Skip to content

Text · Opinion parliamentary committee

On discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office for the financial year 2023

Document LIBE-AD-765282 · 2024/2029(DEC)

Kind
Opinion parliamentary committee LIBE-AD-765282
Date
10 February 2025
Committee
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
Rapporteur
Tomáš Zdechovský
More facts (3)
Subject matter
BUDG
Reference
2024/2029(DEC)
More

In short

A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.

AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs opinion on the 2023 budget discharge for the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) notes its doubled caseload and welcomes its activities, while calling for more funding and staff. It stresses the need for a holistic approach to crime, asset recovery, wider EPPO membership, judicial independence, and enhanced cooperation with OLAF.

Position. The committee suggests that the lead committee incorporate these points into its motion for a resolution, endorsing the EPPO's work and calling for increased resources and mandate expansion.

Key points

  1. Notes that EPPO's caseload almost doubled in 2023, with up to 1,927 active investigations, 139 indictments, 339 VAT-related cases, and over 200 investigations on NextGenerationEU.
  2. Welcomes the 2023 budget increase to EUR 64.6 million and an 11% staff increase, but regrets that the Commission's 2025 budget proposal and Council's stance fall short; calls for dedicated funding in the next MFF.
  3. Calls for a holistic approach to white-collar and conventional crime, and for the Commission to analyse extending EPPO's mandate and present a legislative proposal.
  4. Underlines asset recovery's role, welcomes EPPO's participation in international networks, and asks the Commission to invite EPPO to the new cooperation network on asset recovery.
  5. Calls on remaining Member States to join EPPO or be denied indirect EU fund management; asks the Commission to monitor cooperation and continue dialogue with non-participating states.
  6. Welcomes the appointment of 8 new European Prosecutors and 35 new Delegated Prosecutors; stresses the need for full judicial independence through merit-based appointments.
  7. Encourages enhanced EPPO-OLAF cooperation, including OLAF's obligation to report suspicions without delay, and supports joint initiatives and information sharing.

Who is affected

  • The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and its staff, who would receive more funding and resources.
  • Member States not participating in EPPO, which could be denied the possibility to manage EU funds indirectly.
  • The Commission, which is called on to monitor cooperation, invite EPPO to networks, and propose mandate extensions.
  • OLAF, which is encouraged to cooperate more closely with EPPO.

Figures and deadlines

  • 1,927 active investigations in 2023
  • 139 indictments, 339 VAT-related cases, over 200 NextGenerationEU investigations
  • EUR 64.6 million total budget for 2023
  • 11% increase in staff in 2023
  • Cases increased by 70% and investigations by 58% from 2022 to 2023
  • €1.5 billion seized in 2023
  • 24 Member States participate in EPPO
  • 8 new European Prosecutors and 35 new Delegated Prosecutors appointed in 2023

Read the text · Report a problem

Text

The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.

Opinion

The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following into its motion for a resolution:

1. Notes that, compared with 2022, the caseload of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) almost doubled in 2023, reaching up to 1 927 active investigations; commends the fruitful activities of the EPPO in 2023, which included 139 indictments, 339 VAT-related cases and over 200 investigations on the implementation of NextGenerationEU; further notes that the EPPO started to bring more perpetrators of EU fraud to judgment in front of national courts;

2. Commends the close cooperation between the EPPO and the Court of Auditors, particularly in detecting any suspicions of criminal offences falling within its competence and involving participating Member States;3. Welcomes the increase in appropriations for the EPPO’s budget in 2023, amounting to EUR 64,6 million in total, which allowed for an 11 % increase in staff in that year; acknowledges that the acceleration of the disbursement of NextGenerationEU funding the rapid rise in the EPPO’s workload – with cases increasing by 70% and the investigations by 58% from 2022 to 2023 – and the expansion of its membership are projected to further strain its resources; underlines the importance of additional funding and strengthening its staffing to enable the EPPO to effectively combat organized crime, protect the EU’s financial interests, and uphold the rule of law, which are key EU priorities; regrets that the Commission’s proposal for the EPPO’s 2025 budget and the Council’s stance fall short of ensuring sufficient resources for the agency to fulfil its mandate; stresses that the EPPO generates significant financial returns for the EU, demonstrated by the seizure of €1.5 billion in 2023, and calls for a dedicated increase in funding within the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2028-2034 to ensure it can continue to meet its objectives and obligations;

4. Acknowledges the importance of taking a holistic approach to combating white-collar crime, such as fraud and corruption, and more conventional types of crime, such as drug trafficking and human trafficking, as they are often linked; recalls the fact that, in its upcoming evaluation report, the Commission should carefully analyse to which categories of crimes the EPPO’s mandate needs to be extended in order for it to be best equipped to fulfil its role; meanwhile, the EPPO’s existing competence to investigate organised crime and money laundering, when linked to fraud affecting EU financial interests, should be supported through adequate resources and efficient cooperation with Europol, and analyse how EPPO’s operations and investigations can become more efficient and effective, and present a legislative proposal to accompany the evaluation; recalls in the regard the plans of Commissioner McGrath to accelerate the evaluation;

5. Underlines the essential role of asset recovery in the creation of a credible deterrent to organised crime; welcomes the EPPO’s participation in international networks to advance its asset recovery operations further; stresses the need for the Commission to invite the EPPO to participate in the newly created cooperation network on asset recovery and confiscation; notes that the timely and effective investigation and prosecution of fraud-related crimes can generate significant savings for the budget of the Union and for Member States’ budgets;

