Text · Opinion parliamentary committee draft
On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council European Union geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products, amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) 2017/1001 and (EU) 2019/787 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Full title
On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council European Union geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products, amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) 2017/1001 and (EU) 2019/787 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Document JURI-PA-736693 · COM(2022)0134 – C90130/2022 – 2022/0089(COD)
- Kind
- Opinion parliamentary committee draft JURI-PA-736693
- Date
- 20 October 2022
- Committee
- Committee on Legal Affairs
- Rapporteur
- Adrián Vázquez Lázara
- Dossier
- 2022-0089
More facts (2)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Reference
- COM(2022)0134 – C90130/2022 – 2022/0089(COD)
In short
A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.
AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-flash · 26 Sept 2026
The Committee on Legal Affairs gives its draft opinion on the proposed regulation on EU geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products. It proposes amendments to clarify and set out in the regulation itself the tasks to be carried out by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). The amendments task the EUIPO with technical scrutiny of applications, informing applicants of delays, seeking supplementary information, publishing the single document, supporting the Commission in opposition procedures, and managing an alert system on domain names. The Commission would remain responsible for the product specification, Union amendments and cancellation. The EUIPO would develop, keep up-to-date and maintain the Union register of geographical indications. The draft opinion also proposes a separate notice of comment procedure, rules on temporary amendments due to geopolitical events, and a ban on registering a cancelled geographical indication under another intellectual property right for at least 10 years.
Position. The rapporteur proposes to amend the Commission proposal so that the tasks entrusted to the EUIPO are set out in the regulation by co-legislators rather than by delegated acts, with the Commission keeping responsibility for product specifications, Union amendments and cancellation, and with a separate notice of comment procedure.
Key points
- The rapporteur welcomes the Commission proposal to strengthen protection of geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products.
- The rapporteur wants the role of the EUIPO vis-à-vis DG AGRI and the agricultural GI system clarified, and the tasks agreed by co-legislators directly in the regulation.
- The EUIPO should handle technical supporting tasks: scrutinising applications, informing applicants of delays, seeking supplementary information, publishing the single document, managing the opposition procedure and running a domain-name alert system.
- The analysis of the product specification and Union amendments should remain with DG AGRI, and the Commission should remain responsible for registration, product specification, Union amendment and cancellation.
- The EUIPO should develop, keep up-to-date and maintain the electronic Union register of geographical indications.
- Scrutiny should not exceed 6 months, and where it exceeds or is likely to exceed that period the EUIPO must inform the applicant in writing of the reasons for the delay.
- A new notice of comment procedure is proposed, separate from opposition, allowing corrective remarks on an ongoing registration within three months of publication of the single document.
- The EUIPO should support the Commission in opposition procedures, including receiving oppositions, checking admissibility, inviting consultations, extending deadlines and assessing the application.
- A temporary amendment may be treated as a standard amendment where it results from obligatory sanitary and phytosanitary measures, a natural disaster, adverse weather conditions or the consequences of an exceptional geopolitical event.
- After cancellation of a geographical indication, registration of the name on the market and its protection under another intellectual property right should be prohibited for at least 10 years.
- An application for registration of a geographical indication should be rejected where, in light of a well-known trade mark and its reputation, the name is liable to mislead the consumer as to the true identity of the product.
- The Commission should report to Parliament and the Council on the results and experience of the EUIPO's exercise of these tasks, and that report may be accompanied by legislative proposals.
Who is affected
- The EUIPO, which would take on technical scrutiny, register maintenance, publication and opposition support tasks.
- The Commission and DG AGRI, which would keep responsibility for product specifications, Union amendments and cancellation.
- Applicants for GI registration, who would be informed of delays and may be asked for supplementary information.
- Producer groups and third-country authorities, which could be identified as rights holders in the Union register.
Figures and deadlines
- Scrutiny should not exceed a period of 6 months.
- Opposition may be lodged within 3 months from the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
- A notice of comment may be lodged within three months of the date of publication of the single document and the product specification reference in the Union register.
- Registration of a cancelled geographical indication under another intellectual property right shall be prohibited for a period of at least 10 years following the date of cancellation.
- The Commission shall submit a report no later than 5 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Jump to an amendment (38)
- Amendment 1
- Amendment 2
- Amendment 3
- Amendment 4
- Amendment 5
- Amendment 6
- Amendment 7
- Amendment 8
- Amendment 9
- Amendment 10
- Amendment 11
- Amendment 12
- Amendment 13
- Amendment 14
- Amendment 15
- Amendment 16
- Amendment 17
- Amendment 18
- Amendment 19
- Amendment 20
- Amendment 21
- Amendment 22
- Amendment 23
- Amendment 24
- Amendment 25
- Amendment 26
- Amendment 27
- Amendment 28
- Amendment 29
- Amendment 30
- Amendment 31
- Amendment 32
- Amendment 33
- Amendment 34
- Amendment 35
- Amendment 36
- Amendment 37
- Amendment 38
Short justification
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission’s proposal aimed at strengthening the protection of geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products (GIs).
