Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report
PECH-PR-719724 → A-9-2023-0357
- From
- PECH-PR-719724 report parliamentary committee draft of 8 Nov 2022
- To
- A-9-2023-0357 Plenary report of 13 Nov 2023
- Changes
- Not comparable
- Paragraphs
- +291 added · −43 removed · 11 changed
More facts (2)
- Title (from)
- on the state of play in the implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy and future perspectives
- Title (to)
- on the state of play in the implementation of the Common Fisheries Policy and future perspectives
These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph (under 15 % of their paragraphs match): they are different documents rather than versions of one — for example a group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted.
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 2 of 8: Paragraphs 61–120
AddedAE. whereas the number of total allowable catches (TACs) should be adapted to those that are necessary to manage fisheries as a whole; whereas ICES has indicated that a number of TACs could be eliminated from the EU system without undermining the overall management of fishery resources;
AddedAF. whereas the principle of relative stability, first set out in the CFP Basic Regulation of 1982 and implemented by the TACs and Quota Regulation of 1983, laid down a distributional key of the TAC by Member State based on the allocation principles of historical catches (1973-1978), as enshrined in the Hague preferences of 1976;
AddedAG. whereas relative stability is of great importance for the predictability and continuity of the fishing fleet in the European Union;
AddedAH. whereas Brexit has affected the distribution of fishing rights in the EU and has had a socio-economic impact;
AddedAI. whereas the EU must deliver on the Paris Agreement goals to fight climate change and to be climate-neutral by 2050, as well as to meet International Maritime Organization (IMO)commitments, while creating jobs and sustainable growth in a manner that does not threaten food production, food supply and food security;
AddedAJ. whereas, although fishing is not the activity that generates the most accidents, of all maritime vessels, fishing vessels are those most often involved; whereas in 2018 a 40 % increase in the number of incidents involving fishing vessels was recorded compared with the previous year;
AddedAK. whereas, despite this, it has shown a downward trend, with the vast majority of incidents being the result of human factors (62.4 %) with system/equipment failures being the second most common cause (23.2 %); whereas the three most frequently reported factors contributing to accidents on fishing vessels related to human actions are a lack of safety awareness, a lack of knowledge and inadequate working methods among on board personnel; whereas all these factors cannot be addressed separately from the profitability of the fishing sector, which needs to be secured in order for it to be able to invest further in safe working conditions;
AddedAL. whereas 32 000 lives are lost every year in the fisheries sector globally, not to mention the thousands of victims of accidents; whereas furthermore, as has also been pointed out by professional organisations, occupational diseases among those engaged in this laborious activity have increased alarmingly in recent years;
AddedAM. whereas fishing is an arduous occupation involving serious risks to the health and safety of those engaged in it; whereas the International Labour Organization recognised this problem in a convention dating back to 2007 and called on the countries that have ratified it to guarantee safe and healthy working conditions in this sector; acknowledges that the well-being of workers on board fishing vessels is essential for the future of the industry;
AddedAN. whereas it should be highlighted that maritime fisheries activities play an important part in improving living standards for fishing communities;
AddedAO. whereas, the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF) offers financial support to move towards more sustainable fishing, including support to increase the energy efficiency of fishing vessels or to innovate towards low impact fishing gear;
AddedAP. whereas, however, this support is not sufficient; whereas the restrictions on fishing capacity, as well as the narrow margins that some Member States have within their national ceilings, do not allow for the improvement of safety, working and living conditions on board fishing vessels; whereas new carbon-free propulsion systems require more space on-board than traditional engines and fuel tanks;
AddedAQ. whereas the CFP Basic Regulation provides that multiannual plans (MAPs) must be adopted as a priority; whereas this approach has undoubtedly contributed to better management of resources and to relative certainty for the sector;
AddedAR. whereas certain stocks straddle sea areas covered under the scope of different regional MAPs, hence the need for consistent measures across their whole distribution range;
AddedAS. whereas the CFP is not yet fully implemented and some of its measures, such as the establishment of fish stock recovery areas, have not been used;
AddedAT. whereas regionalisation offers a unique opportunity to avoid micro-management from Brussels and to adapt the decision making process to regional and local specificities, traditional structures (such as ‘cofradias’) and particular activities (such as fishing on foot and shellfish gathering);
AddedAU. whereas early and effective consultation and involvement of the sectors concerned is fundamental for good, workable, fair, well-accepted and successful legislation, and its implementation and compliance; whereas, in this context, the role of advisory councils (ACs) is vital and their advice is of crucial importance in the decision-making process;
AddedAV. whereas ACs have the potential to evolve into pivotal bodies in results-based management or co-management;
AddedAW. whereas, while the Commission regularly publishes ex post analysis on the economic situation of the EU fishing fleets, its initiatives for strategies or legislation related to fisheries management often lack a proper ex ante socio-economic assessment;
