Skip to content

Text · Opinion parliamentary committee

On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509

Full title

On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509

Document LIBE-AD-786702 · COM(2025)0565 – C100179/2025 – 2025/0240(COD)

Kind
Opinion parliamentary committee LIBE-AD-786702
Date
24 June 2026
Committee
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
Rapporteur
Javier Zarzalejos
Dossier
2025-0240
More facts (3)
Subject matter
COHE, BUDG, COOR
Reference
COM(2025)0565 – C100179/2025 – 2025/0240(COD)
More

In short

A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.

AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-flash · 25 Sept 2026

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs gives its opinion on the proposed regulation setting up the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for 2028-2034. It proposes amendments to add democracy, rule of law and Charter safeguards, including a new 'democracy and rule of law' horizontal condition and a financial interests condition. It wants the Commission to decide on non-fulfilment by delegated act, to inform and publish decisions, and to redirect decommitted funds to civil society. It also seeks stronger protection of the EU's financial interests, cooperation with the EPPO, and independent complaint mechanisms.

Position. The committee proposes amendments to strengthen democracy, rule of law and Charter safeguards, protect the EU's financial interests, and increase transparency and parliamentary oversight of the Fund.

Key points

  1. Adds Article 325(4) TFEU to the legal basis of the proposed regulation.
  2. Adds new recitals requiring respect for Charter rights, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
  3. Amends recitals to require Member States to review NRP Plans annually, to support media freedom and pluralism, and to inform Parliament on horizontal enabling conditions.
  4. Adds a recital that decommitted funds should be redirected to non-governmental beneficiaries and civil society organisations in the same Member State.
  5. Amends recitals to require stakeholder consultation, Commission guidance on milestones and targets, and public scrutiny of suspension and release of funds.
  6. Adds recitals on countering fraud, informing Parliament on rule of law and Charter provisions, and reporting criminal conduct to the EPPO.
  7. Amends Article 2 to include protecting and strengthening the rule of law among the Fund's objectives.
  8. Amends Article 3 to add objectives on cross-border connectivity, security, countering disinformation and organised crime, and digitalisation.
  9. Amends Article 7 to require Member States to prevent, detect and address breaches of democracy and rule of law principles, assessed by the Commission on objective criteria.
  10. Amends Article 8 to require independent complaint mechanisms and to define non-fulfilment of the Charter horizontal condition.
  11. Amends Article 9 so the Commission adopts a delegated act determining non-fulfilment of the democracy and rule of law horizontal condition, with criteria for releasing suspended funds.
  12. Adds a PIF horizontal condition and requires Member States to protect the EU's financial interests, report to the EPPO and handle complaints within one year.

Who is affected

  • Member States, which must respect democracy, rule of law and Charter conditions and protect EU financial interests.
  • The Commission, which must assess compliance, adopt delegated acts and inform Parliament.
  • Civil society organisations and non-governmental beneficiaries, which may receive redirected decommitted funds.
  • The European Public Prosecutor's Office, which should receive reports of criminal conduct and support for investigations.

Figures and deadlines

  • 31 January 2028: deadline for Member States to submit NRP Plans.
  • June 2027: date from which Member States may submit a draft NRP Plan.
  • Two months: period for the Commission to adopt a decision on non-fulfilment of the Charter or rule of law condition.
  • One year: period after which the Commission shall reduce the Union financial contribution if the decision has not been repealed.
  • Up to two additional years: possible extension of the one-year period for reducing the contribution.
  • One year: maximum period for complainants to be informed of follow-up to their complaint.
  • Two years: period for which published information must remain available on the website.

Legal basis. Article 42, Article 43(3), Article 46(d), Article 91(1)(d), Article 149, Article 153(2)(a), Articles 164, 175, 177, 178, Article 192(1), Article 194(2), Article 209(1), Article 212(2), Article 322(1)(a), Article 325(4) and Article 349 TFEU.

Read the text · Report a problem

Text

The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.

Jump to an amendment (81)

AMENDMENT

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs submits the following to the Committee on Budgets, the Committee on Regional Development and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, as the committees responsible:

Amendment 1

Proposal for a regulation

Citation 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 42, Article 43(3), Article 46, point (d), Article 91(1), point (d), Article 149, Article 153 (2), point (a), and Articles 164, 175, 177 and 178, Article 192(1), Article 194(2), Article 209(1), Article 212(2), Article 322(1), point (a), and Article 349, thereof,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 42, Article 43(3), Article 46, point (d), Article 91(1), point (d), Article 149, Article 153 (2), point (a), and Articles 164, 175, 177 and 178, Article 192(1), Article 194(2), Article 209(1), Article 212(2), Article 322(1), point (a), Article 325(4) and Article 349, thereof,

Amendment 2

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6a) Horizontal principles as set out in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and in Article 10 TFEU, including the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality as set out in Article 5 TEU, should be respected in the implementation of the Funds, taking into account the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the ‘Charter’). Member States should also respect the obligations set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, and in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and ensure accessibility in line with Article 9 thereof and in accordance with Union law harmonising accessibility requirements for products and services.

Amendment 3

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 7

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(7) The Union needs to achieve its objectives within a challenging economic, social and demographic context including persisting regional and territorial disparities, the impacts of climate change and challenges related to food security and nature protection, insufficient and uneven progress on the Union’s digital transformation, undermining efforts to strengthen the Union’s digital sovereignty as well as significant economic and social consequences. That is coupled with a challenging geopolitical and geoeconomic context that has an impact on the Union’s defence, security (including economic security) and migration policies. Effectively addressing these challenges requires a more focused, simple and impactful Union budget, to ensure the Union added value and clear alignment between Union financial support and Union policy priorities across all policy areas and management modes and to [continue efforts to] simplify rules on Union financial support.(7) The Union needs to achieve its objectives within a challenging economic, social and demographic context including persisting regional and territorial disparities, the impacts of climate change and challenges related to food security and nature protection, insufficient and uneven progress on the Union’s digital transformation, undermining efforts to strengthen the Union’s digital sovereignty as well as significant economic and social consequences. That is coupled with a challenging geopolitical and geoeconomic context that has an impact on the Union’s defence, security (including economic security) and migration policies. Effectively addressing these challenges requires a more focused, simple and impactful Union budget, to ensure the Union added value and clear alignment between Union financial support and Union policy priorities across all policy areas and management modes and to continue efforts to simplify rules on Union financial support.

Amendment 4

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 17

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(17) Measures supporting people and strengthening Union’s societies and the Union’s social model should contribute to the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights and achieving its headline targets, in accordance with the guidelines for employment referred to in Article 148(4) TFEU, by supporting projects in the policy areas of employment and labour mobility, skills development, education, social inclusion and poverty reduction, and therefore strengthening the Union’s resilience and competitiveness. They should aim to ensure equal opportunities, equal access to the labour market, fair and quality working condition, social protection and inclusion, in particular focusing on enhancing labour supply, ensuring quality and inclusive education and training, lifelong learning and material support for the most deprived, closing existing gaps, including gender gaps. The measures should support investments in children and young people, marginalised and disadvantaged communities, third country nationals and should ensure equal access to services. They should also contribute to strengthening the resilience of the healthcare systems and long-term care services, support social and affordable housing and focus on achieving a socially fair transition towards climate neutrality, addressing the social impacts of the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from buildings and road transport within the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.(17) Measures supporting people and strengthening Union’s societies and the Union’s social model should contribute to the implementation of the European Pillar of Social Rights and achieving its headline targets, in accordance with the guidelines for employment referred to in Article 148(4) TFEU, by supporting projects in the policy areas of employment and labour mobility, skills development, education, social inclusion and poverty reduction, and therefore strengthening the Union’s resilience and competitiveness, including through the reduction of administrative burdens and by facilitating SMEs' access to funding and support measures. They should aim to ensure equal opportunities, equal access to the labour market, fair and quality working condition, social protection and inclusion, in particular focusing on enhancing labour supply, ensuring quality and inclusive education and training, lifelong learning and material support for the most deprived, closing existing gaps, including gender gaps. The measures should support investments in children and young people, marginalised and disadvantaged communities, third country nationals and should ensure equal access to services. They should also contribute to strengthening the resilience of the healthcare systems and long-term care services, support social and affordable housing and focus on achieving a socially fair transition towards climate neutrality, addressing the social impacts of the inclusion of greenhouse gas emissions from buildings and road transport within the scope of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Amendment 5

