Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
▸Jump to an amendment (47)
Draft legislative resolution
Milan Uhrík, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Mary Khan
on behalf of the ESN Group
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(16) The storage of a facial image and two fingerprints (‘biometric data’) on identity and residence cards, as already provided for in respect of biometric passports for Union citizens and residence permits for third-country nationals, represents an appropriate combination of reliable identification and authentication with a reduced risk of fraud, for the purpose of strengthening the security of identity and residence cards. As the Court of Justice confirmed, the mandatory inclusion of fingerprints on the storage medium is compatible with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to protection of personal data as guaranteed in Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter. | Amendment(16) The storage of a facial image and two fingerprints (‘biometric data’) on identity and residence cards does not represent an appropriate combination of reliable identification and authentication with a reduced risk of fraud, for the purpose of strengthening the security of identity and residence cards. It is a too strong violation of the right to privacy of the citizens in favor of ever increased possibilities for state control. It also is too big of a risk for cybercriminality: if those fingerprints are stolen from the storage medium on the identity card, they can be used worldwide for all kinds of identity-related fraud and theft. And as they are unique and cannot be changed, the theft of these fingerprints would form a life-long risk for the citizen who is the victim of it. Even if the Court of Justice confirmed, strictly juridical, that the mandatory inclusion of fingerprints on the storage medium is compatible with the fundamental rights to respect for private life and to protection of personal data as guaranteed in Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter, there are other values at stake here, such as a fundamental choice for the privacy of the citizens over ever increasing possibilities for state control, and the strict avoiding of new forms of cybercrime. |
Francisco Assis, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Ana Catarina Mendes, Marco Tarquinio, Emma Rafowicz, Alessandro Zan
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(19) This Regulation does not provide a legal basis for setting up or maintaining databases at national level for the storage of biometric data in Member States, which is a matter of national law that needs to comply with Union law regarding data protection, including its necessity and proportionality requirements. Moreover, this Regulation does not provide a legal basis for setting up or maintaining a centralised database at Union level. | Amendment(19) This Regulation does not provide a legal basis for setting up or maintaining databases at national level for the storage of biometric data in Member States. Moreover, this Regulation does not provide a legal basis for setting up or maintaining a centralised database at Union level. Biometric data processed for the purpose of this Regulation should not be processed for any other purposes, and should not be stored in national or Union level databases. |
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(19) This Regulation does not provide a legal basis for setting up or maintaining databases at national level for the storage of biometric data in Member States, which is a matter of national law that needs to comply with Union law regarding data protection, including its necessity and proportionality requirements. Moreover, this Regulation does not provide a legal basis for setting up or maintaining a centralised database at Union level. | Amendment(19) This Regulation does not provide a legal basis for setting up or maintaining databases at national level for the storage of biometric data in Member States. Moreover, this Regulation does not provide a legal basis for setting up or maintaining a centralised database at Union level. Biometric data processed for the purpose of this Regulation should not be processed for any other purposes, and should not be stored in national or Union level databases. |
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(19) This Regulation does not provide a legal basis for setting up or maintaining databases at national level for the storage of biometric data in Member States, which is a matter of national law that needs to comply with Union law regarding data protection, including its necessity and proportionality requirements. Moreover, this Regulation does not provide a legal basis for setting up or maintaining a centralised database at Union level. | Amendment(19) This Regulation does not provide a legal basis for setting up or maintaining databases at national level for the storage of biometric data in Member States. Moreover, this Regulation does not provide a legal basis for setting up or maintaining a centralised database at Union level. Biometric data processed for the purpose of this Regulation should not be processed for any other purposes, and should not be stored in national or Union level databases. |
