Text · Amendment list
Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation
Document REGI-AM-791869 · 2026/2054(INI)
- Kind
- Amendment list REGI-AM-791869
- Date
- 27 August 2026
- Committee
- Committee on Regional Development
- Dossier
- 2026-2054
More facts (2)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Reference
- 2026/2054(INI)
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Jump to an amendment (295)
- Amendment 1
- Amendment 2
- Amendment 3
- Amendment 4
- Amendment 5
- Amendment 6
- Amendment 7
- Amendment 8
- Amendment 9
- Amendment 10
- Amendment 11
- Amendment 12
- Amendment 13
- Amendment 14
- Amendment 15
- Amendment 16
- Amendment 17
- Amendment 18
- Amendment 19
- Amendment 20
- Amendment 21
- Amendment 22
- Amendment 23
- Amendment 24
- Amendment 25
- Amendment 26
- Amendment 27
- Amendment 28
- Amendment 29
- Amendment 30
- Amendment 31
- Amendment 32
- Amendment 33
- Amendment 34
- Amendment 35
- Amendment 36
- Amendment 37
- Amendment 38
- Amendment 39
- Amendment 40
- Amendment 41
- Amendment 42
- Amendment 43
- Amendment 44
- Amendment 45
- Amendment 46
- Amendment 47
- Amendment 48
- Amendment 49
- Amendment 50
- Amendment 51
- Amendment 52
- Amendment 53
- Amendment 54
- Amendment 55
- Amendment 56
- Amendment 57
- Amendment 58
- Amendment 59
- Amendment 60
- Amendment 61
- Amendment 62
- Amendment 63
- Amendment 64
- Amendment 65
- Amendment 66
- Amendment 67
- Amendment 68
- Amendment 69
- Amendment 70
- Amendment 71
- Amendment 72
- Amendment 73
- Amendment 74
- Amendment 75
- Amendment 76
- Amendment 77
- Amendment 78
- Amendment 79
- Amendment 80
- Amendment 81
- Amendment 82
- Amendment 83
- Amendment 84
- Amendment 85
- Amendment 86
- Amendment 87
- Amendment 88
- Amendment 89
- Amendment 90
- Amendment 91
- Amendment 92
- Amendment 93
- Amendment 94
- Amendment 95
- Amendment 96
- Amendment 97
- Amendment 98
- Amendment 99
- Amendment 100
- Amendment 101
- Amendment 102
- Amendment 103
- Amendment 104
- Amendment 105
- Amendment 106
- Amendment 107
- Amendment 108
- Amendment 109
- Amendment 110
- Amendment 111
- Amendment 112
- Amendment 113
- Amendment 114
- Amendment 115
- Amendment 116
- Amendment 117
- Amendment 118
- Amendment 119
- Amendment 120
- Amendment 121
- Amendment 122
- Amendment 123
- Amendment 124
- Amendment 125
- Amendment 126
- Amendment 127
- Amendment 128
- Amendment 129
- Amendment 130
- Amendment 131
- Amendment 132
- Amendment 133
- Amendment 134
- Amendment 135
- Amendment 136
- Amendment 137
- Amendment 138
- Amendment 139
- Amendment 140
- Amendment 141
- Amendment 142
- Amendment 143
- Amendment 144
- Amendment 145
- Amendment 146
- Amendment 147
- Amendment 148
- Amendment 149
- Amendment 150
- Amendment 151
- Amendment 152
- Amendment 153
- Amendment 154
- Amendment 155
- Amendment 156
- Amendment 157
- Amendment 158
- Amendment 159
- Amendment 160
- Amendment 161
- Amendment 162
- Amendment 163
- Amendment 164
- Amendment 165
- Amendment 166
- Amendment 167
- Amendment 168
- Amendment 169
- Amendment 170
- Amendment 171
- Amendment 172
- Amendment 173
- Amendment 174
- Amendment 175
- Amendment 176
- Amendment 177
- Amendment 178
- Amendment 179
- Amendment 180
- Amendment 181
- Amendment 182
- Amendment 183
- Amendment 184
- Amendment 185
- Amendment 186
- Amendment 187
- Amendment 188
- Amendment 189
- Amendment 190
- Amendment 191
- Amendment 192
- Amendment 193
- Amendment 194
- Amendment 195
- Amendment 196
- Amendment 197
- Amendment 198
- Amendment 199
- Amendment 200
- Amendment 201
- Amendment 202
- Amendment 203
- Amendment 204
- Amendment 205
- Amendment 206
- Amendment 207
- Amendment 208
- Amendment 209
- Amendment 210
- Amendment 211
- Amendment 212
- Amendment 213
- Amendment 214
- Amendment 215
- Amendment 216
- Amendment 217
- Amendment 218
- Amendment 219
- Amendment 220
- Amendment 221
- Amendment 222
- Amendment 223
- Amendment 224
- Amendment 225
- Amendment 226
- Amendment 227
- Amendment 228
- Amendment 229
- Amendment 230
- Amendment 231
- Amendment 232
- Amendment 233
- Amendment 234
- Amendment 235
- Amendment 236
- Amendment 237
- Amendment 238
- Amendment 239
- Amendment 240
- Amendment 241
- Amendment 242
- Amendment 243
- Amendment 244
- Amendment 245
- Amendment 246
- Amendment 247
- Amendment 248
- Amendment 249
- Amendment 250
- Amendment 251
- Amendment 252
- Amendment 253
- Amendment 254
- Amendment 255
- Amendment 256
- Amendment 257
- Amendment 258
- Amendment 259
- Amendment 260
- Amendment 261
- Amendment 262
- Amendment 263
- Amendment 264
- Amendment 265
- Amendment 266
- Amendment 267
- Amendment 268
- Amendment 269
- Amendment 270
- Amendment 271
- Amendment 272
- Amendment 273
- Amendment 274
- Amendment 275
- Amendment 276
- Amendment 277
- Amendment 278
- Amendment 279
- Amendment 280
- Amendment 281
- Amendment 282
- Amendment 283
- Amendment 284
- Amendment 285
- Amendment 286
- Amendment 287
- Amendment 288
- Amendment 289
- Amendment 290
- Amendment 291
- Amendment 292
- Amendment 293
- Amendment 294
- Amendment 295
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to dedicated territorial development programmes and instruments supporting eastern and structurally vulnerable macro-regions, such as the European Funds for Eastern Poland 2021-2027 programme, which have delivered tangible results for citizens, local authorities, SMEs, transport accessibility, climate adaptation, energy infrastructure and quality of life, and to the fact that such dedicated programmes are due to expire at the end of 2027 and have not been replaced by an equivalent dedicated instrument in the proposed post-2027 framework, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the agreement adopted at the 21st Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP21) in Paris on 12 December 2015 (the Paris Agreement), |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the Union's defence readiness initiatives for 2030, including the European Drone Defence Initiative and Eastern Flank Watch, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the EU Preparedness Union Strategy and its whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach to crisis prevention, preparedness and response, |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council - The European Union's strategic approach to the Black Sea region; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council - The European Union's strategic approach to the Black Sea region; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council - The European Union's strategic approach to the Black Sea region; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the Commission Communication of 2025 on EU enlargement stating that enlargement unifies Europe, based on shared values and identity, while embodying an economic, social and democratic model and considering the positive developments with respect to Ukraine and Moldova on their paths towards European integration; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the Commission Communication of 2025 on EU enlargement stating that enlargement unifies Europe, based on shared values and identity, while embodying an economic, social and democratic model and considering the positive developments with respect to Ukraine and Moldova on their paths towards European integration; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 8 December 2010 on the European Union strategy for the Danube region (COM/2010/0715); |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – whereas, for the purposes of this resolution, eastern border regions are understood, in line with the Commission's Communication on the EU's eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine (COM(2026) 82 final), as those regions bordering Russia, Belarus or Ukraine, spanning nine Member States, namely Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – whereas for the purposes of this resolution, eastern border regions are understood, in line with the Commission's Communication on the EU's eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine (COM(2026) 82 final), as those regions bordering Russia, Belarus or Ukraine, spanning nine Member States, namely Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 10 June 2009 on the European Union strategy for the Baltic Sea region (COM/2009/248); |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| – having regard to the Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council - The European Union's strategic approach to the Black Sea region; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| -A. whereas, for the purposes of this resolution, eastern border regions are understood, in line with the Commission's Communication on the EU's eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine (COM(2026) 82 final), as those regions bordering Russia, Belarus or Ukraine, spanning nine Member States, namely Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; | A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus serve as the Union's frontline gateway along a further 1 370 km with Ukraine and 680 km with the Republic of Moldova, together with over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing well over a third of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus as well as the direct and indirect consequences of proximity to the war along the borders with Ukraine and Moldova; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; whereas the economic impact goes beyond direct financial costs and also encompasses lost opportunities, deferred investments, higher perceived risks for private investors, and the need for public authorities to rapidly adjust to an evolving geopolitical environment, elements that remain insufficiently accounted for in the conventional indicators of cohesion policy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; | A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and serve as the Union's frontline gateway along a further 1 370 km with Ukraine and 680 km with the Republic of Moldova, together with over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing well over a third of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus, as well as the direct and indirect consequences of proximity to the war along the borders with Ukraine and Moldova; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; whereas these costs include not only direct expenditures but also opportunity costs, investment delays, heightened risk perception among private investors, and the additional burden of rapidly adapting public institutions to a changing geopolitical context, none of which are adequately captured by standard cohesion policy indicators. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; | A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and serve as the Union's frontline gateway along a further 1 370 km with Ukraine and 680 km with the Republic of Moldova, together with over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing well over a third of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus as well as the direct and indirect consequences of proximity to the war along the borders with Ukraine and Moldova; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; whereas these costs include not only direct expenditures but also opportunity costs, investment delays, heightened risk perception among private investors, and the additional burden of rapidly adapting public institutions to a changing geopolitical context, none of which are adequately entailed by standard cohesion policy indicators; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; | A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas the countries and regions on the eastern flank – and in particular the Republic of Poland, which guards the longest stretch of the external land border with Russia and Belarus – protect this border and bear the associated costs on behalf of the entire Union; whereas European solidarity with these regions must be genuine and financially measurable, rather than merely declarative; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of the Russian Federation's war of aggression against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus, including the instrumentalisation of migration by the Belarusian regime; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic, territorial and security costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; | A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the European Union as a whole, in particular by ensuring the security of external borders, the resilience of supply chains, military mobility, energy security and the functioning of European logistics infrastructure; the eastern border regions should be regarded as strategic territories of the European Union whose development constitutes an element of building European resilience, competitiveness and strategic autonomy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; | A. whereas the Union’s border regions, especially southern and eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas eastern border regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas southern regions are directly exposed to migration pressures, are substantially affected by non-conventional or hybrid risks, and are surrounded by conflicts in North Africa and the Middle East; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; | A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and serve as the Union's frontline gateway along a further 1 370 km with Ukraine and 680 km with the Republic of Moldova, together with over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing well over a third of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus as well as the direct and indirect consequences of proximity to the war along the borders with Ukraine and Moldova; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; | A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; whereas climate change has as well a serious negative effect on border regions generating additional pressure to their economies, environment and sustainable development; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; | A. whereas the Union's eastern border regions constitute the Union's first territorial layer of resilience and deterrence, play a strategic role in the protection of the EU's external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union's resilience and territorial cohesion; ; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; | A. whereas the Union’s eastern border regions play a strategic role in the protection of the EU’s external border and make a significant contribution to European security, as well as to the Union’s resilience and territorial cohesion; whereas these regions collectively guard some 3 646 km of the EU’s external land border with Russia and Belarus and over 600 km of maritime border on the Black Sea, representing almost a quarter of all the Union’s external land borders in Europe; whereas many of the regions covered by the Commission’s communication are among the Union’s less developed regions, are facing long-standing demographic challenges, are very sparsely populated areas, and are suffering the effects of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the hybrid activities being carried out by Russia and Belarus; whereas these regions are bearing disproportionate economic, social, demographic and territorial costs in connection with their fulfilment of strategic functions for benefit of the Union as a whole; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Aa. whereas the Commission’s proposal concerning the Multiannual Financial Framework 2028-2034 and the creation of a single fund combining cohesion policy, the common agricultural policy and other instruments within National and Regional Partnership Plans risks undermining the regional character of cohesion policy, limiting the role of local and regional authorities and the partnership principle, and centralising decision-making at the level of the Commission and national governments; whereas such an approach would be particularly detrimental to the eastern border regions, whose specific needs call for shared management, the strong involvement of local authorities, and predictable, multiannual and genuinely additional resources; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Aa. whereas the Black Sea constitutes a strategic maritime frontier of the Union, playing a key role in European security, trade, transport, connectivity and energy security; whereas Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine has considerably increased the security, economic and geopolitical challenges faced by the countries and regions along the Black Sea, reinforcing the need for a stronger and more coordinated European response; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Aa. Whereas , for the purposes of this resolution, eastern border regions are understood, in line with the Commission's Communication on the EU's eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine (COM(2026) 82 final),to the regions bordering Russia, Belarus or Ukraine across nine Member States: Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Aa. whereas the security environment of the eastern border regions is increasingly shaped by hybrid threats, including sabotage, cyber-attacks, disinformation, the instrumentalisation of migration, GPS jamming and spoofing, drone incursions, attacks on critical infrastructure and other hostile activities conducted or enabled by Russia and Belarus; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas border regions are home to 30 % of the EU’s population and account for 40 % of its territory; the regions on the eastern flank, constituting a particularly vulnerable area of the Union, deserve a dedicated policy response commensurate with the challenges that they face; | B. whereas border regions are home to 30 % of the EU’s population and account for 40 % of its territory; the regions on the eastern flank, constituting a particularly vulnerable area of the Union, deserve a dedicated policy response commensurate with the challenges that they face, to reflect the asymmetric economic and social burden borne by these territories relative to the rest of the Union, as well as the permanent strategic responsibilities they fulfil in safeguarding the Union's external borders, security and resilience. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas border regions are home to 30 % of the EU’s population and account for 40 % of its territory; the regions on the eastern flank, constituting a particularly vulnerable area of the Union, deserve a dedicated policy response commensurate with the challenges that they face; | B. whereas border regions are home to 30 % of the EU’s population and account for 40 % of its territory; the regions on the eastern flank, constituting a protective barrier for the entire EU and a particularly vulnerable part of its territory, deserve a dedicated policy and financial response, encompassing instruments relating to cohesion policy, competitiveness policy, security, research and development policies, and strategic investment, commensurate with the challenges that they face; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas border regions are home to 30 % of the EU’s population and account for 40 % of its territory; the regions on the eastern flank, constituting a particularly vulnerable area of the Union, deserve a dedicated policy response commensurate with the challenges that they face; | B. whereas border regions are home to 30 % of the EU’s population and account for 40 % of its territory; the regions on the eastern flank, constituting a particularly vulnerable area of the Union, deserve a dedicated policy response commensurate with the challenges that they face, to reflect the asymmetric economic and social burden borne by these territories relative to the rest of the Union; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas border regions are home to 30 % of the EU’s population and account for 40 % of its territory; the regions on the eastern flank, constituting a particularly vulnerable area of the Union, deserve a dedicated policy response commensurate with the challenges that they face; | B. whereas border regions are home to 30 % of the EU’s population and account for 40 % of its territory; the regions on the eastern flank, constituting a particularly vulnerable area of the Union, deserve a dedicated policy response commensurate with the challenges that they face to reflect the asymmetric economic and social burden borne by these territories relative to the rest of the Union; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas border regions are home to 30 % of the EU’s population and account for 40 % of its territory; the regions on the eastern flank, constituting a particularly vulnerable area of the Union, deserve a dedicated policy response commensurate with the challenges that they face; | B. whereas border regions are home to 30 % of the EU’s population and account for 40 % of its territory; the regions on the eastern flank, constituting a particularly vulnerable area of the Union, deserve a dedicated policy response commensurate with the challenges that they face; whereas one third of the population of rural regions, lives in a border region; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| B. whereas border regions are home to 30 % of the EU’s population and account for 40 % of its territory; the regions on the eastern flank, constituting a particularly vulnerable area of the Union, deserve a dedicated policy response commensurate with the challenges that they face; | B. whereas border regions are home to 30 % of the EU’s population and account for 40 % of its territory; the regions on the eastern flank, constituting a particularly vulnerable area of the Union, deserve a dedicated and targeted policy response commensurate with the challenges that they face, including adverse effects of climate change; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ba. whereas the challenges facing the Eastern Border regions extend well beyond the territories immediately adjacent to the external border, as incidents involving a military threat, such as drone incursions into Union airspace, generate security, economic and societal consequences across entire regions and Member States; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas the eastern border regions have experienced a significant population decline – by an average of 2.6 % between 2016 and 2025 – while the population of the EU as a whole has increased by 1.2 %; some of these regions have lost more than 10 % of their population, and, in extreme cases, more than 17 % of their inhabitants, over the last decade; labour shortages and the emigration of young people are undermining the long-term prospects for regional development; | C. whereas the eastern border regions have experienced a significant population decline – by an average of 2.6 % between 2016 and 2025 – while the population of the EU as a whole has increased by 1.2 %; some of these regions have lost more than 10 % of their population, and, in extreme cases, more than 17 % of their inhabitants, over the last decade; labour shortages and the emigration of young people are undermining the long-term prospects for regional development and increasing the need for targeted cohesion policy measures to strengthen territorial resilience, economic competitiveness and social cohesion, while supporting talent retention, attracting skilled workers and creating the conditions for young people and families to remain in or return to these regions. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas the eastern border regions have experienced a significant population decline – by an average of 2.6 % between 2016 and 2025 – while the population of the EU as a whole has increased by 1.2 %; some of these regions have lost more than 10 % of their population, and, in extreme cases, more than 17 % of their inhabitants, over the last decade; labour shortages and the emigration of young people are undermining the long-term prospects for regional development; | C. whereas the eastern border regions have experienced a significant population decline – by an average of 2.6 % between 2016 and 2025 – while the population of the EU as a whole has increased by 1.2 %; some of these regions have lost more than 10 % of their population, and, in extreme cases, more than 17 % of their inhabitants, over the last decade; labour shortages and the emigration of young people are undermining the long-term prospects for regional development while exacerbating the challenges associated with providing services for older people; the depopulation of border regions poses a threat not only to their socio-economic development, but also to the security and resilience of the European Union as a whole; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas the eastern border regions have experienced a significant population decline – by an average of 2.6 % between 2016 and 2025 – while the population of the EU as a whole has increased by 1.2 %; some of these regions have lost more than 10 % of their population, and, in extreme cases, more than 17 % of their inhabitants, over the last decade; labour shortages and the emigration of young people are undermining the long-term prospects for regional development; | C. whereas the eastern border regions have experienced a significant population decline – by an average of 2.6 % between 2016 and 2025 – while the population of the EU as a whole has increased by 1.2 %; some of these regions have lost more than 10 % of their population, and, in extreme cases, more than 17 % of their inhabitants, over the last decade; labour shortages and the emigration of young people are undermining the long-term prospects for regional development, further widening regional disparities and increasing the need for targeted cohesion policy measures to strengthen territorial resilience, economic competitiveness and social cohesion; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas the eastern border regions have experienced a significant population decline – by an average of 2.6 % between 2016 and 2025 – while the population of the EU as a whole has increased by 1.2 %; some of these regions have lost more than 10 % of their population, and, in extreme cases, more than 17 % of their inhabitants, over the last decade; labour shortages and the emigration of young people are undermining the long-term prospects for regional development; | C. whereas the eastern border regions have experienced a significant population decline – by an average of 2.6 % between 2016 and 2025 – while the population of the EU as a whole has increased by 1.2 %; some of these regions have lost more than 10 % of their population, and, in extreme cases, more than 17 % of their inhabitants, over the last decade; labour shortages and the emigration of young people are undermining the long-term prospects for regional development further widening regional disparities and increasing the need for targeted cohesion policy measures to strengthen territorial resilience, economic competitiveness and social cohesion; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| C. whereas the eastern border regions have experienced a significant population decline – by an average of 2.6 % between 2016 and 2025 – while the population of the EU as a whole has increased by 1.2 %; some of these regions have lost more than 10 % of their population, and, in extreme cases, more than 17 % of their inhabitants, over the last decade; labour shortages and the emigration of young people are undermining the long-term prospects for regional development; | C. whereas the eastern border regions have experienced a significant population decline – by an average of 2.6 % between 2016 and 2025 – while the population of the EU as a whole has increased by 1.2 %; some of these regions have lost more than 10 % of their population, and, in extreme cases, more than 17 % of their inhabitants, over the last decade; labour shortages and the emigration of young people are undermining the long-term prospects for regional development; whereas mass departures from border regions, especially on the part of young people and skilled labour, illustrates the lack of economic development in such regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas the eastern border regions are disproportionally bearing the costs of hosting war refugees: by early 2026, over 1.3 million Ukrainian refugees had been registered in Poland alone, and significant numbers of them have settled in the border regions of Romania, Hungary and Slovakia; whereas these regions must simultaneously cope with an outflow of their own residents and growing demand for public services from new arrivals; | D. whereas the eastern border regions are disproportionally bearing the costs of hosting war refugees: by early 2026, over 1.3 million Ukrainian refugees had been registered in Poland alone, and significant numbers of them have settled in the border regions of Romania, Hungary and Slovakia; whereas these regions must simultaneously cope with an outflow of their own residents and growing demand for public services from new arrivals; whereas this burden has largely been borne by national, regional and local funds, without adequate compensation from the EU budget, which provides justification for the establishment of a permanent financial support mechanism for the regions bearing the heaviest burden; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas the eastern border regions are disproportionally bearing the costs of hosting war refugees: by early 2026, over 1.3 million Ukrainian refugees had been registered in Poland alone, and significant numbers of them have settled in the border regions of Romania, Hungary and Slovakia; whereas these regions must simultaneously cope with an outflow of their own residents and growing demand for public services from new arrivals; | D. whereas the eastern border regions are disproportionally bearing the costs of hosting war refugees: by early 2026, over 1.3 million Ukrainian refugees had been registered in Poland alone, and significant numbers of them have settled in the border regions of Romania, Hungary and Slovakia; whereas these regions must simultaneously cope with an outflow of their own residents and growing demand for public services from new arrivals; whereas migration pressure, as well as the efforts involved in protecting the European Union’s external borders, should be taken into account as a permanent factor in assessing the financial needs of border regions, even after the end of hostilities; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas the eastern border regions are disproportionally bearing the costs of hosting war refugees: by early 2026, over 1.3 million Ukrainian refugees had been registered in Poland alone, and significant numbers of them have settled in the border regions of Romania, Hungary and Slovakia; whereas these regions must simultaneously cope with an outflow of their own residents and growing demand for public services from new arrivals; | D. whereas the eastern border regions are disproportionally bearing the costs of hosting war refugees: by early 2026, over 1.3 million Ukrainian refugees had been registered in Poland alone, and significant numbers of them have settled in the border regions of Romania, Hungary and Slovakia; whereas these regions must simultaneously cope with an outflow of their own residents and growing demand for public services from new arrivals, placing sustained pressure on local budgets, healthcare, education, housing and public infrastructure, while assuming responsibilities on behalf of the Union as a whole that should be adequately recognised in future cohesion policy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas the eastern border regions are disproportionally bearing the costs of hosting war refugees: by early 2026, over 1.3 million Ukrainian refugees had been registered in Poland alone, and significant numbers of them have settled in the border regions of Romania, Hungary and Slovakia; whereas these regions must simultaneously cope with an outflow of their own residents and growing demand for public services from new arrivals; | D. whereas the eastern border regions are disproportionally bearing the costs of hosting war refugees: by early 2026, over 1.3 million Ukrainian refugees had been registered in Poland alone, and significant numbers of them have settled in the border regions of Romania, Hungary and Slovakia; whereas the Baltic States host beneficiaries of temporary protection at levels well above the Union average relative to their population; whereas these regions must simultaneously cope with an outflow of their own residents and growing demand for public services from new arrivals; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| D. whereas the eastern border regions are disproportionally bearing the costs of hosting war refugees: by early 2026, over 1.3 million Ukrainian refugees had been registered in Poland alone, and significant numbers of them have settled in the border regions of Romania, Hungary and Slovakia; whereas these regions must simultaneously cope with an outflow of their own residents and growing demand for public services from new arrivals; | D. whereas border regions, especially southern and the eastern border regions are disproportionally bearing the costs of hosting war refugees: by early 2026, over 1.3 million Ukrainian refugees had been registered in Poland alone, and significant numbers of them have settled in the border regions of Romania, Hungary and Slovakia; whereas these regions must simultaneously cope with an outflow of their own residents and growing demand for public services from new arrivals; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Da. recognises that the eastern border regions incur permanent structural costs associated with safeguarding the Union's external border, maintaining strategic transport corridors, ensuring customs capacity, supporting military mobility and responding to geopolitical crises; considers that these additional responsibilities should be adequately reflected in future Union funding mechanisms. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Da. whereas the implications of climate change can have a huge impact on all European regions, bringing more drastic changes to the life of people and livelihood of regions especially in less developed and border areas, mainly located in the southern and eastern parts of Europe; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| E. whereas the consequences of the closure of the borders with Russia and Belarus are being felt directly by local communities and businesses in the eastern border regions; whereas the volume of rail freight traffic on the corridors serving these borders has fallen by 75-80 %, and the number of overnight stays by foreign tourists in the most affected regions has decreased by 10-35 %; whereas in the period 2022 to 2023, Member States on the eastern flank recorded inflation rates approximately 3-4 percentage points higher than the EU average as well as slower economic growth; whereas these effects compound existing problems linked to the peripheral nature of these regions, their poor transport connectivity and limited attractiveness to investors; | E. whereas the consequences of the closure of the borders with Russia and Belarus are being felt directly by local communities and businesses in the eastern border regions; whereas the volume of rail freight traffic on the corridors serving these borders has fallen by 75-80 %, and the number of overnight stays by foreign tourists in the most affected regions has decreased by 10-35 %; whereas in the period 2022 to 2023, Member States on the eastern flank recorded inflation rates approximately 3-4 percentage points higher than the EU average as well as slower economic growth; whereas these effects compound existing problems linked to the peripheral nature of these regions, their poor transport connectivity and limited attractiveness to investors; whereas the regions bordering Ukraine are experiencing similar adverse effects resulting from the ongoing armed conflict and are bearing long-term costs associated with acting as the European Union’s main logistics, transport and humanitarian hub, including increased strain on transport infrastructure, border crossings, public services, and health and education systems; whereas these adverse effects also include lost investment opportunities resulting from an increase in the perceived risk of doing business, particularly in regions directly neighbouring Ukraine, owing to their proximity to the ongoing hostilities; whereas the Commission should develop a methodology for estimating the geopolitical costs incurred by border regions and take these into account when allocating funds; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| E. whereas the consequences of the closure of the borders with Russia and Belarus are being felt directly by local communities and businesses in the eastern border regions; whereas the volume of rail freight traffic on the corridors serving these borders has fallen by 75-80 %, and the number of overnight stays by foreign tourists in the most affected regions has decreased by 10-35 %; whereas in the period 2022 to 2023, Member States on the eastern flank recorded inflation rates approximately 3-4 percentage points higher than the EU average as well as slower economic growth; whereas these effects compound existing problems linked to the peripheral nature of these regions, their poor transport connectivity and limited attractiveness to investors; | E. whereas the consequences of the closure of the borders with Russia and Belarus are being felt directly by local communities and businesses in the eastern border regions; whereas the volume of rail freight traffic on the corridors serving these borders has fallen by 75-80 %, and the number of overnight stays by foreign tourists in the most affected regions has decreased by 10-35 %; whereas in the period 2022 to 2023, Member States on the eastern flank recorded inflation rates approximately 3-4 percentage points higher than the EU average as well as slower economic growth; whereas these effects compound existing problems linked to the peripheral nature of these regions, their poor transport connectivity and limited attractiveness to investors; whereas border communities also bear the costs associated with the migratory pressure being instrumentalised by the Belarusian regime and with the need to build and maintain border security infrastructure, which places an additional burden on local public finances and leads to a deterioration in the conditions for doing business; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| E. whereas the consequences of the closure of the borders with Russia and Belarus are being felt directly by local communities and businesses in the eastern border regions; whereas the volume of rail freight traffic on the corridors serving these borders has fallen by 75-80 %, and the number of overnight stays by foreign tourists in the most affected regions has decreased by 10-35 %; whereas in the period 2022 to 2023, Member States on the eastern flank recorded inflation rates approximately 3-4 percentage points higher than the EU average as well as slower economic growth; whereas these effects compound existing problems linked to the peripheral nature of these regions, their poor transport connectivity and limited attractiveness to investors; | E. whereas the consequences of the closure of the borders with Russia and Belarus are being felt directly by local communities and businesses in the eastern border regions; whereas the volume of rail freight traffic on the corridors serving these borders has fallen by 75-80 %, and the number of overnight stays by foreign tourists in the most affected regions has decreased by 10-35 %; whereas in the period 2022 to 2023, Member States on the eastern flank have experienced weaker real GDP growth since the start of the war, with growth in 2022–2023 estimated to be 1.4–1.8 percentage points lower than the EU average and recorded inflation rates approximately 3-4 percentage points higher than the EU average as well as slower economic growth; whereas these effects compound existing problems linked to the peripheral nature of these regions, their poor transport connectivity and limited attractiveness to investors; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| E. whereas the consequences of the closure of the borders with Russia and Belarus are being felt directly by local communities and businesses in the eastern border regions; whereas the volume of rail freight traffic on the corridors serving these borders has fallen by 75-80 %, and the number of overnight stays by foreign tourists in the most affected regions has decreased by 10-35 %; whereas in the period 2022 to 2023, Member States on the eastern flank recorded inflation rates approximately 3-4 percentage points higher than the EU average as well as slower economic growth; whereas these effects compound existing problems linked to the peripheral nature of these regions, their poor transport connectivity and limited attractiveness to investors; | E. whereas the consequences of the closure of the borders with Russia and Belarus are being felt directly by local communities and businesses in the eastern border regions; whereas the volume of rail freight traffic on the corridors serving these borders has fallen by 75-80 %, and the number of overnight stays by foreign tourists in the most affected regions has decreased by 10-35 %; whereas in the period 2022 to 2023, Member States on the eastern flank have experienced weaker real GDP growth since the start of the war, with growth in 2022–2023 estimated to be 1.4–1.8 percentage points lower than the EU average and recorded inflation rates approximately 3-4 percentage points higher than the EU average as well as slower economic growth; whereas these effects compound existing problems linked to the peripheral nature of these regions, their poor transport connectivity and limited attractiveness to investors; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| E. whereas the consequences of the closure of the borders with Russia and Belarus are being felt directly by local communities and businesses in the eastern border regions; whereas the volume of rail freight traffic on the corridors serving these borders has fallen by 75-80 %, and the number of overnight stays by foreign tourists in the most affected regions has decreased by 10-35 %; whereas in the period 2022 to 2023, Member States on the eastern flank recorded inflation rates approximately 3-4 percentage points higher than the EU average as well as slower economic growth; whereas these effects compound existing problems linked to the peripheral nature of these regions, their poor transport connectivity and limited attractiveness to investors; | E. whereas the consequences of the closure of the borders with Russia and Belarus are being felt directly by local communities and businesses in the eastern border regions; whereas the volume of rail freight traffic on the corridors serving these borders has fallen by 75-80 %, and the number of overnight stays by foreign tourists in the most affected regions has decreased by 10-35 %; whereas in the period 2022 to 2023, Member States on the eastern flank have experienced weaker real GDP growth since the start of the war, with growth in 2022–2023 estimated to be 1.4–1.8 percentage points lower than the EU average and recorded inflation rates approximately 3-4 percentage points higher than the EU average as well as slower economic growth; whereas these effects compound existing problems linked to the peripheral nature of these regions, their poor transport connectivity and limited attractiveness to investors; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| E. whereas the consequences of the closure of the borders with Russia and Belarus are being felt directly by local communities and businesses in the eastern border regions; whereas the volume of rail freight traffic on the corridors serving these borders has fallen by 75-80 %, and the number of overnight stays by foreign tourists in the most affected regions has decreased by 10-35 %; whereas in the period 2022 to 2023, Member States on the eastern flank recorded inflation rates approximately 3-4 percentage points higher than the EU average as well as slower economic growth; whereas these effects compound existing problems linked to the peripheral nature of these regions, their poor transport connectivity and limited attractiveness to investors; | E. whereas the consequences of the closure of the borders with Russia and Belarus are being felt directly by local communities and businesses in the eastern border regions; whereas the volume of rail freight traffic on the corridors serving these borders has fallen by 75-80 %, and the number of overnight stays by foreign tourists in the most affected regions has decreased by 10-35 %; whereas in the period 2022 to 2023, Member States on the eastern flank recorded inflation rates approximately 3-4 percentage points higher than the EU average as well as slower economic growth; whereas these effects compound existing problems linked to the peripheral nature of these regions, their sustainable development and poor transport connectivity and consequently limited attractiveness to investors; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ea. whereas Member States bordering Ukraine have substantially increased their support for Ukraine's resistance against Russia's aggression, notably through the EU–Ukraine Solidarity Lanes, which have mobilised nearly EUR 2 billion to strengthen cross-border road and rail connectivity, improve Danube navigability and expand capacity at key border crossings and ports such as Constanța, thereby sustaining Ukraine's export routes and vital trade flows; whereas these Member States have simultaneously reinforced their own security and energy resilience, including through improved military mobility and cross-border energy interconnections supported by the Connecting Europe Facility, thereby also strengthening connectivity and cooperation with Ukraine and Moldova; whereas, in doing so, these Member States are bearing a considerable share of the overall efforts to building resilience in response to increased pressure, including an influx of displaced persons, strained public services and disrupted trade and transport networks; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ea. whereas Member States bordering Ukraine have substantially increased their support for Ukraine's resistance against Russia's aggression, notably through the EU–Ukraine Solidarity Lanes, which have mobilised nearly EUR 2 billion to strengthen cross-border road and rail connectivity, improve Danube navigability and expand capacity at key border crossings and ports such as Constanța, thereby sustaining Ukraine's export routes and vital trade flows; whereas these Member States have simultaneously reinforced their own security and energy resilience, including through improved military mobility and cross-border energy interconnections supported by the Connecting Europe Facility, thereby also strengthening connectivity and cooperation with Ukraine and Moldova; whereas, in doing so, these Member States are bearing a considerable share of the overall efforts to building resilience in response to increased pressure, including an influx of displaced persons, strained public services and disrupted trade and transport networks; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ea. whereas Member States bordering Ukraine have substantially increased their support for Ukraine's resistance against Russia's aggression, notably through the EU–Ukraine Solidarity Lanes, which have mobilised nearly EUR 2 billion to strengthen cross-border road and rail connectivity, improve Danube navigability and expand capacity at key border crossings and ports such as Constanța, thereby sustaining Ukraine's export routes and vital trade flows; whereas these Member States have simultaneously reinforced their own security and energy resilience, including through improved military mobility and cross-border energy interconnections supported by the Connecting Europe Facility, thereby also strengthening connectivity and cooperation with Ukraine and Moldova; whereas, in doing so, these Member States are bearing a considerable share of the overall efforts to building resilience in response to increased pressure, including an influx of displaced persons, strained public services and disrupted trade and transport networks; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ea. whereas