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 20

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(20) In order to protect, strengthen democracy, rule of law and uphold Union values, support should be dedicated to sustaining and further developing open, rights-based, democratic, equal and inclusive societies as well as to strengthening justice systems, anti-corruption frameworks, media pluralism and effective checks and balances. The measures should also aim to contribute to better governance by enhancing the efficiency of public administration, including judicial authorities, and the institutional capacity of public authorities and stakeholders in Member States, regions and local communities. This should enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of supported measures. To ensure that the social dimension of Europe as set out in the European Pillar of Social Rights is duly put forward and that a sufficient amount of resources is targeting those most in need, Member States should allocate resources to fostering social inclusion. Due to the particular need to support children in poverty Member States should also programme resources to address the measures under the Child Guarantee. In light of persistently high levels of youth unemployment and inactivity in a number of Member States and regions, in particular affecting young people who are neither in employment, nor in education or training, it is necessary that those Member States continue to invest sufficient resources towards measures to promote youth employment, including through the implementation of the Youth Guarantee. Member States should therefore allocate an appropriate amount of resources to this challenge. Member States seriously affected by youth unemployment should allocate resources of the ESF to support youth employability.(20) In order to protect, strengthen democracy, rule of law and uphold Union values, support should be dedicated to sustaining and further developing open, rights-based, democratic, equal and inclusive societies as well as to strengthening justice systems, anti-corruption frameworks, media freedom and pluralism and effective checks and balances. The measures should also aim to contribute to better governance by enhancing the efficiency of public administration, including judicial authorities, and the institutional capacity of public authorities and stakeholders in Member States, regions and local communities. This should enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of supported measures. To ensure that the social dimension of Europe as set out in the European Pillar of Social Rights is duly put forward and that a sufficient amount of resources is targeting those most in need, Member States should allocate resources to fostering social inclusion. Due to the particular need to support children in poverty Member States should also programme resources to address the measures under the Child Guarantee. In light of persistently high levels of youth unemployment and inactivity in a number of Member States and regions, in particular affecting young people who are neither in employment, nor in education or training, it is necessary that those Member States continue to invest sufficient resources towards measures to promote youth employment, including through the implementation of the Youth Guarantee. Member States should therefore allocate an appropriate amount of resources to this challenge. Member States seriously affected by youth unemployment should allocate resources of the ESF to support youth employability.

Amendment 6

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 25

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(25) The NRP Plans aim to ensure high value for money by making payments from the Commission to Member States conditional upon the achievement of outputs and the fulfilment of conditions agreed, irrespective of the form of reimbursement from Member States to beneficiaries. Linking disbursements with agreed and pre-set milestones, targets and outputs covering the full lifespan of the supported measure will contribute to the regularity of payments to Member States. To facilitate this process, Member States should be able to submit payment applications up to six times a year. To simplify financing and reduce administrative burden for beneficiaries, Member States are encouraged to use the same form of reimbursement applied for payments from the Commission to Member State or standard scales of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates.(25) The NRP Plans aim to ensure high value for money by making payments from the Commission to Member States conditional upon the achievement of outputs and the fulfilment of conditions agreed, irrespective of the form of reimbursement from Member States to beneficiaries. Linking disbursements with agreed and pre-set milestones, targets and outputs covering the full lifespan of the supported measure will contribute to the regularity of payments to Member States. It is important that milestones and targets are clearly and precisely defined so as to provide clarity on the conditions under which they are considered fulfilled, to enable objective verification, and to ensure legal certainty in the disbursement process. To facilitate this process, Member States should be able to submit payment applications up to six times a year. To simplify financing and reduce administrative burden for beneficiaries, Member States are encouraged to use the same form of reimbursement applied for payments from the Commission to Member State or standard scales of unit costs, lump sums or flat rates.

Amendment 7

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 27

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect with the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans halfway through implementation, as part of the mid-term review, to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach.(27) This Regulation should include strong safeguards to ensure that the Fund is implemented in a way that ensures respect for the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter and the principles of democracy and the rule of law as set out in Article 2 TEU and specified, in particular, in Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council2 . Therefore, as part of the validation process of their NRP Plans, Member States should provide assurance on the fulfilment of these two horizontal conditions, with an identification of potential deficiencies and remedial actions based, in particular, on the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and European Semester, as well as infringement proceedings and judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union. All Member States should be required to review their NRP Plans on an annual basis throughout their implementation, in order to address any new deficiencies identified, in particular, in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report. That review should, where appropriate, lead to the proposal of amendments to the NRP Plans to ensure their continued effectiveness, compliance with Article 2 TEU, and alignment with evolving challenges and priorities. For that purpose, the Commission should translate its recommendations into concrete and operational requirements, identifying the specific changes necessary to the NRP Plans, including, where appropriate, targeted measures, milestones and timelines for their implementation process. At any time during the implementation and following exchanges with the Member State concerned, there should be a possibility to block part or all of the payments made to a Member State if one or more of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions is not fulfilled. With due regard to the principle of proportionality, the determination of the non-fulfilment and identification of the specific measures concerned should take into account the actual or potential impact of the non-fulfilment on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Unions as well as the nature, duration, gravity and scope of the breach.
2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj)2 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget (OJ L 433I, 22.12.2020, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2092/oj)

Amendment 8

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 27 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(27a) Independent and pluralistic media are a cornerstone of democratic societies and a key element of the rule of law. They play a crucial role in safeguarding democratic resilience, including by countering disinformation and foreign interference. Member States should therefore ensure that measures included in their NRP Plans support media pluralism and independence, including through stable and predictable funding models and protection from political and economic interference.

Amendment 9

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 27 b (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(27b) In order to ensure transparency and allow for effective parliamentary oversight of the implementation of the Fund, the Commission should provide the European Parliament with timely and comprehensive information regarding the horizontal enabling conditions.

Amendment 10

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 27 c (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(27c) Where funds are decommitted due to a Member State's failure to respect the values of Article 2 TEU, it is essential that the local population and civil society are not unfairly penalised. Therefore, mechanisms should be established to ensure that forfeited resources are redirected toward non-governmental beneficiaries and civil society organisations within the same Member State, ensuring that Union support continues to reach those who uphold European values.

Amendment 11

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 29

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan.(29) Each Member State should submit to the Commission a NRP Plan, as a rule, by 31 January 2028 so that it can be given careful and timely consideration. To ensure fast implementation of the Fund, Member States should be able to submit a draft NRP Plan from June 2027. In order to ensure the meaningful involvement of all relevant stakeholders, Member States should design and implement the NRP Plans in partnership with local and regional authorities, economic, social and rural partners and civil society organisations and other relevant stakeholders in accordance with the national legal framework and the rules set out in this Regulation. The NRP Plans should be designed in close cooperation with the Commission, prepared in accordance with the template provided and made publicly available following their adoption by the Council on the basis of the Commission’s assessment and proposal for a Council implementing decision. In order to ensure a consistent, transparent and equitable assessment of NRP Plans, payment requests and reported achievements, the Commission should apply clear, harmonised and consistently applied methodologies and provide appropriate guidance to Member States, including as regards the verification of milestones and targets and the avoidance of double funding. In line with current arrangements, Member States will have the possibility to include regional and territorial chapters in their NRP Plan and should be required to ensure that regional managing authorities receive regular payments, based on the progress of their respective measures, and an amount at least equivalent to their Union contribution by the end of the period, subject to potential corrections resulting from the implementation of their respective chapter(s). To ensure effective governance of the NRP Plan, Member States should set up monitoring committees for the chapters and a coordinating committee at the level of the NRP Plan.