AddedAX. whereas science, fishermen’s experience and full impact assessments guarantee an objective basis for decision-making and decisions based on them are more robust and more readily accepted by the sectors concerned;
AddedAY. whereas fisheries and aquaculture are relatively small economic sectors but are strategic ones on account of their socio-economic and food security role, as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic and recent international geopolitical developments;
AddedAZ. whereas the EU biodiversity strategy for 2030 includes the objective of reducing the negative impacts of fisheries and extraction activities on sensitive marine habitats and species, including the seabed, with a view to achieving good environmental status;
AddedBA. whereas objectives of the EU biodiversity strategy include the reduction of by-catch of species to a level that allows their recovery and conservation;
AddedBB. whereas purely plant-based products are already being marketed in the internal market under the trade name ‘fish’ or as various fish species;
AddedBC. whereas both small-scale and artisanal fishers and the shellfish sector play a strategic role in the availability of food supply and have a vital socio-economic role in many coastal communities;
AddedBD. whereas small-scale fishing, including artisanal fishing, has specific characteristics and challenges;
AddedBE. whereas the CFP and the resulting regulations might not cater adequately for the specific characteristics of small-scale and artisanal fishing and in those cases might fail to provide the right, sufficient or necessary response to several of the problems they are currently facing;
AddedBF. whereas professional maritime activities in general are considered high risk and dangerous, particularly fishing, where 85 % of EU vessels are small-scale coastal vessels (less than 12 meters in total length) and are, therefore, exposed to even greater risks caused by adverse weather conditions and by operating close to shore;
AddedBG. whereas, additionally, small-scale coastal vessels have more difficulty providing protective spaces and improving working conditions with risks also associated with the advanced age of a significant proportion of this fleet;
AddedBH. whereas, furthermore, the recent challenges such as Brexit, the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine have severely impacted small-scale fisheries in particular;
AddedBI. whereas the EMFAF Regulation defines ‘small-scale coastal fishing’ as fishing activities carried out by marine and inland fishing vessels of an overall length of less than 12 metres and not using towed gear and also by fishers on foot, including shellfish gatherers; whereas this is the only definition of small-scale coastal fishing existing in EU legislation;
AddedBJ. whereas, in numerous Member States and international forums the defining characteristics of small-scale fishing go beyond the EMFAF definition, as a range of additional criteria apply, including with regard to gear allowed, the maximum vessel length, engine power, maximum duration of fishing trips, the distance from port at which vessels can operate, area of operation, maximum allowed travel time and vessel ownership;
AddedBK. whereas the Council is responsible for setting fishing opportunities, which are then allocated to the Member States following the principle of relative stability; whereas, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Member States are responsible for allocating fishing opportunities to the different fleets;
AddedBL. whereas, according to Article 17 of the CFP, when allocating the fishing opportunities available to them, Member States shall use transparent and objective criteria including those of an environmental, social and economic nature and they shall endeavour to provide incentives to fishing vessels deploying selective fishing gear or using fishing techniques with reduced environmental impact;
AddedBM. whereas there may be large differences between the sectors in different countries, with the result that a ‘one size fits all’ approach is not desirable;
AddedBN. whereas according to the latest STECF assessment on the social dimension of the CFP, only 16 out of 23 coastal Member States replied to the Commission’s request to inform it of the allocation method used; whereas several of those responses were of limited use as they contained only broad descriptions of the national fishing fleet or simply highlighted their intended allocations without outlining the ‘transparent and objective’ criteria used;
AddedBO. whereas on various occasions Parliament has called on the Commission and the Member States to provide dedicated supportive measures for the small-scale coastal fisheries sector;
AddedBP. whereas the EMFAF provides financial support for young fishers starting up fishing activities, while there is no subsequent guarantee for acquiring fishing opportunities;
AddedBQ. whereas producers’ organisations play a key role in the implementation and enforcement of the objectives of the CFP and the CMO for fisheries and aquaculture;
AddedBR. whereas other traditional structures, such as guilds, are also key players in the food systems of some Member States, where they operate as not-for-profit social economy entities representing the fisheries sector, and especially the small-scale coastal fleet and shellfish gatherers, performing co-governance functions for the benefit of maritime fishing and workers in the fisheries sector, as well as carrying out business-related tasks, such as marketing products and providing advisory and management services;
AddedBS. whereas the public perception of the fishing sector still includes negative stereotypes about fishing activity on marine life, despite the sector’s efforts, successes and continued willingness to improve fisheries sustainability; whereas this negative perception influences aquatic food consumption patterns and job attractiveness in an EU fishing sector that is also facing a huge challenge in generational renewal;
AddedBT. whereas generational renewal depends on the attractiveness of the sector and that younger generations aspire to work in sustainable and profitable sectors;