Member States bordering Ukraine have substantially increased their support for Ukraine's resistance against Russia's aggression, notably through the EU–Ukraine Solidarity Lanes, which have mobilised nearly EUR 2 billion to strengthen cross-border road and rail connectivity, improve Danube navigability and expand capacity at key border crossings and ports such as Constanța, thereby sustaining Ukraine's export routes and vital trade flows; whereas these Member States have simultaneously reinforced their own security and energy resilience, including through improved military mobility and cross-border energy interconnections supported by the Connecting Europe Facility, thereby also strengthening connectivity and cooperation with Ukraine and Moldova; whereas, in doing so, these Member States are bearing a disproportionate share of the resulting pressure, including an influx of displaced persons, strained public services and disrupted trade and transport networks; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ea. Whereas Russia conducts coordinated hybrid activities, including large-scale disinformation and information manipulation campaigns aimed at undermining public trust in the European Union, NATO and democratic institutions, disseminating false narratives about Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and distorting historical facts; whereas such campaigns increasingly target young people through online platforms and social media and constitute a direct threat to democratic resilience and social cohesion in the eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ea. whereas the Member States on the eastern flank, including Poland, are making significant national investments as part of the Eastern Shield programme to strengthen and protect the Union’s external border, in the interests of the security of the Community as a whole; whereas this expenditure should be regarded as a contribution to European security and should be genuinely supplemented by additional EU funds instead of being replaced by the reallocation of cohesion policy funds; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ea. whereas repeated drone incidents and the associated airspace threat warnings have had a severe impact on the tourism industry in the Eastern Border regions, with foreign tour operators and tourists cancelling up to 60% of existing reservations in Latvia and overall bookings falling by approximately 40% compared with the previous year; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ea. whereas heightened geopolitical risk in eastern border regions increases the cost of capital, weakens investor confidence, raises insurance and logistics costs, disrupts supply chains and reduces the capacity of local SMEs to remain competitive within the single market; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Eb. whereas EU eastern border regions perform a strategic gateway function for the Union through key road, rail, customs, humanitarian and logistics corridors, which are essential for trade, military mobility, emergency response, reconstruction logistics, the functioning of the Solidarity Lanes; whereas this gateway function benefits the Union as a whole and should therefore be supported as a European strategic priority, rather than treated as a purely local or national responsibility; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Eb. whereas eastern Member States has provided direct and substantial energy support to the Republic of Moldova, including covering up to 62% of its electricity needs at points of acute shortage and supplying natural gas through the Iași–Chișinău pipeline, made necessary by Russia's targeted destruction of Ukraine's energy infrastructure, which had previously supplied a significant share of Moldova's electricity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Eb. whereas eastern Member States has provided direct and substantial energy support to the Republic of Moldova , including covering up to 62% of its electricity needs at points of acute shortage and supplying natural gas through the Iași–Chișinău pipeline, made necessary by Russia's targeted destruction of Ukraine's energy infrastructure, which had previously supplied a significant share of Moldova's electricity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Eb. whereas eastern Member States has provided direct and substantial energy support to the Republic of Moldova , including covering up to 62% of its electricity needs at points of acute shortage and supplying natural gas through the Iași–Chișinău pipeline, made necessary by Russia's targeted destruction of Ukraine's energy infrastructure, which had previously supplied a significant share of Moldova's electricity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Eb. whereas eastern Member States has provided direct and substantial energy support to the Republic of Moldova, including covering up to 62% of its electricity needs at points of acute shortage and supplying natural gas through the Iași–Chișinău pipeline, made necessary by Russia's targeted destruction of Ukraine's energy infrastructure, which had previously supplied a significant share of Moldova's electricity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Eb. whereas the deteriorating security perception is undermining investor confidence in the Eastern Border regions, with up to half of foreign investors in Latvia reconsidering their investment plans or making them conditional on circumstances owing to suboptimal investment conditions, and with cases of companies exiting the region already recorded; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ec. whereas the implementation of the Union's measures to facilitate Ukrainian exports has placed a disproportionate burden on the eastern border regions, where the increased transit and temporary concentration of agricultural products have generated significant market distortions, additional logistical and storage costs, downward pressure on agricultural prices and serious challenges for local farmers and agri-food businesses, which have contributed to the Union's solidarity efforts while bearing a disproportionate share of their economic consequences; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| F. whereas the Commission’s communication does not refer to the European Union’s existing macro-regional strategies, two of which – for the Baltic Sea and Danube regions – have territorial scopes that partially overlap with the territory of the eastern border regions defined in the strategy; | F. whereas the Commission’s communication does not refer to the European Union’s existing macro-regional strategies, two of which – for the Baltic Sea and Danube regions – have territorial scopes that partially overlap with the territory of the eastern border regions defined in the strategy; whereas this strategy also fails to take into account the ongoing work on the Macro-regional Strategy for the Carpathian Region, which could become an important instrument for strengthening resilience, territorial cohesion and cross-border cooperation with Ukraine; whereas the strategy for the eastern border regions should remain complementary to both existing and future EU macro-regional strategies; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Fa. whereas administrative capacity is a fundamental precondition for the absorption of EU funds, the implementation of investments and the delivery of quality public services; whereas in eastern border regions, the combination of geopolitical pressure, demographic decline and institutional strain makes administrative capacity not a technical matter but a strategic priority requiring dedicated and sustained European support; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas the European Union has decided to open accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova; | G. whereas the European Union has decided to open accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova; whereas Ukraine's accession process entails significant economic and social consequences for the neighbouring eastern border regions, in particular for the agricultural, processing and transport sectors, which require appropriate safeguard measures, transitional periods and effective mechanisms to protect the market and ensure fair competition; whereas Ukraine’s accession to the Union cannot take place until Ukraine renounces the nationalist legacy of the Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army, and has fully come to terms with the genocide perpetrated by these formations against the Polish population, in particular the Volhynia massacre, including by facilitating the full exhumation of the victims and their dignified commemoration, and until it ceases to glorify these formations and to promote Nazi and nationalist symbols within its armed forces; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas the European Union has decided to open accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova; | G. whereas the European Union has decided to open accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova, recognising that its role and responsibility in the Black Sea region is increasing and that the enlargement process constitutes a strategic investment to enhance regional security and resilience; whereas the Black Sea region, encompassing the Union's Black Sea Member States, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and other regional partners, represents almost 164 million people and a combined GDP of approximately EUR 2 trillion, underlining its considerable economic and geostrategic significance for the Union; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas the European Union has decided to open accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova; | G. whereas the European Union has decided to open accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova, recognising that its role and responsibility in the Black Sea region is increasing and that the enlargement process constitutes a strategic investment to enhance regional security and resilience; whereas the Black Sea region, encompassing the Union's Black Sea Member States, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and other regional partners, represents almost 164 million people and a combined GDP of approximately EUR 2 trillion, underlining its considerable economic and geostrategic significance for the Union; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| G. whereas the European Union has decided to open accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova; | G. whereas the European Union has decided to open accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova recognising that its role and responsibility in the Black Sea region is increasing and that the enlargement process constitutes a strategic investment to enhance regional security and resilience; whereas the Black Sea region encompassing the Union's Black Sea Member States, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and other regional partners, represents almost 164 million people and a combined GDP of approximately EUR 2 trillion, underlining its considerable economic and geostrategic significance for the Union; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ga. whereas the increasing investment pressure on Member States bordering Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova is compounded by Russia's continued attacks on regional infrastructure, which discourage private investment and increase insurance costs, underlining the urgency of reinforced EU financial and political support to accompany the integration of Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova into the internal market; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ga. whereas the increasing investment pressure on Member States bordering Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova is compounded by Russia's continued attacks on regional infrastructure, which discourage private investment and increase insurance costs, underlining the urgency of reinforced EU financial and political support to accompany the integration of Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova into the internal market; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ga. whereas the increasing investment pressure on Member States bordering Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova is compounded by Russia's continued attacks on regional infrastructure, which discourage private investment and increase insurance costs, underlining the urgency of reinforced EU financial and political support to accompany the integration of Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova into the internal market; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| H. whereas special economic zones are a tool for attracting investment to structurally weak regions affected by high unemployment and heightened geopolitical risks; the eastern border regions, characterised by a combination of these factors, require particular support in this regard; | H. whereas special economic zones are a tool for attracting investment to structurally weak regions affected by high unemployment and heightened geopolitical risks; the eastern border regions, characterised by a combination of these factors, require particular support in this regard; special economic zones, regional innovation ecosystems and dual-use technology clusters are key tools for strengthening the competitiveness of border regions; whereas the development of these regions’ industrial, logistical and technological potential will be of fundamental importance for Ukraine’s future reconstruction and for strengthening the economic resilience of the European Union as a whole; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| H. whereas special economic zones are a tool for attracting investment to structurally weak regions affected by high unemployment and heightened geopolitical risks; the eastern border regions, characterised by a combination of these factors, require particular support in this regard; | H. whereas special economic zones and regional aid instruments are a proven tool for attracting investment to structurally weak regions affected by high unemployment and heightened geopolitical risks; the eastern border regions, characterised by a combination of these factors, require particular support in this regard, including higher regional aid intensity, adjustments to regional aid maps and greater flexibility in the application of State aid rules to reflect the exceptional situation they are facing; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| H. whereas special economic zones are a tool for attracting investment to structurally weak regions affected by high unemployment and heightened geopolitical risks; the eastern border regions, characterised by a combination of these factors, require particular support in this regard; | H. whereas special economic zones are a tool for attracting investment to structurally weak regions affected by climate change, high unemployment and heightened geopolitical risks; the eastern border regions, characterised by a combination of these factors, require particular support in this regard; whereas brain drain disproportionately affects less developed and border regions and if left unaddressed, the phenomenon will have long-term and permanent effects on the future of the European Union; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| H. whereas special economic zones are a tool for attracting investment to structurally weak regions affected by high unemployment and heightened geopolitical risks; the eastern border regions, characterised by a combination of these factors, require particular support in this regard; | H. whereas special economic zones, industrial parks, resilience clusters and regional investment platforms are tools for attracting investment to structurally weak regions affected by high unemployment, depopulation, weakened connectivity and heightened geopolitical risks; the eastern border regions, characterised by a combination of these factors, require particular support in this regard; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ha. whereas strong administrative capacity is an essential prerequisite for the effective absorption of Union funds, the successful implementation of investments and the provision of high-quality public services; whereas in the eastern border regions, the combined effects of geopolitical challenges, demographic decline and institutional pressures make administrative capacity a strategic necessity rather than merely a technical issue, requiring targeted and long-term support at European level; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ha. Whereas insufficient transport, digital and energy connectivity, together with the interruption of long-established economic relations with Russia and Belarus, have further weakened the competitiveness of the eastern border regions, discouraged private investment and deepened their structural economic disadvantages; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ha. whereas mass departures from border regions, especially on the part of young people and skilled labour, illustrates the lack of economic development in such regions and where cross-border cooperation can help to create new opportunities of employment and sustainable economic development; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Ha. whereas the security, resilience and competitiveness of the European Union are interlinked, and the development of the eastern border regions represents an investment in the achievement of all three objectives simultaneously; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Hb. whereas the development of dual-use technologies, in particular in the fields of aviation, unmanned systems, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, robotics and space technologies, constitutes one of the pillars of the European Union’s economic resilience and security; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Hb. Whereas the economic, political and social relations and partnership between the eastern border regions and Ukraine drastically changed since the full scale invasion of the country, reshaping the necessities, the cooperation and investment priorities; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Hc. whereas investment in the eastern border regions is not merely a component of cohesion policy, but constitutes an investment in the security, resilience, competitiveness and strategic autonomy of the European Union as a whole; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Hc. Whereas the Republic of Moldova is also deeply affected by the war in Ukraine, the disinformation campaigns lead and/or funded by Russia and has to find new means and partners to resolve the economic and social challenges; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Hd. Whereas limited energy autonomy, higher energy prices and insufficient local renewable energy production increase the cost of living and production in many eastern border regions; whereas the development of diversified and locally available energy sources, including geothermal energy where appropriate, contributes to both regional competitiveness and strategic resilience; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on the EU’s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, entitled ‘Strong regions for a secure Europe’, and regards it as an important first step towards a comprehensive European strategy for these territories; stresses, however, that this Communication should mark the start of legislative action, rather than a substitute for it; is firmly convinced that the scale of the challenges facing the eastern border regions calls for a dedicated and long-term financial response, primarily within through cohesion policy, commensurate with their contribution to the security, resilience and territorial integrity of the Union; stresses that this response must involve genuine additional resources, rather than the mere reallocation of existing cohesion policy funds; | 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on the EU’s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, entitled ‘Strong regions for a secure Europe’, and regards it as an important first step towards a comprehensive European strategy for these territories; stresses, however, that this Communication should mark the start of legislative action, rather than a substitute for it; is firmly convinced that the scale of the challenges facing the eastern border regions calls for a dedicated and long-term financial response, primarily within through cohesion policy, commensurate with their contribution to the security, resilience and territorial integrity of the Union; stresses that this response must involve genuine additional resources, rather than the mere reallocation of existing cohesion policy funds; calls on the Commission to present a proposal for a regulation establishing a European Instrument for Eastern Border Regions, financed from new resources within the Multiannual Financial Framework; stresses that this instrument should form an integral and permanent part of the architecture of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2028-2034 and provide long-term structural support, independent of the duration of hostilities and without affecting the level of core regional allocations under cohesion policy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on the EU’s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, entitled ‘Strong regions for a secure Europe’, and regards it as an important first step towards a comprehensive European strategy for these territories; stresses, however, that this Communication should mark the start of legislative action, rather than a substitute for it; is firmly convinced that the scale of the challenges facing the eastern border regions calls for a dedicated and long-term financial response, primarily within through cohesion policy, commensurate with their contribution to the security, resilience and territorial integrity of the Union; stresses that this response must involve genuine additional resources, rather than the mere reallocation of existing cohesion policy funds; | 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on the EU’s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, entitled ‘Strong regions for a secure Europe’, and regards it as an important first step towards a comprehensive European strategy for these territories; stresses, however, that this Communication should mark the start of legislative action, rather than a substitute for it; is firmly convinced that the scale of the challenges facing the eastern border regions calls for a dedicated and long-term financial response, primarily within through cohesion policy, commensurate with their contribution to the security, resilience and territorial integrity of the Union; stresses that this response must involve genuine additional resources, rather than the mere reallocation of existing cohesion policy funds; stresses that the future Multiannual Financial Framework must maintain cohesion policy as a distinct, strong and partnership-based Union policy, under shared management with the full involvement of regional and local authorities; rejects any solution that would lead to a dilution of its regional character within a single fund or centralised national plans, as well as any cuts to the total budget for cohesion policy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on the EU’s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, entitled ‘Strong regions for a secure Europe’, and regards it as an important first step towards a comprehensive European strategy for these territories; stresses, however, that this Communication should mark the start of legislative action, rather than a substitute for it; is firmly convinced that the scale of the challenges facing the eastern border regions calls for a dedicated and long-term financial response, primarily within through cohesion policy, commensurate with their contribution to the security, resilience and territorial integrity of the Union; stresses that this response must involve genuine additional resources, rather than the mere reallocation of existing cohesion policy funds; | 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on the