Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report
JURI-PR-753702 → A-9-2024-0020
- From
- JURI-PR-753702 report parliamentary committee draft of 13 Oct 2023
- To
- A-9-2024-0020 Plenary report of 1 Feb 2024
- Changes
- 15 changes to the text
- Paragraphs
- +40 added · −10 removed · 8 changed
More facts (2)
- Title (from)
- on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the unitary supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products
- Title (to)
- on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the unitary supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 2 of 3: Paragraphs 61–63
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point l: (l) where applicable, the filing of an appeal, its status and the outcome of the appeal proceedings, including where applicable a summary of the revised examination opinion;
Change 13
ChangedArticle 40 – paragraph 3: 3. If the Office or the relevant panel considers it necessary for a party, witness or expert to give evidence orally, it shall issue a summons to the person concerned to appear before it. Where an expert is summonsedsummonsed, itthe shallOffice beor verifiedthe relevant panel, as the case may be, shall verify that that expert is free of any conflict of interest. The period of notice provided in such summons shall be at least 1 month, unless they agree to a shorter period.
Change 14
ChangedArticle 51 – paragraph 1: By ...… [OP,[OJ: please insert: five years after the date of application], and every five years thereafter, the Commission shall evaluate the implementation of this Regulation and present a report on the main findings to the European Parliament and to the Council. InAs itspart report,of that evaluation, the Commission shall evaluate and assess whether the creationfeasibility and benefits of establishing a central authorisation procedure for plant protection products under the European Food Safety Authority is appropriate and also whether it is efficient and necessary.Authority.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-753702/compare/A-9-2024-0020?all=1&part=2
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2024). “Changes between JURI-PR-753702 and A-9-2024-0020”. Text, 1 February 2024. from JURI-PR-753702, to A-9-2024-0020. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-753702/compare/A-9-2024-0020?all=1&part=2 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-02-01,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between JURI-PR-753702 and A-9-2024-0020}},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-02-01},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-753702/compare/A-9-2024-0020?all=1&part=2}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-753702/compare/A-9-2024-0020?all=1&part=2},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from JURI-PR-753702, to A-9-2024-0020. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}