Amendment 12

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 30

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production.(30) In order to ensure the national ownership, Member States wishing to receive support should submit to the Commission NRP Plans that are duly reasoned and substantiated. In particular, Member States should ensure that local and regional authorities are consulted during the preparation and implementation of these Plans. The NRP Plans should detail how it represents a comprehensive contribution to all objectives of the Fund, taking into account the specific national, regional and territorial challenges of the Member State concerned. It should also include an explanation of how it contributes to effectively addressing the relevant country-specific challenges identified, inter alia, in the context of the European Semester and the Rule of Law report, the reports by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, relevant jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the European Court of Human Rights and national courts or tribunals, ongoing or concluded infringement proceedings pursuant to Articles 258 to 260 TFEU, recommendations and findings issued by international bodies in the field of human rights, recommendations and findings issues by international bodies in the field of the rule of law and other relevant documents officially adopted by the Commission related to the objectives supported by the Fund, and how it contributes to the completion of the internal market, notably by including reforms, investments and other interventions with a cross-border, transnational or multi-country dimension. To strengthen Union competitiveness in strategically important sectors while ensuring that the level playing field is not compromised, the NRP Plans should include cross-border and multi-country projects, in particular Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs) focusing on either research, development, innovation or first industrial deployment or on the construction of important infrastructure open for third party use, taking into account, in particular, the analyses provided in the latest Annual Single Market and Competitiveness Report. Member States should concentrate resources under their Plans on reducing economic social and territorial disparities, in particular in less developed regions. They should also support generational renewal and social measures and thriving fisheries and aquaculture production.

Amendment 13

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 37

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan.(37) Member States should have the possibility to make a reasoned request to amend the NRP Plan within the period of implementation of the Fund. The Commission should assess the compliance of the amended NRP Plan with this Regulation in a manner proportionate to the changes proposed. In order to avoid excessive administrative burden, it should be possible for Member States to make minor adjustments to or correct clerical errors in the NRP Plans, by a simple notification of those changes to the Commission, provided that such amendments comply with the requirements of the NRP Plan. Where relevant elements affecting the effective implementation of the NRP Plan as regards the rule of law have been identified, including in the context of the latest Rule of Law Report, the Commission may invite the Member State concerned to submit amendments to its NRP Plan and, where appropriate, propose concrete modifications to ensure compliance with this Regulation.

Amendment 14

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 38

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets.(38) Each Member State should carry out a mid-term review of its NRP Plan. That review should provide a fully-fledged proposed amendment of the NRP Plan based on the progress in implementing measures, the main results of relevant evaluations and a review of the estimated total costs of the measures covered by the NRP Plan, while also providing the opportunity to take into account new challenges as well as the occurrence of any crisis. For the purposes of the mid-term review, the socioeconomic situation of the Member State or region concerned, including any major negative financial, economic or social development should be also taken into account as well as challenges and recommendations identified in relevant Union instruments, including the European Semester and the latest Rule of Law Report. The amended NRP Plan submitted by the Member State following the mid-term review should include a proposal for the programming of the flexibility amount with revised or new measures together with their estimated costs and corresponding milestones and targets. In order to ensure consistency and comparability, minimum requirements for the content, structure and methodology of mid-term reviews should be established by the Commission. Those requirements should ensure standardised reporting and the availability of robust and timely evaluation results.

Amendment 15

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 46 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(46a) The Union and the Member States should counter fraud and any other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union through appropriate measures as to afford effective protection in the Member States, and in all the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies.

Amendment 16

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 51 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(51a) In order to ensure transparency and allow for effective parliamentary oversight of the implementation of the Fund, the Commission should provide the European Parliament with timely and comprehensive information regarding the application of the provisions relating to the rule of law, democracy and the Charter under this Regulation.

Amendment 17

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 52

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(52) In order to safeguard the financial interests and the budget of the Union, proportionate measures should be established and implemented at the level of Member States and the Commission. The Commission should be able to interrupt payments deadlines, suspend payments and apply financial corrections where the respective conditions are fulfilled. The Commission should respect the principle of proportionality by taking into account the nature, gravity and frequency of irregularities and their financial implications for the budget of the Union. In accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council(6), and Council Regulations (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95(7), (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96(8) and (EU) 2017/1939(9), the financial interests of the Union are to be protected through proportionate measures, including measures relating to the prevention, detection, correction and investigation of fraud, corruption and conflicts of interests, and, where appropriate, the imposition of administrative penalties. In particular, in accordance with Regulations (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 and (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) has the power to carry out administrative investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections, with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union. In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) is competent to investigate and prosecute fraud and other criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union as provided for in Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council. In accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, any person or entity receiving Union funds is to fully cooperate in the protection of the Union’s financial interests, to grant the necessary rights and access to the Commission, OLAF, the EPPO and the Court of Auditors (ECA) and to ensure that any third parties involved in the implementation of Union funds grant equivalent rights. Member States should swiftly report to the Commission irregularities detected, and any follow-up action they have taken with regard to such irregularities and with regard to any OLAF investigations. The competent authorities of the Member States participating in the enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 should also report to the EPPO without undue delay any criminal conduct in respect of which it could exercise its competence, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1939.(52) In order to safeguard the financial interests of the Union, proportionate measures should be established and implemented at the level of Member States and the Commission. The Commission should be able to interrupt payments deadlines, suspend payments and apply financial corrections where the respective conditions are fulfilled. The Commission should respect the principle of proportionality by taking into account the nature, gravity and frequency of irregularities and their financial implications for the budget of the Union. In accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council(6), and Council Regulations (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95(7), (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96(8) and (EU) 2017/1939(9) and Directive (EU) 2017/1371, the financial interests of the Union are to be protected through proportionate measures, including measures relating to the prevention, detection, correction and investigation and prosecution of fraud, corruption and conflicts of interests and other criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union, and, where appropriate, the imposition of administrative and criminal penalties. In particular, in accordance with Regulations (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 and (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) has the power to carry out administrative investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections, with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union. In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) is competent to investigate and prosecute fraud and other criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union as provided for in Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council. In accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509, any person or entity receiving Union funds is to fully cooperate in the protection of the Union’s financial interests, to grant the necessary rights and access to the Commission, OLAF, the EPPO and the Court of Auditors (ECA) and to ensure that any third parties involved in the implementation of Union funds grant equivalent rights. Member States should swiftly report to the Commission irregularities detected, and any follow-up action they have taken with regard to such irregularities and with regard to any OLAF investigations. The competent authorities of the Member States participating in the enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 should also report to the EPPO without undue delay any criminal conduct in respect of which it could exercise its competence, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1939.

Amendment 18

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 52 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(52a) In accordance with the principles of openness and transparency enshrined in Article 10(3) TEU and Article 15(1) TFEU, the process for the suspension and release of Union funds should be subject to public scrutiny. To that end, it is essential that the specific criteria for the release of frozen funds, as well as the Commission's subsequent assessments, are made publicly available. Such procedures should be based on objective criteria, ensuring that funds are only released once a Member State has verifiably demonstrated the implementation of meaningful reforms and sustained compliance with the rule of law.