Malik Azmani, Jeannette Baljeu, Lucia Yar, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(20) Biometric identifiers should be collected and stored in the storage medium of identity cards and residence documents for the purposes of verifying the authenticity of the document and the identity of the holder. Given the electronic signature on the storage medium of identity cards, identifying the holder by means of the storage medium, which contains the same biographic data as printed on the document, is more reliable than a visual check of the document. Union citizens should thus be allowed to use the data stored in the storage medium of their identity card to identify themselves towards private entities. However, the verification of the fingerprints stored on the storage medium should only be carried out by duly authorised staff and only when the document is required to be produced by law. | Amendment(20) The facial image stored in the storage medium of identity cards and residence documents should only be accessed by duly authorised staff of competent national authorities, Union agencies and private entities for the purposes of verifying the authenticity of the document and the identity of the holder. Such access should comply with Union data protection law. The facial image should not be retained for longer than is necessary for those purposes, should be deleted as soon as those purposes are achieved and should not be transferred to third countries or international organisations unless permitted by Union data protection law. Those safeguards are intended to ensure appropriate protection of the facial image while not prohibiting its use. |
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(20) Biometric identifiers should be collected and stored in the storage medium of identity cards and residence documents for the purposes of verifying the authenticity of the document and the identity of the holder. Given the electronic signature on the storage medium of identity cards, identifying the holder by means of the storage medium, which contains the same biographic data as printed on the document, is more reliable than a visual check of the document. Union citizens should thus be allowed to use the data stored in the storage medium of their identity card to identify themselves towards private entities. However, the verification of the fingerprints stored on the storage medium should only be carried out by duly authorised staff and only when the document is required to be produced by law. | Amendment(20) Biometric identifiers should be collected and stored in the storage medium of identity cards and residence documents for the purposes of verifying the authenticity of the document and the identity of the holder. Such a verification should only be carried out by duly authorised staff and only when the document is required to be produced by law. Moreover, biometric data stored for the purpose of the personalisation of identity cards or residence documents should be kept in a highly secure manner and only until the date of collection of the document and, in any case, no longer than 90 days from the date of issue of the document. After that period, those biometric data should be immediately erased or destroyed. This should be without prejudice to any other processing of those data in accordance with Union and national law regarding data protection. |
Malik Azmani, Jeannette Baljeu, Lucia Yar, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment(20 a) The verification of the fingerprints stored on the storage medium should only be carried out by duly authorised staff of competent national authorities and Union agencies and only when the document is required to be produced by Union or national law. |
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment(20 a) Private entities should be required to obtain the consent of the holder to access the facial image. Consent of the data subject should thus be understood as an additional safeguard and not provide in itself a legal ground for processing by private entities. |
LEFT position remains the rejection of the possibility granted to private entities to have access to the facial image of the document holder. However, in view of the Council’s amendments, this is a “fall-back” position amendment to limit its overall position as much as possible. This particular amendment seeks to put forward the positive parts of Council’s text, strengthening the data subjects’ rights in case access to facial images is granted to private entities
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment(20 b) When the identity cards or residence documents are required to be produced by law, private entities should only be able to access the facial image for the purposes of verifying the identity of the holder and they should not store or transmit the facial images. |
LEFT position remains the rejection of the possibility granted to private entities to have access to the facial image of the document holder. However, in view of the Council’s amendments, this is a “fall-back” position amendment to limit its position as much as possible.
