Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

JURI-PR-753702 → A-9-2024-0020

From
JURI-PR-753702 report parliamentary committee draft of 13 Oct 2023
To
A-9-2024-0020 Plenary report of 1 Feb 2024
Changes
15 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+40 added · −10 removed · 8 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the unitary supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products
Title (to)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the unitary supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 2 of 3: Paragraphs 61–63

Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point l: (l) where applicable, the filing of an appeal, its status and the outcome of the appeal proceedings, including where applicable a summary of the revised examination opinion;

Change 13

ChangedArticle 40 – paragraph 3: 3. If the Office or the relevant panel considers it necessary for a party, witness or expert to give evidence orally, it shall issue a summons to the person concerned to appear before it. Where an expert is summonsedsummonsed, itthe shallOffice beor verifiedthe relevant panel, as the case may be, shall verify that that expert is free of any conflict of interest. The period of notice provided in such summons shall be at least 1 month, unless they agree to a shorter period.

Change 14

ChangedArticle 51 – paragraph 1: By ...… [OP,[OJ: please insert: five years after the date of application], and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall evaluate the implementation of this Regulation and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council. InAs itspart report,of that evaluation, the Commission shall evaluate and assess whether the creationfeasibility and benefits of establishing a central authorisation procedure for plant protection products under the European Food Safety Authority is appropriate and also whether it is efficient and necessary.Authority.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2024). “Changes between JURI-PR-753702 and A-9-2024-0020”. Text, 1 February 2024. from JURI-PR-753702, to A-9-2024-0020. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-753702/compare/A-9-2024-0020?all=1&part=2 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-02-01,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between JURI-PR-753702 and A-9-2024-0020}},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-02-01},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-753702/compare/A-9-2024-0020?all=1&part=2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-753702/compare/A-9-2024-0020?all=1&part=2},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from JURI-PR-753702, to A-9-2024-0020. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}