EU’s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, entitled ‘Strong regions for a secure Europe’, and regards it as an important first step towards a comprehensive European strategy for these territories; stresses, however, that this Communication should mark the start of legislative action, rather than a substitute for it; is firmly convinced that the scale of the challenges facing the eastern border regions calls for a dedicated and long-term financial response, primarily within through cohesion policy, complemented by instruments under direct and indirect management of the Union commensurate with their contribution to the security, resilience and territorial integrity of the Union; underlines that future financial and policy responses should preserve the long-term investment capacity of these regions while addressing emerging strategic priorities, and should, where appropriate, be accompanied by adequate financial resources commensurate with the scale of the challenges they face; stresses that this response must involve genuine additional resources, rather than the mere reallocation of existing cohesion policy funds; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on the EU’s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, entitled ‘Strong regions for a secure Europe’, and regards it as an important first step towards a comprehensive European strategy for these territories; stresses, however, that this Communication should mark the start of legislative action, rather than a substitute for it; is firmly convinced that the scale of the challenges facing the eastern border regions calls for a dedicated and long-term financial response, primarily within through cohesion policy, commensurate with their contribution to the security, resilience and territorial integrity of the Union; stresses that this response must involve genuine additional resources, rather than the mere reallocation of existing cohesion policy funds; | 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on the EU’s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, entitled ‘Strong regions for a secure Europe’, and regards it as an important first step towards a comprehensive European strategy for these territories; stresses, however, that this Communication should mark the start of legislative action, rather than a substitute for it; is firmly convinced that the scale of the challenges facing the eastern border regions calls for a dedicated and long-term financial response, primarily within through cohesion policy, commensurate with their contribution to the security, resilience and territorial integrity of the Union; calls, therefore, for the establishment under the 2028-2034 cohesion policy framework of a dedicated and ring-fenced financial envelope for the eastern border regions, additional to the national and regional allocations otherwise available to the Member States concerned and distributed on the basis of objective territorial vulnerability and strategic-function criteria; stresses that this response must involve genuine additional resources, rather than the mere reallocation of existing cohesion policy funds; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on the EU’s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, entitled ‘Strong regions for a secure Europe’, and regards it as an important first step towards a comprehensive European strategy for these territories; stresses, however, that this Communication should mark the start of legislative action, rather than a substitute for it; is firmly convinced that the scale of the challenges facing the eastern border regions calls for a dedicated and long-term financial response, primarily within through cohesion policy, commensurate with their contribution to the security, resilience and territorial integrity of the Union; stresses that this response must involve genuine additional resources, rather than the mere reallocation of existing cohesion policy funds; | 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on the EU’s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, entitled ‘Strong regions for a secure Europe’, and regards it as an important first step towards a comprehensive European strategy for these territories; stresses, however, that this Communication should mark the start of legislative action, rather than a substitute for it; is firmly convinced that the scale of the challenges facing the eastern border regions calls for a dedicated and long-term financial response, primarily within through cohesion policy, commensurate with their contribution to the security, resilience and territorial integrity of the Union; stresses that this response must involve genuine additional resources, rather than the mere reallocation of existing cohesion policy funds; insists that a dedicated allocation of EUR 8 000 000 000 from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) be provided for this purpose within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on the EU’s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, entitled ‘Strong regions for a secure Europe’, and regards it as an important first step towards a comprehensive European strategy for these territories; stresses, however, that this Communication should mark the start of legislative action, rather than a substitute for it; is firmly convinced that the scale of the challenges facing the eastern border regions calls for a dedicated and long-term financial response, primarily within through cohesion policy, commensurate with their contribution to the security, resilience and territorial integrity of the Union; stresses that this response must involve genuine additional resources, rather than the mere reallocation of existing cohesion policy funds; | 1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication on the EU’s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, entitled ‘Strong regions for a secure Europe’, and regards it as an important first step towards a comprehensive European strategy for these territories; stresses, however, that this Communication should mark the start of legislative action, rather than a substitute for it; is firmly convinced that the scale of the challenges facing the eastern border regions calls for a dedicated and long-term financial response, primarily within through cohesion policy, commensurate with their contribution to the security, resilience, fight against climate change and territorial integrity of the Union; stresses that this response must involve genuine additional resources, rather than the mere reallocation of existing cohesion policy funds; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. Calls, therefore, for the creation of a dedicated Eastern Border Top-up Allocation in the 2028-2034 MFF for Member States with eligible eastern border regions, additional to their national envelopes and regional allocations, ring-fenced for investments in territorial resilience, civil preparedness, dual-use infrastructure, military mobility, connectivity, critical infrastructure, border management, economic recovery and public services in the eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. Underlines that no Member State or region located on the Union's eastern border should be left alone in addressing the consequences of Russia's military aggression, hybrid threats and geopolitical pressure; stresses that solidarity with the eastern border regions is not merely an expression of cohesion policy but a strategic investment in the security, resilience and future prosperity of the entire European Union; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. Stresses as well that all European regions have to play a decisive role in tackling climate change challenges, in coordinated actions with their surrounding regions; points out that the climate change has a serious effect on the border regions including but not limited to the need to search for a common cross-border tailor-made solutions to such natural disasters as forest fires and floods; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. Calls for the establishment, under the 2028-2034 multiannual financial framework, of a dedicated and sufficiently funded financial envelope for the Union’s eastern border regions, providing predictable multiannual support for territorial resilience, strategic connectivity, economic competitiveness and public services; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1b. Stresses that the Eastern Border Top-up Allocation should follow the logic of existing specific territorial instruments used by the Union for territories facing permanent or structural constraints, including specific additional allocations and tailored implementation rules, while reflecting the specific nature of eastern border regions as territories exposed to war-related, hybrid, demographic, economic and security pressures; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1b. Welcomes the inclusion of support for all external border regions, including the regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, in the horizontal part of the negotiating box for the 2028-2034 multiannual financial framework; insists that this commitment be maintained as a clear priority throughout the negotiations and be translated into concrete provisions and adequate funding allocations across the relevant instruments; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1c. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the Eastern Border Top-up Allocation is calculated on the basis of an objective formula combining, inter alia, the length of the external borders with Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, the population of eligible eastern border regions, their level of economic and demographic vulnerability, exposure to hybrid threats, refugee and evacuation pressure, the loss of cross-border trade and tourism, the strategic relevance of transport and logistics corridors, and the role of the region in supporting Ukraine and Moldova; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Recalls that the cohesion policy mid-term review led to the reallocation of approximately EUR 34.6 billion from cohesion policy funds to new priorities in 25 Member States; welcomes the increased levels of co-financing and pre-financing; notes, however, that these measures were conditional on the reallocation of at least 10 % of the programme’s funds to new priorities and did not involve the provision of additional Union financial resources; warns that rising expenditure on security and defence is placing increasing pressure on national budgets, limiting Member States’ ability to provide co-financing for cohesion policy programmes; | 2. Recalls that the cohesion policy mid-term review led to the reallocation of approximately EUR 34.6 billion from cohesion policy funds to new priorities in 25 Member States; welcomes the increased levels of co-financing and pre-financing; notes, however, that these measures were conditional on the reallocation of at least 10 % of the programme’s funds to new priorities and did not involve the provision of additional Union financial resources; stresses that the eastern border regions have made effective use of the additional opportunities introduced as part of the mid-term review by reallocating approximately EUR 5.6 billion to measures relating to military mobility, the development and production of key technologies, and the defence industry, thereby contributing to increased security in these regions, whilst maintaining economic competitiveness and long-term prospects for their inhabitants; warns that rising expenditure on security and defence is placing increasing pressure on national budgets, limiting Member States’ ability to provide co-financing for cohesion policy programmes; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Recalls that the cohesion policy mid-term review led to the reallocation of approximately EUR 34.6 billion from cohesion policy funds to new priorities in 25 Member States; welcomes the increased levels of co-financing and pre-financing; notes, however, that these measures were conditional on the reallocation of at least 10 % of the programme’s funds to new priorities and did not involve the provision of additional Union financial resources; warns that rising expenditure on security and defence is placing increasing pressure on national budgets, limiting Member States’ ability to provide co-financing for cohesion policy programmes; | 2. Recalls that the cohesion policy mid-term review led to the reallocation of approximately EUR 34.6 billion from cohesion policy funds to new priorities in 25 Member States; welcomes the increased levels of co-financing and pre-financing; notes, however, that these measures were conditional on the reallocation of at least 10 % of the programme’s funds to new priorities and did not involve the provision of additional Union financial resources; warns that rising expenditure on security and defence is placing increasing pressure on national budgets, limiting Member States’ ability to provide co-financing for cohesion policy programmes; stresses that expenditure on security and defence, while necessary, should be financed from genuinely additional and dedicated EU instruments and national resources, and not at the expense of cohesion policy or through the compulsory reallocation of its funds; calls on the Commission to discontinue the practice of making increased funding conditional on the reallocation of programme funds, which in practice shifts the burden of new priorities onto the regions and their inhabitants; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Recalls that the cohesion policy mid-term review led to the reallocation of approximately EUR 34.6 billion from cohesion policy funds to new priorities in 25 Member States; welcomes the increased levels of co-financing and pre-financing; notes, however, that these measures were conditional on the reallocation of at least 10 % of the programme’s funds to new priorities and did not involve the provision of additional Union financial resources; warns that rising expenditure on security and defence is placing increasing pressure on national budgets, limiting Member States’ ability to provide co-financing for cohesion policy programmes; | 2. Recalls that the cohesion policy mid-term review led to the reallocation of approximately EUR 34.6 billion from cohesion policy funds to new priorities in 25 Member States; welcomes the increased levels of co-financing and pre-financing; notes, however, that these measures were conditional on the reallocation of at least 10 % of the programme’s funds to new priorities and did not involve the provision of additional Union financial resources; warns that rising expenditure on security and defence is placing increasing pressure on national budgets, limiting Member States’ ability to provide co-financing for cohesion policy programmes; stresses that new security policy commitments must not be funded at the expense of traditional cohesion policy objectives; calls on the Commission to develop a separate co-financing mechanism for projects carried out by regions bearing particular geopolitical costs; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Recalls that the cohesion policy mid-term review led to the reallocation of approximately EUR 34.6 billion from cohesion policy funds to new priorities in 25 Member States; welcomes the increased levels of co-financing and pre-financing; notes, however, that these measures were conditional on the reallocation of at least 10 % of the programme’s funds to new priorities and did not involve the provision of additional Union financial resources; warns that rising expenditure on security and defence is placing increasing pressure on national budgets, limiting Member States’ ability to provide co-financing for cohesion policy programmes; | 2. Recalls that the cohesion policy mid-term review led to the reallocation of approximately EUR 34.6 billion from cohesion policy funds to new priorities in 25 Member States; welcomes the increased levels of co-financing and pre-financing; notes, however, that these measures were conditional on the reallocation of at least 10 % of the programme’s funds to new priorities and did not involve the provision of additional Union financial resources; warns that rising expenditure on security and defence is placing increasing pressure on national budgets, limiting Member States’ ability to provide appropriate co-financing for cohesion policy programmes; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2a. Stresses that access by eastern border regions to cohesion policy funds must not be made conditional on political conditionality mechanisms or macroeconomic conditionality, which lead to the withholding or suspension of payments; warns that the application of such mechanisms to regions playing a strategic role in the protection of the Union’s external border would undermine the security of the Community as a whole, as well as that of citizens and local authorities who bear no responsibility for disputes at national or institutional level; calls for these regions to be guaranteed stable, predictable and unconditional access to the funds to which they are entitled; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; | 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of particular significance for the security, competitiveness and strategic autonomy of the European Union, and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; in particular by ensuring that these territorial plans set out, as a requirement, the priorities, measures, indicators and financial allocations corresponding to the specific needs of the eastern border regions; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement and preparation of the regions to fulfil the role as an economic, logistical and institutional support hub for Ukraine’s reconstruction process, their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; calls on the Commission to establish a permanent European Forum of Eastern Regions as a platform for cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and regional authorities, responsible for monitoring the implementation of the strategy; stresses the need for the regions to be systematically involved in the preparation of legislation concerning security, military mobility, critical infrastructure and economic resilience; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; | 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are systematically reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans as well as in other relevant Union instruments; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework building on and strengthening the existing the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions supported by strengthened administrative capacity and robust mechanisms for territorial impact assessment; stresses that administrative capacity-building must be treated as a strategic investment, not merely as technical assistance, and must be directly linked to programme priorities, to beneficiaries and to the implementation ecosystem, rather than limited to the internal functioning of administrations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; | 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact; stresses that administrative capacity-building must be treated as a strategic investment, not merely as technical assistance, and must be directly linked to programme priorities, to beneficiaries and to the implementation ecosystem, rather than limited to the internal functioning of administrations; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; | 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; calls for the affected regions and local authorities to be involved in the preparation, amendment and implementation of the relevant plans, chapters and programmes on a compulsory basis; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; | 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, representatives of women and vulnerable groups such as persons with disabilities in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; | 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, focusing on the legislative package for the future EU financial perspective 2028-2034 including national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; | 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are sistematically reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans as well as in other relevant Union instruments; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, building on and strenghtening the existing Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, supported by strengthened administrative capacity and robust mechanisms for territorial impact assessment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; | 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise border regions, especially the southern and the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; | 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are systematically reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans as well as in other relevant Union instruments; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, supported by strengthened administrative capacity and robust mechanisms for territorial impact assessment |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; | 3. Calls on the Commission to recognise the eastern border regions as strategic territories of European significance and to ensure that their specific needs are reflected in future cohesion policy regulations and programmes, including in the 2028-2034 national and regional partnership plans; stresses the need to establish a structured governance framework, going beyond the Commission’s annual dialogue with the eastern border regions, to ensure the systematic involvement of their local and regional authorities, NGOs and civil society, including, in particular, youth organisations, in the implementation of the EU strategy for these regions, as well as mechanisms for assessing territorial impact and administrative capacity-building as part of its implementation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. Calls on the Commission, on the basis of its horizontal overview of all national and regional partnership plans (NRPPs), to ensure the strategic coordination and coherence of Union investments across all eastern border regions irrespective of national boundaries, including the Republic of Moldova as much as possible; stresses that this unique overview places the Commission in a position to move beyond fragmented national approaches and to actively shape a common European strategy for the eastern border regions through cohesion policy and other Union financial instruments; underlines that this coordinating role should enable the Commission to identify common challenges, to prevent investment fragmentation, to maximise cross-border synergies and to ensure that all relevant Union funding contributes to shared strategic objectives relating to security, resilience, competitiveness and territorial cohesion; stresses that the eastern border regions should be treated as one functionally interconnected European macro-area for the purposes of programming, implementation and evaluation of Union financial instruments, without prejudice to Member State competences; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the strategy for eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s existing macro-regional strategies, in particular the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region and the EU Strategy for the Danube Region, whose territorial scope partly overlaps with that of the eastern border regions; stresses that making use of existing management structures and macro-regional partnerships will help to avoid duplication of effort and increase the effectiveness of support, particularly in the Baltic Sea region and the Black Sea; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. Recalls that the climate change highly effects border areas; therefore highlights the need to increase efforts to fight climate change and enhance climate mitigation particularly in those regions; emphasize that Cohesion policy must support a strong climate mainstreaming in all sectors and ensure that all EU funding programmes and projects are embedded in strategies that support ambitious climate objectives; highlights the importance that regional environmental strategies are linked with ambitious climate targets that go beyond the overall target of achieving a climate neutral EU by 2050; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. Calls on the Commission to establish an Eastern Border Resilience Platform bringing together DG REGIO, DG DEFIS, DG HOME, DG MOVE, DG ENER, DG ECHO, the European Defence Agency, the European Investment Bank Group, Member States and local and regional authorities from the eastern border regions, in order to coordinate investment pipelines, remove implementation bottlenecks and ensure coherence between cohesion policy, defence readiness, civil protection and military mobility; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. Supports a revision by the Commission of the General Block Exemption Regulation and its assessment of the need to amend the existing guidelines on regional state aid in order to address the specific challenges facing eastern border regions, so that, through greater flexibility in this area, Member States can more effectively address investment gaps and market failures; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. calls on the Commission to provide greater implementation flexibility for programmes in the eastern border regions, including through simplified procedures for programme amendments, adapted eligibility rules and extended implementation deadlines where justified by the consequences of geopolitical developments; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. Calls on the Commission to actively integrate the European Union strategy for the Baltic Sea region (EUSBSR) and the Danube region into the new financing mechanisms and to make them key instruments of democratic cooperation, civil security and economic exchange; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3a. Insists on the full application of the partnership principle and multilevel governance throughout the preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of measures concerning eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to recognise the growing security risks faced by the EU's eastern border regions as a result of repeated drone incidents and the presence of drifting sea mines in the Black Sea linked to Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine; stresses that these threats directly endanger civilian populations, coastal communities and critical infrastructure; calls for enhanced Union support to strengthen preparedness, early-warning systems, civil protection capacities and the resilience of the affected regions. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3b. Calls for representatives of eastern border regions to participate directly in the relevant governance, monitoring and coordination structures established at Union and national level; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3c. Calls for dedicated technical assistance to strengthen the administrative, procurement, project-preparation and strategic-planning capacity of regional and local authorities in eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; | 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova; calls on the Commission to ensure the continuity and substantial reinforcement of the dedicated Interreg cooperation with the Republic of Moldova, supported by an adequate financial allocation that is additional to the resources intended to compensate regions affected by the suspension of cooperation programmes with Russia and Belarus; stresses that such cooperation should particularly benefit the Union's eastern regions bordering with Republic of Moldova and should support projects in the fields of transport, energy connectivity, border-crossing infrastructure, healthcare, education, civil protection, water and environmental resilience, digital connectivity and local economic development; emphasises its role in strengthening the resilience of the Union’s eastern border regions as well as the strengthening of candidate countries in their pre-accession phase; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; | 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced rebuild their partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; further calls for the future Interreg 2028–2034 programmes to include a dedicated North–South cooperation dimension among EU eastern border regions, enabling the exchange of good practices on administrative and civil resilience, the development of joint projects in infrastructure, energy, security and logistics, and the formulation of common positions on the adaptation of European instruments; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; | 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – constituting genuinely additional funds, rather than funds reallocated from the existing Interreg programme envelope – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank, as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova, without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; calls, furthermore, for the significant simplification of procedures and for technical support to be provided, so that these funds are genuinely accessible to smaller local authorities and beneficiaries in border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; | 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; underlines the need to close this gap by deepening cooperation between the democratic states bordering the Baltic Sea region, in particular through targeted support for cross-border civil society projects, youth exchange programmes and cultural initiatives; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; | 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; The Commission should also provide for the possibility of funding projects designed to prepare border regions for closer economic cooperation with Ukraine once hostilities have ceased; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; | 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; believes that cross-border cooperation is an essential step in EU pre-accession processes, which encourages candidate countries to share experience and learn on how the EU functions within; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; | 4. Stresses that the suspension of cross-border cooperation programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in in support for the EU’s eastern border regions; recalls that these regions have lost support amounting to approximately EUR 300 million, while only approximately EUR 150 million has been reallocated to other cross-border cooperation programmes, meaning that these regions have suffered a net loss of EUR 150 million in territorial cooperation and that this loss has not yet been compensated for; notes that these regions are currently forced to build new partnerships within the Union and that part of the funding has been redirected towards security and resilience objectives; points out that the loss of these programmes was not a choice made by the regions, but a consequence of a political decision taken at EU level, and that the regions deserve full financial compensation in the next financial framework; stresses that border regions should not be forced to choose between cohesion and security, and calls on the Commission to establish a dedicated allocation for regions bordering Russia and Belarus in future European territorial cooperation programmes after 2027; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; | 4. Recalls that the suspension of Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus has created a persistent rift in territorial cooperation on the Union’s eastern border; emphasises that the regions bordering Russia and Belarus have lost their traditional cooperation partners and are now forced to build new partnerships with other Member States; calls on Member States and regions to make full use of the potential offered by the BRIDGEforEU regulation to establish these partnerships; calls on the Commission to provide these regions with adequate support under the future Interreg programme post-2027, including dedicated funding opportunities reflecting their specific geopolitical situation, amounting to at least EUR 150 million – an allocation equivalent to the funds lost as a result of the suspension of programmes involving Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4a. Calls on the Commission to establish, within the framework of the future Interreg programme, a dedicated funding envelope amounting to at least the equivalent of the funds lost by the eastern border regions bordering Russia and Belarus; emphasises that such funding should enable these regions to establish partnerships with other regions on the EU’s eastern flank – as well as with regions in Ukraine and Moldova – without having to meet the standard geographical requirements of Interreg programmes; recognises that such surrogate partnerships are already being implemented in some regions and should be formalised and adequately funded in the next financial framework; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4a. Underlines that local and regional authorities play a key role in cross-border cooperation with neighboring countries through knowledge of the geographical, cultural, linguistic and social situation, opportunities, constraints and shared challenges; calls on the Member States to provide them with the tools and resources they need to foster ambitious cross-border cooperation; considers that local and regional authorities as well as citizens and NGOs must be more included in the decision-making and funding process to ensure that needs are addressed properly; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4a. Calls for the creation of a dedicated Eastern Border Cooperation Facility under Interreg post-2027, allowing regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine to establish cooperation with other eastern border regions, Ukraine, Moldova and relevant functional partners without being constrained by standard geographical eligibility rules; stresses that this facility should be financed with resources at least equivalent to the lost Russia and Belarus cooperation envelopes, adjusted to the duration and inflationary context of the 2028-2034 period; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4a. Calls for the future Interreg 2028-2034 programmes to include a dedicated North-South cooperation dimension among EU eastern border regions, enabling the exchange of good practices on administrative and civil resilience, the development of joint projects in infrastructure, energy, security and logistics, and the formulation of common positions on the adaptation of European instruments; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4a. Calls on the Commission to support the creation of Regional Security and Innovation Ecosystems bringing together businesses, universities, research institutes, airports, public administration and the defence sector, with a view to developing dual-use technologies, increasing economic resilience and strengthening the competitiveness of European industry; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4a. stresses that future Interreg programmes should play a stronger role in supporting the European integration of Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova by fostering lasting partnerships between border regions, strengthening institutional cooperation and facilitating their gradual integration into Union policies and programmes; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4a. Calls for priority Union support for the construction and modernisation of road and railway bridges, border crossing points, customs facilities and multimodal connections between Member States, Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4b. Expresses concern that the planned centralisation of the management of Interreg programmes within a single plan for the next financial framework may further limit the ability of eastern border regions to build flexible cross-border partnerships tailored to their specific geopolitical situation; calls on the Commission to ensure that the centralisation of management does not come at the expense of these regions’ territorial flexibility, and that the new specific objective for regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine is based on financial allocations that genuinely compensate for lost funding, simplified rules for the selection of partners, and a guaranteed role for local and regional authorities in managing the programme; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4b. Highlights the importance of upholding the Partnership Principle in all programming, implementation and monitoring of EU projects in order to set up a strong cooperation between regional and local authorities, NGOs and stakeholders, including environmental NGOs; stresses that this process should take into account the gender perspective as well; reminds therefore that the European code of conduct on partnership fully applies to all cross-border projects within the Interreg programmes equally; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4b. Calls for accelerated investment in railway interoperability, including European-standard gauge connections, transhipment capacity, signalling systems and the removal of technical and administrative bottlenecks at the Union’s borders with Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4c. Calls for the eastern border regions bordering Russia and Belarus to be granted front-line priority status under the new Interreg-specific objective, with a higher co-financing rate, simplified application procedures, dedicated technical support and a mechanism for the rapid mobilisation of funds in the event of a further escalation of geopolitical threats; stresses that these regions cannot be treated in the same way as cross-border regions operating in a stable geopolitical environment, as their specific situation requires specific institutional and financial solutions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; | 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be covered by a mandatory package of financial preferences, including higher levels of pre-financing and a co-funding level that is at least 10 % higher, including for businesses, in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; stresses that the maximum level of co-financing for projects carried out in eastern border regions should be up to 95 %, while for projects of significance for security, resilience or critical infrastructure, there should be the possibility of financing up to 100 % of eligible costs; The Commission should allow for the use of simplified accounting methods for projects carried out by border regions, thus reducing the administrative burden on beneficiaries; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; | 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; calls for the ring-fencing of resources for Eastern Border regions within the national and regional partnership plans; recognises that the Eastern Border regions face a dual challenge, combining long-standing structural and demographic weaknesses with acute security-related pressures; calls for the conditions and incentives under the plans to be further improved so as to effectively encourage Member States to direct investment towards these regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; | 5. Is convinced that, it must be insured in the relevant legislative acts that within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing, simplified cost options, fast-track project approval, reduced administrative burden and dedicated technical assistance, in particular for municipalities, SMEs, hospitals, transport operators and local crisis-management authorities with limited administrative capacity, in order to improve projects' liquidity and the regions' capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; | 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; stresses that simplifications and specific support possibilities for administrative procedures should be explored, which will also ensure that funds can be accessed appropriately and quickly. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; | 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; believes that 30% pre-financing rate should be provided to meet these urgent liquidity needs; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; | 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, border regions, especially southern and eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, non-conventional or hybrid risks, resilience and territorial development; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; | 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans and Interreg programmes for 2028-2034, operations implemented in eastern border regions should benefit from a Union co-financing rate of up to 95 %, in recognition of the exceptional pressures placed on national, regional and local budgets and of the European added value of investments in those territories; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; | 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans and of Interreg Plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; | 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans and of Interreg Plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience and territorial development; | 5. Is convinced that, within the framework of the national and regional partnership plans for 2028-2034, eastern border regions should be able to benefit from higher levels of pre-financing and co-financing in order to improve projects’ liquidity and the regions’ capacity to respond to challenges relating to security, resilience, economic, social and territorial development; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5a. Calls for the Eastern Border Top-up Allocation to be implemented through dedicated priorities within the national and regional partnership plans, while ensuring that the allocation remains additional, visible, traceable and protected from transfers to unrelated national or regional priorities; stresses that any transfer of resources from this allocation should require prior Commission approval and a territorial impact assessment demonstrating that the specific needs of eastern border regions will not be weakened; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5a. Points out that the crisis provisions envisaged for the 2028-2034 period are framed primarily around natural disasters and health crises; insists that economic shocks caused by security incidents and hybrid attacks, such as the collapse of tourism bookings following drone incursions, be explicitly recognised as crises capable of triggering the flexibility mechanisms of the national and regional partnership plans and support under the EU Facility; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5a. Calls for an initial pre-financing rate of 20 % of the Union contribution for programmes and priorities dedicated to eastern border regions, in order to ensure sufficient liquidity, accelerate project implementation and reduce the financial burden on regional and local authorities and beneficiaries; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States concerned to implement the national and regional partnership plans with the active involvement of specialised institutions, including state institutions, enabling cities, municipalities, counties, functional urban areas, farmers, entrepreneurs and food producers, public hospitals, universities, vocational schools, civil-protection bodies, border-service operators and local public-infrastructure providers located in eligible eastern border regions to submit projects directly under transparent national calls, taking regional specialisations into account and irrespective of the political composition of the regional authorities; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5c. Stresses that where a regional managing authority does not launch calls, delays project selection, applies non-transparent criteria or fails to ensure fair access for local authorities and public-service providers in eligible eastern border regions, the Member State, in agreement with the Commission, should be able to activate a national reserve or direct-call mechanism for the affected territories; calls for such a mechanism to include clear deadlines, published selection criteria, independent expert assessment and a right for applicants to request review of rejected applications; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; | 6. Stresses that the specific needs of the eastern border regions should be addressed horizontally across all relevant Union financial instruments for the period 2028-2034, whether under shared management or managed directly by the Commission; Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; and instruments supporting the development of cross-border infrastructure on the border with Ukraine; calls for the establishment of a joint coordination mechanism between the EU’s cohesion policy, security policy and industrial policy with regard to the eastern border regions; calls on the Commission to establish clear legal bases and implementing rules that enable the combination and sequential use of support from cohesion policy and centrally managed programmes, including through cascade funding; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; | 6. Calls for an enabling policy and investment framework, supported by appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions; stresses that support should not be limited to cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but should be systematically reflected through other relevant Union policies and programmes, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility, in order to strengthen resilience, competitiveness and territorial connectivity; calls for dedicated and ring-fenced allocations for eastern border regions under the relevant Union instruments, additional to the resources otherwise available under national and regional envelopes, and stresses that such support should not result from the reallocation or reduction of funding already assigned to other cohesion policy priorities or less developed regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; | 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; calls for the Eastern Border regions to benefit from structurally improved implementation conditions across all Union funding instruments, including higher Union co-financing rates that reduce the burden on local budgets, increased pre-financing and advance payments to ease liquidity constraints, greater flexibility in programming, reprogramming, and simplified procedures with proportionate administrative requirements; considers that such conditions should reflect the limited fiscal capacity of these regions and the heightened uncertainty under which they operate; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; | 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility, while ensuring that these instruments prioritise projects contributing to the economic and social development and resilience, to the creation of local and regional value chains, including agriculture and food processing, traditional industries, defence industries and strategic manufacturing, thereby strengthening the integration of these regions into the Single Market. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; | 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; stresses that the specific economic and logistical pressures faced by farmers and agri-food operators in eastern border regions should be reflected in the Common Agricultural Policy and relevant crisis-support instruments; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; | 6. Calls for an enabling policy and investment framework, supported by appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions; stresses that support should not be limited to cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but should be systematically reflected through other relevant Union policies and programmes including the Common Agricultural Policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility, in order to strengthen resilience, competitiveness and territorial connectivity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; | 6. Calls for an enabling policy and investment framework, supported by appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions stresses that support should not be limited to cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but should be systematically reflected through relevant Union policies and programmes, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility, in order to strengthen resilience, competitiveness and territorial connectivity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; | 6. Calls for an enabling policy and investment framework, supported by appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, stresses that support should not be limited to cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but should be systematically reflected through otherrelevant Union policies and programmes , including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility, in order to strengthen resilience, competitiveness and territorial connectivity. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; | 6. Calls for appropriate conditions and financial incentives to be provided for eastern border regions, not only through cohesion policy instruments such as national and regional partnership plans or the Interreg programme, but also through other sectoral instruments and policies, including the common agricultural policy, the European Competitiveness Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility; stresses, furthermore, the importance of energy-intensive industries when it comes to strengthening Europe’s economic resilience, security of supply and competitiveness; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. Calls on the Commission to establish a dedicated administrative capacity and implementation support facility for the eastern border regions under relevant Union financial instruments, providing permanent technical assistance, project preparation support, advisory services and hands-on guidance throughout the entire project cycle; stresses that this facility should be explicitly designed to strengthen managerial capacity, strategic planning capabilities and institutional confidence at local and regional level, including through training and peer-learning mechanisms; underlines that Union implementation rules should encourage responsible innovation and justified risk-taking in project design and execution, while maintaining sound financial management, legal certainty and proportionality in control and audit requirements; considers that excessive risk-aversion in implementation has become a structural barrier to investment in high-exposure regions and must be actively addressed through tailored Union support mechanisms; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. Calls, in this regard, on the Council and the Commission to translate these incentives into dedicated and sufficient financial allocations for the eastern border regions under the 2028-2034 multiannual financial framework commensurate with the scale of the challenges they face; stresses the need for tailored policy responses and adequate implementation conditions tailored to the specific challenges faced by these regions, including higher co-financing and pre-financing rates, simplified administrative procedures and access to funding for local and regional authorities and small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as sufficient flexibility to combine cohesion policy instruments with defence, security and dual-use investments, without compromising the fundamental objectives of cohesion policy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. Calls, in this regard, on the Council and the Commission to translate these incentives into dedicated and sufficient financial allocations for the eastern border regions under the 2028-2034 multiannual financial framework commensurate with the scale of the challenges they face; stresses the need for tailored policy responses and adequate implementation conditions tailored to the specific challenges faced by these regions, including higher co-financing and pre-financing rates, simplified administrative procedures and access to funding for local and regional authorities and small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as sufficient flexibility to combine cohesion policy instruments with defence, security and dual-use investments, without compromising the fundamental objectives of cohesion policy. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. Calls, in this regard, on the Council and the Commission to translate these incentives into dedicated and sufficient financial allocations for the eastern border regions under the 2028-2034 multiannual financial framework commensurate with the scale of the challenges they face; stresses the need for tailored policy responses and adequate implementation conditions tailored to the specific challenges faced by these regions, including higher co-financing and pre-financing rates, simplified administrative procedures and access to funding for local and regional authorities and small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as sufficient flexibility to combine cohesion policy instruments with defence, security and dual-use investments, without compromising the fundamental objectives of cohesion policy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. Calls, in this regard, on the Council and the Commission to translate these incentives into dedicated a ring-fenced budget of 10% for the eastern border regions from NRPP, CEF, Competitiveness Fund, Horizon Europe; stresses the need for adequate implementation conditions tailored to the specific challenges faced by these regions, including co-financing rates of 95% and pre-financing rates of 20 %, simplified administrative procedures and access to funding for local and regional authorities and small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as sufficient flexibility to combine cohesion policy instruments with defence, security and dual-use investments, without compromising the fundamental objectives of cohesion policy. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6a. Underlines the potential of cross-border cooperation and especially sparser inhabited border areas in such fields as renewable energy, circular economy and environment protection and calls to make better use of existing opportunities; emphasize therefore the potential of the less inhabited border areas to develop sustainable and green economy thus making an added value to the local development in opening new green jobs; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6b. Targeted state-aid flexibility should be introduced for EU regions on the eastern flank that have been disproportionately affected by the war in Ukraine to preserve employment, safeguard critical regional infrastructure and attract strategic investment. Such flexibility would allow higher regional aid intensities, accelerated pre-financing and streamlined approval for resilience-enhancing projects; calls on the Commission, in this context, to grant the eastern border regions a special border region status and to introduce greater flexibility and simplification of the State aid rules applicable to them, including by increasing the maximum aid intensity in these regions by at least 10 to 15 percentage points above the standard regional aid ceilings and by raising the relevant notification thresholds, in a manner compatible with Article 107(3)(a) and (c) TFEU; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6b. Targeted state-aid flexibility should be introduced for EU regions on the eastern flank that have been disproportionately affected by the war in Ukraine to preserve employment, safeguard critical regional infrastructure and attract strategic investment. Such flexibility would allow higher regional aid intensities, accelerated pre-financing and streamlined approval for resilience-enhancing projects; calls on the Commission, in this context, to grant the eastern border regions a special border region status and to introduce greater flexibility and simplification of the State aid rules applicable to them, including by increasing the maximum aid intensity in these regions by at least 10 to 15 percentage points above the standard regional aid ceilings and by raising the relevant notification thresholds, in a manner compatible with Article 107(3)(a) and (c) TFEU; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6b. Targeted state-aid flexibility should be introduced for EU regions on the eastern flank that have been disproportionately affected by the war in Ukraine to preserve employment, safeguard critical regional infrastructure and attract strategic investment. Such flexibility would allow higher regional aid intensities, accelerated pre-financing and streamlined approval for resilience-enhancing projects; calls on the Commission, in this context, to grant the eastern border regions a special border region status and to introduce greater flexibility and simplification of the State aid rules applicable to them, including by increasing the maximum aid intensity in these regions by at least 10 to 15 percentage points above the standard regional aid ceilings and by raising the relevant notification thresholds, in a manner compatible with Article 107(3)(a) and (c) TFEU; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6c. Calls on the Commission to introduce a new State aid category dedicated to border regions,[Author1] providing, inter alia, for a specific threshold per undertaking for consultancy and investment aid linked to gaining new export markets and for emergency support to preserve liquidity and jobs; calls, moreover, for a more flexible approach towards small mid-caps established in these regions, for the extension of eligible costs to critical infrastructure and cross-border logistics, for incentives and bonuses rewarding investments that shorten supply chains or reinforce the strategic role of border locations, such as transhipment centres; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6c. Calls on the Commission to introduce a new State aid category dedicated to border regions, providing, inter alia, for a specific threshold per undertaking for consultancy and investment aid linked to gaining new export markets and for emergency support to preserve liquidity and jobs; calls, moreover, for a more flexible approach towards small mid-caps established in these regions, for the extension of eligible costs to critical infrastructure and cross-border logistics, for incentives and bonuses rewarding investments that shorten supply chains or reinforce the strategic role of border locations, such as transhipment centres; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6c. Calls on the Commission to introduce a new State aid category dedicated to border regions, providing, inter alia, for a specific threshold per undertaking for consultancy and investment aid linked to gaining new export markets and for emergency support to preserve liquidity and jobs; calls, moreover, for a more flexible approach towards small mid-caps established in these regions, for the extension of eligible costs to critical infrastructure and cross-border logistics, for incentives and bonuses rewarding investments that shorten supply chains or reinforce the strategic role of border locations, such as transhipment centres; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. Stresses that eastern border regions are at a competitive disadvantage when applying for funding from programmes managed centrally by the Union; calls on the Commission to take this situation into account through dedicated calls for proposals, higher co-financing rates, targeted technical support and other measures to make it easier for these regions to participate in Union programmes; stresses that this support should primarily take the form of grants and should supplement the funds available under cohesion policy; | 7. Stresses that eastern border regions face specific structural and geopolitical constraints which generates disadvantage when applying for funding from programmes managed under direct and indirect management by the Union; calls on the Commission to take these specific circumstances into account through dedicated calls for proposals, higher co-financing rates, targeted technical assistance, capacity-building, and the incorporation, where justified, of strategic criteria reflecting the contribution of projects to the Union's security, resilience, territorial connectivity and supply-chain resilience; stresses that this support should primarily take the form of grants and should supplement the funds available under cohesion policy; calls, in addition, for the establishment of regional one-stop-shops for the private sector in eastern border regions, providing companies with integrated access to financing, advisory services, market information, innovation support and partnership opportunities; underlines that in ADD: 'calls, in addition, for the establishment of regional one-stop-shops for the private sector in eastern border regions, providing companies with integrated access to financing, advisory services, market information, innovation support and partnership opportunities; underlines that in regions exposed to heightened geopolitical risk, private investors need not only funding instruments but also clarity, continuity and institutional connection; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. Stresses that eastern border regions are at a competitive disadvantage when applying for funding from programmes managed centrally by the Union; calls on the Commission to take this situation into account through dedicated calls for proposals, higher co-financing rates, targeted technical support and other measures to make it easier for these regions to participate in Union programmes; stresses that this support should primarily take the form of grants and should supplement the funds available under cohesion policy; | 7. Stresses that eastern border regions face specific structural and geopolitical constraints which generates disadvantage when applying for funding from programmes under direct or indirect management by the Union; calls on the Commission to take this situation into account through dedicated calls for proposals, higher co-financing rates, targeted technical assistance, capacity-building, and the incorporation, where justified, of strategic criteria reflecting the contribution of projects to the Union's security, resilience, territorial connectivity and supply-chain resilience; points out that a Union co-financing rate of up to 95 % would substantially reduce the pressure on national, regional and local budgets, while maintaining a minimum national contribution and ensuring continued national and local ownership of the investments concerned; highlights the critical role of pre-financing in the face of limited local and regional resources and points out that pre-financing rate of 20 %, paid predominantly at the beginning of the implementation period, would provide managing authorities and beneficiaries with the liquidity necessary to launch projects without excessive reliance on national advance financing or borrowing; stresses that this support should primarily take the form of grants and should supplement the funds available under cohesion policy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. Stresses that eastern border regions are at a competitive disadvantage when applying for funding from programmes managed centrally by the Union; calls on the Commission to take this situation into account through dedicated calls for proposals, higher co-financing rates, targeted technical support and other measures to make it easier for these regions to participate in Union programmes; stresses that this support should primarily take the form of grants and should supplement the funds available under cohesion policy; | 7. Stresses that eastern border regions are at a competitive disadvantage when applying for funding from programmes managed centrally by the Union; calls on the Commission to take this situation into account through dedicated calls for proposals, higher co-financing rates, targeted technical support and other measures to make it easier for these regions to participate in Union programmes; stresses that this support should primarily take the form of grants and should supplement the funds available under cohesion policy; welcomes the launch of the EastInvest Facility as a first step towards mobilising investment in the Eastern Border regions; notes, however, that lending-based instruments are difficult for smaller municipalities to access, given minimum project size requirements, creditworthiness and co-financing conditions, constraints on municipal borrowing and limited administrative capacity to prepare bankable projects; recalls that the Facility does not rely on new Union financial resources; calls, therefore, for the emphasis of Union support to be placed on grant funding, including through dedicated direct calls for Eastern Border region projects under the European Competitiveness Fund; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. Stresses that eastern border regions are at a competitive disadvantage when applying for funding from programmes managed centrally by the Union; calls on the Commission to take this situation into account through dedicated calls for proposals, higher co-financing rates, targeted technical support and other measures to make it easier for these regions to participate in Union programmes; stresses that this support should primarily take the form of grants and should supplement the funds available under cohesion policy; | 7. Stresses that eastern border regions face specific structural and geopolitical constraints when applying for funding from programmes managed under direct and indirect managementcentrally by the Union; calls on the Commission to take this situation into account through dedicated calls for proposals, higher co-financing rates, targeted technical assistance, capacity-building, and the incorporation, where justified, of strategic criteria reflecting the contribution of projects to the Union's security, resilience, territorial connectivity and supply-chain resilience;; stresses that this support should primarily take the form of grants and should supplement the funds available under cohesion policy; calls, in addition, for the establishment of regional one-stop-shops for the private sector in eastern border regions, providing companies with integrated access to financing, advisory services, market information, innovation support and partnership opportunities; underlines that in regions exposed to heightened geopolitical risk, private investors need not only funding instruments but also clarity, continuity and institutional connection; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. Stresses that eastern border regions are at a competitive disadvantage when applying for funding from programmes managed centrally by the Union; calls on the Commission to take this situation into account through dedicated calls for proposals, higher co-financing rates, targeted technical support and other measures to make it easier for these regions to participate in Union programmes; stresses that this support should primarily take the form of grants and should supplement the funds available under cohesion policy; | 7. Stresses that eastern border regions are at a competitive disadvantage when applying for funding from programmes managed centrally by the Union; calls for the introduction of a mandatory quality bonus for projects carried out by eastern border regions in all programmes managed centrally by the European Commission, and for this situation to be taken into account through dedicated calls for proposals, higher co-financing rates, targeted technical support and other measures to make it easier for these regions to participate in Union programmes; stresses that this support should primarily take the form of grants and should supplement the funds available under cohesion policy; calls for dedicated funding instruments to be provided for projects relating to logistics, digital and transport infrastructure, innovation and cooperation between businesses preparing to participate in the reconstruction of Ukraine; the Commission should provide specialist advisory support to border regions in the preparation of projects of strategic importance; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. Stresses that eastern border regions are at a competitive disadvantage when applying for funding from programmes managed centrally by the Union; calls on the Commission to take this situation into account through dedicated calls for proposals, higher co-financing rates, targeted technical support and other measures to make it easier for these regions to participate in Union programmes; stresses that this support should primarily take the form of grants and should supplement the funds available under cohesion policy; | 7. Stresses that eastern border regions are at a competitive disadvantage when applying for funding from programmes managed centrally by the Union; calls on the Commission to take this situation into account through dedicated calls for proposals, higher co-financing rates, targeted technical support and other measures to make it easier for these regions to participate in Union programmes; stresses that this support should primarily take the form of grants rather than repayable instruments, and should supplement rather than replace the funds available under cohesion policy; calls for the significant streamlining of administrative procedures, which place a disproportionate burden on smaller local authorities and beneficiaries in border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7a. Welcomes the EU Cities web-portal as an important tool to simplify access to EU support; underlines that administrative support is highly important, especially in eastern border regions, to increase participation of small and medium-sized cities in European actions and funding and to navigate complex procedures and overlapping European and national legislation; stresses that this tool should allow for direct dialogue and access to tailored solutions to support local and regional authorities in the use of Union financial instruments; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7a. Notes that the reduced availability and rising cost of insurance against war and hybrid risks is becoming a structural barrier to private investment in the Eastern Border regions; calls on the Commission, together with the EIB Group and Member States, to develop a European reinsurance or guarantee scheme covering war and hybrid risks, in order to keep investments in these regions insurable and bankable; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7a. Underlines that grants should constitute the predominant form of support for investments in essential public services, civil preparedness, critical infrastructure, demographic resilience, cross-border connectivity and administrative capacity in eastern border regions, and should supplement both lending made available through EastInvest and the funds available under cohesion policy; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7a. Calls on the Commission to introduce an eastern border territorial bonus in centrally managed programmes, including the European Competitiveness Fund, Connecting Europe Facility, Horizon Europe, Digital Europe and EU security-related instruments, in order to increase the success rate of high-quality projects from regions facing exceptional security and investment risks; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish single contact points for beneficiaries in eastern border regions, providing coordinated information and support concerning all relevant Union funding programmes; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7b. Calls on the Commission and Member States, supported by Union financial instruments, to strengthen fact-checking initiatives of the local, regional and national TV channels and media literacy programmes in the eastern border regions; stresses that such actions should be systematically supported under relevant Union financial instruments, including cohesion policy, Creative Europe and other applicable programmes, as part of a structured response to foreign information manipulation