Text · Opinion parliamentary committee
On the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction
Document PECH-AD-774485 · COM(2025)0173 – C100074/2025 – 2025/0090(COD)
- Kind
- Opinion parliamentary committee PECH-AD-774485
- Date
- 17 October 2025
- Committee
- Committee on Fisheries
- Rapporteur
- Emma Fourreau
- Dossier
- 2025/0090(COD)
More facts (3)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Subject matter
- ENV, EXT
- Reference
- COM(2025)0173 – C100074/2025 – 2025/0090(COD)
In short
A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.
AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
The Committee on Fisheries opinion on the proposed directive to integrate the BBNJ Agreement into EU law suggests amendments to align with the agreement, focusing on fisheries and coordination. It clarifies exceptions for environmental assessments, adds stakeholder collaboration, and specifies Commission representation in regional fisheries bodies. It calls for swift transposition and implementation, and for a coordinated EU approach with regional fisheries management organizations and regional seas conventions.
Position. The Committee on Fisheries proposes targeted amendments to align the directive with the BBNJ Agreement, focusing on environmental assessment exceptions, stakeholder collaboration, and coordination with regional fisheries bodies.
Key points
- Member States retain sovereignty in determining activities under their jurisdiction or control; the directive shall not limit that.
- The directive should support climate adaptation and resilience without threatening food production, and align with the EU biodiversity strategy and Kunming-Montreal framework.
- The Commission should support Member States hosting the BBNJ secretariat and encourage third countries to ratify the agreement.
- The Commission and Member States should develop a common coordinated approach with regional fisheries management organizations and regional seas conventions.
- Regional fisheries management organizations remain competent for fisheries conservation; the directive must respect their competences and existing EU law.
- The directive should work with Regulation (EU) No 1026/2012 to address non-cooperating third countries in fisheries management.
- The directive is limited to strict transposition of the BBNJ Agreement; it applies to areas beyond national jurisdiction and alongside the common fisheries policy.
- Environmental assessments may be waived if other frameworks, such as regional fisheries management organizations, have already assessed the activity, provided conditions are met.
- Member States must collaborate and consult stakeholders, including regional fisheries management organizations, when developing area-based management tool proposals.
- Member States and the Commission, where applicable, shall promote measures in regional bodies to support BBNJ decisions and may coordinate between bodies.
- Member States should encourage third countries to support BBNJ area-based management tools and make implementation information available.
- The Commission shall submit biannual reports to the European Parliament on implementation and global developments.
Who is affected
- Member States: must coordinate with the Commission before submitting proposals for area-based management tools or emergency measures.
- Regional fisheries management organizations: to be consulted and their competences respected in fisheries-related environmental assessments and area-based tools.
- Fisheries stakeholders: to be consulted in the development of area-based management tool proposals.
- The public: given opportunities to participate in preparation of area-based management tool proposals and access to review procedures.
Figures and deadlines
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Jump to an amendment (51)
- Amendment 1
- Amendment 2
- Amendment 3
- Amendment 4
- Amendment 5
- Amendment 6
- Amendment 7
- Amendment 8
- Amendment 9
- Amendment 10
- Amendment 11
- Amendment 12
- Amendment 13
- Amendment 14
- Amendment 15
- Amendment 16
- Amendment 17
- Amendment 18
- Amendment 19
- Amendment 20
- Amendment 21
- Amendment 22
- Amendment 23
- Amendment 24
- Amendment 25
- Amendment 26
- Amendment 27
- Amendment 28
- Amendment 29
- Amendment 30
- Amendment 31
- Amendment 32
- Amendment 33
- Amendment 34
- Amendment 35
- Amendment 36
- Amendment 37
- Amendment 38
- Amendment 39
- Amendment 40
- Amendment 41
- Amendment 42
- Amendment 43
- Amendment 44
- Amendment 45
- Amendment 46
- Amendment 47
- Amendment 48
- Amendment 49
- Amendment 50
- Amendment 51
Short justification
The Ocean, which is a global common of humanity, covers approximately 70% of the world’s surface. The ⅔ of the Ocean surface lies in areas beyond national jurisdiction. The High Seas are home to unique marine species and ecosystems, which are facing threats resulting from the impacts of human activities such as overfishing, shipping, pollution, extractive industries and the growing effects of climate change. They are also an area of geopolitical competition. Protecting those areas and strengthening the High Seas governance are therefore vital actions for tackling marine biodiversity loss, climate change, but also to ensure long-term sustainable management of marine populations, including for fisheries management.
