Text · Opinion parliamentary committee
On discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023, Section IX - European Data Protection Supervisor
Document LIBE-AD-765277 · 2024/2028(DEC)
- Kind
- Opinion parliamentary committee LIBE-AD-765277
- Date
- 10 February 2025
- Committee
- Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
- Rapporteur
- Tomáš Zdechovský
- Dossier
- 2024/2028(DEC)
More facts (3)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Subject matter
- BUDG
- Reference
- 2024/2028(DEC)
In short
A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.
AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs gives its opinion on the discharge for the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) for 2023, noting budget implementation and calling for improvements. It welcomes the EDPS's legislative work and supervision, but expresses concern about investigation delays, rising mission costs, and reduced transparency on missions.
Position. The committee calls on the lead committee to incorporate these points into its motion for a resolution on discharge for the EDPS for 2023.
Key points
- Notes the 2023 operating budget of the EDPS was EUR 22 711 559, a 12% increase from 2022, with a 96% implementation rate of commitment appropriations.
- Welcomes the EDPS's increased legislative consultations, including 82 formal consultations, 54 opinions, and 26 formal comments, and its role in new laws like the Artificial Intelligence Act.
- Emphasises that additional responsibilities delegated to the EDPS require adequate resources to fulfil its obligations effectively.
- Notes with concern that the EDPS did not close a single investigation in 2023, though notifications beyond 72 hours decreased significantly compared to the previous year.
- Welcomes the EDPS's focus on ensuring external contractors meet standards, particularly given previous use of companies operating in Russia, and its use of KPIs to monitor performance.
- Expresses concern about the increase in EDPS staff mission costs from EUR 28 789 in 2021 to EUR 284 580 in 2023, and calls for an assessment of their appropriateness and effectiveness.
- Calls on the EDPS to reinstate public reporting on the number of missions funded by organisers and which units participated, to improve transparency.
Who is affected
- The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) and its staff, who are subject to calls for better resource use and transparency.
- Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies supervised by the EDPS, as they are affected by its investigation delays and legislative role.
Figures and deadlines
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Opinion
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following into its motion for a resolution:
1. Notes that the 2023 operating budget of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) amounted to EUR 22 711 559 and compared to the 2022 final budget, the operating budget increased by 12 %; welcomes that, in 2023, the implementation rate of the commitment appropriations by the EDPS was 96 %;
2. Notes the increased number of legislative consultations by the EDPS, resulting in 82 formal legislative consultations, 54 opinions and 26 formal comments; appreciates the contribution of the EDPS to legislative work, including in cooperation with the European Data Protection Board; notes the increased role of the EDPS in multiple new legislative acts, including the Artificial Intelligence Act, under which EDPS becomes the competent authority for the Union institutions, agencies, offices and bodies, where the EDPS has been delegated further tasks; emphasizes that these additional responsibilities, delegated by the co-legislators, require adequate resources to ensure the EDPS can effectively fulfil its obligations;
3. Emphasises the role of the EDPS in supervising the processing of personal data by Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies; notes with concern the length of proceedings before the EDPS, as the EDPS did not close a single investigation in 2023, but in comparison to the previous year, in 2023, the number of notifications beyond the 72 hours significantly decreased;
4. Welcomes the EDPS's focus on ensuring that external contractors meet the standards expected of all Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, particularly in light of the previous use of external companies by EDPS that, according to Yale University's ranking, continue to operate in Russia; appreciates that EDPS uses key performance indicators (KPIs) to monitor its performance in light of the main objectives set out in the EDPS Strategy, which contributes to ensure adaptability to activities where needed and to increase the effective use or resources;
5. Expresses concern about the significant increase in EDPS staff mission costs, from EUR 28 789 in 2021 and EUR 176 903 in 2022, to EUR 284 580 in 2023; calls on the EDPS to assess whether the resources spent on missions are being used appropriately and effectively; notes that the EDPS ceased making public the number of missions funded by organisers, as well as information on which unit or sector participated in each mission, thus reducing transparency regarding mission expenses; calls on the EDPS to reinstate this practice.
Back matter, 2
Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.
Annex: entities or persons from whom the rapporteur has received input 1 block
Information on adoption by committee asked for opinion 1 block
| Date adopted | 6.2.2025 | |
| Result of final vote | +: –: 0: | 47 8 5 |
| Members present for the final vote | Magdalena Adamowicz, Giuseppe Antoci, Jaume Asens Llodrà, Nikola Bartůšek, Krzysztof Brejza, Saskia Bricmont, Jaroslav Bžoch, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Lena Düpont, Marieke Ehlers, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Branko Grims, Evin Incir, Irena Joveva, Erik Kaliňák, Marina Kaljurand, Fabienne Keller, András László, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Erik Marquardt, Michael McNamara, Birgit Sippel, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Petra Steger, Cecilia Strada, Georgiana Teodorescu, Milan Uhrík, Tom Vandendriessche, Charlie Weimers, Sophie Wilmès, Alessandro Zan, Javier Zarzalejos, Tomáš Zdechovský | |
| Substitutes present for the final vote | Fredis Beleris, David Casa, Sigrid Friis, Markéta Gregorová, Hannah Neumann, Gaetano Pedulla’, Sandro Ruotolo, Oliver Schenk, Alexander Sell, Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, Malika Sorel, António Tânger Corrêa, Marco Tarquinio, Pekka Toveri, Loránt Vincze, Petar Volgin, Axel Voss, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Lucia Yar | |
| Members under Rule 216(7) present for the final vote | Bart Groothuis, Rima Hassan, Anja Hazekamp, Pär Holmgren, Sérgio Humberto, Evelyn Regner, Carla Tavares, Ingeborg Ter Laak |
Procedure pages and committee votes
How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.
Final vote by roll call by the committee asked for opinion 3 blocks
47 · For
- ECR
- Georgiana Teodorescu
- EPP
- Magdalena Adamowicz, Fredis Beleris, Krzysztof Brejza, David Casa, Lena Düpont, Branko Grims, Sérgio Humberto, Oliver Schenk, Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Pekka Toveri, Loránt Vincze, Axel Voss, Michał Wawrykiewicz, Javier Zarzalejos, Tomáš Zdechovský
- Renew
- Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Sigrid Friis, Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle, Bart Groothuis, Irena Joveva, Fabienne Keller, Michael McNamara, Sophie Wilmès, Lucia Yar
- S&D
- Evin Incir, Marina Kaljurand, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Evelyn Regner, Sandro Ruotolo, Birgit Sippel, Krzysztof Śmiszek, Cecilia Strada, Marco Tarquinio, Carla Tavares, Alessandro Zan
- The Left
- Giuseppe Antoci, Rima Hassan, Anja Hazekamp, Gaetano Pedulla'
- Greens
- Jaume Asens Llodrà, Saskia Bricmont, Markéta Gregorová, Pär Holmgren, Erik Marquardt, Hannah Neumann
8 · Against
- Patriots
- Nikola Bartůšek, Jaroslav Bžoch, Marieke Ehlers, András László, Malika Sorel, Petra Steger, António Tânger Corrêa, Tom Vandendriessche
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023, Section IX - European Data Protection Supervisor”. Text, 10 February 2025. docId LIBE-AD-765277. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/LIBE-AD-765277 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/LIBE-AD-765277 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-libe-ad-765277,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2023, Section IX - European Data Protection Supervisor}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-02-10},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/LIBE-AD-765277}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/LIBE-AD-765277},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId LIBE-AD-765277. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}