6. Emphasises the important role of the EPPO in the Union approach to combating corruption and the misuse of Union funds; expresses its satisfaction that 24 Member States participate in the EPPO and calls on the remaining Member States to do so as well or be denied the possibility to manage EU funds indirectly; calls on the Commission to closely monitor Member States’ level of cooperation with the EPPO in subsequent reports and to continue engaging in an active dialogue with non-participating Member States to effectively facilitate the EPPO in carrying out its tasks; emphasises the fact that such a dialogue should be ongoing with the Member States that already participate in the EPPO as regards tackling difficulties in fighting rule of law violations and corruption and support them in the practical implementation of the recommendations in this regard in the annual rule of law reports; reiterates, however, the EP calls that membership of the EPPO should be a precondition for receiving EU funds and the need for an expansion of the mandate of the EPPO; welcomes the participation of Sweden and Poland in the EPPO which was confirmed in January and July 2024 repectively;

7. Welcomes the appointment of 8 new European Prosecutors and 35 new European Delegated Prosecutors to the EPPO in 2023; reiterates that the EPPO can fulfil its role only if it enjoys full judicial independence, which flows from a merit-based and objective appointment procedure; encourages Member States to contribute to the full independence of the EPPO in that regard;

8. Encourages continued and enhanced cooperation between the EPPO and OLAF, in line with their respective regulations, and the obligation of OLAF to report, without undue delay, suspicions of criminal contact to EPPO, in order to enable it tackle fraud, corruption and financial crime affecting the Union’s financial interests; supports the further development of joint initiatives, information sharing and coordinated actions between the EPPO and OLAF, as such cooperation is vital to strengthening the protection of EU financial interests and the Union’s fight against financial crime and to ensuring the effective and efficient use of Union resources.

Back matter, 2

Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.

Annex: entities or persons from whom the rapporteur has received input 1 block

The rapporteur for the opinion declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

Information on adoption by committee asked for opinion 1 block
Table from the text: Date adopted
Date adopted6.2.2025
Result of final vote+: –: 0:46 13 1
Members present for the final voteMagdalena Adamowicz, Giuseppe Antoci, Jaume Asens Llodrà, Nikola Bartůšek, Krzysztof Brejza, Saskia Bricmont, Jaroslav Bžoch, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Lena Düpont, Marieke Ehlers, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Branko Grims, Evin Incir, Irena Joveva, Erik Kaliňák, Marina Kaljurand, Fabienne Keller, András László, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Erik Marquardt, Michael McNamara, Birgit Sippel, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Petra Steger, Cecilia Strada, Georgiana Teodorescu, Milan Uhrík, Tom Vandendriessche, Charlie Weimers, Sophie Wilmès, Alessandro Zan, Javier Zarzalejos, Tomáš Zdechovský
Substitutes present for the final voteFredis Beleris, David Casa, Sigrid Friis, Markéta Gregorová, Hannah Neumann, Gaetano Pedulla’, Sandro Ruotolo, Oliver Schenk, Alexander Sell, Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, Malika Sorel, António Tânger Corrêa, Marco Tarquinio, Pekka Toveri, Loránt Vincze, Petar Volgin, Axel Voss, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Lucia Yar
Members under Rule 216(7) present for the final voteBart Groothuis, Rima Hassan, Anja Hazekamp, Pär Holmgren, Sérgio Humberto, Evelyn Regner, Carla Tavares, Ingeborg Ter Laak

Procedure pages and committee votes

How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.

Final vote by roll call by the committee asked for opinion 3 blocks

46 · For

EPP
Magdalena Adamowicz, Fredis Beleris, Krzysztof Brejza, David Casa, Lena Düpont, Branko Grims, Sérgio Humberto, Oliver Schenk, Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Pekka Toveri, Loránt Vincze, Axel Voss, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Javier Zarzalejos, Tomáš Zdechovský
Renew
Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Sigrid Friis, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Bart Groothuis, Irena Joveva, Fabienne Keller, Michael McNamara, Sophie Wilmès, Lucia Yar
S&D
Evin Incir, Marina Kaljurand, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Evelyn Regner, Sandro Ruotolo, Birgit Sippel, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Cecilia Strada, Marco Tarquinio, Carla Tavares, Alessandro Zan
The Left
Giuseppe Antoci, Rima Hassan, Anja Hazekamp, Gaetano Pedulla'
Greens
Jaume Asens Llodrà, Saskia Bricmont, Markéta Gregorová, Pär Holmgren, Erik Marquardt, Hannah Neumann

13 · Against

ECR
Charlie Weimers
ESN
Alexander Sell, Milan Uhrík, Petar Volgin
No group
Erik Kaliňák
Patriots
Nikola Bartůšek, Jaroslav Bžoch, Marieke Ehlers, András László, Malika Sorel, Petra Steger, António Tânger Corrêa, Tom Vandendriessche

1 · Abstained

ECR
Georgiana Teodorescu

Connections

The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office for the financial year 2023”. Text, 10 February 2025. docId LIBE-AD-765282. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/LIBE-AD-765282 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/LIBE-AD-765282 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-libe-ad-765282,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office for the financial year 2023}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-02-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/LIBE-AD-765282}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/LIBE-AD-765282},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. docId LIBE-AD-765282. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}