Roberto Vannacci, António Tânger Corrêa, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Nikola Bartůšek, Fabrice Leggeri, Tom Vandendriessche, Matthieu Valet
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(22) The specifications of ICAO Document 9303, which ensure global interoperability including in relation to machine readability and use of visual inspection, should be taken into account for the purpose of this Regulation. | Amendment(22) The specifications of ICAO Document 9303, which ensure global interoperability including in relation to machine readability and use of visual inspection, should be the benchmark for the purpose of this Regulation. |
Roberto Vannacci, António Tânger Corrêa, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Fabrice Leggeri, András László, Tom Vandendriessche, Matthieu Valet
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(23) Member States should be able to decide whether to include a person’s gender on a document covered by this Regulation. Where a Member State includes a person’s gender on such a document, the specifications of ICAO Document 9303 ‘F’, ‘M’ or ‘X’ or the corresponding single initial used in the language or languages of that Member State should be used, as appropriate. | Amendment(23) Member States should include a person’s sex on a document covered by this Regulation, according to the specifications of ICAO Document 9303. Displaying the holder's sex enables documents to be used more effectively to identify the holder. |
Paolo Inselvini, Alessandro Ciriani
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(23) Member States should be able to decide whether to include a person’s gender on a document covered by this Regulation. Where a Member State includes a person’s gender on such a document, the specifications of ICAO Document 9303 ‘F’, ‘M’ or ‘X’ or the corresponding single initial used in the language or languages of that Member State should be used, as appropriate. | Amendment(23) Member States should be able to decide whether to include a person’s sex on a document covered by this Regulation. Where a Member State includes a person’s sex on such a document, the specifications ‘F’ or ‘M’ or the corresponding single initial used in the language or languages of that Member State should be used, as appropriate. |
Alessandro Zan, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Emma Rafowicz, Evin Incir, Cecilia Strada, Pina Picierno
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(23) Member States should be able to decide whether to include a person’s gender on a document covered by this Regulation. Where a Member State includes a person’s gender on such a document, the specifications of ICAO Document 9303 ‘F’, ‘M’ or ‘X’ or the corresponding single initial used in the language or languages of that Member State should be used, as appropriate. | Amendment(23) Member States should be able to decide whether to include a person’s gender on a document covered by this Regulation. Where a Member State includes a person’s gender on such a document, the specifications of ICAO Document 9303 ‘F’, ‘M’ or ‘X’ or the corresponding single initial used in the language or languages of that Member State should be used, as appropriate, according to the case law of the Court of Justice1a. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment1a Judgment of the Court of Justice of 4 October 2024, Mirin, C-4/23, ECLI:EU:C:2024:845 |
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment(25 a) Qualified staff should receive mandatory training on best practices for collecting biometric identifiers from children and vulnerable persons, ensuring sensitivity to gender and age-specific needs while respecting the dignity of all individuals. |
Roberto Vannacci, António Tânger Corrêa, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Nikola Bartůšek, Fabrice Leggeri, Tom Vandendriessche, Matthieu Valet
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(26) Where difficulties are encountered in the collection of biometric identifiers, Member States should ensure that appropriate procedures are in place to respect the dignity of the person concerned. Therefore, specific considerations relating to gender and to the specific needs of children and of vulnerable persons should be taken into account. | Amendment(26) Where difficulties are encountered in the collection of biometric identifiers, Member States should ensure that appropriate procedures are in place to respect the dignity of the person concerned. Therefore, specific considerations relating to the specific needs of children and of vulnerable persons should be taken into account. |
Paolo Inselvini, Alessandro Ciriani
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(26) Where difficulties are encountered in the collection of biometric identifiers, Member States should ensure that appropriate procedures are in place to respect the dignity of the person concerned. Therefore, specific considerations relating to gender and to the specific needs of children and of vulnerable persons should be taken into account. | Amendment(26) Where difficulties are encountered in the collection of biometric identifiers, Member States should ensure that appropriate procedures are in place to respect the dignity of the person concerned. Therefore, specific considerations relating to the sex and to the specific needs of children and of vulnerable persons should be taken into account. |
Roberto Vannacci, António Tânger Corrêa, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Fabrice Leggeri, Tom Vandendriessche, Matthieu Valet
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(28) A distinguishing sign in the form of the two-letter country code of the Member State issuing the document, printed in negative in a blue rectangle and encircled by 12 yellow stars, facilitates the visual inspection of the document, in particular when the holder is exercising the right of free movement. | Amendment(28) A distinguishing sign in the form of the two-letter country code of the Member State issuing the document facilitates the visual inspection of the document, in particular when the holder is exercising the right of free movement. |
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment(32 a) In support of this objective, the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, should ensure the harmonization of electronic identification systems and the integration of cross-border e-government services. Those measures should enhance the usability and accessibility of identity cards for all Union citizens while maintaining seamless functionality and full interoperability across all Member States. |