and interference; underlines the importance of targeted investment in democratic resilience, particularly among young people and vulnerable communities; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7b. Calls on the Commission to introduce an "Eastern Border Reflex" in the preparation of work programmes, calls for proposals and legislative initiatives under the 2028-2034 MFF, ensuring that the specific security, demographic, economic and territorial situation of eastern border regions is systematically assessed and reflected through dedicated calls, territorial bonuses, reduced administrative requirements, higher co-financing rates and targeted technical assistance; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7b. Considers that support for the Eastern Border regions should constitute a horizontal priority across the next multiannual financial framework, given that incidents with security implications spill over well beyond the immediately affected territories; supports, therefore, a broad definition of the Eastern Border regions and a funding allocation commensurate with that definition; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7b. Calls for wider use of simplified cost options, lump sums, standard scales of unit costs and financing not linked to costs for operations implemented in eastern border regions, particularly for small beneficiaries and local authorities; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7c. Calls for the use of Union programmes and financial instruments including Erasmus+, ESF+, the European Competitiveness Fund to prioritise investments in education, skills and entrepreneurship for young people in the eastern border regions, particularly in defence technologies, cybersecurity, digital technologies, agriculture, food production and civil preparedness; stresses that these investments should be designed to directly support regional labour markets, reduce youth outmigration and strengthen the integration of young people into local, regional and European value chains; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7c. Calls for projects of major importance for the security, resilience and connectivity of eastern border regions to be granted strategic project status, allowing coordinated and accelerated administrative procedures while fully respecting applicable environmental and social standards; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7d. Calls for dedicated grant schemes for microenterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises in eastern border regions, supporting productive investment, digitalisation, energy efficiency, cybersecurity, innovation and access to new markets; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7d. Encourages the active involvement of young people in initiatives funded by Union instruments aimed at strengthening democratic resilience, media literacy and participation in regional value chains of innovation ecosystems; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7e. Calls for appropriate access to Union support for small mid-cap companies performing strategic economic, industrial, logistical or technological functions in eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7f. Calls for measures facilitating the participation of local small and medium-sized enterprises in public procurement and strategic investment projects, including through proportionate requirements and the division of contracts into lots where appropriate; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7g. Supports the development of regional innovation ecosystems linking enterprises, universities, research institutions, vocational education providers and public authorities, including in the fields of cybersecurity, energy, transport, health, agri-food and dual-use technologies; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have at least 5 km of land border or at least 30 km of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; | 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital, as well as their exposure to geopolitical, economic, demographic, security and transport pressures and the strategic functions they perform for the Union as a whole; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which share a land or maritime border with Russia, Belarus, Ukraine or the Republic of Moldova, or have access to the Black Sea; considers that targeted support should also be available to contiguous NUTS 2 regions where they are demonstrably affected by significant economic, demographic, security or transport spillover effects, or host strategic transport, port, energy, digital, healthcare or civil-protection infrastructure directly serving the Union’s eastern external border, the EU–Ukraine Solidarity Lanes or connectivity with Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova; notes furthermore that regions bordering Russia, Belarus, Ukraine or the Republic of Moldova and regions situated alongthe Black Sea face distinct forms and levels of geopolitical, security, economic, demographic and territorial vulnerability; stresses that Union's support for these eastern regions should therefore be determined on the basis of objective territorial vulnerability, development needs and strategic-function criteria, without establishing an automatic hierarchy between the different categories of eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have at least 5 km of land border or at least 30 km of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; | 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have at least 5 km of land border or at least 30 km of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; stresses that all these regions bear the geopolitical costs of war and threats, regardless of which third country a given NUTS 2 region borders; notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, including numerous incursions by unmanned aerial vehicles, cyber threats and disinformation campaigns, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; The Commission should periodically review the territorial scope of the strategy, taking into account changing geopolitical circumstances and the implications of the European Union’s future enlargement; calls for the first such review to be carried out, at the latest, as part of the mid-term revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2028-2034 and the relevant national and regional partnership plans; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have at least 5 km of land border or at least 30 km of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; | 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have at least 5 km of land border or at least 30 km of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea, as well as regions functionally linked to them, which suffer direct economic, demographic and security-related consequences as a result of their location; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; stresses, in this regard, that the EU’s approach should be differentiated and should provide the regions directly bordering Russia and Belarus with the highest level of support and the most far-reaching streamlining measures, commensurate with their highest level of exposure; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have at least 5 km of land border or at least 30 km of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; | 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have a land or maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia, Belarus and Ukraine are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents; at the same time keeps in mind that the definition of eastern border regions should not exclude functional areas, NUTS 3 territories, cities, logistics hubs and transport corridors which, while not always directly located directly on the border, perform essential functions for border security, military mobility, refugee reception, humanitarian support, reconstruction logistics and connectivity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have at least 5 km of land border or at least 30 km of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; | 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at a NUTS level that in each Member State corresponds the regions responsible for regional development, and which have land border or of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; as the regional needs and administrative structures vary, the final definition of Eastern Border Regions should be done in the respective Member States. Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have at least 5 km of land border or at least 30 km of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; | 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential and environmental risks, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have at least 5 km of land border or at least 30 km of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have at least 5 km of land border or at least 30 km of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; | 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have land border or maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have at least 5 km of land border or at least 30 km of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; | 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have land border of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have at least 5 km of land border or at least 30 km of maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; | 8. Stresses that the European Union’s strategy for the eastern border regions must be tailored to the specific needs of each of these regions, taking into account their varying levels of potential, including in terms of natural resources, economy and human capital; notes, in light of the above, that the geographical scope of the term ‘eastern border regions’ should therefore encompass EU regions at NUTS 2 level which have land border or maritime border with Russia or Belarus, or which have a land or maritime border with Ukraine or access to the Black Sea; Notes furthermore that the thus defined eastern border regions directly neighbouring Russia and Belarus are most vulnerable to a deterioration in security conditions and an increased risk of military incidents, which must be reflected in the EU’s approach to these regions compared to other eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8a. Calls, therefore for the eastern border regions strategy to be fully integrated into the implementation of the Multiannual Financial Framework 2028-2034 and the policies and instruments financed from that budget; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8a. calls for the future implementation framework to include a distinct Black Sea pillar reflecting the specific maritime, economic, energy, transport and security challenges of the Union’s Black Sea regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8b. Recognises the Danube–Black Sea corridor as a strategic European axis for civilian and military mobility, trade, energy security and connectivity with Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova; calls for coordinated investment in its capacity, resilience and interoperability; Calls for targeted support for the modernisation of Danube ports, fairway infrastructure, multimodal terminals and hinterland connections, including measures to improve navigation reliability and eliminate capacity bottlenecks; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 8c. Highlights the strategic European role of the Port of Constanța as a major gateway for the Union’s trade, the EU–Ukraine Solidarity Lanes, energy supplies and military mobility; calls for sufficient Union support for the expansion and modernisation of its port, rail, road and inland waterway connections; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility, which means that investments in these regions strengthen Europe’s overall security; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they tend to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, in the absence of a territorial approach, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; | 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility, which means that investments in these regions strengthen Europe’s overall security; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they tend to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, in the absence of a territorial approach, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; emphasises the importance of small-scale and cross-border projects in bringing people together and in that way opening new potentials for sustainable local development and cross-border cooperation; stresses the importance of cross-border investments to enhance innovations, technology transfer, common solutions and synergies and that way increase territorial cohesion beyond administrative borders and strengthen European solidarity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility, which means that investments in these regions strengthen Europe’s overall security; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they tend to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, in the absence of a territorial approach, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; | 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility, which means that investments in these regions strengthen Europe’s overall security; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they tend to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, in the absence of a territorial approach, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity, which also encompasses the development of intermodal terminals, transshipment infrastructure, logistics centres and regional airports of strategic importance, and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; stresses that the development of dual-use technologies should encompass not only infrastructure, but also scientific research, technological development, the commercialisation of research results, business development and the training of highly qualified personnel; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility, which means that investments in these regions strengthen Europe’s overall security; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they tend to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, in the absence of a territorial approach, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; | 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility, which means that investments in these regions strengthen Europe’s overall security; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they tend to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, in the absence of a territorial approach, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; emphasises that military mobility in eastern border regions requires investment not only in TEN-T corridors, but also in local and regional roads, bridge load capacity, rail infrastructure, transhipment terminals, airport access, fuel distribution, secure logistics areas, maintenance facilities and border-crossing procedures enabling the rapid movement of troops, equipment, emergency services and humanitarian aid; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility, which means that investments in these regions strengthen Europe’s overall security; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they tend to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, in the absence of a territorial approach, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; | 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility, recognising that investments in these regions contribute directly to the Union's overall security, resilience and strategic preparedness; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they risk to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, without appropriate territorial safeguards and participation mechanisms, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility, which means that investments in these regions strengthen Europe’s overall security; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they tend to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, in the absence of a territorial approach, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; | 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, inculuding increased military mobility recognising that investments in these regions contribute directly to the Union's overall security, resilience and strategic preparedness; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they risk to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that without appropriate territorial safeguards and participation mechanisms, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility, which means that investments in these regions strengthen Europe’s overall security; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they tend to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, in the absence of a territorial approach, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; | 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility, which means that investments in these regions strengthen Europe’s overall security; demands the possibility to create and develop new military corridors; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they tend to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, in the absence of a territorial approach, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility, which means that investments in these regions strengthen Europe’s overall security; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they tend to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, in the absence of a territorial approach, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; | 9. Notes that the EU’s approach to its eastern border regions is consistent with the Union’s security initiatives, including increased military mobility,recognising that investments in these regions contribute directly to the Union's overall security, resilience and strategic preparedness ; notes, however, in this context that while so-called dual-use investments may create economic opportunities, they risk to be concentrated in regions with existing industrial and innovation capacities; emphasises that, in the absence of a territorial approach, this risks further increasing spatial concentration rather than promoting cohesion; considers that this limitation can be overcome by extending the scope of dual-use investments to further areas of activity, such as healthcare or education; emphasises the economic importance of such measures – including high-quality jobs, improved transport, greater logistical capacity and multiplier effects in terms of innovation – for strengthening the broader links between eastern border regions and the rest of Europe, which remain an essential element of these regions’ competitiveness and of EU cohesion; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9a. The security investment is particularly acute at the border of Russia and Belarus, but also in the Black Sea region, following recurrent drone incursions into the EU airspace and territorial waters and growing threats to critical offshore energy infrastructure. These developments require reinforced investment in surveillance, border protection, air and maritime monitoring, critical infrastructure resilience, and rapid-response capabilities, in order to safeguard territorial integrity, protect strategic assets, and strengthen the overall security posture of the affected regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9a. The security investment is particularly acute at the border of Russia and Belarus, but also in the Black Sea region, following recurrent drone incursions into the EU airspace and territorial waters and growing threats to critical offshore energy infrastructure. These developments require reinforced investment in surveillance, border protection, air and maritime monitoring, critical infrastructure resilience, and rapid-response capabilities, in order to safeguard territorial integrity, protect strategic assets, and strengthen the overall security posture of the affected regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9a. The security investment is particularly acute at the border of Russia and Belarus, but also in the Black Sea region, following recurrent drone incursions into the EU airspace and territorial waters and growing threats to critical offshore energy infrastructure. These developments require reinforced investment in surveillance, border protection, air and maritime monitoring, critical infrastructure resilience, and rapid-response capabilities, in order to safeguard territorial integrity, protect strategic assets, and strengthen the overall security posture of the affected regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9a. Emphasises that cohesion and social policy cannot deliver on their objectives without a strong European defence, as security is a precondition for economic and social development and for the willingness of people and businesses to remain in the Eastern Border regions; calls for civil protection infrastructure, such as multi-purpose public shelters, stockpiling capacities and other preparedness facilities, to be made eligible across Union funding instruments, including the national and regional partnership plans; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9a. Stresses the strategic importance of rail-logistics nodes, transhipment areas and intermodal terminals in eastern border regions for European supply chains, military mobility and future reconstruction logistics; calls for EU support for their modernisation, capacity expansion, digitalisation, cybersecurity, protection against sabotage and integration with TEN-T and military mobility requirements; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9a. The security investment is particularly acute at the border of Russia and Belarus, but also in the Black Sea region, following recurrent drone incursions into the EU airspace and territorial waters and growing threats to critical offshore energy infrastructure; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9b. Stresses that Union funding to modernise transport connectivity in the Eastern Border regions, together with investment in military mobility links, is integral to both their economic development and Europe’s defence readiness; calls for cohesion policy, the Connecting Europe Facility and its military mobility strand to be deployed in a complementary manner, so that dual-use corridors also deliver tangible improvements in civilian connectivity, including east-west road and rail links connecting the Eastern Border regions to the core TEN-T network; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9c. Stresses the importance of more sustainable mobility solutions throughout the cross-border areas, including the TEN-T policy; calls on the Commission to promote smart and green mobility; is of the position that smart and sustainable mobility solutions should be prioritized for EU funding; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Is of the opinion that the unique security and resilience challenges facing the eastern border regions require support to be extended to categories of investment which, under standard cohesion policy rules, would not be eligible for funding; calls on the Commission to introduce, as part of the regulations for the period 2028 to 2034, specific provisions enabling investments to be made in the eastern border regions in the following categories: | 10. Is of the opinion that the unique security and resilience challenges facing the eastern border regions require support to be extended to categories of investment which, under standard cohesion policy rules, would not be eligible for funding; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure, during the negotiations of the national and regional partnership plans for the period 2028 to 2034, specific provisions enabling investments to be made in the eastern border regions in the following categories: |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Is of the opinion that the unique security and resilience challenges facing the eastern border regions require support to be