Amendment 19

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 55

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(55) Procedures for the selection of operations applied by Member States can be competitive or non-competitive provided that the criteria applied, and procedures used are non-discriminatory, inclusive, accessible when appropriate for persons with disabilities, and transparent, taking into account the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and that the operations selected maximise the contribution of the Union funding and are in line with the horizontal principles defined in this Regulation.(55) Procedures for the selection of operations applied by Member States can be competitive or non-competitive provided that the criteria applied, and procedures used are non-discriminatory, inclusive, accessible when appropriate for persons with disabilities, and transparent, taking into account the Charter and the values enshrined in Article 2 TEU, and that the operations selected maximise the contribution of the Union funding and are in line with the horizontal principles defined in this Regulation.

Amendment 20

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 56

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(56) With a view to ensuring the principle of sound financial management, Member States should ensure that the amount of the estimated total costs of their NRP Plan remain reasonable and plausible throughout its implementation and request an amendment of their NRP Plan where necessary. The Fund’s delivery model should aim at providing predictability and consistency between payment levels and the individual implementation pace of each measure by assigning ex-ante pay-out values to each milestone and target. Furthermore, a review of the estimated total costs of the reforms and investments and other interventions covered by the NRP Plan should be conducted by the Member State as part of the mid-term review with corresponding adjustments whenever justified. Additionally, when submitting its final annual assurance package for the last financial year, the Member State should confirm that the total payments from the Commission do not exceed the total amount paid by the Member State to the beneficiaries in implementing the Plan, taking into account the national contribution. For the same reasons of sound financial management, the Commission should be allowed to recover amounts previously paid for interim steps of a measure if the final milestone or target of the given measure is not fulfilled and to take action in case of a reversal of a milestone or a target occurring up to five years after the date of the corresponding Commission payment.(56) With a view to ensuring the principle of sound financial management, Member States should ensure that the amount of the estimated total costs of their NRP Plan remain reasonable and plausible throughout its implementation and request an amendment of their NRP Plan where necessary. The Fund’s delivery model should aim at providing predictability and consistency between payment levels and the individual implementation pace of each measure by assigning ex-ante pay-out values to each milestone and target in advance, while ensuring that disbursements are conditional upon their verified achievement and reflect the actual progress of implementation. The Commission should establish clear and harmonised methodologies for the setting of milestones, targets and baselines, in order to ensure value for money from Union funding, objective verification of achievements and a consistent level of ambition among Member States. Furthermore, a review of the estimated total costs of the reforms and investments and other interventions covered by the NRP Plan should be conducted by the Member State as part of the mid-term review with corresponding adjustments whenever justified. Additionally, when submitting its final annual assurance package for the last financial year, the Member State should confirm that the total payments from the Commission do not exceed the total amount paid by the Member State to the beneficiaries in implementing the Plan, taking into account the national contribution. For the same reasons of sound financial management, the Commission should be allowed to recover amounts previously paid for interim steps of a measure if the final milestone or target of the given measure is not fulfilled and to take action in case of a reversal of a milestone or a target occurring up to five years after the date of the corresponding Commission payment.

Amendment 21

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 58

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(58) The Social Climate Fund established by Regulation (EU) 2023/955 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 20234 pursues similar objectives and support similar actions in a comparable implementation timeline. Therefore, the Social Climate Plans should be integrated into the NRP Plans from 2028 onwards. This should allow for a more efficient use of Union funds and support a more effective and coherent delivery of the objectives of the fund. This would avoid running similar systems and processes being run in parallel thereby bringing clear benefits in terms of improved policy planning, policy consistency and simplification efforts. It should also ensure the application of common rules, notably regarding respect for the rule of law and compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, while Member States’ current allocations under the Social Climate Fund would continue to apply. Synergies between existing and future investments under the Modernisation Fund and the measures of the Plans should also be encouraged through coordinated programming with a view to ensuring better complementarity and policy coherence between the Union budget and the resources allocated to the Modernisation Fund.(58) The Social Climate Fund established by Regulation (EU) 2023/955 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 20234 pursues similar objectives and support similar actions in a comparable implementation timeline. Therefore, the Social Climate Plans should be integrated into the NRP Plans from 2028 onwards. This should allow for a more efficient use of Union funds and support a more effective and coherent delivery of the objectives of the fund. This would avoid running similar systems and processes being run in parallel thereby bringing clear benefits in terms of improved policy planning, policy consistency and simplification efforts. It should also ensure the application of common rules, notably regarding respect for democracy and the rule of law and compliance with the Charter, while Member States’ current allocations under the Social Climate Fund would continue to apply. Synergies between existing and future investments under the Modernisation Fund and the measures of the Plans should also be encouraged through coordinated programming with a view to ensuring better complementarity and policy coherence between the Union budget and the resources allocated to the Modernisation Fund.
4 Regulation (EU) 2023/955 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 establishing a Social Climate Fund and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 (OJ L 130, 16.5.2023, p. 1).4 Regulation (EU) 2023/955 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 establishing a Social Climate Fund and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 (OJ L 130, 16.5.2023, p. 1).

Amendment 22

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 61

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(61) In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of Articles on support for local agricultural, fisheries and aquaculture products, reporting on irregularities, calculation of penalties for stewardship, data collection and recording, IACS, as well as Annexes on fulfilment of milestones and targets, progress on implementation, Union actions, financial corrections, EU school scheme, CAP interventions, CAP cooperation. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making5 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.(61) In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission in respect of Articles on support for local agricultural, fisheries and aquaculture products, reporting on irregularities, calculation of penalties for stewardship, data collection and recording, IACS, as well as Annexes on fulfilment of milestones and targets, progress on implementation, Union actions, financial corrections, EU school scheme, CAP interventions, CAP cooperation. Furthermore, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU should be delegated to the Commission to determine the non-fulfilment of the democracy and rule of law horizontal condition or the Charter horizontal condition and identify the specific measures of the NRP Plan affected by the non-fulfilment. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making5 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.
5 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_interinstit/2016/512/oj5 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_interinstit/2016/512/oj

Amendment 23

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 64 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(64a) All Union institutions, bodies and agencies, as well as the competent authorities of the Member States participating in the enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the EPPO pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 should report to the EPPO without undue delay any criminal conduct in respect of which it could exercise its competence, in accordance with Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939.

Amendment 24

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(e) to protect and strengthen democracy in the Union and uphold Union values in accordance with Article 2 TEU.(e) to protect and strengthen democracy and the rule of law in the Union and uphold Union values in accordance with Article 2 TEU.

Amendment 25

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(ii) strengthening the Union’s industrial base, resilient supply chains and boosting sustainable and competitive manufacturing, in particular in the areas of net zero and critical raw materials technologies, with special attention to the competitiveness of small- and medium-sized enterprises, by fully integrating environmental and climate ambitions to accelerate a clean industrial transition;(ii) strengthening the Union’s industrial base, resilient supply chains and boosting sustainable and competitive manufacturing, in particular in the areas of net zero and critical raw materials technologies thereby contributing to the Union’s open strategic autonomy, with special attention to the competitiveness of small- and medium-sized enterprises, by fully integrating environmental and climate ambitions to accelerate a clean industrial transition;

Amendment 26

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a – point x a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(xa) strengthening cross-border connectivity, resilience and security within the Union, and enhancing the Union’s capacity to address cross-border threats, through strategic and scalable investments with clear Union added value, in particular large-scale projects contributing to the functioning of the internal market, the Schengen area, border management, internal security and crisis preparedness, while avoiding the fragmentation of funding and ensuring a stronger focus on projects with a significant impact on the Union’s competitiveness, resilience and security;

Amendment 27

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – subparagraph 1 – point iii

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(iii) strengthening the Union’s security by improving threat detection, prevention and response threat detection capabilities, including by strengthening energy and transport critical infrastructure and cybersecurity;(iii) strengthening the Union’s security by improving threat detection, analysis prevention and response threat detection capabilities, including by strengthening energy and transport critical infrastructure and cybersecurity; countering disinformation and organised cross-border crime, including those originating outside the Union, in close operational cooperation with Union agencies;

