Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

JURI-PR-749960 → A-9-2023-0315

From: JURI-PR-749960 report parliamentary committee draft of 15 Jun 2023
To: A-9-2023-0315 Plenary report of 6 Nov 2023
Changes: 25 changes to the text
Paragraphs: +51 added · −45 removed · 4 changed

More facts (2)

Title (from): on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2246/2002
Title (to): on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2246/2002

Title (from): on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2246/2002
Title (to): on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2246/2002

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 6 of 6: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

AddedEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 can be credited for establishing a European design protection system. But having been in place for over 20 years, the regulation needed to be modernised, in particular to adapt it to the digital age and also to make it more attractive for independent creators and businesses, in particular SMEs. This is the focus of the Commission proposal.

Change 25

ChangedThe rapporteur broadly agrees with the proposed guidelines, but suggests some 20 amendments which seek primarily to bolster legal certainty. The main aims are to clarify the ‘repair clause’ (recital 16, Article 20a), to remove powers from the Executive Director which are difficult to justify (Articles 42, 65, 72a, 78, 100 and 102), and to ~~reduce~~increase the amount of the ~~fees for 3rd and 4th~~renewal ~~renewals~~fees (annex).

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-749960/compare/A-9-2023-0315?all=1&part=6
Data source: European Parliament Open Data
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 28 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2023). “Changes between JURI-PR-749960 and A-9-2023-0315”. Text, 6 November 2023. from JURI-PR-749960, to A-9-2023-0315. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-749960/compare/A-9-2023-0315?all=1&part=6 (retrieved 28 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-text-2023-11-06,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between JURI-PR-749960 and A-9-2023-0315}},
  year = {2023},
  date = {2023-11-06},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-749960/compare/A-9-2023-0315?all=1&part=6}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PR-749960/compare/A-9-2023-0315?all=1&part=6},
  urldate = {2026-09-28},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from JURI-PR-749960, to A-9-2023-0315. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}