extended to categories of investment which, under standard cohesion policy rules, would not be eligible for funding; calls on the Commission to introduce, as part of the regulations for the period 2028 to 2034, specific provisions enabling investments to be made in the eastern border regions in the following categories: | 10. Is of the opinion that the unique security and resilience challenges facing the eastern border regions require support to be extended to categories of investment which, under standard cohesion policy rules, would not be eligible for funding; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure during the negotiations of the national and regional partnership plans for the period 2028 to 2034, specific provisions enabling investments to be made in the eastern border regions in the following categories: |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Is of the opinion that the unique security and resilience challenges facing the eastern border regions require support to be extended to categories of investment which, under standard cohesion policy rules, would not be eligible for funding; calls on the Commission to introduce, as part of the regulations for the period 2028 to 2034, specific provisions enabling investments to be made in the eastern border regions in the following categories: | 10. is of the opinion that the unique security and resilience challenges facing the eastern border regions require support to be extended to categories of investment which, under standard cohesion policy rules, would not be eligible for funding; calls on the Commission to introduce, as part of the regulations for the period 2028 to 2034, specific provisions enabling the financing of categories of investment, including, among others, investments to be made in the eastern border regions in the following categories: |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. Is of the opinion that the unique security and resilience challenges facing the eastern border regions require support to be extended to categories of investment which, under standard cohesion policy rules, would not be eligible for funding; calls on the Commission to introduce, as part of the regulations for the period 2028 to 2034, specific provisions enabling investments to be made in the eastern border regions in the following categories: | 10. Is of the opinion that the unique security and resilience challenges facing the eastern border regions require support to be extended to categories of investment which, under standard cohesion policy rules, would not be eligible for funding; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure, during the negotiations of the national and regional partnership plans for the period 2028 to 2034, specific provisions enabling investments to be made in the eastern border regions in the following categories: |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) healthcare infrastructure, including hospitals, emergency medical services and telemedicine, bearing in mind that such infrastructure fulfils both civilian healthcare functions and functions supporting civil defence and protection in the event of armed conflict; | (a) healthcare infrastructure in border regions, including hospitals, emergency medical services and telemedicine, within a 150 km radius of the external border with Russia, Belarus or Ukraine, bearing in mind that such infrastructure fulfils both civilian healthcare functions and functions supporting civil defence and protection in the event of armed conflict; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (aa) energy infrastructure and cross-border energy connectivity in order to ensure the resilience of energy systems against disruptions and hybrid threats, including the modernisation of electricity and gas networks, enhancements of grid flexibility, reverse-flow capacities, interconnectors, energy storage capacity including gas storage, integration of renewables, backup power systems; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) local and regional road infrastructure, including links not forming part of the TEN-T network, which are important for mobility, accessibility and territorial resilience; | (b) local and regional road infrastructure, as well as cross-border road and rail infrastructure on the border with Ukraine, intermodal terminals, logistics centres, border crossings, customs and phytosanitary infrastructure, and links forming part of the TEN-T network and their regional connections, including links not forming part of the TEN-T network, which are important for mobility, accessibility and territorial resilience; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) local and regional road infrastructure, including links not forming part of the TEN-T network, which are important for mobility, accessibility and territorial resilience; | (b) local and regional road infrastructure, including links not forming part of the TEN-T network, which are important for mobility, accessibility and territorial resilience; in particular, roads serving border crossings, military mobility routes and rural road networks in sparsely populated border areas, which are essential for connecting isolated communities, for evacuation and for military transport; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) local and regional road infrastructure, including links not forming part of the TEN-T network, which are important for mobility, accessibility and territorial resilience; | (b) local and regional road infrastructure, including links not forming part of the TEN-T network, access roads to border crossings, customs terminals, logistics parks, railway terminals, hospitals, civil-protection facilities and military mobility corridors, which are important for mobility, accessibility and territorial resilience; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) local and regional road infrastructure, including links not forming part of the TEN-T network, which are important for mobility, accessibility and territorial resilience; | (b) local and regional road infrastructure, including links not forming part of the TEN-T network, as well as dual-use airports and ports, which are important for mobility, accessibility and territorial resilience; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) energy infrastructure strengthening regional energy autonomy, including renewable energy generation, geothermal energy projects where appropriate, smart grids and energy storage; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) critical digital infrastructures and connectivity, including effective cybersecurity measures; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) critical digital infrastructures and connectivity, including effective cybersecurity measures; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) critical digital infrastructures and connectivity, including effective cybersecurity measures; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (bb) strategic transport, logistics and border infrastructure, including the integration and upgrading of regional railway systems within the TEN-T and Connecting Europe Facility frameworks, high-quality road and rail connections with major urban and economic centres, bridges, inland waterways, Black Sea and Danube ports; investments supporting the Baltic Sea–Black Sea–Aegean Sea Corridor and their extensions to Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova, as well as major cross-border projects and dual-use infrastructure; sustainable public, shared and on-demand transport solutions aimed at reducing transport poverty in rural or remote eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) dual-use infrastructure serving both civilian purposes and civil defence and preparedness needs; | (c) dual-use infrastructure – investments in transport, energy, telecommunications and logistics infrastructure serving both civilian purposes and civil defence and preparedness needs; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) civil preparedness and resilience infrastructure – public shelters, energy microgrids, water reserves, emergency communications systems and ground-based GNSS support infrastructure; | (d) civil preparedness and resilience infrastructure – public shelters, energy microgrids, including those utilising renewable energy sources, water supply, sewerage and flood control infrastructure, including water reserves, emergency communications systems and ground-based GNSS support infrastructure, rescue systems, civil protection infrastructure and solutions ensuring the continuity of supply of essential goods and services; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) civil preparedness and resilience infrastructure – public shelters, energy microgrids, water reserves, emergency communications systems and ground-based GNSS support infrastructure; | (d) civil preparedness and resilience infrastructure - public shelters, emergency medical facilities, energy microgrids, water reserves, emergency communications systems, cybersecure crisis-management centres, ground-based GNSS support infrastructure, counter-drone detection systems, electronic warfare resilience and secure backup systems for critical public services; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) civil preparedness and resilience infrastructure – public shelters, energy microgrids, water reserves, emergency communications systems and ground-based GNSS support infrastructure; | (d) civil preparedness and resilience infrastructure – public shelters, energy microgrids, water reserves, emergency communications systems, water and food reserves, micro-grids, and ground-based GNSS support infrastructure; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) civil preparedness and resilience infrastructure – public shelters, energy microgrids, water reserves, emergency communications systems and ground-based GNSS support infrastructure; | (d) civil preparedness and resilience infrastructure – multi-purpose public shelters, energy microgrids, water reserves, emergency communications systems and ground-based GNSS support infrastructure; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) hardening of critical infrastructure, including electricity substations, heating systems, water and wastewater facilities, hospitals, railway nodes, bridges, airports, border crossings, telecommunications networks and data infrastructure, as well as the creation of strategic reserves of spare parts, fuel, generators, transformers and emergency equipment; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) secure digital and telecommunications infrastructure, including high-capacity broadband and 5G connectivity, cybersecurity systems, secure public data infrastructure, emergency communication networks and resilient digital public services, particularly in rural and remotely populated areas; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) civilian counter-drone detection and low-level airspace surveillance systems, including for the protection of airports, other critical infrastructure and public events, in complementarity with the European Drone Defence Initiative and the Eastern Flank Watch; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) sustainable maritime infrastructure, ports and offshore energy networks in the Baltic Sea region, contributing both to European energy independence and security of supply and creating high-quality training and jobs in border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) border protection infrastructure, drone detection and counter-drone capabilities and other security infrastructure, including public shelters, contributing to the protection of the Union's external borders and societal resilience. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) energy security infrastructure, including interconnectors, energy storage facilities and distribution networks, as well as projects aimed at diversifying supplies and reducing dependence on raw materials from the Russian Federation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) infrastructure supporting cross-border cooperation with Ukraine, including logistics centres, administrative cooperation centres, training facilities and digital platforms for cooperation between local authorities. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) (e) management of security-related incidents and crises, including as a result of hostile acts, such as hybrid threats; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) management of security-related incidents and crises, including as a result of hostile acts, such as hybrid threats. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) management of security-related incidents and crises, including as a result of hostile acts, such as hybrid threats; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (db) essential local public-service infrastructure, including schools, childcare facilities, elderly-care services and affordable housing for healthcare professionals, teachers, emergency personnel and other essential workers, where such investments are necessary to counter depopulation and guarantee the continuity of essential services, as well as to boost the local economies and attract workforce in the eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (db) infrastructure and equipment for border-crossing resilience, including customs and sanitary-veterinary facilities, parking and queuing systems, digital border management tools, crisis reception points, secure warehouses, mobile inspection equipment and facilities enabling the separation of civilian, humanitarian, military and commercial traffic in times of crisis; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (db) cyber security, the development and modernisation of systems for detecting threats and for notifying and warning of threats, including infrastructure relating to crisis management and civil defence; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (db) agricultural, storage, processing and logistics infrastructure that is important for food security and the resilience of supply chains in border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (db) (f) productive investment support for enterprises |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (db) productive investment support for enterprises; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (dc) human capital, skills, youth retention and community resilience, including investments in vocational education and training, reskilling and upskilling through the European Social Fund Plus and the Pact for Skills; stronger education-to-employment pathways through Erasmus+ Centres of Vocational Excellence, quality apprenticeships, the upskilling of VET teachers and cooperation between education, research, innovation and local employers; support for civic participation, volunteering, media and financial literacy, preparedness and grassroots initiatives aimed at strengthening local resilience, mutual trust and social inclusion. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (dc) the development of regional dual-use technology ecosystems encompassing aviation technologies, unmanned systems, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, space technologies, robotics, autonomous technologies, advanced materials, and centres for the testing and certification of new technologies; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (dc) infrastructure supporting food security and agri-food resilience, including cold-chain infrastructure, food storage, veterinary and phytosanitary laboratories, agri-food logistics hubs and SMEs operating in regional food supply chains, in particular in agricultural eastern border regions; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (dc) electricity and gas interconnectors, transmission and distribution grids, energy storage facilities and other infrastructure necessary to strengthen security of supply and cross-border energy solidarity; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (dc) digital and broadband infrastructure in rural and outlying areas, which is essential for access to public services, education and telemedicine; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (dd) strengthening the resilience of energy infrastructure and energy security at local and regional level, including by enhancing cyber defence, constructing additional, distributed and flexible generation sources and energy storage facilities at critical infrastructure sites, and building and expanding power grids, including 400 kV grids, the construction and modernisation of main supply points, high- and medium-voltage substations and smart grids, the connection of new renewable energy capacity, and the supply of power to facilities of strategic importance in order to ensure that critical infrastructure is resilient to hybrid threats and energy crises; the development of mobile capacity to restore the electricity network in areas affected by a failure; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (dd) water security and climate-resilience infrastructure, including drinking-water supply, wastewater collection and treatment, flood and drought prevention, irrigation, water storage, coastal protection; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (dd) modernisation, digitalisation and reinforcement of electricity grids in order to integrate new generation and storage capacity and ensure continuity of essential services during crises; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (de) industrial parks, business incubators, testing facilities, logistics centres and other business infrastructure supporting productive investment, innovation and regional value chains; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (de) productive investment support for enterprises; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10a. Welcomes the Drone Wall initiative at the eastern border of the Union; stresses that this initiative should be fully integrated into relevant Union financial instruments, including security-related, defence and dual-use funding mechanisms, ensuring rapid deployment, adequate financing and long-term operational sustainability; underlines the urgency of its implementation in view of the evolving security environment and encourages the European Commission to explore all possible routes for integrating the Republic of Moldova in this project; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10a. Calls for EU support to be made available for regional and local civil-preparedness plans in eastern border regions, including population alert systems, evacuation and reception plans, emergency stockpiles, school and community preparedness education, first-aid training, regular crisis exercises and coordination between municipalities, civil protection services, police, border guards, healthcare providers, firefighters, NGOs, transport operators and critical infrastructure owners; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the guidelines on the ‘do no significant harm’ principle (DNSH) for the MFF 2028-2034 include clear and proportionate exceptions for investments in security, defence and civil preparedness in the eastern border regions, and that they specify that dual-use infrastructure projects with a predominantly civilian function meet the DNSH requirements; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10a. Recognises that the experience gained by local authorities in the eastern border regions since 2022 in the areas of crisis management, humanitarian aid, refugee integration, cooperation with the Ukrainian authorities and infrastructure reconstruction constitutes European added value and should be taken into account when designing future EU financial instruments. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10a. Calls for the development of alternative transport routes in eastern border regions in order to ensure continuity of mobility and supply chains where principal corridors are disrupted by military, hybrid or natural events; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10b. Calls on the Commission to prioritise investments that improve transport accessibility in border regions, including road and rail links, the development of logistics infrastructure and the modernisation of border crossings with Ukraine, as measures that strengthen resilience, competitiveness and future European integration. |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10b. Stresses that the investments in the energy sector should be explicitly prioritised under cohesion policy, the European Competitiveness Fund, CEF Energy and other relevant instruments as part of a broader objective of reducing energy poverty and strengthening strategic resilience; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10b. Encourages investment in cross-border and regional public transport services connecting peripheral communities with employment centres, education facilities, healthcare services and border crossings; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10c. Underlines that the Commission and Member States should facilitate acceleration of permitting and implementation of strategic dual use infrastructure financed under Union financial instruments; stresses that administrative procedures should be adapted to the urgency of security-related and resilience-enhancing investments in the eastern border regions, without compromising environmental and legal standards, but ensuring proportionality and efficiency in implementation; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10c. Calls for enhanced Union support for the protection, development and connection of offshore and onshore energy infrastructure in the Black Sea region, including electricity cables, offshore renewable energy, gas infrastructure and associated port facilities; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10d. Stresses, in particular, the strategic importance of developing rail, road, inland waterways and ports, including along the Danube, Vistula and Oder corridors; calls for a substantial increase in Union financial support for transport, digital, energy and inland waterway infrastructure connecting the eastern border regions with one another and with the rest of the Union, recognising that territorial connectivity is a prerequisite for economic convergence, military mobility, regional competitiveness and full integration into the Single Market; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10d. Calls for investment in the monitoring, protection, redundancy and rapid repair of undersea energy and telecommunications infrastructure in the Black Sea; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10e. Calls for prioritisation under cohesion policy, CAP and other Union financial instruments of projects developing local and regional value chains in agriculture, industry, defence, civil protection and strategic sectors; stresses that strengthening regional value chains is essential for reducing external dependencies, increasing strategic autonomy and enhancing the long-term competitiveness of the eastern border regions within the Single Market; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10f. Encourages public-private partnerships supported by Union financial instruments to mobilise private investment in the eastern border regions; stresses that blended finance instruments under InvestEU, the EIB Group and other relevant programmes should be actively used to reduce perceived investment risk and unlock private capital in geopolitically exposed regions; |
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “AMENDMENTS 1 - 295 - Draft report Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation”. Text, 27 August 2026. docId REGI-AM-791869. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/REGI-AM-791869 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/REGI-AM-791869 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-regi-am-791869,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{AMENDMENTS 1 - 295 - Draft report Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-08-27},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/REGI-AM-791869}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/REGI-AM-791869},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId REGI-AM-791869. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}