Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report
PECH-PR-766600 → A-10-2025-0070
- From
- PECH-PR-766600 report parliamentary committee draft of 27 Jan 2025
- To
- A-10-2025-0070 Plenary report of 15 Apr 2025
- Changes
- 18 changes to the text
- Paragraphs
- +21 added · −11 removed · 11 changed
More facts (3)
- Dossier
- 2024/0224(COD)
- Title (from)
- on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1026/2012 on certain measures for the purpose of the conservation of fish stocks in relation to countries allowing non-sustainable fishing
- Title (to)
- on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1026/2012 on certain measures for the purpose of the conservation of fish stocks in relation to countries allowing non-sustainable fishing
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Adds new criteria for identifying non-sustainable fishing, including unilateral measures, discriminatory measures, and inaction against IUU fishing.10111213 Adds procedural requirements for the Commission, including responding to requests within 90 days and raising issues in RFMOs before acting.1415 Clarifies the definition of 'unsustainable state' and adds a definition of 'best available scientific advice'.38 Extends the scope of non-cooperation to include delays in consultations and adds obligations for continued dialogue and prompt consultations.91718 The other changes are formal or wording: renumbering, rephrasing, and formatting updates.1245
The notes class 11 changes as substance, 4 as formal, 3 as wording only.
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 3 of 3: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
7 unchanged paragraphs
This regulation is a vital tool within the EU’s international fisheries governance framework, designed to reinforce its mechanisms that ensure sustainable management of fish stocks. It serves as a cornerstone fostering international cooperation in sustainability, addressing non-compliance and safeguarding the long-term interests of EU fishers.
The aim of the rapporteur, among others, is to enhance the potential of this instrument. The rapporteur seeks to ensure that the EU is equipped with a robust and comprehensive framework to confront current and future challenges posed by all bilateral and multilateral partners, while also leveraging the role of compliance bodies within regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs). This report therefore aims to strengthen the EU’s international fisheries governance strategy and secure its long-term objectives for sustainable and equitable fisheries management.
The rapporteur commends the Commission’s proposed changes to Article 3 on the identification of countries allowing non-sustainable fishing, as well as Article 6 establishing actions to be taken prior and subsequently to the adoption of measures, and has decided to introduce clearer and more comprehensive provisions to strengthen accountability.
Among others, the rapporteur highlights the importance of countering unreasonable demands from third countries, which could jeopardize the strategic interests of the EU and its fishers. Provisions aimed at preventing unjustified requests and deadlines safeguard the fairness of negotiations and protect the interests of EU fishers. Additionally, the rapporteur amendments address non-compliance by our partners, thereby upholding international sustainability efforts to protect our oceans, while also protecting the interests of EU fishers. Collectively, these changes establish a more comprehensive and strategic negotiating framework with our partners.
The rapporteur considers critical to strengthen the role of compliance bodies within RFMOs and deems that the Commission underutilises this tool of international fisheries governance. Before taking further action, the EU can better leverage international cooperation in sustainable fisheries management, by holding accountable, within these multilateral bodies, third countries that allow non-sustainable fishing. The proposed amendments aim to integrate more effectively RFMOs as a compliance tool within the EU’s international fisheries governance strategy, unlocking their full potential to combat non-sustainable fishing practices. The rapporteur underscores the importance of these legislative changes in driving tangible action by the Commission to enhance the effectiveness of RFMOs, improve environmental sustainability and ensure social justice for EU fishers.
The introduction of a clear definition of "best available scientific advice" addresses a critical gap in existing legislation. This amendment ensures greater consistency and clarity across all provisions, while preventing ambiguity in decision-making. By grounding fisheries management decisions in sound scientific principles, the EU strengthens both the legal and scientific rigor of conservation actions. This, is turn, improves the long-term effectiveness of the EU’s sustainability efforts.
In conclusion, the rapporteur believes that the proposed amendments have the potential to make this regulation a stronger, more comprehensive and future-proof instrument for the EU. It would further advance our efforts towards a proactive, resilient, and equitable approach to fisheries management, consolidating the EU’s position as a global leader in international sustainable fisheries governance.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/PECH-PR-766600/compare/A-10-2025-0070?all=1&part=3
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Changes between PECH-PR-766600 and A-10-2025-0070”. Text, 15 April 2025. from PECH-PR-766600, to A-10-2025-0070, reference 2024/0224(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/PECH-PR-766600/compare/A-10-2025-0070?all=1&part=3 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-04-15,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between PECH-PR-766600 and A-10-2025-0070}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-04-15},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/PECH-PR-766600/compare/A-10-2025-0070?all=1&part=3}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/PECH-PR-766600/compare/A-10-2025-0070?all=1&part=3},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from PECH-PR-766600, to A-10-2025-0070, reference 2024/0224(COD). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}