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(43) In accordance with the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making9 , the Commission should, no sooner than six years after the date of application of this Regulation carry out an evaluation of this Regulation, including on the basis of information gathered through specific monitoring arrangements, in order to assess the actual effects of this Regulation and the need for any further action. For the purpose of monitoring, Member States should collect statistics on the number of identity cards and residence documents which they issued. | Amendment(43) The Commission should report on the implementation of this Regulation two years, and 11 years, respectively, after the date of its application, including on the appropriateness of the level of security, taking into account its impact on fundamental rights and data protection principles. In accordance with the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making9 , the Commission should, six years after the date of application of this Regulation, and every six years thereafter, carry out an evaluation of this Regulation, including on the basis of information gathered through specific monitoring arrangements, in order to assess the actual effects of this Regulation and the need for any further action. For the purpose of monitoring, Member States should collect statistics on the number of identity cards and residence documents which they issued. |
| Text proposed by the Commission9 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_interinstit/2016/512/oj. | Amendment9 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_interinstit/2016/512/oj. |
Roberto Vannacci, António Tânger Corrêa, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Nikola Bartůšek, Fabrice Leggeri, Tom Vandendriessche, Matthieu Valet
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the CommissionBy way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the document number may be inserted in zone I and the designation of a person’s gender shall be optional. | Amendmentdeleted |
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the CommissionBy way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the document number may be inserted in zone I and the designation of a person’s gender shall be optional. | AmendmentBy way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the document number may be inserted in zone I. |
Paolo Inselvini, Alessandro Ciriani
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the CommissionBy way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the document number may be inserted in zone I and the designation of a person’s gender shall be optional. | AmendmentBy way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the document number may be inserted in zone I and the designation of a person’s sex shall be optional. |
Alessandro Zan, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Emma Rafowicz, Evin Incir, Cecilia Strada, Pina Picierno
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the CommissionBy way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the document number may be inserted in zone I and the designation of a person’s gender shall be optional. | AmendmentBy way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the document number may be inserted in zone I and the designation of a person’s gender shall be optional. Where a Member State includes a person’s gender on a document covered by this Regulation, the specifications of ICAO Document 9303 ‘F’, ‘M’ or ‘X’ or the corresponding single initial used in the official language or languages of that Member State shall be used, as appropriate. |
Roberto Vannacci, António Tânger Corrêa, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Fabrice Leggeri, Tom Vandendriessche, Matthieu Valet
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission4. The identity card shall contain, on the front side, the two-letter country code of the Member State issuing the card, printed in negative in a blue rectangle and encircled by 12 yellow stars. | Amendment4. The identity card shall contain, on the front side, the two-letter country code of the Member State issuing the card. |
Milan Uhrík, Ewa Zajączkowska-Hernik, Mary Khan
on behalf of the ESN Group
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission5. Identity cards shall include a highly secure storage medium which shall contain a facial image of the holder of the card and two fingerprints in interoperable digital formats. For the capture of biometric identifiers, Member States shall apply the technical specifications as established by Commission Implementing Decision C(2018) 776712 as amended by Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 372613 . | Amendment5. Identity cards shall include a highly secure storage medium which shall contain a facial image of the holder of the card in interoperable digital formats. For the capture of biometric identifiers, Member States shall apply the technical specifications as established by Commission Implementing Decision C(2018) 776712 as amended by Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 372613 . |
| Text proposed by the Commission12 Commission Implementing Decision C(2018) 7767 of 30 November 2018 laying down the technical specifications for the uniform format for residence permits for third country nationals and repealing Decision C(2002) 3069. | Amendment12 Commission Implementing Decision C(2018) 7767 of 30 November 2018 laying down the technical specifications for the uniform format for residence permits for third country nationals and repealing Decision C(2002) 3069. |
| Text proposed by the Commission13 Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 3726 of 4 June 2021 amending Annex III to Implementing Decision C(2018) 7767 as regards the list of normative references. | Amendment13 Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 3726 of 4 June 2021 amending Annex III to Implementing Decision C(2018) 7767 as regards the list of normative references. |
This amendment deletes the obligation for storage of two fingerprints on the identity cards. It is a too strong violation of the right to privacy of the citizens in favor of ever increased possibilities for state control. It also is too big of a risk for cybercriminality: if these fingerprints are stolen, they can be used worldwide for all kinds of identity-related fraud. As they are unique, the theft of these fingerprints would form a life-long risk for the citizen who is the victim.
