Text · Amendment list
Asylum and migration management and amending Council Directive (EC) 2003/109 and the proposed Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Fund]
Document LIBE-AM-702945 · COM(2020)0610 – C9-0309/2020 – 2020/0279(COD)
- Kind
- Amendment list LIBE-AM-702945
- Date
- 9 December 2021
- Committee
- Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
- Dossier
- 2020-0279
More facts (2)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Reference
- COM(2020)0610 – C9-0309/2020 – 2020/0279(COD)
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Jump to an amendment (400)
- Amendment 2001
- Amendment 2002
- Amendment 2003
- Amendment 2004
- Amendment 2005
- Amendment 2006
- Amendment 2007
- Amendment 2008
- Amendment 2009
- Amendment 2010
- Amendment 2011
- Amendment 2012
- Amendment 2013
- Amendment 2014
- Amendment 2015
- Amendment 2016
- Amendment 2017
- Amendment 2018
- Amendment 2019
- Amendment 2020
- Amendment 2021
- Amendment 2022
- Amendment 2023
- Amendment 2024
- Amendment 2025
- Amendment 2026
- Amendment 2027
- Amendment 2028
- Amendment 2029
- Amendment 2030
- Amendment 2031
- Amendment 2032
- Amendment 2033
- Amendment 2034
- Amendment 2035
- Amendment 2036
- Amendment 2037
- Amendment 2038
- Amendment 2039
- Amendment 2040
- Amendment 2041
- Amendment 2042
- Amendment 2043
- Amendment 2044
- Amendment 2045
- Amendment 2046
- Amendment 2047
- Amendment 2048
- Amendment 2049
- Amendment 2050
- Amendment 2051
- Amendment 2052
- Amendment 2053
- Amendment 2054
- Amendment 2055
- Amendment 2056
- Amendment 2057
- Amendment 2058
- Amendment 2059
- Amendment 2060
- Amendment 2061
- Amendment 2062
- Amendment 2063
- Amendment 2064
- Amendment 2065
- Amendment 2066
- Amendment 2067
- Amendment 2068
- Amendment 2069
- Amendment 2070
- Amendment 2071
- Amendment 2072
- Amendment 2073
- Amendment 2074
- Amendment 2075
- Amendment 2076
- Amendment 2077
- Amendment 2078
- Amendment 2079
- Amendment 2080
- Amendment 2081
- Amendment 2082
- Amendment 2083
- Amendment 2084
- Amendment 2085
- Amendment 2086
- Amendment 2087
- Amendment 2088
- Amendment 2089
- Amendment 2090
- Amendment 2091
- Amendment 2092
- Amendment 2093
- Amendment 2094
- Amendment 2095
- Amendment 2096
- Amendment 2097
- Amendment 2098
- Amendment 2099
- Amendment 2100
- Amendment 2101
- Amendment 2102
- Amendment 2103
- Amendment 2104
- Amendment 2105
- Amendment 2106
- Amendment 2107
- Amendment 2108
- Amendment 2109
- Amendment 2110
- Amendment 2111
- Amendment 2112
- Amendment 2113
- Amendment 2114
- Amendment 2115
- Amendment 2116
- Amendment 2117
- Amendment 2118
- Amendment 2119
- Amendment 2120
- Amendment 2121
- Amendment 2122
- Amendment 2123
- Amendment 2124
- Amendment 2125
- Amendment 2126
- Amendment 2127
- Amendment 2128
- Amendment 2129
- Amendment 2130
- Amendment 2131
- Amendment 2132
- Amendment 2133
- Amendment 2134
- Amendment 2135
- Amendment 2136
- Amendment 2137
- Amendment 2138
- Amendment 2139
- Amendment 2140
- Amendment 2141
- Amendment 2142
- Amendment 2143
- Amendment 2144
- Amendment 2145
- Amendment 2146
- Amendment 2147
- Amendment 2148
- Amendment 2149
- Amendment 2150
- Amendment 2151
- Amendment 2152
- Amendment 2153
- Amendment 2154
- Amendment 2155
- Amendment 2156
- Amendment 2157
- Amendment 2158
- Amendment 2159
- Amendment 2160
- Amendment 2161
- Amendment 2162
- Amendment 2163
- Amendment 2164
- Amendment 2165
- Amendment 2166
- Amendment 2167
- Amendment 2168
- Amendment 2169
- Amendment 2170
- Amendment 2171
- Amendment 2172
- Amendment 2173
- Amendment 2174
- Amendment 2175
- Amendment 2176
- Amendment 2177
- Amendment 2178
- Amendment 2179
- Amendment 2180
- Amendment 2181
- Amendment 2182
- Amendment 2183
- Amendment 2184
- Amendment 2185
- Amendment 2186
- Amendment 2187
- Amendment 2188
- Amendment 2189
- Amendment 2190
- Amendment 2191
- Amendment 2192
- Amendment 2193
- Amendment 2194
- Amendment 2195
- Amendment 2196
- Amendment 2197
- Amendment 2198
- Amendment 2199
- Amendment 2200
- Amendment 2201
- Amendment 2202
- Amendment 2203
- Amendment 2204
- Amendment 2205
- Amendment 2206
- Amendment 2207
- Amendment 2208
- Amendment 2209
- Amendment 2210
- Amendment 2211
- Amendment 2212
- Amendment 2213
- Amendment 2214
- Amendment 2215
- Amendment 2216
- Amendment 2217
- Amendment 2218
- Amendment 2219
- Amendment 2220
- Amendment 2221
- Amendment 2222
- Amendment 2223
- Amendment 2224
- Amendment 2225
- Amendment 2226
- Amendment 2227
- Amendment 2228
- Amendment 2229
- Amendment 2230
- Amendment 2231
- Amendment 2232
- Amendment 2233
- Amendment 2234
- Amendment 2235
- Amendment 2236
- Amendment 2237
- Amendment 2238
- Amendment 2239
- Amendment 2240
- Amendment 2241
- Amendment 2242
- Amendment 2243
- Amendment 2244
- Amendment 2245
- Amendment 2246
- Amendment 2247
- Amendment 2248
- Amendment 2249
- Amendment 2250
- Amendment 2251
- Amendment 2252
- Amendment 2253
- Amendment 2254
- Amendment 2255
- Amendment 2256
- Amendment 2257
- Amendment 2258
- Amendment 2259
- Amendment 2260
- Amendment 2261
- Amendment 2262
- Amendment 2263
- Amendment 2264
- Amendment 2265
- Amendment 2266
- Amendment 2267
- Amendment 2268
- Amendment 2269
- Amendment 2270
- Amendment 2271
- Amendment 2272
- Amendment 2273
- Amendment 2274
- Amendment 2275
- Amendment 2276
- Amendment 2277
- Amendment 2278
- Amendment 2279
- Amendment 2280
- Amendment 2281
- Amendment 2282
- Amendment 2283
- Amendment 2284
- Amendment 2285
- Amendment 2286
- Amendment 2287
- Amendment 2288
- Amendment 2289
- Amendment 2290
- Amendment 2291
- Amendment 2292
- Amendment 2293
- Amendment 2294
- Amendment 2295
- Amendment 2296
- Amendment 2297
- Amendment 2298
- Amendment 2299
- Amendment 2300
- Amendment 2301
- Amendment 2302
- Amendment 2303
- Amendment 2304
- Amendment 2305
- Amendment 2306
- Amendment 2307
- Amendment 2308
- Amendment 2309
- Amendment 2310
- Amendment 2311
- Amendment 2312
- Amendment 2313
- Amendment 2314
- Amendment 2315
- Amendment 2316
- Amendment 2317
- Amendment 2318
- Amendment 2319
- Amendment 2320
- Amendment 2321
- Amendment 2322
- Amendment 2323
- Amendment 2324
- Amendment 2325
- Amendment 2326
- Amendment 2327
- Amendment 2328
- Amendment 2329
- Amendment 2330
- Amendment 2331
- Amendment 2332
- Amendment 2333
- Amendment 2334
- Amendment 2335
- Amendment 2336
- Amendment 2337
- Amendment 2338
- Amendment 2339
- Amendment 2340
- Amendment 2341
- Amendment 2342
- Amendment 2343
- Amendment 2344
- Amendment 2345
- Amendment 2346
- Amendment 2347
- Amendment 2348
- Amendment 2349
- Amendment 2350
- Amendment 2351
- Amendment 2352
- Amendment 2353
- Amendment 2354
- Amendment 2355
- Amendment 2356
- Amendment 2357
- Amendment 2358
- Amendment 2359
- Amendment 2360
- Amendment 2361
- Amendment 2362
- Amendment 2363
- Amendment 2364
- Amendment 2365
- Amendment 2366
- Amendment 2367
- Amendment 2368
- Amendment 2369
- Amendment 2370
- Amendment 2371
- Amendment 2372
- Amendment 2373
- Amendment 2374
- Amendment 2375
- Amendment 2376
- Amendment 2377
- Amendment 2378
- Amendment 2379
- Amendment 2380
- Amendment 2381
- Amendment 2382
- Amendment 2383
- Amendment 2384
- Amendment 2385
- Amendment 2386
- Amendment 2387
- Amendment 2388
- Amendment 2389
- Amendment 2390
- Amendment 2391
- Amendment 2392
- Amendment 2393
- Amendment 2394
- Amendment 2395
- Amendment 2396
- Amendment 2397
- Amendment 2398
- Amendment 2399
- Amendment 2400
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| IV SOLIDARITY | IV COOPERATION MEASURES |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| IV SOLIDARITY | IV VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| I SOLIDARITY MECHANISMS | I DISTRIBUTION |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| I SOLIDARITY MECHANISMS | I VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| I SOLIDARITY MECHANISMS | I SOLIDARITY MECHANISM |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| I SOLIDARITY MECHANISMS | I SOLIDARITY MECHANISM |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Solidarity contributions | Automatic solidarity mechanism |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Solidarity contributions | Voluntary contributions |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Solidarity contributions | Distribution |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations shall consist of the following types: | 1. Member States shall contribute to the distribution in their territories of those third-country national or a stateless persons who have been granted international protection in third country processing centres in accordance with the procedures established in partnership agreements with relevant third countries |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations shall consist of the following types: | 1. Voluntary contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following failed missions to return search and rescue vessels to the port of origin of the migrants on board can consist of the following types: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations shall consist of the following types: | 1. The form of solidarity contributions should be based on the free and voluntary choice of each Member State taking into account their national specificities. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State may consist of the following types: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations shall consist of the following types: | 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations shall reflect the needs of the benefitting Member State and shall consist of the following types: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations shall consist of the following types: | 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State shall consist of the following types: |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations shall consist of the following types: | 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State of first entry or subject to disembarkation, including after search and rescue operations and activities shall be established according to the procedure provided in this Article. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations shall consist of the following types: | 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations carried out by national competent authorities shall consist of the following types: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations shall consist of the following types: | 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations or the arrival of persons in a vulnerable situation shall consist of: |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations shall consist of the following types: | 1. Contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations may consist of the following types: |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State under migratory pressure or subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations shall consist of the following types: | 1. Solidarity contributions for the benefit of a Member State including subject to disembarkations following search and rescue operations shall consist of the following types: |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation of applicants who are not subject to the border procedure for the examination of an application for international protection established by Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | deleted |
The shadow Rapporteur has deleted this part for the sake of consistency with the new solidarity mechanism conceived in Articles 14 and 45 of this Regulation.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation of applicants who are not subject to the border procedure for the examination of an application for international protection established by Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation of applicants who are not subject to the border procedure for the examination of an application for international protection established by Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | (a) relocation of applicants who are not subject to the border procedure for the examination of an application for international protection established by Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation] irrespective of exceptions from the application of the border procedure foreseen in Article 41 paragraphs 4, 5 and 9 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; |
Persons, who would be subject to the border procedure but fall under an exception provision should under no circumstances be relocated. Therefore, it should be clarified that any relocation activity does not apply to any person, originally covered by the border procedure, notwithstanding an applicable exception.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation of applicants who are not subject to the border procedure for the examination of an application for international protection established by Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | (a) relocation of applicants; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation of applicants who are not subject to the border procedure for the examination of an application for international protection established by Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | (a) relocation of applicants for international protection; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation of applicants who are not subject to the border procedure for the examination of an application for international protection established by Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | (a) relocation of applicants to third country partner state reception centres; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation of applicants who are not subject to the border procedure for the examination of an application for international protection established by Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | (a) measures taken for the effective protection of the external borders of the European Union; |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation of applicants who are not subject to the border procedure for the examination of an application for international protection established by Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | (a) relocation of applicants for the examination of an application for international protection |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (aa) Relocation of beneficiaries of prima facie international protection; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) return sponsorship of illegally staying third-country nationals; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) return sponsorship of illegally staying third-country nationals; | deleted |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) return sponsorship of illegally staying third-country nationals; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) return sponsorship of illegally staying third-country nationals; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) return sponsorship of illegally staying third-country nationals; | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) return sponsorship of illegally staying third-country nationals; | deleted |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) assistance to protect the external border of the Union; |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) relocation of beneficiaries of international protection who have been granted international protection less than three years prior to adoption of an implementing act pursuant to Article 53(1); | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) relocation of beneficiaries of international protection who have been granted international protection less than three years prior to adoption of an implementing act pursuant to Article 53(1); | deleted |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) relocation of beneficiaries of international protection who have been granted international protection less than three years prior to adoption of an implementing act pursuant to Article 53(1); | (c) relocation of beneficiaries of international protection who have been granted international protection less than three years prior to adoption of an implementing act pursuant to Article 53(1) with the consent of the beneficiary of international protection; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) relocation of beneficiaries of international protection who have been granted international protection less than three years prior to adoption of an implementing act pursuant to Article 53(1); | (c) relocation of beneficiaries of international protection who have been granted international protection less than three years prior to adoption of an implementing act pursuant to Article 53(1) and who have requested such relocation in writing. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) relocation of beneficiaries of international protection who have been granted international protection less than three years prior to adoption of an implementing act pursuant to Article 53(1); | (c) relocation of beneficiaries of international protection who have been granted international protection to third country partner state reception centres; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) relocation of beneficiaries of international protection who have been granted international protection less than three years prior to adoption of an implementing act pursuant to Article 53(1); | (c) voluntary relocation of beneficiaries of international protection who have been granted international protection less than three years prior to the implementation of the solidarity contribution; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ca) relocation of illegally staying third-country nationals. |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) capacity-building measures in the field of asylum, reception and return, operational support and measures aimed at responding to migratory trends affecting the benefitting Member State through cooperation with third countries. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) capacity-building measures in the field of asylum, reception and return, operational support and measures aimed at responding to migratory trends affecting the benefitting Member State through cooperation with third countries. | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) capacity-building measures in the field of asylum, reception and return, operational support and measures aimed at responding to migratory trends affecting the benefitting Member State through cooperation with third countries. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) capacity-building measures in the field of asylum, reception and return, operational support and measures aimed at responding to migratory trends affecting the benefitting Member State through cooperation with third countries. | deleted |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) capacity-building measures in the field of asylum, reception and return, operational support and measures aimed at responding to migratory trends affecting the benefitting Member State through cooperation with third countries. | (d) capacity-building measures; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) capacity-building measures in the field of asylum, reception and return, operational support and measures aimed at responding to migratory trends affecting the benefitting Member State through cooperation with third countries. | (d) capacity-building contributions in the field of asylum, reception and return; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) capacity-building measures in the field of asylum, reception and return, operational support and measures aimed at responding to migratory trends affecting the benefitting Member State through cooperation with third countries. | (d) the decision by a Member State to examine an application for international protection pursuant to Article 25. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) capacity-building measures in the field of asylum, reception and return, operational support and measures aimed at responding to migratory trends affecting the benefitting Member State through cooperation with third countries. | (d) capacity-building measures in the field of asylum, reception and return and operational support, when this is clearly in the interest of the benefitting Member State. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) capacity-building measures in the field of asylum, reception and return, operational support and measures aimed at responding to migratory trends affecting the benefitting Member State through cooperation with third countries. | (d) capacity-building measures in the field of border protection, reception and return, operational support and measures aimed at mitigating migratory pressures through cooperation with third countries. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) operational support to the benefitting Member State such as the joint processing of cases, support in asylum management and reception capacities, border protection, countering human smuggling and trafficking, return and readmission, communication and information; |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) the decision by a Member State to examine an application for international protection pursuant to Article 25, including after a decision of transfer has been taken pursuant to Article 32. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) protection sponsorships pursuant to Article 56a; |