AddedBU. whereas fishing is universally considered a risky profession, compounded by the arduous nature of the work on fishing boats and unpredictable incomes; whereas these are significant factors in younger people’s lack of interest in the profession, thereby jeopardising generational renewal in the fisheries sector and the future of the fishing sector as a whole;
AddedBV. whereas improving fishers’ living and working conditions and safety is an overarching social objective, essential to attract young people and achieve generational renewal;
AddedBW. whereas young people who want to start their own business as fishers face significant barriers;
AddedBX. whereas the CFP tools that can help to improve the attractiveness of fishing and aquaculture as a profession are insufficient;
AddedBY. whereas the CFP does not mention major societal concerns such as climate change, Brexit, the Green Deal, the energy crisis or address the impact on food security of the growing number of marine protected areas, the expansion of off-shore renewable energy sites and the energy transition;
AddedBZ. whereas, even so, the majority of Member States and the EU’s economic partners in the fishing industry often refer to the income insecurity of fishing activities in some sectors, which is a factor in young people’s lack of interest in fishing, a trend that has been rising in recent years, and which creates additional difficulties in maintaining activities troubled by job losses in coastal communities;
AddedCA. whereas, even so, the majority of the Member States and the EU’s economic partners in the fishing industry often refer to young people’s lack of interest in fishing, a fact which was first acknowledged at least two decades ago, and which creates additional difficulties in the industry as a whole and exacerbates social problems in coastal communities both in continental Europe and overseas regions;
AddedCB. whereas a significant number of people working in the fisheries sector are women, most are employed in activities on land, often informally, supporting sea-based activities, particularly in the case of small-scale fishing; whereas despite their significant contribution to the sector, the role of women is still not sufficiently recognised;
AddedCC. whereas combating illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing helps ensure a level playing field forfair competition between the EU and certain foreign fleets with lower social and environmental standards that potentially undermine the competitiveness of EU producers when selling their products on the EU market; whereas, however, anti-IUU legislation alone cannot ensure a level playing field;
AddedCD. whereas defending and promoting the EU’s model of sustainability is perfectly compatible with defence of the EU sectors, and should go hand in hand with the defence of the EU sectors’ interests;
AddedCE. whereas joint enterprises with EU capital play a role in disseminating the CFP’s values and sustainability objectives, as well as an important role in development cooperation with third countries, contributing to improving the economy, working conditions and food security in the countries where they are based;
AddedCF. whereas fisheries played a very prominent role in the campaign in the run-up to the referendum on the United Kingdom’s membership of the EU in 2016;
AddedCG. whereas the increases in the autonomous tariff quotas (ATQs) for tuna loins have benefited the Chinese industry, which does not guarantee traceability information and relies on subsidies;
AddedCH. whereas the outermost regions (ORs) face specific challenges linked to their remoteness, topography, small markets and climate as referred to in Article 349 TFEU; whereas the specific characteristics of fisheries in the ORs are insufficiently taken into account in the CFP;
AddedCI. whereas artisanal fishing in the ORs is a major economic driver, a source of food sovereignty and a traditional activity that is part of the culture of these territories, which creates jobs at sea and in the processing sector and contributes to the dynamism of the tourist industry, which is an important economic engine of these regions;
AddedCJ. whereas, in order to ensure the survival of the fisheries sector in the ORs and in compliance with the principles of differential treatment for small islands and territories mentioned in SDG 14, it should be possible to support, on the basis of Article 349 TFEU, the renewal of the ORs’ artisanal fishing vessels which land all their catches in ports in the ORs and contribute to local sustainable development;
AddedCK. whereas the indicators to establish whether the fishing capacity is in balance with the available fishing opportunities are not adapted to the characteristics of the ORs’ local fleets;
AddedCL. whereas the ORs’ special characteristics and permanent structural constraints need to be acknowledged and considered; stresses that the fisheries sector plays an important role in the socio-economic situation, in employment and in the promotion of the economic and social cohesion of these regions, and that there is potential for employment growth in the sustainable blue economy; highlights that geographical location puts outermost regions in a privileged position in the monitoring and control of coastal and oceanic areas and should be used for the EU’s efforts to fight IUU fishing;
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/PECH-PR-719724/compare/A-9-2023-0357?all=1&part=2
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2023). “Changes between PECH-PR-719724 and A-9-2023-0357”. Text, 13 November 2023. from PECH-PR-719724, to A-9-2023-0357. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/PECH-PR-719724/compare/A-9-2023-0357?all=1&part=2 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2023-11-13,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between PECH-PR-719724 and A-9-2023-0357}},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-11-13},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/PECH-PR-719724/compare/A-9-2023-0357?all=1&part=2}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/PECH-PR-719724/compare/A-9-2023-0357?all=1&part=2},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from PECH-PR-719724, to A-9-2023-0357. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}