Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

JURI-PR-776862 → A-10-2026-0020

From
JURI-PR-776862 report parliamentary committee draft of 20 Oct 2025
To
A-10-2026-0020 Plenary report of 10 Feb 2026
Changes
8 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+63 added · −25 removed · 9 changed
More facts (3)
Dossier
2025/2015(INI)
Title (from)
on the European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024
Title (to)
on the European Union regulatory fitness and subsidiarity and proportionality – report on Better Law-Making covering 2023 and 2024
Cite Link to this page
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The new version expands recitals on conferral, values, and better lawmaking, and adds paragraphs on national parliaments' subsidiarity checks and AI in lawmaking.1235 It replaces the 'one in, two out' approach with calls for a more ambitious overarching approach, and adds many new paragraphs on competitiveness, SMEs, and simplification.38 It adds paragraphs on implementation dialogues, rule of law, impact assessments, and reporting obligations, and renumbers existing paragraphs.8 The other changes are wording or formal: a phrase shortened and a transition year rephrased.47

The notes class 6 changes as substance, 0 as formal, 2 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 3 of 3: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedThis report reviews EU better law-making in 2023 and 2024, stressing shared responsibility between institutions and Member States. Parliament calls for a 30 % cut in regulatory costs, 35 % for SMEs. Stronger evaluations and impact assessments, and less gold-plating. It urges upgrading “one-in, one-out” to “one-in, two-out”, reinforcing subsidiarity, and the role of Regulatory Scrutiny Board when it comes to independence and transparency.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-776862/compare/A-10-2026-0020?all=1&part=3
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
5 October 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Changes between JURI-PR-776862 and A-10-2026-0020”. Text, 10 February 2026. from JURI-PR-776862, to A-10-2026-0020, reference 2025/2015(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-776862/compare/A-10-2026-0020?all=1&part=3 (retrieved 5 October 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-text-2026-02-10,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between JURI-PR-776862 and A-10-2026-0020}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-776862/compare/A-10-2026-0020?all=1&part=3}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-776862/compare/A-10-2026-0020?all=1&part=3},
  urldate = {2026-10-05},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from JURI-PR-776862, to A-10-2026-0020, reference 2025/2015(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}