANT-PR-773198, to A-10-2025-0274. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}