Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

Change 81

AddedLETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS

AddedMr Juan Fernando López Aguilar

AddedChair

AddedCommittee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs

AddedBRUSSELS

AddedSubject: Opinion on Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a single application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third-country workers legally residing in a Member State (recast) (COM(2022)0655 – C90163/2022 – 2022/0131(COD))

AddedDear Mr Chair,

AddedThe Committee on Legal Affairs has examined the proposal referred to above pursuant to Rule 110 on recasting of Parliament's Rules of Procedure.

AddedParagraph 3 of that Rule reads as follows:

Added“If the committee responsible for legal affairs considers that the proposal does not entail any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal, it shall inform the committee responsible for the subject matter thereof.

AddedIn such a case, over and above the conditions laid down in Rules 180 and 181, amendments shall be admissible within the committee responsible for the subject-matter only if they concern those parts of the proposal which contain changes.

AddedHowever, amendments to parts of the proposal which remain unchanged may, by way of exception and on a case-by-case basis, be accepted by the Chair of the committee responsible for the subject matter if he or she considers that this is necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text or because the amendments are inextricably linked to other admissible amendments. Such reasons must be stated in a written justification to the amendments.”

AddedFollowing the here attached opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the Parliament, the Council and the Commission, which has examined the recast proposal, and in keeping with the recommendations of the Rapporteur, the Committee on Legal Affairs considers that the proposal in question does not include any substantive changes other than those identified as such and that, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier act with those substantive amendments, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing text, without any change in its substance.

AddedIn conclusion, at its meeting of 21 March 2023, the Committee on Legal Affairs unanimously decided to recommend that the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, proceed to examine the above proposal in accordance with Rule 110.

AddedYours sincerely,

AddedAdrián Vázquez Lázara

AddedEncl.: Opinion of the Consultative Working Party.

AddedAnnex

AddedBrussels, 16 March 2023

AddedOPINION

AddedFOR THE ATTENTION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

AddedTHE COUNCIL

AddedTHE COMMISSION

AddedProposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on a single application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third-country workers legally residing in a Member State (recast)

AddedCOM(2022) 655 of 27.4.2022 – 2022/0131(COD)

AddedHaving regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 6 October 2022 and 1 February 2023 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.

AddedAt those meetings, an examination of the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Directive 2011/98/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on a single application procedure for a single permit for third-country nationals to reside and work in the territory of a Member State and on a common set of rights for third-country workers legally residing in a Member State resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, that the following should have been marked with the grey-shaded type generally used for identifying substantive amendments:

Added- in recital 7, the adding of the words ‘subject to Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council’;

Added- in recital 9, the adding of the word ‘globally’;

Added- in recital 17, the replacement of the word ‘title’ with the word ‘permit’;

Added- in recital 23, the replacement of the word ‘specified’ with the word ‘covered’;

Added- the entire text of recital 32 of Directive 2011/98/EU;

Added- in Article 1(2), the adding of the words ‘volume of’ and ‘coming from third countries to seek employment’ and the deletion of the words ‘to their labour markets’;

Added- in Article 3(2), point (c), the replacement of the words ‘posted for’ with the words ‘covered by Directive 96/71/EC’;

Added- in Article 9, point (a), the deletion of the word ‘complete’;

Added- in Article 10, the replacement of the word ‘may’ with the word ‘shall’;

Added- in Article 18(1), first subparagraph, the replacement of the words ‘25 December 2013’ with the words ‘[two years after the entry into force]’.

AddedIn consequence, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such. The Working Party also concluded, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier act with those substantive amendments, that the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing legal text, without any change in its substance.

AddedF. DREXLER J.B. LAIGNELOT D. CALLEJA CRESPO

AddedJurisconsult acting Director-General Director-General

Added25.1.2023