Amendment 28

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – subparagraph 1 – point iii a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(iiia) strengthening operational cooperation between Member States and Union agencies responsible for internal security and border management through interoperable systems and secure data exchange, enabling real-time information sharing, enhancing effectiveness and ensuring rapid and coordinated responses in case of cross-border threats, in full compliance with data protection and privacy safeguards;

Amendment 29

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – subparagraph 2 – indent 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
– in Regulation (EU) […] establishing the Union support for asylum migration and integration for the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2034;deleted

Amendment 30

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(ba) to support the area of freedom, security and justice, in a manner that is fully consistent with the objectives set out in Regulations (EU) XX [...] establishing the Union support for asylum, migration and integration for the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2034 and (EU) XX [...] establishing the Union support for European integrated border management and European visa policy for the period from 1 January 2028 to 31 December 2034;

Amendment 31

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point c – point vi a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(via) prioritising investments in digitalisation, including artificial intelligence, secure data infrastructure and technological innovation, as drivers of competitiveness and democratic resilience, in full compliance with fundamental rights, including the rights to privacy and the protection of personal data;

Amendment 32

Proposal for a regulation

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e – point ii

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(ii) promoting and upholding the rule of law through strengthening justice systems, anti-corruption frameworks, media pluralism, information integrity, media literacy, and effective checks and balances;(ii) promoting and upholding the rule of law through strengthening the quality and the efficiency of the justice systems, anti-corruption frameworks, media freedom and pluralism, information integrity, media literacy, and effective checks and balances;

Amendment 33

Proposal for a regulation

Article 4 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point 40 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(40a) 'Union's financial interests' means all revenues, expenditure and assets covered by, acquired through, or due to the budgets established pursuant to this Regulation, including budgets directly or indirectly financed and/or managed and budgets under shared management.

Amendment 34

Proposal for a regulation

Article 5 – paragraph 3

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
3. The technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission referred to in Article 10 shall be implemented under direct or indirect management, in accordance with Article 62(1), first subparagraph, points (a) and (c), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509.3. The technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission referred to in Article 10 shall be implemented under direct or indirect management, subject to full transparency designed to prevent misuse of funds, including public reporting on allocation, beneficiaries and final use, as well as regular audits in accordance with Article 62(1), first subparagraph, points (a) and (c), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509.

Amendment 35

Proposal for a regulation

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) relevant bodies representing civil society, such as environmental partners, non-governmental organisations, youth organisations, and bodies responsible for promoting social inclusion, fundamental rights, rights of persons with disabilities, gender equality and non-discrimination, national human rights institutions and organisations;(c) relevant bodies representing civil society, such as environmental partners, non-governmental organisations, youth organisations, and bodies responsible for promoting social inclusion, fundamental rights, rights of persons with disabilities, gender equality and non-discrimination, national human rights institutions and organisations and, where appropriate, international organisations in a manner proportionate to their relevance and without prejudice to the primary responsibility of public authorities, ensuring that support is effectively targeted at communities most in need;

Amendment 36

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2, point (a), and Article 3 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092;(a) the principles of democracy and the rule of law as set out in Article 2 TEU and specified, in particular, in Article 2, point (a), and Article 3 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092;

Amendment 37

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Member States shall respect those rights, freedoms and principles throughout the preparation and implementation of their respective Plans.The Member States shall respect those rights, freedoms and principles throughout the preparation and implementation of their respective Plans. To that end, Member States shall put in place appropriate arrangements to prevent, detect and address any breaches of those rights, freedoms and principles, including through effective monitoring and control mechanisms.

Amendment 38

Proposal for a regulation

Article 7 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Compliance with the rule of law horizontal condition shall be assessed by the Commission on the basis of objective, transparent and verifiable criteria. Such criteria may be adopted by means of a delegated act. The Commission shall monitor the continued fulfilment of these criteria throughout the implementation of the Plans.

Amendment 39

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Member States shall put in place and maintain effective mechanisms to ensure compliance of the measures supported by their Plans and their implementation with the relevant provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union throughout the implementation of the Fund (‘Charter horizontal condition’).Member States shall, in a way that is transparent and independently verifiable, put in place and maintain effective mechanisms to ensure compliance of the measures supported by their Plans and their implementation with the relevant provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union throughout the implementation of the Fund (‘Charter horizontal condition’).

Amendment 40

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
They shall provide an assessment of those mechanisms, in accordance with Article 22(2), point (q) [requirements for the NRP Plan] and inform the Commission of any modification impacting the fulfilment of the Charter horizontal condition.They shall provide an assessment of this compliance, in accordance with Article 22(2), point (q) [requirements for the NRP Plan] and inform the Commission of any modification impacting the fulfilment of the Charter horizontal condition. The condition is fulfilled where related criteria are met.

Amendment 41

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The compliance referred to in the first subparagraph shall include:
(a) arrangements - including preventive measures, risk assessments and capacity building for managing authorities and beneficiaries - to ensure that measures implemented under and supported by the Fund comply with the Charter horizontal condition;
(b) independent complaint mechanisms enabling individuals and organisations to report cases of non-compliance. Such mechanisms shall be publicly accessible throughout the lifetime of the NRP plans.
The Monitoring Committees established pursuant to Article 54 of this Regulation shall address issues identified by the independent complaints mechanism. Complaint mechanisms shall be widely publicised, user-friendly and accessible to all, including persons in vulnerable situations, throughout the entire programme cycle.

Amendment 42

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the Commission concludes that the Charter horizontal condition is not fulfilled, it shall adopt an implementing decision determining the non-fulfilment of the Charter horizontal condition and identifying the specific measures of the NRP Plan affected by the non-fulfilment, within two months of receiving the Member State’s observations referred to in paragraph 3.Where the Commission concludes that the Charter horizontal condition is not fulfilled, it shall adopt an implementing decision determining the non-fulfilment, in particular where lack of transparency or deficiencies result in misuse, fraud or failure to deliver tangible improvements to the intended beneficiaries, of the Charter horizontal condition and identifying the specific measures of the NRP Plan affected by the non-fulfilment, within two months of receiving the Member State’s observations referred to in paragraph 3.

Amendment 43

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 8

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. If the breach identified by the Commission could also constitute a breach of the rule of law horizontal condition, the procedure of Article 9 shall be activated by priority.deleted

Amendment 44

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8a. The Commission shall immediately inform the European Parliament of any decision proposed, adopted, amended or repealed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 6 and 7. That information shall include a duly reasoned justification, the underlying assessment and all relevant elements. Upon request of the European Parliament, the Commission shall present its assessment without undue delay.

Amendment 45

Proposal for a regulation

Article 8 – paragraph 8 b (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8b. The Commission shall publish without delay the acts authorising the release of funds under the Fund, as well as any acts adopted in connection with those decisions.

Amendment 46

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Member States shall ensure the respect of the principles of the rule of law as set out in Article 2, point (a), and Article 3 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 throughout implementation of the Fund (the ‘rule of law horizontal condition’). They shall inform the Commission of any modification impacting the fulfilment of that condition.1. Member States shall, in a way that is transparent and independently verifiable, ensure the respect of the principles of democracy and the rule of law as set out in Article 2 TEU and specified, in particular, in Article 2, point (a), and Article 3 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 throughout implementation of the Fund (the ‘democracy and rule of law horizontal condition’). They shall inform the Commission of any modification impacting the fulfilment of that condition. The condition is fulfilled where related criteria are met. The Commission shall also take into consideration reports provided by the EPPO under Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092.