“The ship has reached the shore” announced the UN Ambassador for Oceans and Law of the Sea Issues on 3 March 2023. The landmark agreement 'International Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction' (BBNJ) Agreement adopted in 2023 is one of the biggest achievements in Ocean Diplomacy and a success for multilateralism. It addresses 4 key areas: marine genetic resources; measures such as area-based management tools; environmental impact assessments; and capacity-building and the transfer of marine technology. It should be ratified soon following the progress made at the 2025 UN Ocean Conference.
Your Rapporteur therefore welcomes the Commission’s proposal for a directive to integrate the BBNJ agreement into EU law. She agrees with the need for a swift transposition to ensure that the EU is compliant with its international obligations at the time of the entry into force. The Commission’s approach to limit the proposal to a strict transposition of the BBNJ agreement is appropriate and ensures a level playing field. The proposal is also in line with the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). The BBNJ Agreement does not undermine relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies (IFBs), including Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) and promotes coherence and coordination with those instruments, frameworks and bodies. The proposal notably aims at ensuring coordination between Member States and the Commission. Such coordination at EU level will be key to the success of its implementation, including to avoid infringements of the CFP and ensure a coherent approach.
Your Rapporteur suggests a few targeted amendments on provisions that fit within the remit of the opinion of the Committee on fisheries, in order to closer align the proposal to the BBNJ agreement:
• Article 8(6) on the General Conditions related to Environmental Assessments: the draft opinion introduces changes to better reflect the exception introduced by article 29(4) of the BBNJ agreement and that applies in the case where an environmental impact assessment has been already conducted for the planned activity in accordance with the requirements of other relevant IFBs, including RFMOs. While Article 8(6) can be understood as implying that this exception applies in all circumstances, the BBNJ agreement set out several conditions that must be fulfilled
• Article 17(2) on the Content of Proposals of Measures such as area-based management tools: under the BBNJ Agreement, Parties shall collaborate and consult with the relevant stakeholders. The word “collaborate” is missing. This addition is important, including when it comes to fisheries stakeholders.
• Article 18 on Implementation: the rapporteur introduces some of the provisions of Article 25 of the BBNJ agreement that were missing and clarifies cases where, in addition to Member States, the Commission represents the EU in some IFBs, notably RFMOs.
• A recital on the BBNJ general provisions related to international cooperation was introduced to recall the EU’s obligations under the BBNJ agreement to ensure cooperation and coherence with the work done within RFMOs and Regional Seas Convention, considering their key role. It calls on the Commission and Member States to develop a common coordinated approach and cooperation mechanisms.
Your Rapporteur finally calls for the swift transposition and implementation of the BBNJ agreement. She believes that the repeated attacks against multilateralism highlight the need for the EU to reiterate its strong commitment to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
The Committee on Fisheries submits the following to the Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety, as the committee responsible:
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3a) It should be noted that Member States shall retain full sovereignty in determining the activities under their jurisdiction or control. This Directive shall not be interpreted as limiting their ability to define, in accordance with their domestic legal system and international law, the activities falling within its scope. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (5) The Union is committed to stepping up efforts to tackle climate change and to delivering on the implementation of the Paris Agreement adopted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (‘the Paris Agreement’), guided by its principles and on the basis of the best available scientific knowledge, in the context of the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement. | (5) The Union is committed to stepping up efforts to tackle climate change and to delivering on the implementation of the Paris Agreement adopted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (‘the Paris Agreement’), guided by its principles, including by increasing the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and foster climate resilience and development with low greenhouse gas emissions, in a manner that does not threaten food production, and on the basis of the best available scientific knowledge, in the context of the long-term temperature goal of the Paris Agreement. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (7) As parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Union and its Member States are committed to achieving the goals and targets of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, adopted at the fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity on 7-19 December 2022, and the long-time strategic vision that, by 2050, biodiversity is to be valued, conserved, restored and wisely used, maintaining ecosystem services, sustaining a healthy planet and delivering benefits essential for all people. The EU biodiversity strategy for 2030, in the communication of the Commission of 20 May 2020 entitled ‘EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2023 Bringing nature back into our lives’, sets out multiple objectives, including the aim to restore the good environmental status of marine ecosystems. | (7) The EU biodiversity strategy for 2030, contained in the communication of the Commission of 20 May 2020 entitled ‘EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 Bringing nature back into our lives’, sets out multiple objectives including regarding marine ecosystems, notably with the aim of concluding an ambitious legally binding agreement on marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ). As parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Union and its Member States are committed to achieving the goals and targets of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, adopted at the fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) on 7-19 December 2022, and together with the long-time strategic vision that, by 2050, biodiversity is to be valued, conserved, restored and wisely used, maintaining ecosystem services, sustaining a healthy planet and delivering benefits essential for all people. Parties to the CBD, in accordance with the 2030 mission towards achieving the 2050 strategic vision, are to take urgent action to halt and reverse biodiversity loss to put nature on a path to recovery for the benefit of people and the planet by conserving and sustainably using biodiversity and by ensuring the fair and equitable sharing of benefits from the use of genetic resources, while providing the necessary means of implementation of the CBD. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (7a) The communication of the Commission of 5 June 2025 entitled “The European Ocean Pact” sets out actions to ensure the swift ratification, transposition into Union law, and implementation of the BBNJ Agreement and the sustainable governance of the High Seas. It also envisages that the Union support the implementation of the BBNJ agreement in developing countries through the EUR40 million contribution to the Global Ocean Programme. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (7b) The declaration of the High Ambition Coalition for Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ HAC) of 28 May 2025, initiated by the Commission and bringing together some 40 countries, illustrates the Union's ambition in global ocean governance and protection. In line with that vision, complemented by ocean diplomacy, the Commission should support Member States willing to host the headquarters of the international secretariat defined in Article 50 of the BBNJ Agreement and ensure its co-financing. It is also important for the Union, as part of its Ocean diplomacy, to encourage third countries to ratify the BBNJ Agreement and ensure that they comply with its provision in order to ensure a level playing field. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (7c) Under the BBNJ Agreement, Parties shall cooperate, including through strengthening and enhancing cooperation with and promoting cooperation among relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies in the achievement of the objectives of the BBNJ Agreement. The Commission and Member States should thus develop a common coordinated approach and mechanisms for ensuring coherence with the work undertaken within those instruments, framework and bodies such as in Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) or Regional Seas Conventions, including regarding the promotion of measures to support the implementation of the decisions and recommendations made by the Conference of the Parties under Part III of the BBNJ Agreement. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (7d) According to its Article 5, the BBNJ Agreement is to be interpreted and applied in a manner that does not undermine relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies, and that promotes coherence and coordination with those instruments, frameworks and bodies. In that context, RFMOs remain the competent international bodies for the conservation and management of fisheries resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction. The application of this Directive should fully respect their competences as well as the obligations of the Union and its Member States under existing Union law and international agreements on the high seas. At the same time, the Union and its Member States should act within RFMOs to ensure that the decisions adopted by these organisations are guided by the best available science and promote consistency between fisheries management decisions and the objectives of the BBNJ Agreement. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (7e) The Union and its Member States are committed to following the general principles and approaches set out in Article 7 of the BBNJ Agreement. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (7f) Regulation (EU) No 1026/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council 1a establishes a framework for the identification and the adoption of measures with regard to third countries which fail to cooperate and allow non-sustainable fishing of a stock of common interest for the Union. That Regulation, recently amended, makes possible for the Union to identify a third country as allowing non-sustainable fishing if, among others, it fails to cooperate in the management of a stock of common interest, in full compliance with the provisions of the UNCLOS and the UN Fish Stocks Agreement (UNFSA), or with any other international agreement, such as the BBNJ Agreement, or rule of international law, and if it fails to adopt the necessary fisheries management measures. In that regard, this Directive should work together with Regulation (EU) No 1026/2012, especially in relation to international cooperation that may be established in the framework of RFMOs or, where those have no competence for the stock in question, by means of ad hoc arrangements among the countries having an interest in the relevant fisheries | |
| 1a Regulation (EU) No 1026/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on certain measures for the purpose of the conservation of fish stocks in relation to countries allowing non-sustainable fishing, OJ L 316, 14.11.2012, pp. 34–37. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (8a) This directive is limited to the strict transposition of the Union’s international obligations under the BBNJ Agreement. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (9) Pursuant to the BBNJ Agreement, activities with respect to marine genetic resources and digital sequence information on marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction are in the interests of all States and for the benefit of all humanity, particularly for the benefit of advancing the scientific knowledge of humanity and promoting the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity, taking into consideration the interests and needs of developing States. | (9) Pursuant to the BBNJ Agreement, activities with respect to marine genetic resources and digital sequence information on marine genetic resources of areas beyond national jurisdiction are in the interests of all States and for the benefit of all humanity, particularly for the benefit of advancing the scientific knowledge of humanity and promoting the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity, ensuring food security and supporting the development of the marine economy, taking into consideration the interests and needs of developing States. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (14) The BBNJ Agreement allows the establishment of area-based management tools, including marine protected, areas in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Measures adopted by the Conference of the Parties under the BBNJ Agreement should be implemented and, if necessary, transposed into EU legislation. Pending transposition, Member States should not undermine the effectiveness of the measures adopted. It is necessary to lay down the procedures needed to ensure coordination among the Member States and the Commission prior to the submission of any proposal to establish area-based management tools or a proposal for an emergency measure to the BBNJ Secretariat. | (14) The BBNJ Agreement allows the establishment of area-based management tools, including marine protected, areas in areas beyond national jurisdiction. The target 3 of the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework mentions protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs). Although not referred to in the BBNJ Agreement, OECMs may be considered as part of the area-based management tools. Measures adopted by the Conference of the Parties under the BBNJ Agreement should be implemented and, where relevant, transposed into EU legislation. Pending transposition, the effectiveness of the adopted measures should not be undermined. It is important to lay down the procedures needed to ensure coordination among the Member States and the Union actions prior to the submission of any proposal to establish area-based management tools to the BBNJ Secretariat. An emergency measure, as it requires rapid response to prevent damage on biodiversity, ecosystems or fisheries, can be adopted intersessionally. Member states should therefore have the possibility to submit proposals for an emergency measure directly to the Secretariat. Where applicable and in line with the BBNJ Agreement, cooperation and coordination with RFMOs in the use of area-based management tools and conservation measures should be strengthened. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (15) Under this Directive, for any proposal to establish area-based management tools or any proposal for an emergency measure under Articles 19 and 24(3) of the BBNJ Agreement, the Commission should carry out a preliminary legal assessment. This assessment should include an assessment of the need for the Union to make such a proposal to the BBNJ Secretariat. | (15) Under this Directive, for any proposal to establish area-based management tools or any proposal for an emergency measure under Articles 19 and 24(3) of the BBNJ Agreement, the Commission should carry out a preliminary assessment in order to provide support to Member States and ensure coordination. This assessment should include an assessment of the relevance for the Union to make such a proposal to the BBNJ Secretariat. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (16a) In order to ensure the effective implementation of this Agreement, the decision-making processes and the Clearing-House Mechanism should function effectively, be based on the best available science and scientific information, and operate efficiently with adequate consideration and dialogue with the relevant stakeholders; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (17) The Union is party to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters, signed in Aarhus on 25 June 1998 and ratified on 17 February 2005. The Union is party to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context, signed in Espoo on 25 February 1991 and ratified on 24 June 1997. The obligations under these Conventions should remain applicable in the areas falling within the scope of this Directive. The Espoo Convention aims to enhance international co-operation in assessing environmental impact in particular in a transboundary context. The objectives of the Aarhus Convention include guaranteeing the rights of public participation in decision-making in environmental matters in order to contribute to the protection of the right to live in an environment which is adequate for personal health and well-being. Within the scope of this Directive, the rights of public participation in decision-making in environmental matters should be exercised following the same principles as those established under the Aarhus Convention. | (17) The Union is party to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters, signed in Aarhus on 25 June 1998 and ratified on 17 February 2005. The Union is party to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context, signed in Espoo on 25 February 1991 and ratified on 24 June 1997. The obligations under these Conventions should remain applicable in the areas falling within the scope of this Directive. The Espoo Convention aims to enhance international co-operation in assessing environmental impact in particular in a transboundary context. The objectives of the Aarhus Convention aims to guarantee the rights of access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters in order to contribute to the protection of the right to live in an environment which is adequate for personal health and well-being. Within the scope of this Directive, the rights of public participation in decision-making in environmental matters should be exercised following the same principles as those established under the Aarhus Convention. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (19) Since other applicable legal instruments or frameworks or global, regional, subregional or sectoral bodies provide a framework for assessing the impacts of planned activities under national jurisdiction or control that take place in areas beyond national jurisdiction, Member States should not be required to conduct a screening or an environmental impact assessment in accordance with this Directive under the conditions set out in Article 29(4) of the BBNJ Agreement. In such cases, the Member State concerned should ensure that the environmental impact assessment report is published through the BBNJ Clearing-House Mechanism. | (19) Where other applicable legal instruments or legal frameworks or global, regional, subregional or sectoral bodies, such as the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs) or the common fisheries policy (CFP), provide a framework for assessing the impacts of planned activities under national jurisdiction or control that take place in areas beyond national jurisdiction, Member States should not be required to conduct a screening or an environmental impact assessment in accordance with this Directive, provided that that the Member States with jurisdiction or control over the planned activity determine that the conditions set out in Article 29(4) of the BBNJ Agreement are met. In such cases, the Member State concerned should ensure that the environmental impact assessment report is published through the BBNJ Clearing-House Mechanism. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (23) Decisions authorising planned activities that take place in areas beyond national jurisdiction granted by the competent authority or authorities may take the form of a wide range of legal acts (such as development consents, decisions, permits and other forms of authorisation), depending on the national procedures applicable in the Member States. Irrespective of the form, title or the procedure for adopting such decisions under national law, Member States should ensure that planned activities taking place in areas beyond national jurisdiction that may cause substantial pollution of or significant and harmful changes to the marine environment are made subject to an assessment before being authorised. | (23) Decisions authorising planned activities that take place in areas beyond national jurisdiction granted by the competent authority or authorities may take the form of a wide range of legal acts (such as development consents, decisions, permits and other forms of authorisation), depending on the national procedures applicable in the Member States. Irrespective of the form, title or the procedure for adopting such decisions under national law, Member States should ensure that planned activities taking place in areas beyond national jurisdiction that may cause substantial pollution of or significant and harmful changes to the marine environment are made subject to an assessment before being authorised. It should be considered that fishing activities regulated by RFMOs or the CFP may have already been subject to a screening process and that conducting a new screening may not be necessary, provided that the Member States determine that conditions under Article 8(6) of the BBNJ agreement are met. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. This Directive applies to areas beyond national jurisdiction. It sets out rules applicable to marine genetic resources and digital sequence information, environmental assessments of planned activities under the jurisdiction or control of Member States, as well as rules on the establishment and implementation of area-based management tools and emergency measures. It applies together with the Union rules and policies in the area of the common fisheries policy (CFP). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) ‘planned activity’ means an activity involving the execution of construction works, installations, schemes or other interventions in the marine environment, including regular activities aimed at utilising natural resources; | (i) ‘planned activity’ means any activity involving an intervention in the marine environment, that inter alia includes the execution of construction works, installations, schemes and regular activities aimed at utilising natural resources; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) ‘activities under jurisdiction or control’ means activities carried out by both public and private entities, on which the Member State can, in accordance with international law, exercise its competence or authority; | (j) ‘activities under jurisdiction or control’ means activities carried out by natural and legal persons, including public and private entities, on which the Member State can, in accordance with international law, exercise its competence or authority; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (n) ‘public’ means the public concerned as well as indigenous peoples and local communities with relevant traditional knowledge and relevant global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies and the scientific community; | (n) ‘public’ means the public concerned as well as Indigenous Peoples and local communities with relevant traditional knowledge and relevant global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies and the scientific community; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. This Directive applies to planned activities under Member States’ jurisdiction or control that take place in areas beyond national jurisdiction. | 1. This Directive applies to planned activities under Member States’ jurisdiction or control that take place in areas beyond national jurisdiction, without prejudice to Member States' competences. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1b. The Directive shall not, under any circumstances, interfere with the processes by which Member States seek the extension of their continental shelf before the United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) fishing regulated under applicable international law and fishing-related activities; and | (a) fishing regulated under applicable international law and the common fisheries policy, and fishing-related activities; and |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. This Chapter does not apply to planned activities under Member States’ jurisdiction or control that take place in areas beyond national jurisdiction for which a screening or an environmental impact assessment have been carried out in accordance with the requirements of other relevant international legal instruments or frameworks or by relevant global, regional, subregional or sectoral bodies. For activities for which an environmental impact assessment has been carried out in accordance with the requirements of other relevant legal instruments or frameworks or by relevant global, regional, subregional or sectoral bodies, Member States shall ensure that the conditions under Article 29(4) of the BBNJ Agreement are met. In such cases, the Member State concerned shall ensure that the environmental impact assessment report is published through the BBNJ Clearing-House Mechanism and that the activity is monitored. | 6. This Chapter does not apply to planned activities under Member States’ jurisdiction or control that take place in areas beyond national jurisdiction for which a screening or an environmental impact assessment have been carried out in accordance with the requirements of other relevant international legal instruments or frameworks or by relevant global, regional, subregional or sectoral bodies, such as RFMOs, provided that Member States determine that the conditions under Article 29 (4), of the BBNJ Agreement are met; In such cases, the Member State concerned shall ensure that the environmental impact assessment report is published through the BBNJ Clearing- House Mechanism and that the activity is monitored. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. For planned activities under Member States’ jurisdiction or control that take place in areas within national jurisdiction and are likely to have significant effects on the marine environment in areas beyond national jurisdiction, Member States shall apply Directive 2011/92/EU and other relevant EU law that contains provisions related to environment assessments for planned activities. For these activities, Member States shall make relevant information available through the BBNJ Clearing-House Mechanism in a timely manner, during the process under Directive 2011/92/EU and other relevant EU law that contains provisions related to environment assessments for planned activities and ensure that the activity is monitored in a manner consistent with the requirements of that Directive and national legislation. | 7. For planned activities under Member States’ jurisdiction or control that take place in areas within national jurisdiction and are likely to cause substantial pollution of or significant and harmful changes to the marine environment in areas beyond national jurisdiction, Member States shall apply Directive 2011/92/EU and other relevant EU law that contains provisions related to environment assessments for planned activities. For these activities, Member States shall make relevant information, including any relevant monitoring reports, available through the BBNJ Clearing-House Mechanism in a timely manner, during the process under Directive 2011/92/EU and other relevant EU law that contains provisions related to environment assessments for planned activities and ensure that the activity is monitored in a manner consistent with the requirements of that Directive and national legislation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. When conducting the screening, Member States shall consider at least the description of the planned activity, including its purpose, location, duration and intensity, the initial analysis of the potential impacts, including consideration of cumulative impacts and, as appropriate, alternatives to the planned activity. | 3. When conducting the screening, Member States shall at least consider the description of the planned activity, including its purpose, location, duration and intensity, the initial analysis of the potential impacts, including consideration of cumulative impacts and, as appropriate, alternatives to the planned activity. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) the potential impacts of the planned activity, including the potential cumulative impacts and the potential impacts in areas within national jurisdiction; | (e) the potential impacts of the planned activity on the environment and existing activities, including the potential cumulative impacts and the potential impacts in areas within national jurisdiction; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The environmental impact assessment report shall be based on an opinion on its scope issued by a competent authority. | 2. The environmental impact assessment report shall be based on a scoping opinion issued by a competent authority. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) a description of potential impacts of the planned activity, including potential cumulative impacts and any impacts of the activity in areas within national jurisdiction; | (d) a description of potential impacts of the planned activity, including key environmental and any associated impacts, such as economic, social, cultural and human health impacts in line with article 31.1 of the BBNJ agreement, including potential cumulative impacts and any impacts of the activity in areas within national jurisdiction; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Parties to the BBNJ Agreement, in particular coastal parties adjacent to the planned activity and any other parties adjacent to the planned activity, and the public concerned shall be given early and effective opportunities to participate in procedures for authorising the planned activities referred to in Article 12(2) and shall, for that purpose, be entitled to express comments and opinions before a decision to authorise a planned activity is taken when all options are open to the competent authority or authorities. | 2. Parties to the BBNJ Agreement, in particular coastal parties adjacent to the planned activity and any other parties adjacent to the planned activity, and the public concerned shall be given early and effective opportunities to participate in procedures for authorising the planned activities referred to in Article 12(2), including in the environmental impact assessment process, and shall, for that purpose, be entitled to express comments and opinions before a decision to authorise a planned activity is taken when all options are open to the competent authority or authorities. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) parties that carry out, in the area of the planned activity, human activities, including economic activities, that may reasonably be believed to be affected by the planned activity. | (b) parties that carry out, in the area of the planned activity, human activities, including economic activities, that may reasonably be believed to be affected by the planned activity. In the case of fisheries activities, the relevant RFMOs shall be consulted. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) any conditions attached to the decision, a description of any features of the planned activity and/or measures envisaged to avoid, prevent or reduce any substantial pollution of or significant and harmful changes to the marine environment as well as monitoring measures. Where appropriate, these measures may be incorporated into an environmental management plan. | (b) any conditions attached to the decision, a description of any features of the planned activity and/or measures envisaged to avoid, prevent or reduce any substantial pollution of or significant and harmful changes to the marine environment as well as monitoring measures. Where appropriate, these measures may be incorporated into an environmental management plan. The decision shall take into account the associated impacts, such as economic, social, cultural and human health impacts, including socioeconomic impacts on sectors and communities. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. When a decision to authorise or not to authorise a planned activity has been taken, Member States shall promptly ensure that the decision is made available to the public, including through the BBNJ Clearing-House Mechanism and the BBNJ secretariat. To that point, Member States shall make available the comments and opinions received during the consultations referred to in Article 11 and a description of the manner in which these comments and opinions have been taken into account or otherwise addressed. | 4. When a decision to authorise or not to authorise a planned activity has been taken, Member States shall promptly ensure that the decision is made available to the public, including through the BBNJ Clearing-House Mechanism and the BBNJ secretariat. To that point, Member States shall make available to the public any conditions of approval, including conditions related to mitigation measures and follow-up requirements, and the comments and opinions received during the consultations referred to in Article 11 and a description of the manner in which these comments and opinions have been taken into account or otherwise addressed. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. The Commission may, in collaboration with Member States, participate in the monitoring referred to in paragraph 1 with its agencies, in particular the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA), the European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA) and the European Space Agency (ESA). In the case of fisheries activities, Member States may use data collected from fishing activities in the context of RMFOs. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with the relevant national legal system, members of the public concerned have access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent and impartial body set up by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions under Articles 8 to 13. | Member States shall ensure that, in line with the implementation of the Aarhus Convention, in accordance with the relevant national legal system, members of the public concerned have access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent and impartial body set up by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions under Articles 8 to 13 and 16 to 19. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The review procedures referred to in paragraph 1 shall be fair, equitable, timely and free of charge or not prohibitively expensive, and shall provide adequate and effective remedies, including injunctive relief where necessary. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Member States shall ensure that practical information is made available to the public on access to the administrative and judicial review procedures referred to in this Article. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Member States shall, irrespective of whether they act individually or collectively, send the draft of a proposal under Article 19 of the BBNJ Agreement or of an emergency measure under Article 24(3) of that Agreement to the Commission before any submission to the BBNJ Secretariat. Upon receipt, the Commission shall inform all Member States and share the draft proposal. If other Member States have comments, they shall submit these comments to the Commission within 30 days from receipt of the draft proposal or earlier if warranted by the emergency measure. The Commission shall send the comments received on to the other Member States. | 1. Member States shall, irrespective of whether they act individually or collectively, send the draft of a proposal under Article 19 of the BBNJ Agreement to the Commission before any submission to the BBNJ Secretariat. Upon receipt, the Commission shall inform all Member States and share the draft proposal. If other Member States have comments, they shall submit these comments to the Commission within 30 days from receipt of the draft proposal or earlier if warranted by the emergency measure. The Commission shall send the comments received on to the other Member States, upon receipt. Member States may submit proposals for emergency measures under Article 24(3) of the Agreement directly to the BBNJ Secretariat. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The Commission shall present a preliminary assessment of the draft proposal or draft emergency measures received under paragraph 1 before Member States submit any proposal or draft to the BBNJ Secretariat. The aim of the preliminary assessment is to help determining whether the proposal or the emergency measure should be submitted or not on behalf of the Union, or the Union and its Member States. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The Commission shall present a preliminary assessment of whether the draft proposal or draft emergency measure received under paragraph 1 should be submitted to the BBNJ Secretariat by the Commission on behalf of the Union. Pending such preliminary assessment, and if the preliminary assessment concludes that the submission should be made on behalf of the Union, Member States shall refrain from submitting the proposal or emergency measure referred to in paragraph 1 to the BBNJ Secretariat. | 3. Within 30 days of the deadline on Member States to comment as laid down in paragraph 1, the Commission shall present a preliminary assessment of whether the draft proposal or draft emergency measure received under paragraph 1 should be submitted to the BBNJ Secretariat by the Commission on behalf of the Union. Pending such preliminary assessment, and if the preliminary assessment concludes that the submission should be made on behalf of the Union, Member States shall refrain from submitting the proposal or emergency measure referred to in paragraph 1 to the BBNJ Secretariat. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Proposals under Article 19 of the BBNJ Agreement regarding the establishment of area-based management tools, including marine protected areas, or the emergency measure under Article 24(3) of that Agreement shall be formulated on the basis of the best available science and scientific information and, where available, relevant traditional knowledge of indigenous peoples and local communities, following the precautionary approach and an ecosystem approach. | 1. Proposals under Article 19 of the BBNJ Agreement regarding the establishment of area-based management tools, including marine protected areas, or the emergency measure under Article 24(3) of that Agreement shall be formulated on the basis of the best available science and scientific information and, where available, relevant traditional knowledge of indigenous peoples and local communities, taking into account the precautionary approach and an ecosystem approach. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Stakeholders, including states and global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies, as well as civil society, the scientific community, the private sector, indigenous peoples and local communities, shall be consulted, as appropriate, on the development of proposals referred to in this Chapter. | 2. Member States shall collaborate and consult, as appropriate, with stakeholders, including states and global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies, inter aliaRMFOs, as well as civil society, the scientific community, the private sector, indigenous peoples and local communities, for the development of proposals referred to in this Chapter. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4a. Member States shall make information relating to the establishment of area-based management tools, including marine protected areas, available through the BBNJ Clearing-House Mechanism. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Member States shall ensure that activities under their jurisdiction or control that take place in areas beyond national jurisdiction are conducted in line with the decisions of the Conference of the Parties adopted under Part III of the BBNJ Agreement. | 1. Member States shall ensure that activities under their jurisdiction or control taking place in areas beyond national jurisdiction are conducted in accordance with the decisions of the Conference of the Parties adopted under Part III of the BBNJ Agreement. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Member States shall promote, as appropriate, the adoption of measures under relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies of which they are members, to support the implementation of the decisions and recommendations made by the Conference of the Parties under Part III of the BBNJ Agreement. | 2. Member States and the Commission, where applicable, shall promote, as appropriate, the adoption of measures under relevant legal instruments and frameworks and relevant global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies of which they are members, to support the implementation of the decisions and recommendations adopted by the Conference of the Parties under Part III of the BBNJ Agreement. They may participate in coordination between these bodies or between protected areas where they are interconnected. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2a. Member States shall encourage those third countries that are entitled to become parties to the BBNJ Agreement, in particular those whose activities, vessels or nationals operate in an area that is the subject of an established area- based management tool, including a marine protected area, to adopt measures supporting the decisions and recommendations of the Conference of the Parties on area-based management tools, including marine protected areas, established under the BBNJ Agreement. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2b. Member States shall make information relating to the implementation of area-based management tools, including marine protected areas, available through the BBNJ Clearing-House Mechanism. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2c. The Commission, based on the information from the Member States, shall submit biannual reports to the European Parliament on the implementation measures adopted under this Directive and on global developments regarding the implementation of the BBNJ Agreement, including information on compliance, enforcement and scientific monitoring. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Member States shall ensure that the public is given the opportunity to participate in the preparation of proposals to establish area-based management tools, including marine protected areas, under Article 15 in accordance with the requirements of Articles 6 and 7 of Directive 2001/42/EC. | Member States shall ensure that the public is given the opportunity to participate in the preparation of proposals to establish area-based management tools, including marine protected areas, under Article 15 in accordance with the requirements of Articles 6 and 7 of Directive 2001/42/EC. Member States shall ensure that consultations on proposals submitted under Article 17 of this Directive are inclusive, transparent and open to all relevant stakeholders, including States and global, regional, subregional and sectoral bodies, including RFMOs, as well as civil society, the scientific community, Indigenous Peoples and local communities. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Member States shall ensure that competent authorities performing duties under this Directive have a sufficient number of qualified staff and sufficient financial, technical and technological resources to perform their tasks effectively. | 2. Member States shall ensure that competent authorities performing duties under this Directive have a sufficient number of qualified staff and sufficient financial, technical and technological resources to perform their tasks effectively and to comply with the EU’s international obligations in the best way. |
Back matter, 1
Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.
Annex: declaration of input 4 blocks
Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur for opinion declares that she included in her opinion input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that she received, in the preparation of the opinion, prior to the adoption thereof in committee, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:
| 1. Interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register |
| High Seas Alliance |
| 2. Representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies |
Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur for opinion declares that she has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament's Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.
Procedure pages and committee votes
How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.
Procedure – committee asked for opinion 1 block
| Title | Conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction | |
| References | COM(2025)0173 – C10-0074/2025 – 2025/0090(COD) | |
| Committee(s) responsible Date announced in plenary | ENVI 7.7.2025 | |
| Opinion by Date announced in plenary | PECH 7.7.2025 | |
| Rapporteur for the opinion Date appointed | Emma Fourreau 5.6.2025 | |
| Discussed in committee | 4.9.2025 | |
| Date adopted | 16.10.2025 | |
| Result of final vote | +: –: 0: | 22 4 0 |
| Members present for the final vote | Thomas Bajada, Asger Christensen, Carmen Crespo Díaz, Siegbert Frank Droese, Emma Fourreau, Nora Junco García, Isabella Lövin, Giuseppe Lupo, Francisco José Millán Mon, Jessica Polfjärd, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Sander Smit, Emma Wiesner | |
| Substitutes present for the final vote | Carlo Ciccioli, Anna Maria Cisint, Marco Falcone, Luke Ming Flanagan, Idoia Mendia, Eric Sargiacomo, Michal Wiezik | |
| Members under Rule 216(7) present for the final vote | Paolo Borchia, Herbert Dorfmann, Camilla Laureti, Michele Picaro, Giusi Princi, Isabella Tovaglieri |
Final vote by roll call by the committee asked for opinion 3 blocks
22 · For
- ECR
- Carlo Ciccioli, Nora Junco García, Michele Picaro, Bert-Jan Ruissen
- EPP
- Carmen Crespo Díaz, Herbert Dorfmann, Marco Falcone, Francisco José Millán Mon, Jessica Polfjärd, Giusi Princi, Sander Smit
- Renew
- Asger Christensen, Emma Wiesner, Michal Wiezik
- S&D
- Thomas Bajada, Camilla Laureti, Giuseppe Lupo, Idoia Mendia, Eric Sargiacomo
- The Left
- Luke Ming Flanagan, Emma Fourreau
- Greens
- Isabella Lövin
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction”. Text, 17 October 2025. docId PECH-AD-774485. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/PECH-AD-774485 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/PECH-AD-774485 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-pech-ad-774485,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-10-17},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/PECH-AD-774485}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/PECH-AD-774485},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId PECH-AD-774485. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}