There is a need for a mandatory but also flexible approach by introducing innovative and equally weighted solidarity contributions, for example in the external dimension, such as protection sponsorships. Furthermore, the taking over of responsibility for other Member States should equally be considered. The proposal by the EP to refer to Art. 25 decisions as a solidarity contribution is positive. The focus on relocation and/or return sponsorship as proposed by the European Commission is problematic.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (db) capacity-building measures and support in the field of asylum and migration management | |
| – in the benefitting Member State, including joint processing of cases, reception, border protection and return | |
| – or operational support and measures in third countries such as integrated border management, disembarkation following Search and Rescue operations, combatting human smuggling, strengthening protection capacities as well as fostering perspectives in regions of origin aimed at responding to and preventing illegal migration flows towards the European Union. |
There is a need for a mandatory but also flexible approach by introducing innovative and equally weighted solidarity contributions, for example in the external dimension, such as protection sponsorships. Furthermore, the taking over of responsibility for other Member States should equally be considered. The proposal by the EP to refer to Art. 25 decisions as a solidarity contribution is positive. The focus on relocation and/or return sponsorship as proposed by the European Commission is problematic.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (db) measures taken in the external dimension of migration, especially through cooperation with third countries and taking help to territories in need; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (dc) any other form of solidarity agreed by the contributing and benefitting Member State. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. Where no meaningful links can be established, the Commission, assisted by the Asylum Agency, shall identify the Member State with the lowest number of applicants in relation to its share, calculated on the basis of the distribution key, as the Member State responsible. The European Commission will immediately notify this Member State which will be responsible for examining the application and the Member State of first entry. |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. Relocation of applicants for the examination of an application of international protection shall be automatic and obligatory pursuant to the criteria set out in Chapter II and to the distribution key set out in Article 54. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. The measures set out in paragraph 1, point (c) are offered in addition to the measure provided for in paragraph 1, point (a). |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1b. The Member State of first entry, in cooperation with the Asylum Agency, shall immediately inform the applicant about the determination of responsibility as referred to in paragraph2 of this Article, and of the arrangements of the transfer to the Member State responsible for the examination, in accordance to Article 32 of this Regulation. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1c. The procedure established by this Article shall apply to applicants arrived in a Member State by land, air or sea, including after disembarkation and following search and rescue operations and activities. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1d. The share calculated according to the distribution key may be adjusted when a Member State demonstrates that over the proceeding 10 years it has been responsible for twice the Union average per capita of applicants for international protection. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Such contributions may, pursuant to Article 56, also consist of: | deleted |
| (a) relocation of applicants for international protection subject to the border procedure in accordance with Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | |
| (b) relocation of illegally staying third-country nationals. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Such contributions may, pursuant to Article 56, also consist of: | deleted |
| (a) relocation of applicants for international protection subject to the border procedure in accordance with Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | |
| (b) relocation of illegally staying third-country nationals. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Such contributions may, pursuant to Article 56, also consist of: | deleted |
| (a) relocation of applicants for international protection subject to the border procedure in accordance with Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | |
| (b) relocation of illegally staying third-country nationals. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Such contributions may, pursuant to Article 56, also consist of: | deleted |
| (a) relocation of applicants for international protection subject to the border procedure in accordance with Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | |
| (b) relocation of illegally staying third-country nationals. |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Such contributions may, pursuant to Article 56, also consist of: | deleted |
| (a) relocation of applicants for international protection subject to the border procedure in accordance with Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | |
| (b) relocation of illegally staying third-country nationals. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Such contributions may, pursuant to Article 56, also consist of: | deleted |
| (a) relocation of applicants for international protection subject to the border procedure in accordance with Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | |
| (b) relocation of illegally staying third-country nationals. |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Such contributions may, pursuant to Article 56, also consist of: | 2. Member States may also provide voluntary solidarity contributions to assist a Member State in addressing the migratory situation on its territory or prevent a migratory pressure. Such contributions may consist of: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Such contributions may, pursuant to Article 56, also consist of: | 2. Such voluntary contributions may, pursuant to Article 56, also consist of: |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (-a) solidarity contributions referred to in paragraph 1; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation of applicants for international protection subject to the border procedure in accordance with Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation of applicants for international protection subject to the border procedure in accordance with Article 41 of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | (a) relocation of applicants for international protection to third country partner state reception centres; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) relocation of illegally staying third-country nationals. | deleted |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where a Member State requests solidarity support from other Member States in accordance with this paragraph, it shall notify the Commission of that request. | |
| Any Member State may, at any time, in response to a request for solidarity support by a Member State, or on its own initiative, including in agreement with another Member State, make contributions by means of the measures referred to in the first subparagraph for the benefit of the Member State concerned and with its agreement. Contributions referred to in paragraph 1, point (d) shall be in accordance with the objectives of Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Migration Fund]. | |
| Member States which have contributed or plan to contribute with solidarity contributions in response to a request for solidarity support by a Member State, or on their own initiative, shall notify the Commission, thereof by completing the Solidarity Support Plan form set out in Annex IV. The Solidarity Response Plan shall include, where relevant, verifiable information, including on the scope and nature of the measures and their implementation. |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2a. With a view to provide solidarity contributions as soon as possible to a benefiting Member State, solidarity pools shall be established every year to ensure an appropriate and predictive solidarity response at the European level. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 45a | |
| Automatic solidarity mechanism | |
| 1. The solidarity mechanism set out in this article shall apply automatically for the benefit of a Member State where the redistribution criteria set out in Chapter II cannot be applied. | |
| 2. The solidarity mechanism shall include the measures set out in points (a), (b) and (c) of Article 45. | |
| 3. The mechanism set out in paragraph 1 shall be binding upon all Member States. | |
| 4. The number of applicants to be relocated for each Member State shall be determined by the Commission in an implementing act by applying the key indicated in Article 54 in the preceding 12 months. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 45a | |
| 1. The European Commission in cooperation with the relevant EU agencies, mainly Frontex and EASO, shall set up asylum processing centres in third countries. | |
| 2. Staff serving in those facilities shall be adequately trained to swiftly process asylum applications in accordance with Union and national law. | |
| 3. Applicants that receive a positive application shall be relocated according to the conditions set out in Article 45 paragraph 2. | |
| 4. Applicants that do not receive a positive decision shall be immediately returned to their country of origins. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 46 | deleted |
| Solidarity Forum | |
| A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States. The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 46 | deleted |
| Solidarity Forum | |
| A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States. The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 46 | deleted |
| Solidarity Forum | |
| A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States. The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 46 | deleted |
| Solidarity Forum | |
| A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States. The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 46 | deleted |
| Solidarity Forum | |
| A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States. The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 46 | deleted |
| Solidarity Forum | |
| A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States. The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 46 | deleted |
| Solidarity Forum | |
| A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States. The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Solidarity Forum | Voluntary Contribution Forum |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States. The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. | deleted |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States. The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States. The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. | A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States, who shall be represented by officials with the power to take decisions on their behalf. The EU Relocation Coordinator shall convene and preside over the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. The Forum shall meet annually following the adoption of the Asylum Situation Report as well as according to need as identified in Part IV of this Regulation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States. The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. | A Voluntary Contribution Forum shall comprise all Member States and third country partner states hosting reception centres. The Council shall convene and preside over the Voluntary Contribution Forum in order to ensure its smooth functioning. |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior, Abir Al-Sahlani
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| A Solidarity Forum shall comprise all Member States. The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of this Part. | The Commission shall convene and preside the Solidarity Forum in order to ensure the smooth functioning of the solidarity between the Member States pursuant to this Regulation. |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior, Abir Al-Sahlani
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Solidarity Forum should comprise all Member States, whose representatives shall have the appropriate level of responsibility and decision-making for its purpose. Should one or several Member States decide not to participate, the Solidarity Forum shall still be convened within the margins of a qualified majority. | |
| The Commission may request the Asylum Agency, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, and the External Action Service to be represented. |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior, Abir Al-Sahlani
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Solidarity Forum shall be convened at least once a year to establish the Annual solidarity pool referred to in Article 46a, and as much as necessary during the year to ensure an appropriate solidarity response in case of migratory pressure. |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior, Abir Al-Sahlani
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 46a | |
| Annual solidarity pool | |
| 1. Each year, the Commission shall set up an ‘Annual solidarity pool’ composed of the Member States’ contributions commitments for the upcoming year. | |
| 2. The Annual solidarity pool shall consist of: | |
| (a) a specific solidarity pool for search and rescue operations which shall be activated for a Member State where search and rescue operations generate recurring arrivals of third-country nationals or stateless persons onto its territory, pursuant to Articles 47, 48 and 49. That pool shall consist of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 47(4); | |
| (b) a general solidarity pool which shall be activated in the event a Member State is under migratory pressure, pursuant to Articles 49a. That pool shall consist of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1); | |
| 3. Where at the end of the one year period referred to in the first paragraph the contributions commitments have not been used, or not entirely, that commitments shall be deleted. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
This specification is no longer necessary in view of the introduction of the permanent, compulsory solidarity mechanism set out in the previous article.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 47 Solidarity for disembarkations following search and rescue operations | 47 Solidarity for arrivals of persons in a vulnerable situation and disembarkations following search and rescue operations |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 47 Solidarity for disembarkations following search and rescue operations | 47 Solidarity for disembarkations following search and rescue activities and operations |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. This Article and Articles 48 and 49 shall apply to search and rescue operations that generate recurring arrivals of third-country nationals or stateless persons onto the territory of a Member State and to vulnerable persons as set out in Article 49(4). | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. This Article and Articles 48 and 49 shall apply to search and rescue operations that generate recurring arrivals of third-country nationals or stateless persons onto the territory of a Member State and to vulnerable persons as set out in Article 49(4). | 1. Articles 14 and 45 shall also apply to arrivals, connected to search and rescue activities as referred to in the 1979 International Convention Maritime on Search and Rescue adopted in Hamburg, Germany, on 27 April 1979, and operations as referred to in Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No656/2014, leading to disembarkation of third-country nationals and stateless persons on to the territory of a Member State. |