Amendment 47

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 2

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Where the Commission considers that a Member State does not fulfil or no longer fulfils the rule of law horizontal condition, it shall notify the Member State concerned of its assessment, taking into account relevant information, including information provided by the Member State concerned in its NRP Plan, in response to Commission observations, and the Rule of Law and European Semester country- reports.2. Where the Commission considers that a Member State does not fulfil or no longer fulfils the democracy and rule of law horizontal condition, it shall notify the Member State concerned of its assessment, taking into account relevant information, including information provided by the Member State concerned in its NRP Plan, in response to Commission observations, and the Rule of Law and European Semester country- reports.

Amendment 48

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Where the Commission concludes that the rule of law horizontal condition is not fulfilled, it shall propose to Council an implementing decision determining the non-fulfilment of the Rule of Law horizontal conditions and identifying the specific measures of the NRP Plan affected by the non-fulfilment, within two months of receiving the Member State’s observations referred to in paragraph 4.Where the Commission concludes that the democracy and rule of law horizontal condition is not fulfilled, it shall adopt a delegated act determining the non-fulfilment of the democracy and rule of law horizontal condition and identifying the specific measures of the NRP Plan affected by the non-fulfilment, within two months of receiving the Member State’s observations referred to in paragraph 4.

Amendment 49

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
For that purpose, the following aspects of the non-fulfilment of the Rule of Law horizontal condition shall be taken into consideration:For that purpose, the following aspects of the non-fulfilment of the democracy and rule of law horizontal condition shall be taken into consideration:

Amendment 50

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 – point a

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) the actual or potential impact on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Union;(a) the actual or potential impact on the sound financial management of the Union budget or on the financial interests of the Union, in particular effective and timely cooperation with the EPPO;

Amendment 51

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Council shall adopt the implementing decision within four weeks of the adoption of the Commission proposaldeleted

Amendment 52

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 5

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
5. The Member State may submit payment applications for the specific measures identified in the decision referred to in paragraph 4, but the Commission shall not make the corresponding payments until the Rule of Law horizontal condition has been fulfilled.5. The Member State may submit payment applications for the specific measures identified in the decision referred to in paragraph 4, but the Commission shall not make the corresponding payments until the democracy and rule of law horizontal condition has been fulfilled.

Amendment 53

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 6

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6. The Member State shall inform the Commission as soon as it considers that the breach of the rule of law horizontal condition has been remedied. The Commission shall assess that information within two months of receipt. If the Commission considers that the breach has been remedied in full, it shall propose to the Council to repeal the decision referred to in paragraph 4. If the Commission considers that the breach has been remedied in part, it shall propose to the Council to amend the decision referred to in paragraph 4 accordingly. The Council shall adopt the implementing decision within four weeks of the adoption of the Commission proposal.6. The Member State concerned shall inform the Commission as soon as it considers that the breach of the democracy and rule of law horizontal condition has been remedied. The Commission shall assess that information within two months of receipt. Where the Commission considers that the democracy and rule of law horizontal condition has been fulfilled, it shall repeal the decision referred to in paragraph 4. Where the Commission disagrees with the Member State regarding the fulfilment of rule of law horizontal condition, it shall inform the Member State thereof and set out its assessment. The Commission shall set out the specific criteria to be met for the release of suspended funds in a clear and objective manner and shall make these criteria, as well as the assessment of their fulfilment, publicly available. Decisions to suspend, amend, or repeal funding shall be based on verifiable reforms and demonstrated compliance with the rule of law in practice.

Amendment 54

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 7

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
7. The Commission shall reduce proportionately the Union financial contribution of the Member State as regards the specific measures of the Plan concerned or, in respect of loan support, take any measure available under the loan agreement, where the decision referred to in paragraph 4 has not been repealed [within [one] year of its adoption].7. The Commission shall reduce proportionately the Union financial contribution of the Member State as regards the specific measures of the Plan concerned or, in respect of loan support, take any measure available under the loan agreement, where the decision referred to in paragraph 4 has not been repealed within one year of its adoption. Where duly justified in light of the nature, complexity or systemic character of the breaches of the democracy and rule of law concerned, the Commission may extend that period by up to two additional years. Such extension shall be based on objective and verifiable elements and shall be duly reasoned.

Amendment 55

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 8

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The Commission shall immediately inform the European Parliament of any decision proposed, adopted, amended or repealed pursuant to paragraphs 4 and 6.8. The Commission shall immediately inform the European Parliament of any decision proposed, adopted, amended or repealed pursuant to paragraphs 4, 6 and 7. That information shall include a duly reasoned justification, the underlying assessment and all relevant elements. Upon request of the European Parliament, the Commission shall present its assessment without undue delay.

Amendment 56

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8a. The Commission shall publish without delay the acts authorising the release of funds under the Fund, as well as any acts adopted in connection with those decisions.

Amendment 57

Proposal for a regulation

Article 9 – paragraph 8 b (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8b. Member States shall put in place and maintain effective mechanisms to ensure compliance with the Union acquis essential to the protection of the Union’s financial interests throughout the implementation of the Fund (the "PIF horizontal condition”). Member States shall inform the Commission of any modification impacting the fulfilment of the PIF horizontal condition. Where the Commission considers that a Member State does not fulfil or no longer fulfils the PIF horizontal condition, it shall notify the Member State concerned of its assessment.

Amendment 58

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Commission shall decommit any amount in an NRP Plan and the Interreg Plan chapter which has not been used for pre-financing, in accordance with Article 17 [pre-financing] or for which a payment application has not been submitted in accordance with Articles 65 [submission and assessment of payment applications], by 31 October of the calendar year following the year of the budgetary commitments.1. The Commission shall decommit any amount in an NRP Plan and the Interreg Plan chapter which has not been used for pre-financing, in accordance with Article 17 [pre-financing] or for which a payment application has not been submitted in accordance with Articles 65 [submission and assessment of payment applications], by 31 October of the calendar year following the year of the budgetary commitments. Decommitted amounts shall be entered in the general budget of the Union and their reallocation or reuse shall be decided by the budgetary authority in accordance with the annual budgetary procedure.

Amendment 59

Proposal for a regulation

Article 15 – paragraph 4

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
4. The appropriations corresponding to decommitments in accordance with Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 and Articles 8 [Charter] and 9 [RoL horizonal condition] of this Regulation may be made available again for use under other Union instruments or programmes implemented under direct or indirect management, in particular those contributing to supporting Europe’s democracy, civil society, Union values or the fight against corruption.4. The appropriations corresponding to decommitments in accordance with Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 and Articles 8 [Charter] and 9 [RoL horizonal condition] of this Regulation shall be made available again for use under other Union instruments or programmes implemented under direct or indirect management, in particular those contributing to supporting Europe’s democracy, civil society, Union values or the fight against corruption. Such appropriations shall, to the extent possible, be earmarked for the benefit of final beneficiaries in the Member State concerned and shall be directed, in priority, towards measures aimed at mitigating the adverse effects of breaches of democracy, rule of law and the principles set out in the Charter on final beneficiaries and recipients. A proportion of the appropriations contributing to the support of Europe’s democracy shall, where appropriate, be allocated to instruments or programmes implemented in the Member State concerned in which the funds have been suspended or decommitted, with a view to ensuring continued support for final beneficiaries and the promotion of Article 2 TEU at national level.

Amendment 60

Proposal for a regulation

Article 22 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1a. Member States shall ensure that the implementation of national plans complies with the principles of the rule of law, democracy and the respect of the Charter including effective judicial protection, independent oversight, and the prevention of conflicts of interest, corruption and fraud. Any deficiencies in these areas that risk affecting the sound financial management of Union funds shall be addressed without delay through appropriate corrective measures.