Malik Azmani, Jeannette Baljeu, Lucia Yar, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission5. Identity cards shall include a highly secure storage medium which shall contain a facial image of the holder of the card and two fingerprints in interoperable digital formats. For the capture of biometric identifiers, Member States shall apply the technical specifications as established by Commission Implementing Decision C(2018) 776712 as amended by Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 372613 . | Amendment5. Identity cards shall include a highly secure storage medium which shall contain a facial image of the holder of the card and two fingerprints in interoperable digital formats. For the capture of those two types of biometric identifiers, Member States shall apply the technical specifications as established by Commission Implementing Decision C(2018) 776712 as amended by Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 372613 . |
| Text proposed by the Commission12 Commission Implementing Decision C(2018) 7767 of 30 November 2018 laying down the technical specifications for the uniform format for residence permits for third country nationals and repealing Decision C(2002) 3069. | Amendment12 Commission Implementing Decision C(2018) 7767 of 30 November 2018 laying down the technical specifications for the uniform format for residence permits for third country nationals and repealing Decision C(2002) 3069. |
| Text proposed by the Commission13 Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 3726 of 4 June 2021 amending Annex III to Implementing Decision C(2018) 7767 as regards the list of normative references. | Amendment13 Commission Implementing Decision C(2021) 3726 of 4 June 2021 amending Annex III to Implementing Decision C(2018) 7767 as regards the list of normative references. |
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the CommissionChildren under the age of 12 years may be exempt from the requirement to give fingerprints. | AmendmentChildren under the age of 12 years shall be exempt from the requirement to give fingerprints. |
Roberto Vannacci, António Tânger Corrêa, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Nikola Bartůšek, Fabrice Leggeri, Tom Vandendriessche, Matthieu Valet
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment(e a) sex of the holder |
Roberto Vannacci, António Tânger Corrêa, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Fabrice Leggeri, Tom Vandendriessche, Matthieu Valet
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(h) on the front-side, the two-letter country code of the Member State issuing the document, printed in negative in a blue rectangle and encircled by twelve yellow stars. | Amendment(h) on the front-side, the two-letter country code of the Member State issuing the document. |
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission3. Other than where required for the purpose of processing in accordance with Union and national law, biometric identifiers stored for the purpose of personalisation of identity cards or residence documents shall be kept in a highly secure manner and only until the date of collection of the document and, in any case, no longer than 90 days from the date of issue. After this period, these biometric identifiers shall be immediately erased or destroyed. | Amendment3. The biometric identifiers stored for the purpose of personalisation of identity cards or residence documents shall be processed exclusively for that purpose and shall be kept in a highly secure manner and only until the date of collection of the document and, in any case, no longer than 90 days from the date of issue. After this period, these biometric identifiers shall be immediately erased or destroyed. |
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission3. Other than where required for the purpose of processing in accordance with Union and national law, biometric identifiers stored for the purpose of personalisation of identity cards or residence documents shall be kept in a highly secure manner and only until the date of collection of the document and, in any case, no longer than 90 days from the date of issue. After this period, these biometric identifiers shall be immediately erased or destroyed. | Amendment3. Biometric identifiers stored for the purpose of personalisation of identity cards or residence documents shall be processed exclusively for that purpose. They shall be kept in a highly secure manner and only until the date of collection of the document and, in any case, no longer than 90 days from the date of issue. After this period, these biometric identifiers shall be immediately erased or destroyed. |
Francisco Assis, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Ana Catarina Mendes, Marco Tarquinio, Emma Rafowicz, Alessandro Zan
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission3. Other than where required for the purpose of processing in accordance with Union and national law, biometric identifiers stored for the purpose of personalisation of identity cards or residence documents shall be kept in a highly secure manner and only until the date of collection of the document and, in any case, no longer than 90 days from the date of issue. After this period, these biometric identifiers shall be immediately erased or destroyed. | Amendment3. Biometric identifiers stored for the purpose of personalisation of identity cards or residence documents shall be processed exclusively for that purpose and shall be kept in a highly secure manner and only until the date of collection of the document and, in any case, no longer than 90 days from the date of issue. After this period, these biometric identifiers shall be immediately erased or destroyed. |