The Shadow Rapporteur substantially amended this Article considering that the binding solidarity response, including relocation, which has to be implemented by Member States, who are not expected to be faced with recurring arrivals generated by search and rescue operations and activities, is clearly foreseen in the new mechanism, included in Article 14 and 45.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. This Article and Articles 48 and 49 shall apply to search and rescue operations that generate recurring arrivals of third-country nationals or stateless persons onto the territory of a Member State and to vulnerable persons as set out in Article 49(4). | 1. This Article and Articles 48 and 49 shall apply to search and rescue operations and to persons in a vulnerable situation as set out in Article 49(4). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the Migration Management Report referred to in Article 6(4) indicates that one or more Member States faced with the situations referred to in paragraph 1, it shall also set out the total number of applicants for international protection referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) that would need to be relocated in order to assist those Member States. The report shall also identify any capacity-building measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) which are necessary to assist the Member State concerned. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the Migration Management Report referred to in Article 6(4) indicates that one or more Member States faced with the situations referred to in paragraph 1, it shall also set out the total number of applicants for international protection referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) that would need to be relocated in order to assist those Member States. The report shall also identify any capacity-building measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) which are necessary to assist the Member State concerned. | 2. Where the Asylum Situation Report referred to in Article 6(4) indicates that one or more Member States are faced with the situations referred to in paragraph 1, it shall also set out the total number of persons referred to in Article 45(1), point (a), (a a) and (c) that would need to be relocated in order to assist those Member States. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the Migration Management Report referred to in Article 6(4) indicates that one or more Member States faced with the situations referred to in paragraph 1, it shall also set out the total number of applicants for international protection referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) that would need to be relocated in order to assist those Member States. The report shall also identify any capacity-building measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) which are necessary to assist the Member State concerned. | 2. Where the Migration Mitigation Report referred to in Article 6(4) indicates that one or more Member States faced with the situations referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall also set out the total number of applicants to be relocated to third country reception centres for processing of their request for international protection and its potential facilitation in the third country partner state. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the Migration Management Report referred to in Article 6(4) indicates that one or more Member States faced with the situations referred to in paragraph 1, it shall also set out the total number of applicants for international protection referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) that would need to be relocated in order to assist those Member States. The report shall also identify any capacity-building measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) which are necessary to assist the Member State concerned. | 2. In the context of disembarkations following search and rescue activities and operations, as defined in paragraph 1, the special needs of children, including unaccompanied minors, victims of trafficking in human beings, persons in need of urgent medical assistance, disabled persons, persons in need of international protection and other persons in a particularly vulnerable situation, shall be addressed as a matter of urgency and in a spirit of solidarity, pursuant to Articles 14 and 45. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Within two weeks of the adoption of the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall invite all other Member States that are not expected to be faced with arrivals on their territory as referred to in paragraph 1 to provide the solidarity contributions referred to in paragraph 2. In its request, the Commission shall indicate the total number of applicants to be relocated by each Member State in the form of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) by each Member State, calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. The distribution key shall include the share of the benefitting Member States. | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Within two weeks of the adoption of the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall invite all other Member States that are not expected to be faced with arrivals on their territory as referred to in paragraph 1 to provide the solidarity contributions referred to in paragraph 2. In its request, the Commission shall indicate the total number of applicants to be relocated by each Member State in the form of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) by each Member State, calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. The distribution key shall include the share of the benefitting Member States. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Within two weeks of the adoption of the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall invite all other Member States that are not expected to be faced with arrivals on their territory as referred to in paragraph 1 to provide the solidarity contributions referred to in paragraph 2. In its request, the Commission shall indicate the total number of applicants to be relocated by each Member State in the form of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) by each Member State, calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. The distribution key shall include the share of the benefitting Member States. | 3. Within two weeks of the adoption of the Migration Mitigation Report, the Commission shall invite all Member States expected to be faced with arrivals on their territory as referred to in paragraph 1 to provide the voluntary contributions referred to in paragraph 2. In its request for relocation to third country partner state reception centres, the Commission shall indicate the total number of applicants to be relocated to third country partner state reception centres. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Within two weeks of the adoption of the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall invite all other Member States that are not expected to be faced with arrivals on their territory as referred to in paragraph 1 to provide the solidarity contributions referred to in paragraph 2. In its request, the Commission shall indicate the total number of applicants to be relocated by each Member State in the form of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) by each Member State, calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. The distribution key shall include the share of the benefitting Member States. | 3. Within two weeks of the adoption of the Asylum Situation Report, the Commission shall invite all other Member States that are not expected to be faced with arrivals on their territory as referred to in paragraph 1 to provide the solidarity contributions referred to in paragraph 2. In its request, the Commission shall indicate the total number of persons to be relocated by each Member State in the form of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), point (a), (a a) and (c) by each Member State, calculated according to the reference key set out in Article 54. The reference key shall include the share of the benefitting Member States. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Within one month of the adoption of the Migration Management Report, Member States shall notify the Commission of the contributions they intend to make, by completing the SAR Solidarity Response Plan set out in Annex I. Member States shall indicate whether they intend to provide contributions in the form of: | deleted |
| (a) relocation in accordance with Article 45(1), point (a); or | |
| (b) measures in accordance with Article 45(1), point (d) identified in the Migration Management Report; or | |
| (c) relocation in accordance with Article 45(1), point (a) of vulnerable persons pursuant to Article 49(4). |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Within one month of the adoption of the Migration Management Report, Member States shall notify the Commission of the contributions they intend to make, by completing the SAR Solidarity Response Plan set out in Annex I. Member States shall indicate whether they intend to provide contributions in the form of: | deleted |
| (a) relocation in accordance with Article 45(1), point (a); or | |
| (b) measures in accordance with Article 45(1), point (d) identified in the Migration Management Report; or | |
| (c) relocation in accordance with Article 45(1), point (a) of vulnerable persons pursuant to Article 49(4). |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Within one month of the adoption of the Migration Management Report, Member States shall notify the Commission of the contributions they intend to make, by completing the SAR Solidarity Response Plan set out in Annex I. Member States shall indicate whether they intend to provide contributions in the form of: | deleted |
| (a) relocation in accordance with Article 45(1), point (a); or | |
| (b) measures in accordance with Article 45(1), point (d) identified in the Migration Management Report; or | |
| (c) relocation in accordance with Article 45(1), point (a) of vulnerable persons pursuant to Article 49(4). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Within one month of the adoption of the Migration Management Report, Member States shall notify the Commission of the contributions they intend to make, by completing the SAR Solidarity Response Plan set out in Annex I. Member States shall indicate whether they intend to provide contributions in the form of: | 4. Within one month of the adoption of the Asylum Situation Report, Member States shall notify the Commission of the total number of persons to be relocated, by completing the Solidarity Response Plan set out in Annex I. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Within one month of the adoption of the Migration Management Report, Member States shall notify the Commission of the contributions they intend to make, by completing the SAR Solidarity Response Plan set out in Annex I. Member States shall indicate whether they intend to provide contributions in the form of: | 4. Within one month of the adoption of the Migration Mitigation Report, Member States shall notify each other of the voluntary contributions they intend to make and whether they intend to provide voluntary contributions in the form of: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation in accordance with Article 45(1), point (a); or | deleted |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation in accordance with Article 45(1), point (a); or | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) relocation in accordance with Article 45(1), point (a); or | (a) relocation to a third country partner state reception centre; or |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) measures in accordance with Article 45(1), point (d) identified in the Migration Management Report; or | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) measures in accordance with Article 45(1), point (d) identified in the Migration Management Report; or | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) measures in accordance with Article 45(1), point (d) identified in the Migration Management Report; or | (b) measures in accordance with Article 45(1), point (d) identified in the Migration Mitigation Report; or |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) relocation in accordance with Article 45(1), point (a) of vulnerable persons pursuant to Article 49(4). | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) relocation in accordance with Article 45(1), point (a) of vulnerable persons pursuant to Article 49(4). | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) relocation in accordance with Article 45(1), point (a) of vulnerable persons pursuant to Article 49(4). | (c) relocation to third country partner state reception centres. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated by all the Member States pursuant to paragraph 4 fall significantly short of the total solidarity contributions set out in the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall convene the Solidarity Forum. The Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the number and, where relevant, the type of contributions. Member States that adjust their contributions shall submit revised SAR Solidarity Response Plans in the course of the Solidarity Forum. | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated by all the Member States pursuant to paragraph 4 fall significantly short of the total solidarity contributions set out in the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall convene the Solidarity Forum. The Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the number and, where relevant, the type of contributions. Member States that adjust their contributions shall submit revised SAR Solidarity Response Plans in the course of the Solidarity Forum. | deleted |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated by all the Member States pursuant to paragraph 4 fall significantly short of the total solidarity contributions set out in the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall convene the Solidarity Forum. The Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the number and, where relevant, the type of contributions. Member States that adjust their contributions shall submit revised SAR Solidarity Response Plans in the course of the Solidarity Forum. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated by all the Member States pursuant to paragraph 4 fall significantly short of the total solidarity contributions set out in the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall convene the Solidarity Forum. The Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the number and, where relevant, the type of contributions. Member States that adjust their contributions shall submit revised SAR Solidarity Response Plans in the course of the Solidarity Forum. | 5. Where the Council by unanimity considers that the voluntary contributions indicated by all the Member States pursuant to paragraph 4 fall significantly short of the total voluntary contributions set out in the Migration Mitigation Report, the Council shall by unanimous decision convene the Voluntary Contribution Forum. The Member States are welcome to adjust the number of relocations to third country partner state reception centres or returns. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated by all the Member States pursuant to paragraph 4 fall significantly short of the total solidarity contributions set out in the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall convene the Solidarity Forum. The Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the number and, where relevant, the type of contributions. Member States that adjust their contributions shall submit revised SAR Solidarity Response Plans in the course of the Solidarity Forum. | 5. Where the EU Relocation Coordinator identifies that the solidarity contributions indicated by all the Member States pursuant to paragraph 4 fall significantly short of the total solidarity contributions set out in the Asylum Situation Report, the EU Relocation Coordinator shall convene the Solidarity Forum. The Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the number of contributions. Member States that adjust their contributions shall submit revised Solidarity Response Plans in the course of the Solidarity Forum. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Commission implementing acts for search and rescue operations | Commission implementing acts for solidarity contributions |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Within two weeks from the submission of the SAR Solidarity Response Plans referred to in Article 47(4) or two weeks from the end of the Solidarity Forum referred to in Article 47(5), and where the total solidarity contributions indicated by all the Member States in their Plans corresponds to, or is considered by the Commission to be sufficiently close to the total solidarity contributions set out in the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act setting out the solidarity measures indicated by Member States pursuant to Article 47(4) or Article 47(5). Such measures shall constitute a solidarity pool for each Member State expected to be faced with disembarkations in the short term. | deleted |
| Where the Asylum Agency notifies the Commission and the Member States that 80% of the solidarity pool in the first subparagraph has been used for one or more of the benefitting Member States, the Commission shall convene the Solidarity Forum to inform the Member States of the situation and request Member States to increase their contributions. Following the end of the Solidary Forum, where Member States have indicated their readiness to make increased contributions the Commission shall amend the implementing act establishing a solidarity pool referred to in the first subparagraph in relation to the benefitting Member State concerned to increase the contributions indicated by Member States. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Within two weeks from the submission of the SAR Solidarity Response Plans referred to in Article 47(4) or two weeks from the end of the Solidarity Forum referred to in Article 47(5), and where the total solidarity contributions indicated by all the Member States in their Plans corresponds to, or is considered by the Commission to be sufficiently close to the total solidarity contributions set out in the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act setting out the solidarity measures indicated by Member States pursuant to Article 47(4) or Article 47(5). Such measures shall constitute a solidarity pool for each Member State expected to be faced with disembarkations in the short term. | 1. Within two weeks from the presentation of the Solidarity Response Plans referred to in Article 47, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act setting out the solidarity measures. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Within two weeks from the submission of the SAR Solidarity Response Plans referred to in Article 47(4) or two weeks from the end of the Solidarity Forum referred to in Article 47(5), and where the total solidarity contributions indicated by all the Member States in their Plans corresponds to, or is considered by the Commission to be sufficiently close to the total solidarity contributions set out in the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act setting out the solidarity measures indicated by Member States pursuant to Article 47(4) or Article 47(5). Such measures shall constitute a solidarity pool for each Member State expected to be faced with disembarkations in the short term. | 1. Within two weeks from the submission of the Solidarity Response Plans referred to in Article 47(4) or two weeks from the end of the Solidarity Forum referred to in Article 47(5), and where the total solidarity contributions indicated by all the Member States in their Plans corresponds to, or is considered by the Commission to be sufficiently close to the total solidarity contributions set out in the Asylum Situation Report, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act setting out the solidarity measures indicated by Member States pursuant to Article 47(4) or Article 47(5). Such measures shall constitute a solidarity pool for each Member State expected to be faced with disembarkations or the arrival of persons in a vulnerable situation in the short term. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the Asylum Agency notifies the Commission and the Member States that 80% of the solidarity pool in the first subparagraph has been used for one or more of the benefitting Member States, the Commission shall convene the Solidarity Forum to inform the Member States of the situation and request Member States to increase their contributions. Following the end of the Solidary Forum, where Member States have indicated their readiness to make increased contributions the Commission shall amend the implementing act establishing a solidarity pool referred to in the first subparagraph in relation to the benefitting Member State concerned to increase the contributions indicated by Member States. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the total number or type of solidarity contributions indicated by Member States pursuant to Article 47(5) still falls significantly short of the total solidarity contributions set out in the Migration Management Report leading to a situation where the solidarity pool is not able to provide a foreseeable basis of ongoing support to the Member States referred to in Article 47(2), the Commission shall, within two weeks after the end of the Solidarity Forum, adopt an implementing act establishing a solidarity pool for each Member State expected to be faced with disembarkations in the short term. That implementing act shall set out: | 2. Where the total number of solidarity contributions indicated by Member States pursuant to Article 47(5) still falls more than 20% short of the total solidarity contributions set out in the Asylum Situation Report leading to a situation where the solidarity pool is not able to provide a foreseeable basis of ongoing support to the Member States referred to in Article 47(2), the Commission shall, within two weeks after the end of the Solidarity Forum, adopt an implementing act establishing a solidarity pool for each Member State expected to be faced with disembarkations or the arrival of persons in a vulnerable situation in the short term. That implementing act shall set out: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the total number of third-country nationals to be covered by relocation to contribute to the needs of the Member States referred to in Article 47(2) as identified in the Migration Management Report; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the total number of third-country nationals to be covered by relocation to contribute to the needs of the Member States referred to in Article 47(2) as identified in the Migration Management Report; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the total number of third-country nationals to be covered by relocation to contribute to the needs of the Member States referred to in Article 47(2) as identified in the Migration Management Report; | (a) the total number of third-country nationals to be relocated to third country partner state reception centres; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the total number of third-country nationals to be covered by relocation to contribute to the needs of the Member States referred to in Article 47(2) as identified in the Migration Management Report; | (a) the total number of third-country nationals to be covered by relocation to contribute to the needs of the Member States referred to in Article 47(2) as identified in the Asylum Situation Report; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the number and share referred to in point (a) for each Member State, including the benefitting Member States calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the number and share referred to in point (a) for each Member State, including the benefitting Member States calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the number and share referred to in point (a) for each Member State, including the benefitting Member States calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the measures indicated by Member States as set out in Article 45(1), point (d). | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the measures indicated by Member States as set out in Article 45(1), point (d). | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Member States have indicated measures set out in Article 45(1), point (d), those measures shall be in proportion to the contributions that the Member States would have made by means of the relocations referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) as a result of the application of the distribution key set out in Article 54. They shall be set out in the implementing act except where the indications by Member States would lead to a shortfall of greater than 30% of the total number of relocations identified in the Migration Management Report. In those cases, the contributions set out in the implementing act shall be adjusted so that those Member States indicating such measures are required to cover 50% of their share calculated in accordance with the distribution key set out in Article 54 through relocation or return sponsorship as referred to in Article 45(1) point (b) or a combination of both. The Member States concerned shall immediately indicate to the Commission how they intend to cover their share in this regard. The Commission shall adjust the contributions set out in the implementing act regarding relocation, return sponsorship and the measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) for those Member States accordingly. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Member States have indicated measures set out in Article 45(1), point (d), those measures shall be in proportion to the contributions that the Member States would have made by means of the relocations referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) as a result of the application of the distribution key set out in Article 54. They shall be set out in the implementing act except where the indications by Member States would lead to a shortfall of greater than 30% of the total number of relocations identified in the Migration Management Report. In those cases, the contributions set out in the implementing act shall be adjusted so that those Member States indicating such measures are required to cover 50% of their share calculated in accordance with the distribution key set out in Article 54 through relocation or return sponsorship as referred to in Article 45(1) point (b) or a combination of both. The Member States concerned shall immediately indicate to the Commission how they intend to cover their share in this regard. The Commission shall adjust the contributions set out in the implementing act regarding relocation, return sponsorship and the measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) for those Member States accordingly. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Member States have indicated measures set out in Article 45(1), point (d), those measures shall be in proportion to the contributions that the Member States would have made by means of the relocations referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) as a result of the application of the distribution key set out in Article 54. They shall be set out in the implementing act except where the indications by Member States would lead to a shortfall of greater than 30% of the total number of relocations identified in the Migration Management Report. In those cases, the contributions set out in the implementing act shall be adjusted so that those Member States indicating such measures are required to cover 50% of their share calculated in accordance with the distribution key set out in Article 54 through relocation or return sponsorship as referred to in Article 45(1) point (b) or a combination of both. The Member States concerned shall immediately indicate to the Commission how they intend to cover their share in this regard. The Commission shall adjust the contributions set out in the implementing act regarding relocation, return sponsorship and the measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) for those Member States accordingly. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Member States have indicated measures set out in Article 45(1), point (d), those measures shall be in proportion to the contributions that the Member States would have made by means of the relocations referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) as a result of the application of the distribution key set out in Article 54. They shall be set out in the implementing act except where the indications by Member States would lead to a shortfall of greater than 30% of the total number of relocations identified in the Migration Management Report. In those cases, the contributions set out in the implementing act shall be adjusted so that those Member States indicating such measures are required to cover 50% of their share calculated in accordance with the distribution key set out in Article 54 through relocation or return sponsorship as referred to in Article 45(1) point (b) or a combination of both. The Member States concerned shall immediately indicate to the Commission how they intend to cover their share in this regard. The Commission shall adjust the contributions set out in the implementing act regarding relocation, return sponsorship and the measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) for those Member States accordingly. | deleted |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Member States have indicated measures set out in Article 45(1), point (d), those measures shall be in proportion to the contributions that the Member States would have made by means of the relocations referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) as a result of the application of the distribution key set out in Article 54. They shall be set out in the implementing act except where the indications by Member States would lead to a shortfall of greater than 30% of the total number of relocations identified in the Migration Management Report. In those cases, the contributions set out in the implementing act shall be adjusted so that those Member States indicating such measures are required to cover 50% of their share calculated in accordance with the distribution key set out in Article 54 through relocation or return sponsorship as referred to in Article 45(1) point (b) or a combination of both. The Member States concerned shall immediately indicate to the Commission how they intend to cover their share in this regard. The Commission shall adjust the contributions set out in the implementing act regarding relocation, return sponsorship and the measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) for those Member States accordingly. | Where Member States have indicated measures set out in Article 45(1), point (d), those measures shall be in proportion to the contributions that the Member States would have made by means of the relocations referred to in Article 45(1), point (a) and (da) as a result of the application of the distribution key set out in Article 54. They shall be set out in the implementing act except where the indications by Member States would lead to a shortfall of greater than 30% of the total number of relocations identified in the Migration Management Report. In those cases, the contributions set out in the implementing act shall be adjusted so that those Member States indicating such measures are required to cover 50% of their share calculated in accordance with the distribution key set out in Article 54 through relocation or return sponsorship as referred to in Article 45(1) point (b) or a combination of both. The Member States concerned shall immediately indicate to the Commission how they intend to cover their share in this regard. The Commission shall adjust the contributions set out in the implementing act regarding relocation, return sponsorship and the measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) for those Member States accordingly. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where one or more Member States have not submitted an SAR Solidarity Response Plan within the time limits set out in Article 47(4) and Article 47(5), the Commission shall determine the amount and type of contributions to be made by those Member States. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where one or more Member States have not submitted an SAR Solidarity Response Plan within the time limits set out in Article 47(4) and Article 47(5), the Commission shall determine the amount and type of contributions to be made by those Member States. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where one or more Member States have not submitted an SAR Solidarity Response Plan within the time limits set out in Article 47(4) and Article 47(5), the Commission shall determine the amount and type of contributions to be made by those Member States. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where one or more Member States have not submitted an SAR Solidarity Response Plan within the time limits set out in Article 47(4) and Article 47(5), the Commission shall determine the amount and type of contributions to be made by those Member States. | Where one or more Member States have not submitted a Solidarity Response Plan within the time limits set out in Article 47(4) and Article 47(5), the Commission shall determine the amount of contributions to be made by those Member States. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the Asylum Agency notifies the Commission and the Member States that 80% of the solidarity pool in the first subparagraph has been used for one or more of the benefitting Member States, the Commission shall convene the Solidarity Forum to inform the Member States of the situation and the additional needs of the Member States. Following the Solidary Forum the Commission shall adopt an amendment to the implementing act establishing a solidarity pool referred to in the first subparagraph in relation to the benefitting Member State concerned to increase the total number of third-country nationals covered by the solidarity measures referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph by a maximum of 50%. The share of each Member State referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph shall be amended accordingly. Where the provisions of the second subparagraph are applied and Member States have indicated that they shall contribute through return sponsorship, the share of these measures shall be increased by 50%. The measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) shall also be increased by a share that is in proportion to a 50% increase of that Member States share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the Asylum Agency notifies the Commission and the Member States that 80% of the solidarity pool in the first subparagraph has been used for one or more of the benefitting Member States, the Commission shall convene the Solidarity Forum to inform the Member States of the situation and the additional needs of the Member States. Following the Solidary Forum the Commission shall adopt an amendment to the implementing act establishing a solidarity pool referred to in the first subparagraph in relation to the benefitting Member State concerned to increase the total number of third-country nationals covered by the solidarity measures referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph by a maximum of 50%. The share of each Member State referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph shall be amended accordingly. Where the provisions of the second subparagraph are applied and Member States have indicated that they shall contribute through return sponsorship, the share of these measures shall be increased by 50%. The measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) shall also be increased by a share that is in proportion to a 50% increase of that Member States share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the Asylum Agency notifies the Commission and the Member States that 80% of the solidarity pool in the first subparagraph has been used for one or more of the benefitting Member States, the Commission shall convene the Solidarity Forum to inform the Member States of the situation and the additional needs of the Member States. Following the Solidary Forum the Commission shall adopt an amendment to the implementing act establishing a solidarity pool referred to in the first subparagraph in relation to the benefitting Member State concerned to increase the total number of third-country nationals covered by the solidarity measures referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph by a maximum of 50%. The share of each Member State referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph shall be amended accordingly. Where the provisions of the second subparagraph are applied and Member States have indicated that they shall contribute through return sponsorship, the share of these measures shall be increased by 50%. The measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) shall also be increased by a share that is in proportion to a 50% increase of that Member States share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the Asylum Agency notifies the Commission and the Member States that 80% of the solidarity pool in the first subparagraph has been used for one or more of the benefitting Member States, the Commission shall convene the Solidarity Forum to inform the Member States of the situation and the additional needs of the Member States. Following the Solidary Forum the Commission shall adopt an amendment to the implementing act establishing a solidarity pool referred to in the first subparagraph in relation to the benefitting Member State concerned to increase the total number of third-country nationals covered by the solidarity measures referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph by a maximum of 50%. The share of each Member State referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph shall be amended accordingly. Where the provisions of the second subparagraph are applied and Member States have indicated that they shall contribute through return sponsorship, the share of these measures shall be increased by 50%. The measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) shall also be increased by a share that is in proportion to a 50% increase of that Member States share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. | Where the Asylum Agency notifies the Commission and the Member States that 80% of the solidarity pool in the first subparagraph has been used for one or more of the benefitting Member States, the Commission shall convene the Solidarity Forum to inform the Member States of the situation and the additional needs of the Member States. Following the Solidary Forum the Commission shall adopt an amendment to the implementing act establishing a solidarity pool referred to in the first subparagraph in relation to the benefitting Member State concerned to increase the total number of third-country nationals covered by the solidarity measures referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph by a maximum of 50%. The share of each Member State referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph shall be amended accordingly. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The implementing act referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 67(2). | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
This Article is redundant and it is not needed anymore. The binding solidarity response, including relocation, which has to be implemented by Member states who are not expected to be faced with recurring arrivals generated by search and rescue operations and activities is clearly provided in the new mechanism foreseen in Articles 14 and 45.