Amendment 61

Proposal for a regulation

Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) support the general objectives laid down in Article 2 and contribute in a comprehensive and adequate manner to all the specific objectives laid down in Article 3, taking into account the specific challenges of the Member State concerned, and provide an intervention strategy demonstrating how those objectives will be addressed and financed by the Plan, what level of financing is needed to ensure achievement of the general objectives, and how that level of financing is justified. The NRP Plan of Member State with a per capita GNI of less than 90 % of the Union average shall in particular demonstrate that it contributes in an adequate manner to the specific objectives set out in Article 3(a), points (vii) and (ix), and Article 3(d), point (v).(a) support, be consistent with and respect the general objectives laid down in Article 2 and contribute in a comprehensive and adequate manner to all the specific objectives laid down in Article 3, taking into account the specific challenges of the Member State concerned, and provide an intervention strategy demonstrating how those objectives will be addressed and financed by the Plan, what level of financing is needed to ensure achievement of the general objectives, and how that level of financing is justified. The NRP Plan of Member State with a per capita GNI of less than 90 % of the Union average shall in particular demonstrate that it contributes in an adequate manner to the specific objectives set out in Article 3(a), points (vii) and (ix), and Article 3(d), point (v).

Amendment 62

Proposal for a regulation

Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b– point i

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(i) in the context of the European Semester, in particular in the relevant country-specific recommendations addressed to the Member State, including those related to the European Pillar of Social Rights;(i) in the context of the European Semester, in particular in the relevant country-specific recommendations addressed to the Member State, including those related to the European Pillar of Social Rights as well as those related to the rule of law;

Amendment 63

Proposal for a regulation

Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b– point iii a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(iiia) explain how the Member States provide support to the EPPO, in accordance with Article 5(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, in terms of the mechanisms in place and the capacity dedicated to such support.

Amendment 64

Proposal for a regulation

Article 22 – paragraph 2– subparagraph 2 – point l

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(l) specify the arrangements in place to ensure that in the event of interruption of payment deadlines or suspension of Union funding, financial corrections or other measures to ensure the protection of Union’s financial interests, the Member States will comply with their obligations to continue the payments to beneficiaries, recipients, final recipients, contractors and participants;(l) specify the arrangements in place to ensure that in the event of interruption of payment deadlines or suspension of Union funding, financial corrections or other measures to ensure the protection of Union’s financial interests, the Member States will comply with their obligations to ensure the uninterrupted and timely continuation of the payments to beneficiaries, recipients, final recipients, contractors and participants;

Amendment 65

Proposal for a regulation

Article 22 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – point o

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(o) provide a self-assessment of the compliance with the Charter horizontal condition referred to in Article 8 [Charter Article];(o) provide a comprehensive, evidence-based self-assessment of the compliance with the Charter horizontal condition referred to in Article 8 [Charter Article]. That assessment shall be supported by relevant documentation and data, and shall identify potential risks of non-compliance, the measures taken to prevent and mitigate such risks, as well as the mechanisms available to ensure effective remedies in case of breaches;

Amendment 66

Proposal for a regulation

Article 22 – paragraph 2– subparagraph 2 – point p

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(p) specify the way in which the Plan and its envisaged implementation ensure the respect of the Rule of Law horizontal condition referred to in Article 9 [RoL horizontal condition], including the follow-up given to the country-specific recommendations issued in the framework of the latest Rule of Law Report and European Semester, together with measures to address those identified country-specific challenges.(p) specify the way in which the Plan and its envisaged implementation ensure the respect of the democracy and rule of law horizontal condition referred to in Article 9 [RoL horizontal condition], including the follow-up given to the country-specific recommendations issued in the framework of the latest Rule of Law Report and European Semester, together with measures to address those identified country-specific challenges. To that end, the Plan shall include a concrete and detailed implementation strategy setting out the measures to be adopted, the timeline for their execution, the responsible authorities, and the corresponding milestones and targets, as well as the resources allocated.

Amendment 67

Proposal for a regulation

Article 24 – paragraph 8

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
8. The specific measures identified in the implementing decision referred to in Article 9(4) or subject to a decision imposing measures for the protection of the budget under Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 shall not be amended until the decision has been repealed, unless the amendment is intended to support measures that contribute to the fulfilment of the Rule of Law horizontal condition or to addressing the situation that led to the adoption of the aforementioned decisions.8. The specific measures identified in the delegated act referred to in Article 9(4) or subject to a decision imposing measures for the protection of the budget under Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 shall not be amended until the decision has been repealed, unless the amendment is intended to support measures that contribute to the fulfilment of the democracy and rule of law horizontal condition or to addressing the situation that led to the adoption of the aforementioned decisions.

Amendment 68

Proposal for a regulation

Article 24 – paragraph 9 – point a

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) the fulfilment of the Charter horizontal condition;(a) the fulfilment of the Charter horizontal condition or to addressing the situation that led to the adoption of the aforementioned decision;

Amendment 69

Proposal for a regulation

Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point g

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(g) the need to ensure continuous compliance of the Rule of Law and the Charter horizontal conditions in the implementation of the Plan, taking into consideration in particular the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and the European Semester.(g) the need to ensure continuous compliance with the democracy and rule of law, protection of financial interests and the Charter horizontal conditions, including ensuring that the relevant country-specific recommendations issued by the Commission are duly integrated and effectively addressed in the implementation of the Plan, taking into consideration in particular the country-specific challenges identified in the context of the Rule of Law Report and the European Semester.

Amendment 70

Proposal for a regulation

Article 51 – paragraph 1 – point c

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) applying effective and proportionate measures and procedures, taking into account the risks identified, to prevent, detect, and correct irregularities, including fraud, corruption, conflict of interests, and double-funding and ensure compliance of the underlying operations with applicable law, in accordance with the relevant key requirements set out in Annex IV [key requirements];(c) applying effective and proportionate measures and procedures, taking into account the risks identified, to prevent, report, detect, and correct irregularities, including fraud, corruption, conflict of interests or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union, and double-funding and ensure compliance of the underlying operations with applicable law, in accordance with the relevant key requirements set out in Annex IV [key requirements];

Amendment 71

Proposal for a regulation

Article 54 – paragraph 2

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Where the Member State sets up more than one monitoring committee, it shall also set up a coordinating committee which shall ensure the overview and the monitoring of the implementation of the plan, after consulting the relevant authorities managing each of the NRP Plan’s chapters, within three months of the date of notification to the Member State concerned of the decision approving the NRP Plan. The coordinating committee shall approve all elements listed under Article 56(1) [ functions of the monitoring committee]2. Where the Member State sets up more than one monitoring committee, it shall also set up a coordinating committee which shall ensure the overview and the monitoring of the implementation of the plan, after consulting the relevant authorities managing each of the NRP Plan’s chapters, within three months of the date of notification to the Member State concerned of the decision approving the NRP Plan. The coordinating committee shall ensure that the organisation of the monitoring committees allows for effective monitoring across the different policy areas covered by the NRP Plan. The coordinating committee shall approve all elements listed under Article 56(1) [ functions of the monitoring committee]

Amendment 72

Proposal for a regulation

Article 54 – paragraph 6 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
6a. The Monitoring Committees shall operate in accordance with the principles of partnership, taking into account the institutional and administrative arrangements of the Member States. Member States may involve relevant partners, where appropriate and in accordance with national practices, in the work of the Monitoring Committees and in the implementation of programmes.
The Commission may facilitate the exchange of experience between Member States, where relevant.

Amendment 73

Proposal for a regulation

Article 56 – paragraph 1 – point c

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) the fulfilment of the Rule of Law and Charter horizontal conditions laid down in Articles 8 and 9 [Rule of law and charter horizontal conditions] and their application throughout the programming period;(c) the fulfilment of the democracy and rule of law and Charter horizontal conditions laid down in Articles 8 and 9 [Rule of law and charter horizontal conditions] and their application throughout the programming period including an assessment of the implementation of the relevant recommendations identified in the latest Rule of Law Report, and of the measures taken to address the related country-specific challenges;

Amendment 74

Proposal for a regulation

Article 56 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(ga) the extent to which final beneficiaries are adequately protected in the implementation of the programme or agreement.