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission4. Cooperation with external service providers shall not exclude any liability on the part of a Member State which may arise under Union or national law in respect of breaches of obligations with regard to personal data. | Amendment4. Cooperation with external service providers shall not exclude any liability on the part of a Member State. Member States shall ensure that all external providers comply with Union and national data protection law, and additional measures should be adopted to prevent any unauthorized access or misuse of personal data during outsourced processes. |
Malik Azmani, Jeannette Baljeu, Lucia Yar, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the CommissionBiometric data stored in the storage medium of identity cards and residence documents shall only be used in accordance with Union and national law for the purpose of verifying: | AmendmentThe facial image of the holder stored in the storage medium of identity cards and residence documents shall only be accessed by duly authorised staff of competent national authorities, Union agencies and private entities in accordance with Union data protection law for the purposes of verifying: |
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the CommissionBiometric data stored in the storage medium of identity cards and residence documents shall only be used in accordance with Union and national law for the purpose of verifying: | AmendmentBiometric data stored in the storage medium of identity cards and residence documents shall only be used in accordance with Union and national law, by the duly authorised staff of competent national authorities and Union agencies, for the purpose of verifying: |
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the CommissionThe two fingerprints stored in the storage medium shall only be accessed by duly authorised staff of competent national authorities and Union agencies. | Amendmentdeleted |
Both types of biometric data, fingerprints and facial images, shall only be used for the purposes of this Regulation and only duly authorised staff of competent national authorities and Union agencies shall be able to use them. The deletion seeks to ensure that facial images are not excluded from the provisions, hence, not allowing for the cardholders to use them to identify themselves towards private entities, thus granting them access to their sensitive biometric access via this Regulation.
on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the CommissionThe two fingerprints stored in the storage medium shall only be accessed by duly authorised staff of competent national authorities and Union agencies. | AmendmentThe biometric data stored in the storage medium shall only be accessed by duly authorised staff of competent national authorities and Union agencies. |
Malik Azmani, Jeannette Baljeu, Lucia Yar, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the CommissionThe two fingerprints stored in the storage medium shall only be accessed by duly authorised staff of competent national authorities and Union agencies. | AmendmentThe two fingerprints of the holder stored in the storage medium shall only be accessed by duly authorised staff of competent national authorities and Union agencies for the purposes set out in the first subparagraph in accordance with Union and national data protection law. |
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission | AmendmentMember States shall maintain, and communicate annually to the Commission, a list of the competent national authorities with access to the biometric data stored in the storage medium referred to in Article 3(5). The Commission shall publish online a compilation of such national lists. |
Proposal for a regulation
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the CommissionEvaluation | AmendmentReporting and evaluation |
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission1. No sooner than [six years after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee. The report shall in particular focus on: | Amendment1. Two years, and 11 years, respectively, after the date of application of this Regulation, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee on the implementation of this Regulation, in particular on the protection of fundamental rights and personal data. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | AmendmentSix years after the entry into force of this Regulation, and every subsequent six years, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee. The report shall in particular focus on: |
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission1. No sooner than [six years after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee. The report shall in particular focus on: | Amendment1. Two years, and 11 years, respectively, after the date of application of this Regulation, the Commission shall report the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Regulation, in particular on the protection of fundamental rights and personal data. Six years after the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee. The report shall in particular focus on: |
Francisco Assis, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Ana Catarina Mendes, Marco Tarquinio, Emma Rafowicz, Alessandro Zan
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission1. No sooner than [six years after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee. The report shall in particular focus on: | Amendment1. Within [six years after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of this Regulation and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee. The report shall in particular focus on: |
Roberto Vannacci, António Tânger Corrêa, Susanna Ceccardi, Anna Maria Cisint, Nikola Bartůšek, Fabrice Leggeri, Tom Vandendriessche, Matthieu Valet
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission(a) the impact of this Regulation on fundamental rights; | Amendmentdeleted |
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment(d a) the necessity of introducing common security features of identification documents used on a provisional basis in view of their better recognition. |
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment(d a) a possible use of residence cards as travel documents. |