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Solidarity pool for search and rescue operations | Solidarity pool for persons in a vulnerable situation and search and rescue operations |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Within two weeks of the adoption of the implementing act referred to in Article 48(1) or Article 48(2), the Member State referred to in Article 47(2) shall notify the Commission of its request for solidarity support. Following that request, the Commission shall draw on the solidarity pool and coordinate the implementation of the solidarity measures for each disembarkation or group of disembarkations taking place in a period of two weeks. | 1. Within two weeks of the adoption of the implementing act referred to in Article 48(1) or Article 48(2), the Member State referred to in Article 47(2) shall notify the EU Relocation Coordinator of its request for solidarity support. Following that request, the EU Relocation Coordinator shall draw on the solidarity pool and coordinate the implementation of the solidarity measures for each arrival, disembarkation or group of disembarkations taking place in a period of two weeks. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Under the coordination of the Commission, the Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall draw up the list of eligible persons to be relocated and to be subject to return sponsorship. The list shall indicate the distribution of those persons among the contributing Member States taking into account the total number of persons to be relocated or to be subject to return sponsorship by each contributing Member State, the nationality of those persons and the existence of meaningful links between them and the Member State of relocation or of return sponsorship. Priority shall be given to the relocation of vulnerable persons. The Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall assist the Commission in monitoring the use of the solidarity pool. | 2. Under the coordination of the EU Relocation Coordinator, the Asylum Agency shall draw up the list of eligible persons to be relocated. The list shall indicate the distribution of those persons among the contributing Member States taking into account the total number of persons to be relocated by each contributing Member State, the nationality of those persons and the existence of meaningful links between them and the Member State of relocation. Eligible persons shall be consulted in the course of determining meaningful links and shall have the right to object to such categorisation. Priority shall be given to the relocation of unaccompanied minors and other persons in a vulnerable situation. Where a person has meaningful links to more than one Member State, the person’s preference shall prevail. Where no meaningful links can be determined, the procedure in Article 23b(b) and (c) shall apply. The Asylum Agency shall assist the Commission in monitoring the use of the solidarity pool. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Under the coordination of the Commission, the Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall draw up the list of eligible persons to be relocated and to be subject to return sponsorship. The list shall indicate the distribution of those persons among the contributing Member States taking into account the total number of persons to be relocated or to be subject to return sponsorship by each contributing Member State, the nationality of those persons and the existence of meaningful links between them and the Member State of relocation or of return sponsorship. Priority shall be given to the relocation of vulnerable persons. The Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall assist the Commission in monitoring the use of the solidarity pool. | 2. Under the coordination of the Commission and competent Member State agencies, the Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall draw up the list of Member States that have concluded agreements with third countries enabling the relocation to third country partner state reception centres of eligible persons for relocation as well as a list of countries that comply with requirements to accept returns from the Member States. The list shall lay out all current agreements with regard to third country processing and facilitation of international protection as well as all third countries that comply or do not comply with requirements to accept returns or host reception centres in order for third countries to be eligible for any EU funding such as development aid. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Where the Commission has adopted a report concluding that a Member State referred to in Article 47(2) is under migratory pressure as set out in Article 51(3), the remaining solidarity contributions from the solidarity pool established under Article 48(1) or Article 48(2) may be used for the purpose of immediately alleviating the migratory pressure on that Member State. In such cases, the provisions of paragraph 2 shall apply. | deleted |
| This paragraph shall not apply where an implementing act provided for in Article 53 is adopted. As from the adoption of that implementing act drawing on the list of eligible persons to be relocated and to be subject to return sponsorship as provided for in paragraph 2 shall cease. | |
| Where the solidarity pool referred to in the first subparagraph is insufficient for the purpose of immediately alleviating the challenges faced by the Member State referred to in Article 47(2), solidarity contributions from the solidarity pool of the other Member States established under Article 48(1) or Article 48(2) may be used insofar as this does not jeopardize the functioning of the pool for those Member States. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Where the Commission has adopted a report concluding that a Member State referred to in Article 47(2) is under migratory pressure as set out in Article 51(3), the remaining solidarity contributions from the solidarity pool established under Article 48(1) or Article 48(2) may be used for the purpose of immediately alleviating the migratory pressure on that Member State. In such cases, the provisions of paragraph 2 shall apply. | 3. Where the Commission has adopted a report concluding that a Member State referred to in Article 47(2) is at risk of pressure on its asylum or reception system as set out in Article 51(3), solidarity contributions from the solidarity pool established under Article 48(1) or Article 48(2) may be used for the purpose of immediately reducing the risk of pressure on that Member State. In such cases, the provisions of paragraph 2 shall apply. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| This paragraph shall not apply where an implementing act provided for in Article 53 is adopted. As from the adoption of that implementing act drawing on the list of eligible persons to be relocated and to be subject to return sponsorship as provided for in paragraph 2 shall cease. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| This paragraph shall not apply where an implementing act provided for in Article 53 is adopted. As from the adoption of that implementing act drawing on the list of eligible persons to be relocated and to be subject to return sponsorship as provided for in paragraph 2 shall cease. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the solidarity pool referred to in the first subparagraph is insufficient for the purpose of immediately alleviating the challenges faced by the Member State referred to in Article 47(2), solidarity contributions from the solidarity pool of the other Member States established under Article 48(1) or Article 48(2) may be used insofar as this does not jeopardize the functioning of the pool for those Member States. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the solidarity pool referred to in the first subparagraph is insufficient for the purpose of immediately alleviating the challenges faced by the Member State referred to in Article 47(2), solidarity contributions from the solidarity pool of the other Member States established under Article 48(1) or Article 48(2) may be used insofar as this does not jeopardize the functioning of the pool for those Member States. | Where the solidarity pool referred to in the first subparagraph is insufficient for the purpose of immediately alleviating the challenges faced by the Member State referred to in Article 47(2), solidarity contributions from the solidarity pool of the other Member States established under Article 48(1) may be used insofar as this does not jeopardize the functioning of the pool for those Member States. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Where the Migration Management Report identifies that a Member State referred to in Article 47(2) is faced with capacity challenges due to the presence of applicants who are vulnerable regardless of how they crossed the external borders, the solidarity pool established under Article 48(1) or Article 48(2) may also be used for the purpose of relocation of vulnerable persons. In such cases, the provisions of paragraph 2 shall apply. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Where the Migration Management Report identifies that a Member State referred to in Article 47(2) is faced with capacity challenges due to the presence of applicants who are vulnerable regardless of how they crossed the external borders, the solidarity pool established under Article 48(1) or Article 48(2) may also be used for the purpose of relocation of vulnerable persons. In such cases, the provisions of paragraph 2 shall apply. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The Commission shall support and facilitate the procedures leading to the relocation of applicants and the implementation of return sponsorship, paying particular attention to unaccompanied minors. It shall coordinate the operational aspects of relocation and return sponsorship, including with the assistance of experts or teams of experts to be deployed by the Asylum Agency or the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. | 5. The Commission shall support and facilitate the procedures leading to the successful conclusion of agreements between Member States and third countries for the purposes of relocation to third country partner state reception centres of applicants for international protection and the facilitation of granted requests. In addition, the Commission shall also make it a priority to support by all means available, the successful implementation of return agreements, including by not providing any funds to beneficiary third countries that refuse to enter into return agreements with Member States of the European Union or refuse to host reception centres on their territory. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The Commission shall support and facilitate the procedures leading to the relocation of applicants and the implementation of return sponsorship, paying particular attention to unaccompanied minors. It shall coordinate the operational aspects of relocation and return sponsorship, including with the assistance of experts or teams of experts to be deployed by the Asylum Agency or the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. | 5. The EU Relocation Coordinator shall support and facilitate the procedures leading to the relocation of applicants, paying particular attention to unaccompanied minors and other persons in a vulnerable situation. They shall coordinate the operational aspects of relocation, including with the assistance of experts or teams of experts to be deployed by the Asylum Agency or the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior, Abir Al-Sahlani
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 49a | |
| Solidarity pool for a Member State under migratory pressure | |
| 1. Each year, on the basis of annual projection indicated in the Migration Management Report referred to in Article 6(4), third subparagraph, the Commission shall draw on a solidarity pool and coordinate the distribution of contributions when a Member State is under pressure. | |
| 2. Within two weeks of the adoption of the Migration Management Report, the Commission shall invite all other Member States that are not expected to be under migratory pressure to provide solidarity contributions referred to in Article45(1). | |
| 3. Within one month of the adoption of the Migration Management Report, Member States shall submit to the Commission their solidarity contributions commitments, including the share of each type of contribution where relevant. | |
| Where the contributions includes return sponsorship, Member States shall indicate the nationalities of the illegally staying third-country nationals present on the territory of the Member State concerned that they intend to sponsor. | |
| Where Member States indicate capacity-building measures set out in Article 45(2), point (d) they shall also indicate the detailed arrangements and the time frame for their implementation. | |
| 4. Where the Commission considers that the contributions indicated by the Member States do not correspond to the needs identified in the Migration Management Report provided for in Article 6(4), it shall convene the Solidarity Forum within a maximum time of two weeks. In such cases, the Commission shall invite Member States to adjust their contributions in the course of the Solidarity Forum by submitting a revised version of their contributions. |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 49b | |
| Commission implementing acts on solidarity in situations of migratory pressure | |
| 1. Within two weeks from the submission of Member States solidarity contributions commitments pursuant to Article 49a(3), first subparagraph or, where the Solidarity Forum is convened pursuant to Article 49a(4), within two weeks from the end of the Solidarity Forum, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act laying down the solidarity contributions commitments for the benefit of a Member State in the event of a migratory pressure to be taken by the other Member States and the timeframe for their implementation. | |
| 2. The types of contributions set out in the implementing act shall be those indicated by Member States. Where one or more Member States have not submitted their contributions, the Commission shall determine the types of contributions to be made by the Member State taking into account the needs identified in the Migration Management Report referred to in Article 6(4). | |
| Where the measures proposed would lead to a shortfall greater than 30% of the total number of solidarity measures identified in the Migration Management Report under Article 45(1), points (a), (b), (a), (da), the contributions set out in the implementing act shall be adjusted so that those Member States indicating such measures would be required to cover 50% of their share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 through measures set out in Article 45(1), points (a), (b), (c), (da). The Commission shall adjust measures referred to in Article 45(1)(d) indicated by those Member States accordingly. | |
| 3. The implementing act shall set out: | |
| (a) the total number of relocations pursuant to Article 45(1), points (a), (c) or (da); | |
| (b) the total number of return sponsorships pursuant to Article 45(1), point (b); | |
| (c) the distribution of persons to be relocated and/or those to be subject to return sponsorship among the Member States, on the basis of the distribution key set out in Article 54; | |
| (d) the measures indicated by Member States pursuant to second subparagraph of paragraph 2. | |
| The distribution referred to in paragraph 3 point (c) shall be adjusted where a Member State making a request pursuant to Article 52(4) demonstrates that over the preceding 5 years it has been responsible for twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. In such cases the Member State shall receive a deduction of 10/% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. This deduction shall be distributed proportionately among the Member States making contributions referred to in Article 45(1) points (a), (b), (c) or (da); | |
| 4. On duly justified imperative grounds of urgency due to the migratory pressure present in a benefitting Member State, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the urgency procedure referred to in Article 67(3). | |
| Those acts shall remain in force for a period not exceeding 1 year. | |
| 5. At the end of the one year period, the Commission shall report on the implementation of the solidarity contributions where relevant one month after the closure of the period. The report shall contain an analysis of the effectiveness of the measures undertaken. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 50 Assessment of migratory pressure | 50 Assessment of pressure on the asylum or reception system |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission shall assess the migratory situation in a Member State where: | 1. The Commission shall assess the migratory situation in a Member State following information by a: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission shall assess the migratory situation in a Member State where: | 1. The Commission shall assess the asylum situation in a Member State where: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) that Member State has informed the Commission that it considers itself to be under migratory pressure; | (a) that Member State has informed the Commission that it considers its asylum or reception system to be at risk of pressure; or |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) that Member State has informed the Commission that it considers itself to be under migratory pressure; | (a) that Member State has informed the Commission that it considers itself to be under migratory pressure; and |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) that Member State has informed the Commission that it considers itself to be under migratory pressure; | (a) Member State that considers itself to be under migratory pressure; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) on the basis of available information, it considers that a Member State may be under migratory pressure. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) on the basis of available information, it considers that a Member State may be under migratory pressure. | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) on the basis of available information, it considers that a Member State may be under migratory pressure. | (b) on the basis of available information, it considers that one or more Member States may be under migratory pressure, due to a constant level of arrivals, including after disembarkation, which would undermine the effective functioning of the procedures foreseen in Articles 14 and 45 of this Regulation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) on the basis of available information, it considers that a Member State may be under migratory pressure. | (b) on the basis of available information, it considers that the asylum or reception system of a Member State may be at risk of pressure. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) The Council or European Parliament requests it to carry out such an assessment |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall assist the Commission in drawing up the assessment of migratory pressure. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States, without delay, that it is undertaking an assessment. | 2. The Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in close cooperation with competent Member State authorities, acting as equal partners, shall assist the Commission in drawing up the assessment of migratory pressure. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States, without delay, that it is undertaking an assessment jointly with competent Member State authorities. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall assist the Commission in drawing up the assessment of migratory pressure. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States, without delay, that it is undertaking an assessment. | 2. The Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall assist the Commission in drawing up the assessment of migratory pressure. The Member State concerned should also be involved in and be duly informed of all stages of such assessment. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States, without delay, that it is undertaking an assessment. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall assist the Commission in drawing up the assessment of migratory pressure. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States, without delay, that it is undertaking an assessment. | 2. The Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall assist the Commission in drawing up the assessment of migratory pressure, in cooperation with the Member States in question. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States concerned, without delay, that it is undertaking an assessment. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall assist the Commission in drawing up the assessment of migratory pressure. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States, without delay, that it is undertaking an assessment. | 2. The Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall assist the Commission in drawing up the assessment of migratory pressure in cooperation with the Member State in question. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States, without delay, that it is undertaking an assessment. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall assist the Commission in drawing up the assessment of migratory pressure. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States, without delay, that it is undertaking an assessment. | 2. The Asylum Agency and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall assist the Commission in drawing up the assessment of pressure. The Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States, without delay, that it is undertaking an assessment. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The assessment of migratory pressure shall cover the situation in the Member State concerned during the preceding six months, compared to the overall situation in the Union, and shall be based in particular on the following information: | 3. The assessment of migratory pressure shall cover the situation in the Member State concerned during the preceding five years, compared to the overall situation in the Union, and shall be based in particular on the following information: |
Pressure situations in Member States are often the result of long term developments such as a high number of asylum seeker over many years. Therefore, the assessment of developments of the previous 6 months is not sufficient and should be extended to 5 years.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The assessment of migratory pressure shall cover the situation in the Member State concerned during the preceding six months, compared to the overall situation in the Union, and shall be based in particular on the following information: | 3. The assessment of pressure shall cover the situation in the Member State concerned during the preceding twelve months, compared to the overall situation in the Union, and shall be based in particular on the following information: |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the number of applications for international protection by third-country nationals and the nationality of the applicants; | (a) the total number of applications for international protection by third-country nationals and the nationality of the applicants; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (aa) the reception capacity of the Member State |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the number of third-country nationals who have been detected by Member State authorities while not fulfilling, or no longer fulfilling, the conditions for entry, stay or residence in the Member State including overstayers within the meaning of Article 3(1)(19) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council58 ; | deleted |