Amendment 75

Proposal for a regulation

Article 58 – paragraph 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Member States shall take appropriate measures to protect the financial interests of the Union and to ensure that the use of funds in the implementation of the Plans complies with the applicable law, including applicable public procurement and State aid rules. They shall in particular ensure the prevention, detection, correction and reporting of irregularities, including fraud, corruption and conflicts of interest.1. The Member States shall take appropriate measures to protect the financial interests of the Union and to ensure that the use of funds in the implementation of the Plans complies with the applicable law, including applicable public procurement and State aid rules. They shall in particular ensure the prevention, detection, correction and reporting of irregularities, including fraud, corruption and conflicts of interest and other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union.

Amendment 76

Proposal for a regulation

Article 58 – paragraph 2 – point c

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(c) take appropriate measures to prevent, detect and correct irregularities including fraud, corruption, conflicts of interest, including the use of data mining tools;(c) take appropriate measures to prevent, report, detect and correct irregularities including fraud, corruption, conflicts of interest and other illegal activities affecting the Fund, including the use of data mining tools;

Amendment 77

Proposal for a regulation

Article 58 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(ga) for those Member States participating in enhanced cooperation pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2017/1939:
- have systems in place that ensures that their authorities have the capacity to detect and report to the EPPO without undue delay any criminal conduct in respect of which it could exercise its competence, in accordance with Article 24(1) to (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939,
- ensure that the EPPO receives adequate support in its investigations, in accordance with Article 5(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1939, notably by having dedicated and specialised staff assigned by Member States to the EPPO’s decentralised level, including law enforcement authorities and other specialised investigators and experts;

Amendment 78

Proposal for a regulation

Article 58 – paragraph 2 – point j

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(j) make arrangements to ensure the effective examination of complaints concerning the use of the Fund, in accordance with their institutional and legal frameworks, and upon request by the Commission, examine complaints submitted to the Commission falling within the scope of the NRP Plan and inform the Commission of the results of these examinations;(j) make arrangements to ensure the effective, impartial and timely examination of complaints concerning the use of the Fund, in accordance with their institutional and legal frameworks, and upon request by the Commission, examine complaints submitted to the Commission falling within the scope of the NRP Plan and inform the Commission of the results of these examinations. Such arrangements shall ensure that complaints may be submitted in any written form, that receipt of each complaint is promptly acknowledged and assigned a clear reference number, and that complainants are informed of the follow-up to their complaint within a reasonable period not exceeding one year from its submission. The Commission shall take appropriate measures to ensure the visibility and broad awareness and accessibility of such mechanisms;

Amendment 79

Proposal for a regulation

Article 61 – paragraph 6 – point a

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(a) there is a specific risk or suspicion of fraud, corruption or conflicts of interest or another serious non-compliance with the responsibilities of Member States referred to in Article 58 [Responsibilities of Member States];(a) there is a specific risk or suspicion of fraud, corruption or conflicts of interest, other illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the Union or another serious non-compliance with the responsibilities of Member States referred to in Article 58 [Responsibilities of Member States];

Amendment 80

Proposal for a regulation

Article 64 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The information shall be in the official language or languages of the Member State and/or in either English, French or German, and shall remain available on the website for two years from the date of its initial publication. The data published on the website referred to in paragraph 1 shall be in a digital-ready, open, interoperable and machine-readable format, which allows data to be sorted, searched, extracted, compared and reused.The information shall be in the official language or languages of the Member State and/or in either English, French or German, and shall remain available on the website for two years from the date of its initial publication. The data published on the website referred to in paragraph 1 shall be in a digital-ready, open, interoperable and machine-readable format, which allows data to be sorted, searched, extracted, compared and reused. The information shall also be presented in a clear, accessible and user-friendly manner, including through summaries or explanations in plain language, so as to ensure that it is easily understandable for the general public.

Amendment 81

Proposal for a regulation

Article 86 – paragraph 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 87 [Exercise of delegation] to amend Articles 48 [Support for local agricultural, fisheries and aquaculture products], 58 [Responsibilities of Member States, reporting on irregularities], 62 [calculation of penalties for stewardship], 63 [data collection and recording], 70 [IACS], Annexes VIII [fulfilment of milestones and targets], IX [progress on implementation], XI [payment application], XV [Union actions], XIV [financial corrections], to this Regulation in order to adapt them to changes occurring during the programming period.The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 87 [Exercise of delegation] to amend Articles 48 [Support for local agricultural, fisheries and aquaculture products], 58 [Responsibilities of Member States, reporting on irregularities], 62 [calculation of penalties for stewardship], 63 [data collection and recording], 70 [IACS], Annexes VIII [fulfilment of milestones and targets], IX [progress on implementation], XI [payment application], XV [Union actions], XIV [financial corrections], to this Regulation in order to adapt them to changes occurring during the programming period. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 87 to determine the non-fulfilment of the rule of law and to identify the specific measures of the NRP Plan affected by the non-fulfilment.

Back matter, 1

Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.

Annex: declaration of input 1 block

The Chair in his capacity as rapporteur for opinion declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not include in his opinion input from interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies, to be listed in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

Procedure pages and committee votes

How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.

Procedure – committee asked for opinion 1 block
Table from the text: Title
TitleEstablishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034
ReferencesCOM(2025)0565 – C10-0179/2025 – 2025/0240(COD)
Committee(s) responsible Date announced in plenaryBUDG 23.10.2025REGI 23.10.2025AGRI 23.10.2025
Opinion by Date announced in plenaryLIBE 23.10.2025
Rapporteur for opinion Date appointedJavier Zarzalejos 19.6.2026
Previous rapporteur for opinionAntónio Tânger Corrêa
Date adopted24.6.2026
Result of final vote+: –: 0:51 17 1
Final vote by roll call by the committee asked for opinion 3 blocks

51 · For

ECR
Assita Kanko
EPP
Krzysztof Brejza, Caterina Chinnici, Paulo Cunha, Lena Düpont, Loucas Fourlas, Ondřej Kolář, Marie-Sophie Lanig, Jeroen Lenaers, Verena Mertens, Ana Miguel Pedro, Emil Radev, Karlo Ressler, Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, Tomas Tobé, Loránt Vincze, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Javier Zarzalejos, Tomáš Zdechovský
Renew
Malik Azmani, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Fabienne Keller, Moritz Körner, Michael McNamara, Marjan Šarec, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
S&D
Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, Francisco Assis, Katarina Barley, Hannes Heide, Alicia Homs Ginel, Evin Incir, Murielle Laurent, Ana Catarina Mendes, Birgit Sippel, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Cecilia Strada, Kristian Vigenin, Alessandro Zan
The Left
Giuseppe Antoci, Pernando Barrena Arza, Gaetano Pedulla', Ilaria Salis
Greens
Jaume Asens Llodrà, Saskia Bricmont, Mélissa Camara, Markéta Gregorová, Leoluca Orlando, Tineke Strik

17 · Against

ECR
Alessandro Ciriani, Geadis Geadi, Paolo Inselvini, Georgiana Teodorescu, Maciej Wąsik
ESN
Alexander Sell, Milan Uhrík, Roberto Vannacci
No group
Erik Kaliňák
Patriots
Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Mélanie Disdier, Marieke Ehlers, Catherine Griset, András László, Fabrice Leggeri, António Tânger Corrêa, Tom Vandendriessche

1 · Abstained

Patriots
Jaroslav Bžoch

Connections

The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509”. Text, 24 June 2026. docId LIBE-AD-786702. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/LIBE-AD-786702 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/LIBE-AD-786702 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-libe-ad-786702,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/LIBE-AD-786702}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/LIBE-AD-786702},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. docId LIBE-AD-786702. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}