| 58 Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2017 establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third-country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States and determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes, and amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement and Regulations (EC) No 767/2008 and (EU) No 1077/2011, OJ L 327, 9.12.2017, p. 20. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the number of third-country nationals who have been detected by Member State authorities while not fulfilling, or no longer fulfilling, the conditions for entry, stay or residence in the Member State including overstayers within the meaning of Article 3(1)(19) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council58 ; | deleted |
| 58 Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2017 establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third-country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States and determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes, and amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement and Regulations (EC) No 767/2008 and (EU) No 1077/2011, OJ L 327, 9.12.2017, p. 20. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the number of third-country nationals who have been detected by Member State authorities while not fulfilling, or no longer fulfilling, the conditions for entry, stay or residence in the Member State including overstayers within the meaning of Article 3(1)(19) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council58 ; | deleted |
| 58 Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2017 establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third-country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States and determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes, and amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement and Regulations (EC) No 767/2008 and (EU) No 1077/2011, OJ L 327, 9.12.2017, p. 20. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the number of return decisions that respect Directive 2008/115/EC; | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the number of return decisions that respect Directive 2008/115/EC; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the number of return decisions that respect Directive 2008/115/EC; | (c) the number of return decisions; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the number of third-country nationals who left the territory of the Member States following a return decision that respects Directive 2008/115/EC; | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the number of third-country nationals who left the territory of the Member States following a return decision that respects Directive 2008/115/EC; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the number of third-country nationals who left the territory of the Member States following a return decision that respects Directive 2008/115/EC; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the number of third-country nationals who left the territory of the Member States following a return decision that respects Directive 2008/115/EC; | (d) the number of third-country nationals who left the territory of the Member States following a return decision; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) the number of third-country nationals admitted by the Member States through Union and national resettlement [or humanitarian admission] schemes; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) the number of third-country nationals admitted by the Member States through Union and national resettlement [or humanitarian admission] schemes; | (e) the number of third-country nationals admitted by the Member States; |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) the number of incoming and outgoing take charge requests and take back notifications in accordance with Articles 34 and 36; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) the number of incoming and outgoing take charge requests and take back notifications in accordance with Articles 34 and 36; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) the number of incoming and outgoing take charge requests and take back notifications in accordance with Articles 34 and 36; | (f) the number of incoming and outgoing take charge requests in accordance with Articles 34 and 36; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) the number of transfers carried out in accordance with Article 31; | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (g) the number of transfers carried out in accordance with Article 31; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) the number of persons apprehended in connection with an irregular crossing of the external land, sea or air border; | (h) the number of persons apprehended in connection with an irregular crossing of the external land, sea or air border who subsequently lodge an asylum claim; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) the number of persons apprehended in connection with an irregular crossing of the external land, sea or air border; | (h) the number of persons identified in connection with an irregular crossing of the external land, sea or air border; |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) the number of persons apprehended in connection with an irregular crossing of the external land, sea or air border; | (h) the number of persons identified in connection with an irregular crossing of the external land, sea or air border; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) the number of persons apprehended in connection with an irregular crossing of the external land, sea or air border; | (h) the number of persons apprehended in connection with an illegal crossing of the external land, sea or air border; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) the number of persons apprehended in connection with an irregular crossing of the external land, sea or air border; | (h) the number of persons apprehended in connection with an illegal crossing of the external land, sea or air border; |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) the number of persons refused entry in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation EU (No) 2016/399; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) the number of persons refused entry in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation EU (No) 2016/399; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) the number of persons refused entry in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation EU (No) 2016/399; | (i) the number of persons refused entry in accordance with national law; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) the number and nationality of third-country nationals disembarked following search and rescue operations, including the number of applications for international protection; | (j) the number and nationality of third-country nationals disembarked after a failed mission to return migrants to the port of origin, including the number of applications for international protection; |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) the number and nationality of third-country nationals disembarked following search and rescue operations, including the number of applications for international protection; | (j) the number and nationality of third-country nationals disembarked and following search and rescue operations and activities, including the number of applications for international protection; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (k) the number of unaccompanied minors. | (k) the number of vulnerable applicants, in particular unaccompanied minors. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (k) the number of unaccompanied minors. | (k) the number of vulnerable migrants, in particular unaccompanied minors. |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (k) the number of unaccompanied minors. | (k) the number of unaccompanied minors and children. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ka) the actions taken by the Member State to protect the external borders, in particular the financial and human expenditures for the protection of external borders; |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ka) the capacity of the Member States under migratory pressure, in particular in its overall needs in managing its asylum and reception caseload. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ka) the number of applicants in a vulnerable situation and the nature of their special procedural or reception needs |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ka) the number of third country nationals in specific areas or regions; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (kb) a comparison of actions and expenditures for the protection of external borders by Member States at each external border section. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. The assessment of migratory pressure shall also take into account the following: | 4. The assessment of risk of pressure shall also take into account the following: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the information presented by the Member State, where the assessment is carried out pursuant to paragraph 1, point (a); | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the level of cooperation on migration with third countries of origin and transit, first countries of asylum, and safe third countries as defined in Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the level of cooperation on migration with third countries of origin and transit, first countries of asylum, and safe third countries as defined in Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the level of cooperation on migration with third countries of origin and transit, first countries of asylum, and safe third countries as defined in Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum Procedure Regulation]; | (b) the level of cooperation on migration with third countries of origin and transit, first countries of asylum, and safe third countries as defined by Member States individually; |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) the Migration Management Report referred to in Article 6(4); | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) the Migration Management Report referred to in Article 6(4); | (f) the Migration Mitigation Report referred to in Article 6(4); |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) the Migration Management Report referred to in Article 6(4); | (f) the Asylum Situation Report referred to in Article 6(4); |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) information from the visa liberalisation reporting process and dialogues with third countries; | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (h) information from the visa liberalisation reporting process and dialogues with third countries; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) quarterly bulletins on migration, and other reports, of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. | (i) regular bulletins on migration, and other reports, of relevant Member State bodies. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ia) information and data from international organisations, NGOs and independent bodies. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (j) the support provided by Union Agencies to the benefitting Member State. | (j) the support provided by Union Agencies and through the Union budget to the benefitting Member State. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 51 | deleted |
| Report on migratory pressure | |
| 1. The Commission shall consult the Member State concerned during its assessment undertaken pursuant to Article 50(1). | |
| The Commission shall submit the report on migratory pressure to the European Parliament and to the Council within one month after the Commission informed them that it was carrying out an assessment pursuant to Article 50(2). | |
| 2. In the report, the Commission shall state whether the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure. | |
| 3. Where the Commission concludes that the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure, the report shall identify: | |
| (a) the capacity of the Member State under migratory pressure in the field of migration management, in particular asylum and return as well as its overall needs in managing its asylum and return caseload; | |
| (b) measures that are appropriate to address the situation and the expected timeframe for their implementation consisting, as appropriate, of: | |
| (i) measures that the Member State under migratory pressure should take in the field of migration management, and in particular in the field of asylum and return; | |
| (ii) measures referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be taken by other Member States; | |
| (iii) measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) to be taken by other Member States. | |
| 4. Where the Commission considers that a rapid response is required due to a developing situation in a Member State, it shall submit its report within two weeks at the latest from the date on which it informed the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States pursuant to Article 50(2) that it was carrying out an assessment. |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 51 | deleted |
| Report on migratory pressure | |
| 1. The Commission shall consult the Member State concerned during its assessment undertaken pursuant to Article 50(1). | |
| The Commission shall submit the report on migratory pressure to the European Parliament and to the Council within one month after the Commission informed them that it was carrying out an assessment pursuant to Article 50(2). | |
| 2. In the report, the Commission shall state whether the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure. | |
| 3. Where the Commission concludes that the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure, the report shall identify: | |
| (a) the capacity of the Member State under migratory pressure in the field of migration management, in particular asylum and return as well as its overall needs in managing its asylum and return caseload; | |
| (b) measures that are appropriate to address the situation and the expected timeframe for their implementation consisting, as appropriate, of: | |
| (i) measures that the Member State under migratory pressure should take in the field of migration management, and in particular in the field of asylum and return; | |
| (ii) measures referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be taken by other Member States; | |
| (iii) measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) to be taken by other Member States. | |
| 4. Where the Commission considers that a rapid response is required due to a developing situation in a Member State, it shall submit its report within two weeks at the latest from the date on which it informed the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States pursuant to Article 50(2) that it was carrying out an assessment. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 51 | deleted |
| Report on migratory pressure | |
| 1. The Commission shall consult the Member State concerned during its assessment undertaken pursuant to Article 50(1). | |
| The Commission shall submit the report on migratory pressure to the European Parliament and to the Council within one month after the Commission informed them that it was carrying out an assessment pursuant to Article 50(2). | |
| 2. In the report, the Commission shall state whether the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure. | |
| 3. Where the Commission concludes that the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure, the report shall identify: | |
| (a) the capacity of the Member State under migratory pressure in the field of migration management, in particular asylum and return as well as its overall needs in managing its asylum and return caseload; | |
| (b) measures that are appropriate to address the situation and the expected timeframe for their implementation consisting, as appropriate, of: | |
| (i) measures that the Member State under migratory pressure should take in the field of migration management, and in particular in the field of asylum and return; | |
| (ii) measures referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be taken by other Member States; | |
| (iii) measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) to be taken by other Member States. | |
| 4. Where the Commission considers that a rapid response is required due to a developing situation in a Member State, it shall submit its report within two weeks at the latest from the date on which it informed the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States pursuant to Article 50(2) that it was carrying out an assessment. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Report on migratory pressure | Report on pressure on the asylum or reception system |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission shall consult the Member State concerned during its assessment undertaken pursuant to Article 50(1). | 1. The Commission shall consult the Member States concerned during its assessment undertaken pursuant to Article 50(1). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall submit the report on migratory pressure to the European Parliament and to the Council within one month after the Commission informed them that it was carrying out an assessment pursuant to Article 50(2). | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall submit the report on migratory pressure to the European Parliament and to the Council within one month after the Commission informed them that it was carrying out an assessment pursuant to Article 50(2). | The Commission shall submit the proposal for a report on migratory pressure to the Council within one month after the Commission informed them that it was carrying out an assessment pursuant to Article 50(2). The Commission shall communicate the proposal for a report on migratory pressure to the European Parliament. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall submit the report on migratory pressure to the European Parliament and to the Council within one month after the Commission informed them that it was carrying out an assessment pursuant to Article 50(2). | The Commission shall submit the report on pressure to the European Parliament and to the Council within one month after the Commission informed them that it was carrying out an assessment pursuant to Article 50(2). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. In the report, the Commission shall state whether the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. In the report, the Commission shall state whether the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure. | 2. In the report, the Commission shall state whether it considers that the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure. The Council shall adopt the report on migratory pressure. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. In the report, the Commission shall state whether the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure. | 2. In the report, the Commission shall state and explain whether the Member States concerned are under migratory pressure. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. In the report, the Commission shall state whether the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure. | 2. In the report, the Commission shall state whether the Member State concerned is at risk of pressure. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. In the report, the Commission shall state whether the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure. | 2. In the report, the Commission shall list elements related to migratory pressure. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Where the Commission concludes that the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure, the report shall identify: | 3. Where the Council concludes that the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure, the report of the Council shall identify: |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Where the Commission concludes that the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure, the report shall identify: | 3. Where the Commission concludes that the Member States concerned are under migratory pressure, the report shall identify: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Where the Commission concludes that the Member State concerned is under migratory pressure, the report shall identify: | 3. Where the Commission concludes that the Member State concerned is at risk of pressure, the report shall identify: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the capacity of the Member State under migratory pressure in the field of migration management, in particular asylum and return as well as its overall needs in managing its asylum and return caseload; | (a) the asylum and reception capacity of the Member State at risk of pressure as well as its overall needs in managing its asylum caseload; |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the capacity of the Member State under migratory pressure in the field of migration management, in particular asylum and return as well as its overall needs in managing its asylum and return caseload; | (a) the capacity of the Member States under migratory pressure, in particular in its overall needs in managing its asylum and reception caseload; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (aa) measures that the Member State has taken to reduce the risk of pressure; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) measures that the Member State under migratory pressure should take in the field of migration management, and in particular in the field of asylum and return; | (i) measures that the Member State at risk of pressure should take to enhance its reception capacity or address shortcomings in its ability to fulfil its obligations in compliance with EU and international law; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) measures that the Member State under migratory pressure should take in the field of migration management, and in particular in the field of asylum and return; | (i) measures that the Member State under migratory pressure should take in the field of migration mitigation, and in particular in the field of returns and third country reception as well as processing and facilitation of asylum; |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) measures that the Member State under migratory pressure should take in the field of migration management, and in particular in the field of asylum and return; | (i) measures that the Member States under migratory pressure should take in the field of asylum and reception; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) measures that the Member State under migratory pressure should take in the field of migration management, and in particular in the field of asylum and return; | (i) measures and actions that the Member State under migratory pressure should take, in particular in the field of asylum and return; |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ii) measures referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be taken by other Member States; | (ii) measures identified by the Commission to support the Member States concerned, including: |
| (a) capacity building measures in the field of asylum and reception, corresponding to the needs of the Member States under pressure; | |
| (b) relocation of beneficiaries of international protection who have been granted protection less than two years prior to the relocation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ii) measures referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be taken by other Member States; | (ii) The number of relocation places needed to reduce the risk of pressure |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ii) measures referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be taken by other Member States; | (ii) measures referred to in Article 45(1) to be taken by other Member States; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (iii) measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) to be taken by other Member States. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (iii) measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) to be taken by other Member States. | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (iii) measures referred to in Article 45(1), point (d) to be taken by other Member States. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Where the Commission considers that a rapid response is required due to a developing situation in a Member State, it shall submit its report within two weeks at the latest from the date on which it informed the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States pursuant to Article 50(2) that it was carrying out an assessment. | 4. Where the Commission considers that a rapid response is required due to a developing situation in a Member State, it shall submit its proposal for a report to the Council within two weeks at the latest from the date on which it informed the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States pursuant to Article 50(2) that it was carrying out an assessment. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Where the Commission considers that a rapid response is required due to a developing situation in a Member State, it shall submit its report within two weeks at the latest from the date on which it informed the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States pursuant to Article 50(2) that it was carrying out an assessment. | 4. Where the Commission concludes that the Member State concerned is no longer merely at risk but actively under pressure and a rapid response is required, it shall submit its report within two weeks at the latest from the date on which it informed the European Parliament, the Council and the Member States pursuant to Article 50(2) that it was carrying out an assessment. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Solidarity Response Plans in situations of migratory pressure | Voluntary Contribution Plans to respond to situations of migratory pressure |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Solidarity Response Plans in situations of migratory pressure | Situations of migratory pressure |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Solidarity Response Plans in situations of migratory pressure | Response in situations of pressure |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the other Member States which are not themselves benefitting Member States shall contribute by means of the solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c). Member States shall prioritise the relocation of unaccompanied minors. | 1. Within two weeks after the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the Commission shall coordinate the distribution of contributions under the solidarity pool referred to in Article 49a. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the other Member States which are not themselves benefitting Member States shall contribute by means of the solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c). Member States shall prioritise the relocation of unaccompanied minors. | 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the other Member States which are not themselves benefitting Member States are encouraged to contribute by means of the voluntary contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c). Member States shall prioritise the relocation of unaccompanied minors to third country partner state reception centres. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the other Member States which are not themselves benefitting Member States shall contribute by means of the solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c). Member States shall prioritise the relocation of unaccompanied minors. | 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the other Member States which are not themselves Member States under pressure, shall contribute by means of the solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the other Member States which are not themselves benefitting Member States shall contribute by means of the solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c). Member States shall prioritise the relocation of unaccompanied minors. | 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that the asylum or reception system of a Member State is at risk of pressure, Article 25(b) and 49(3) shall apply. Member States shall prioritise the relocation of unaccompanied minors and other persons in a vulnerable situation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the other Member States which are not themselves benefitting Member States shall contribute by means of the solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c). Member States shall prioritise the relocation of unaccompanied minors. | 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the other Member States which are not themselves benefitting Member States shall contribute by means of the solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c). Member States shall prioritise the relocation of vulnerable applicants, in particular unaccompanied minors. |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the other Member States which are not themselves benefitting Member States shall contribute by means of the solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c). Member States shall prioritise the relocation of unaccompanied minors. | 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the other Member States which are not themselves benefitting Member States can contribute by means of the voluntary contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c). Member States shall prioritise the relocation of unaccompanied minors. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the other Member States which are not themselves benefitting Member States shall contribute by means of the solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c). Member States shall prioritise the relocation of unaccompanied minors. | 1. Where the report referred to in Article 51 indicates that a Member State is under migratory pressure, the other Member States which are not themselves benefitting Member States shall contribute by means of the solidarity contributions referred to in Article 51(3) (b) (ii). Member States shall prioritise the relocation of unaccompanied minors. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the report referred to in Article 51 identifies measures referred to in paragraph 3, point (b)(iii) of that Article, other Member States may contribute by means of those measures instead of measures referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(ii). Such measures shall not lead to a short fall of more than 30% of the total contributions identified in the report on migratory pressure under Article 51(3)(b)(ii). | deleted |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the report referred to in Article 51 identifies measures referred to in paragraph 3, point (b)(iii) of that Article, other Member States may contribute by means of those measures instead of measures referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(ii). Such measures shall not lead to a short fall of more than 30% of the total contributions identified in the report on migratory pressure under Article 51(3)(b)(ii). | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the report referred to in Article 51 identifies measures referred to in paragraph 3, point (b)(iii) of that Article, other Member States may contribute by means of those measures instead of measures referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(ii). Such measures shall not lead to a short fall of more than 30% of the total contributions identified in the report on migratory pressure under Article 51(3)(b)(ii). | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the report referred to in Article 51 identifies measures referred to in paragraph 3, point (b)(iii) of that Article, other Member States may contribute by means of those measures instead of measures referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(ii). Such measures shall not lead to a short fall of more than 30% of the total contributions identified in the report on migratory pressure under Article 51(3)(b)(ii). | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the report referred to in Article 51 identifies measures referred to in paragraph 3, point (b)(iii) of that Article, other Member States may contribute by means of those measures instead of measures referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(ii). Such measures shall not lead to a short fall of more than 30% of the total contributions identified in the report on migratory pressure under Article 51(3)(b)(ii). | 2. Where the report referred to in Article 51 identifies measures referred to in paragraph 3, point (b)(iii) of that Article, other Member States may contribute by means of those measures instead of measures referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(ii). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where the report referred to in Article 51 identifies measures referred to in paragraph 3, point (b)(iii) of that Article, other Member States may contribute by means of those measures instead of measures referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(ii). Such measures shall not lead to a short fall of more than 30% of the total contributions identified in the report on migratory pressure under Article 51(3)(b)(ii). | 2. The effort of contributions shall be shared proportionately between the contributing Member States, taking into account the distribution key and specific needs of the benefiting Member States identified in the report on migratory pressure. Member States shall prioritise the relocation of unaccompanied minors, unless it is not in their best interests. |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2a. Where the solidarity pool falls short of the needs identified in the migratory pressure report, the Commission shall convene the Member States to adjust their contributions, pursuant to Article 49b. |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Within two weeks from the adoption of the report referred to in Article 51, Member States shall submit to the Commission a Solidarity Response Plan by completing the form in Annex II. The Solidarity Response Plan shall indicate the type of contributions from among those set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii) or, where relevant, the measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) that Member States propose to take. Where Member States propose more than one type of contribution set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), they shall indicate the share of each. | deleted |
| Where the Solidarity Response Plan includes return sponsorship, Member States shall indicate the nationalities of the illegally staying third-country nationals present on the territory of the Member State concerned that they intend to sponsor. | |
| Where Member States indicate measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) in the Solidarity Response Plan they shall also indicate the detailed arrangements and the time-frame for their implementation. |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Within two weeks from the adoption of the report referred to in Article 51, Member States shall submit to the Commission a Solidarity Response Plan by completing the form in Annex II. The Solidarity Response Plan shall indicate the type of contributions from among those set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii) or, where relevant, the measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) that Member States propose to take. Where Member States propose more than one type of contribution set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), they shall indicate the share of each. | deleted |
| Where the Solidarity Response Plan includes return sponsorship, Member States shall indicate the nationalities of the illegally staying third-country nationals present on the territory of the Member State concerned that they intend to sponsor. | |
| Where Member States indicate measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) in the Solidarity Response Plan they shall also indicate the detailed arrangements and the time-frame for their implementation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Within two weeks from the adoption of the report referred to in Article 51, Member States shall submit to the Commission a Solidarity Response Plan by completing the form in Annex II. The Solidarity Response Plan shall indicate the type of contributions from among those set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii) or, where relevant, the measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) that Member States propose to take. Where Member States propose more than one type of contribution set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), they shall indicate the share of each. | deleted |
| Where the Solidarity Response Plan includes return sponsorship, Member States shall indicate the nationalities of the illegally staying third-country nationals present on the territory of the Member State concerned that they intend to sponsor. | |
| Where Member States indicate measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) in the Solidarity Response Plan they shall also indicate the detailed arrangements and the time-frame for their implementation. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Within two weeks from the adoption of the report referred to in Article 51, Member States shall submit to the Commission a Solidarity Response Plan by completing the form in Annex II. The Solidarity Response Plan shall indicate the type of contributions from among those set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii) or, where relevant, the measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) that Member States propose to take. Where Member States propose more than one type of contribution set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), they shall indicate the share of each. | 3. Within two weeks from the adoption of the report referred to in Article 51, Member States shall submit to the Commission a Solidarity Response Plan by completing the form in Annex II. The Solidarity Response Plan shall indicate the type of contributions from among those set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii) . Where Member States propose more than one type of contribution set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), they shall indicate the share of each. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Within two weeks from the adoption of the report referred to in Article 51, Member States shall submit to the Commission a Solidarity Response Plan by completing the form in Annex II. The Solidarity Response Plan shall indicate the type of contributions from among those set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii) or, where relevant, the measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) that Member States propose to take. Where Member States propose more than one type of contribution set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), they shall indicate the share of each. | 3. Within two weeks from the adoption of the report referred to in Article 51, Member States shall submit to the Commission a Solidarity Response Plan by completing the form in Annex II. The Solidarity Response Plan shall indicate the type of contributions from among those set out in Article 45(1) that Member States propose to take. Where Member States propose more than one type of contribution set out in Article 45(1) they shall indicate the share of each. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Within two weeks from the adoption of the report referred to in Article 51, Member States shall submit to the Commission a Solidarity Response Plan by completing the form in Annex II. The Solidarity Response Plan shall indicate the type of contributions from among those set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii) or, where relevant, the measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) that Member States propose to take. Where Member States propose more than one type of contribution set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), they shall indicate the share of each. | 3. Within two weeks from the adoption of the report referred to in Article 51, Member States are encouraged but not obliged to submit to the Commission a Voluntary Contribution Plan by completing the form in Annex II. The Solidarity Response Plan shall indicate the type of contributions from among those set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii) or, where relevant, the measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) that Member States propose to take. Where Member States propose more than one type of contribution set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), they are encouraged to indicate the share of each. |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the Solidarity Response Plan includes return sponsorship, Member States shall indicate the nationalities of the illegally staying third-country nationals present on the territory of the Member State concerned that they intend to sponsor. | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the Solidarity Response Plan includes return sponsorship, Member States shall indicate the nationalities of the illegally staying third-country nationals present on the territory of the Member State concerned that they intend to sponsor. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the Solidarity Response Plan includes return sponsorship, Member States shall indicate the nationalities of the illegally staying third-country nationals present on the territory of the Member State concerned that they intend to sponsor. | Where the Voluntary Contribution Plan includes return sponsorship or relocation to a third country partner state reception centre, Member States shall indicate the nationalities of the illegally staying third-country nationals present on the territory of the Member State concerned that they intend to return or relocate to a third country partner state reception centre. |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Member States indicate measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) in the Solidarity Response Plan they shall also indicate the detailed arrangements and the time-frame for their implementation. | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Member States indicate measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) in the Solidarity Response Plan they shall also indicate the detailed arrangements and the time-frame for their implementation. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Member States indicate measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) in the Solidarity Response Plan they shall also indicate the detailed arrangements and the time-frame for their implementation. | Where Member States indicate measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) in the Voluntary Contribution Plan they are also encouraged to indicate the detailed arrangements and the time-frame for their implementation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Member States indicate measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) in the Solidarity Response Plan they shall also indicate the detailed arrangements and the time-frame for their implementation. | Where Member States indicate measures set out in Article 45(1) in the Solidarity Response Plan they shall also indicate the detailed arrangements and the time-frame for their implementation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated in the Solidarity Response Plans do not correspond to the needs identified in the report on migratory pressure provided for in Article 51, it shall convene the Solidarity Forum. In such cases, the Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the type of contributions in their Solidarity Response Plans in the course of the Solidarity Forum by submitting revised Solidarity Response Plans. | deleted |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated in the Solidarity Response Plans do not correspond to the needs identified in the report on migratory pressure provided for in Article 51, it shall convene the Solidarity Forum. In such cases, the Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the type of contributions in their Solidarity Response Plans in the course of the Solidarity Forum by submitting revised Solidarity Response Plans. | deleted |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated in the Solidarity Response Plans do not correspond to the needs identified in the report on migratory pressure provided for in Article 51, it shall convene the Solidarity Forum. In such cases, the Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the type of contributions in their Solidarity Response Plans in the course of the Solidarity Forum by submitting revised Solidarity Response Plans. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated in the Solidarity Response Plans do not correspond to the needs identified in the report on migratory pressure provided for in Article 51, it shall convene the Solidarity Forum. In such cases, the Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the type of contributions in their Solidarity Response Plans in the course of the Solidarity Forum by submitting revised Solidarity Response Plans. | 4. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated in the Voluntary Contribution Plans do not correspond to the needs identified in the report on migratory pressure provided for in Article 51, it shall recommend to the Council to convene the Voluntary Contribution Forum by way of unanimous decision. In such cases, the Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the type of contributions in their Voluntary Contribution Plans in the course of the Voluntary Contribution Forum by submitting revised Voluntary Contribution Plans. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated in the Solidarity Response Plans do not correspond to the needs identified in the report on migratory pressure provided for in Article 51, it shall convene the Solidarity Forum. In such cases, the Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the type of contributions in their Solidarity Response Plans in the course of the Solidarity Forum by submitting revised Solidarity Response Plans. | 4. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated in the Solidarity Response Plans do not correspond to the needs identified in the report on migratory pressure provided for in Article 51. In such cases, the Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the type of contributions by submitting revised Solidarity Response Plans. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Where the Commission considers that the solidarity contributions indicated in the Solidarity Response Plans do not correspond to the needs identified in the report on migratory pressure provided for in Article 51, it shall convene the Solidarity Forum. In such cases, the Commission shall invite Member States to adjust the type of contributions in their Solidarity Response Plans in the course of the Solidarity Forum by submitting revised Solidarity Response Plans. | 4. Where the Council considers that the solidarity contributions indicated in the Solidarity Response Plans do not correspond to the needs identified in the report on migratory pressure provided for in Article 51, it shall convene a special Council meeting. In such cases, the Council shall invite Member States to adjust their contributions in their Solidarity Response Plans. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. A Member State proposing solidarity contributions set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), may request a deduction of 10% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 where it indicates in the Solidarity Response Plans that over the preceding five years it has examined twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. | deleted |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. A Member State proposing solidarity contributions set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), may request a deduction of 10% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 where it indicates in the Solidarity Response Plans that over the preceding five years it has examined twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. A Member State proposing solidarity contributions set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), may request a deduction of 10% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 where it indicates in the Solidarity Response Plans that over the preceding five years it has examined twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. A Member State proposing solidarity contributions set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), may request a deduction of 10% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 where it indicates in the Solidarity Response Plans that over the preceding five years it has examined twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. | 5. A Member State proposing solidarity contributions set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), shall be given a deduction of 50% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 where it indicates in the Solidarity Response Plans that over the preceding five years it has examined twice the Union average per capita of first instance recognitions of international protection. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. A Member State proposing solidarity contributions set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), may request a deduction of 10% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 where it indicates in the Solidarity Response Plans that over the preceding five years it has examined twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. | 5. A Member State proposing voluntary contributions set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), may request a deduction of 100% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 where it indicates in the Voluntary Contribution Plan that over the preceding four decades it has examined above the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. A Member State proposing solidarity contributions set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), may request a deduction of 10% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 where it indicates in the Solidarity Response Plans that over the preceding five years it has examined twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. | 5. A Member State proposing solidarity contributions may request a deduction of 10% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 where it indicates in the Solidarity Response Plans that over the preceding five years it has examined twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. A Member State proposing solidarity contributions set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), may request a deduction of 10% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 where it indicates in the Solidarity Response Plans that over the preceding five years it has examined twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. | 5. A Member State proposing solidarity contributions set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii), may request a deduction of 20% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 where it indicates in the Solidarity Response Plans that over the preceding 10 years it has examined twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Fabienne Keller, Hilde Vautmans, Olivier Chastel, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Malik Azmani, Sophia in 't Veld, Karen Melchior
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| [...] | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Within two weeks from the submission of the Solidarity Response Plans referred to in Article 52(3) or, where the Solidarity Forum is convened pursuant to Article 52(4), within two weeks from the end of the Solidarity Forum, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act laying down the solidarity contributions for the benefit of the Member State under migratory pressure to be taken by the other Member States and the timeframe for their implementation. | 1. Within two weeks from the submission of the Solidarity Response Plans referred to in Article 52, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act laying down the solidarity contributions for the benefit of the Member States under migratory pressure to be taken by the other Member States and the timeframe for their implementation. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the type of contribution indicated by Member States in their solidarity response plans is that referred to in Article 45(1), point (d), the Commission shall assess whether the measures proposed are in proportion to the contributions that the Member States would have made by means of the measures referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) or (c) as a result of the application of the distribution key set out in Article 54. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the type of contribution indicated by Member States in their solidarity response plans is that referred to in Article 45(1), point (d), the Commission shall assess whether the measures proposed are in proportion to the contributions that the Member States would have made by means of the measures referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) or (c) as a result of the application of the distribution key set out in Article 54. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the measures proposed are not in proportion to the contributions that the contributing Member State would have made by means of the measures referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) or (c), the Commission shall set out in the implementing act the measures proposed while adjusting their level. | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the measures proposed are not in proportion to the contributions that the contributing Member State would have made by means of the measures referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) or (c), the Commission shall set out in the implementing act the measures proposed while adjusting their level. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the measures proposed are not in proportion to the contributions that the contributing Member State would have made by means of the measures referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) or (c), the Commission shall set out in the implementing act the measures proposed while adjusting their level. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the measures proposed would lead to a shortfall greater than 30% of the total number of solidarity measures identified in the report on migratory pressure under Article 51(3)(b)(ii), the contributions set out in the implementing act shall be adjusted so that those Member States indicating such measures would be required to cover 50% of their share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 through measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii). The Commission shall adjust measures referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) indicated by those Member States accordingly. | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where the measures proposed would lead to a shortfall greater than 30% of the total number of solidarity measures identified in the report on migratory pressure under Article 51(3)(b)(ii), the contributions set out in the implementing act shall be adjusted so that those Member States indicating such measures would be required to cover 50% of their share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54 through measures set out in Article 51(3)(b)(ii). The Commission shall adjust measures referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(iii) indicated by those Member States accordingly. | Where the Commission considers the measures proposed are inadequate, it shall adjust measures referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(ii) indicated by those Member States accordingly. |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the total number of persons to be relocated from the requesting Member State pursuant to Article 45(1), points (a) or (c), taking into account the capacity and needs of the requesting Member States in the area of asylum identified in the report referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(ii); | (a) the set of measures foreseen in Article 51 (3) (b) (ii) of this Regulation, including the total number of beneficiaries of international protection pursuant to Article 51 (3) (b) (ii) (b), that shall be relocated; |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the total number of persons to be subject to return sponsorship from the requesting Member State pursuant to Article 45(1), point (b), taking into account the capacity and needs of the requesting Member States on return identified in the report referred to in Article 51(3)(b)(ii); | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) the distribution of persons to be relocated and/or those to be subject to return sponsorship among the Member States including the benefitting Member State, on the basis of the distribution key set out in Article 54; | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the measures indicated by Member States pursuant to second, third and fourth subparagraph of paragraph 2. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (d) the measures indicated by Member States pursuant to second, third and fourth subparagraph of paragraph 2. | (d) the number of cases deducted according to Art 45 (1) (d). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) the number and profile of persons to be subject to protection sponsorships according to Art. 45 (1) and 56 and determine the benefitting Member State as identified in the report on migratory pressure pursuant to Article 51 (5). |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The distribution referred to in paragraph 3 point (c) shall be adjusted where a Member State making a request pursuant to Article 52(5) demonstrates in the Solidarity Response Plan that over the preceding 5 years it has been responsible for twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. In such cases the Member State shall receive a deduction of 10/% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. This deduction shall be distributed proportionately among the Member States making contributions referred to in Article 45(1) points (a), (b) and (c); | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The distribution referred to in paragraph 3 point (c) shall be adjusted where a Member State making a request pursuant to Article 52(5) demonstrates in the Solidarity Response Plan that over the preceding 5 years it has been responsible for twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. In such cases the Member State shall receive a deduction of 10/% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. This deduction shall be distributed proportionately among the Member States making contributions referred to in Article 45(1) points (a), (b) and (c); | The distribution referred to in paragraph 3 point (c) shall be adjusted where a Member State making a request pursuant to Article 52(5) demonstrates in the Voluntary Contribution Plan that over the preceding four decades it has been responsible for above Union average per capita of applications for international protection. In such cases the Member State shall receive a deduction of 100% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The distribution referred to in paragraph 3 point (c) shall be adjusted where a Member State making a request pursuant to Article 52(5) demonstrates in the Solidarity Response Plan that over the preceding 5 years it has been responsible for twice the Union average per capita of applications for international protection. In such cases the Member State shall receive a deduction of 10/% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. This deduction shall be distributed proportionately among the Member States making contributions referred to in Article 45(1) points (a), (b) and (c); | The distribution referred to in paragraph 3 point (c), (d) and (e) shall be adjusted where a Member State making a request pursuant to Article 52(5) demonstrates in the Solidarity Response Plan that over the preceding 5 years it has been responsible for twice the Union average per capita number of first instance asylum decisions. In such cases the Member State shall receive a deduction of 10/% of its share calculated according to the distribution key set out in Article 54. This deduction shall be distributed proportionately among the Member States making contributions referred to in Article 45(1) points (a), (b), (c), (d), (d a) and (d b); |
It is important to acknowledge pressure on national asylum and migration systems from the past, so that previous burdens allow for higher deductions in the solidarity contributions. There are Member States that have disproportionately contributed to the protection system in the EU, which should be properly acknowledged.
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Where contributions have been made in response to a request by a Member State for solidarity support from other Member States to assist it in addressing the migratory situation on its territory to prevent migratory pressure pursuant to Article 56(1) within the preceding year, and where they correspond to the type of measures set out in the implementing act, the Commission shall deduct these contributions from the corresponding contributions set out in the implementing act. | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Those acts shall remain in force for a period not exceeding 1 year. | Those acts shall remain in force for a period not exceeding three months. |
Nicolaus Fest, Jaak Madison, Bernhard Zimniok, Gunnar Beck, Tom Vandendriessche, Peter Kofod, Roman Haider, Georg Mayer, Harald Vilimsky, Laura Huhtasaari, Philippe Olivier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 54 | deleted |
| Distribution key | |
| The share of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be provided by each Member State in accordance with Articles 48 and 53 shall be calculated in accordance with the formula set out in Annex III and shall be based on the following criteria for each Member State, according to the latest available Eurostat data: | |
| (a) the size of the population (50% weighting); | |
| (b) the total GDP (50% weighting). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 54 | deleted |
| Distribution key | |
| The share of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be provided by each Member State in accordance with Articles 48 and 53 shall be calculated in accordance with the formula set out in Annex III and shall be based on the following criteria for each Member State, according to the latest available Eurostat data: | |
| (a) the size of the population (50% weighting); | |
| (b) the total GDP (50% weighting). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Distribution key | Reference key |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The share of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be provided by each Member State in accordance with Articles 48 and 53 shall be calculated in accordance with the formula set out in Annex III and shall be based on the following criteria for each Member State, according to the latest available Eurostat data: | The share of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be provided by each Member State in accordance with Articles 48 and 53 should take into account the actual efforts of the Member States in the field of asylum, migration and border management, their effectiveness in terms of returns, their external dimension actions, the overall capacity of their own systems and potential migratory pressure on their territory. The Member States whose burden of responsibility is greater should have the option of reducing their solidarity contribution. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The share of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be provided by each Member State in accordance with Articles 48 and 53 shall be calculated in accordance with the formula set out in Annex III and shall be based on the following criteria for each Member State, according to the latest available Eurostat data: | The share of contributions referred to in Article 45(1),to be provided by the contributing Member State, shall be calculated taking into account the following criteria: |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The share of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be provided by each Member State in accordance with Articles 48 and 53 shall be calculated in accordance with the formula set out in Annex III and shall be based on the following criteria for each Member State, according to the latest available Eurostat data: | The share of solidarity contributions referred to in Articles 45 and 50 to 53 shall be based on the following criteria for each Member State, according to the latest available Eurostat data: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The share of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (b) and (c) to be provided by each Member State in accordance with Articles 48 and 53 shall be calculated in accordance with the formula set out in Annex III and shall be based on the following criteria for each Member State, according to the latest available Eurostat data: | The share of solidarity contributions referred to in Article 45(1), points (a), (aa) and (c) to be provided by each Member State in accordance with Article 48 shall be calculated in accordance with the formula set out in Annex III and shall be based on the following criteria for each Member State, according to the latest available Eurostat data: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the size of the population (50% weighting); | deleted |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the size of the population (50% weighting); | (a) the size of the population (40% weighting); |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the size of the population (50% weighting); | (a) the size of the population (35% weighting); |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the size of the population (50% weighting); | (a) the size of the population (40% weighting); |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the size of the population (50% weighting); | (a) the size of the population (40% weighting); |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the total GDP (50% weighting). | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the total GDP (50% weighting). | (b) the inverse of the proportion of the population born in a third country (50% weighting). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the total GDP (50% weighting). | (b) the total GDP (40% weighting). |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the total GDP (50% weighting). | (b) the total GDP (40% weighting). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the total GDP (50% weighting). | (b) the total GDP (35% weighting). |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the total GDP (50% weighting). | (b) the total GDP (40% weighting). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) the total GDP (50% weighting). | (b) the total GDP (25% weighting); |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) the number of first instance decisions as an outcome of asylum procedures over the preceding 5 years (25% weighting). |
The distribution key should not only focus on population and GDP but also take into account the burden on national asylum system in the past. The best indicator for previous pressure situations is the number of taken asylum decisions.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) the average number of asylum requests processed per one million inhabitants (15% weighting) |
Cornelia Ernst, Konstantinos Arvanitis, Sira Rego, Pernando Barrena Arza, Malin Björk, Miguel Urbán Crespo, Anne-Sophie Pelletier
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) the unemployment rate (20%) |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) the unemployment rate (20% weighting) |
Pietro Bartolo, Sylvie Guillaume, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Bettina Vollath, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Giuliano Pisapia, Elena Yoncheva, Thijs Reuten, Birgit Sippel, Franco Roberti, Cyrus Engerer, Caterina Chinnici
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) unemployment rate (20% weighting) |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ba) the unemployment rate |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (bb) the average number of resettled or admitted refugees per one million inhabitants (15% weighting) |
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2021). “Asylum and migration management and amending Council Directive (EC) 2003/109 and the proposed Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Fund]”. Text, 9 December 2021. docId LIBE-AM-702945. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/LIBE-AM-702945 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: The text on the European Parliament’s website, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-702945_EN.html. Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-libe-am-702945,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Asylum and migration management and amending Council Directive (EC) 2003/109 and the proposed Regulation (EU) XXX/XXX [Asylum and Migration Fund]}},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-12-09},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/LIBE-AM-702945}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/LIBE-AM-702945},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId LIBE-AM-702945. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-702945\_EN.html. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}