In 2022 the European Commission and its Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (DG AGRI) informally agreed to delegate tasks in the scrutiny and registration process of geographical indications (GIs) to the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), responsible for managing the EU trade mark and the registered Community design, an agency that is under the remit of the legal affairs committee.
The JURI rapporteur for this opinion sees the upcoming revision of the GI system as an opportunity to clarify the role of the EUIPO vis-à-vis the DG AGRI and the system of agricultural GIs. Indeed, the Memorandum of Understanding between DG AGRI and the EUIPO was reached in a way rather unbeknown to the Parliament and its Members, not providing enough certainty as to which tasks had been covered, which had not, and to what extent and purpose.
We should strive for further legal clarity. The Commission proposal indeed advances in that direction, acknowledging the EUIPO’s assistance role, but leaves out still the details of such cooperation regarding delegated acts. The JURI rapporteur believes that such tasks should be clearly delineated and agreed, among co-legislators, directly in that particular regulation.
One notable exception to that approach is the use of GI registers which, he believes, should be tackled through a further delegated act that should include the creation of a new GI register, its maintenance, update and protection.
On substance, hence, the JURI rapporteur sees a relevant role for the EUIPO in performing technical supporting tasks such as scrutinizing the application for registration, informing applicants in case of delay in the scrutiny process, seeking supplementary information from the applicant if necessary. Also in handling the publication of the single document in the Union registration, managing the opposition procedure or establishing and managing an alert system that would provide information about the availability of a geographical indication as a domain name.
The more substantial aspect of GI registration, like the analysis of the products specification (cahier des charges), however, should remain within the DG AGRI. Union amendments should also remain under the responsibility of DG AGRI.
The JURI rapporteur believes that a certain level of coherence between the revised system for agricultural GIs and the proposed system for craft GIs should be aimed for.
Overall, the JURI rapporteur sees the collaboration between EUIPO and DG AGRI as positive and cost-efficient but he wishes to clarify that collaboration.
The JURI rapporteur also suggests an amendment related to the rights of the information of the applicants and the timeline the Commission must respect when handling their requests.
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (15) To ensure transparency and uniformity across Member States, it is necessary to establish and maintain an electronic Union register of geographical indications, registered as protected designations of origin or protected geographical indications. The register should provide information to consumers and to those involved in trade. The register should be an electronic database stored within an information system, and should be accessible to the public. | (15) To ensure transparency and uniformity across Member States, it is necessary to establish and maintain an electronic Union register of geographical indications, registered as protected designations of origin or protected geographical indications. The register should provide information to consumers and to those involved in trade. The register should be an electronic database stored within an information system, and should be accessible to the public. It should be developed, kept-up-to date and maintained by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39) The procedures for registration, amendment and cancellation of geographical indications, including the scrutiny and the opposition procedure, should be carried out in the most efficient way. This can be achieved by using the assistance for the scrutiny of the applications provided by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). While a partial outsourcing to EUIPO has been considered, the Commission would remain responsible for registration, amendment and cancellation, due to a strong relation with the Common Agricultural Policy and to the expertise needed to ensure that specificities of wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products are adequately assessed. | (39) The procedures for registration, amendment and cancellation of geographical indications, including the scrutiny and the opposition procedure, should be carried out in the most efficient way. This can be achieved by using the assistance for the scrutiny of the applications provided by the EUIPO. The involvement of the EUIPO should not lead to delays or unnecessary administrative burden. While a partial outsourcing has been considered, the Commission should remain responsible for the product specification, Union amendment and cancellation, due to a strong relation with the Common Agricultural Policy and to the expertise needed to ensure that specificities of wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products are adequately assessed. |
The JURI rapporteur believes that while the involvement of the EUIPO can be of benefit, it should not lead to delays and extra administrative layers. Also the JURI rapporteur believes that the EC should in any case remain responsible for the registration, including the product specification and union amendments.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39a) Clear deadlines and faster procedures for amending specifications, by dividing amendments into Union amendments and standard amendments, will help improve the effectiveness of the system. |
The simplification of procedures for amending specifications will help to address administrative burden. This is important because amendments to specifications have a major impact on the adoption of production process adjustments.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (39b) The role of the EUIPO should be reinforced in order for the registration procedure to be more efficient. Namely, the EUIPO should be tasked with scrutinising the application for registration, informing applicants in the event of delay in the scrutiny process and seeking supplementary information from the applicant if necessary. The EUIPO should be entrusted with the publication of the single document in the Union register, after its verification by the Commission. The EUIPO should support the Commission in the opposition procedure. It should carry out the tasks related to the amendments to a product specification and makes public the standard amendments. Similarly to its role in protecting domain names in trade marks, the EUIPO should establish and manage an alert system that provides information about the availability of a geographical indication as a domain name. The EUIPO should carry out the scrutiny of third-country geographical indications and updates to the list of international agreement protecting them. Finally, the EUIPO and the competent authorities of the Member States should cooperate with each other to promote convergence of practices and tools in the field of geographical indications. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (56) In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of defining sustainability standards and laying down criteria for the recognition of existing sustainability standards; clarifying or adding items to be supplied as part of accompanying information; entrusting the EUIPO with the tasks related to scrutiny for opposition and the opposition procedure, operation of the register, publication of standard amendments to a product specification, consultation in the context of cancellation procedure, establishment and management of an alert system informing applicants about the availability of their geographical indication as a domain name, scrutiny of third country geographical indications other than geographical indications under the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications34 , proposed for protection pursuant to international negotiations or international agreements; establishing appropriate criteria for monitoring performance of the EUIPO in the execution of the tasks entrusted to it; laying down additional rules on the use of geographical indications to identify ingredients in processed products; laying down additional rules for determining the generic status of terms; establishing the restrictions and derogations with regard to the sourcing of feed in the case of a designation of origin; establishing restrictions and derogations with regard to the slaughtering of live animals or with regard to the sourcing of raw materials; laying down rules for determining the use of the denomination of a plant variety or of an animal breed; laying down rules which limit the information contained in the product specification for geographical indications and traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down further details of the eligibility criteria for traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down additional rules to provide for appropriate certification and accreditation procedures to apply in respect of product certification bodies; laying down additional rules to further detail protection of traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down for traditional specialities guaranteed additional rules for determining the generic status of terms, conditions for use of plant variety and animal breed denominations, and relation to intellectual property rights; defining additional rules for joint applications concerning more than one national territory and complementing the rules of the application process for traditional specialities guaranteed guaranteed; complementing the rules for the opposition procedure for traditional specialities guaranteed to establish detailed procedures and deadlines; supplementing the rules regarding the amendment application process for traditional specialities guaranteed; supplementing the rules regarding the cancellation process for traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down detailed rules relating to the criteria for optional quality terms; reserving an additional optional quality term, laying down its conditions of use; laying down derogations to the use of the term ‘mountain product’ and establishing the methods of production, and other criteria relevant for the application of that optional quality term, in particular, laying down the conditions under which raw materials or feedstuffs are permitted to come from outside the mountain areas. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making35 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. | (56) In order to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of this Regulation, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of defining sustainability standards and laying down criteria for the recognition of existing sustainability standards; laying down additional rules on the use of geographical indications to identify ingredients in processed products; laying down additional rules for determining the generic status of terms; establishing the restrictions and derogations with regard to the sourcing of feed in the case of a designation of origin; establishing restrictions and derogations with regard to the slaughtering of live animals or with regard to the sourcing of raw materials; laying down rules for determining the use of the denomination of a plant variety or of an animal breed; laying down rules which limit the information contained in the product specification for geographical indications and traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down further details of the eligibility criteria for traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down additional rules to provide for appropriate certification and accreditation procedures to apply in respect of product certification bodies; laying down additional rules to further detail protection of traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down for traditional specialities guaranteed additional rules for determining the generic status of terms, conditions for use of plant variety and animal breed denominations, and relation to intellectual property rights; defining additional rules for joint applications concerning more than one national territory and complementing the rules of the application process for traditional specialities guaranteed guaranteed; complementing the rules for the opposition procedure for traditional specialities guaranteed to establish detailed procedures and deadlines; supplementing the rules regarding the amendment application process for traditional specialities guaranteed; supplementing the rules regarding the cancellation process for traditional specialities guaranteed; laying down detailed rules relating to the criteria for optional quality terms; reserving an additional optional quality term, laying down its conditions of use; laying down derogations to the use of the term ‘mountain product’ and establishing the methods of production, and other criteria relevant for the application of that optional quality term, in particular, laying down the conditions under which raw materials or feedstuffs are permitted to come from outside the mountain areas. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making35 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States’ experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. |
| 34 https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=3983 | 34 https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=3983 |
| 35 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1. | 35 OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Scrutiny by the Commission and publication for opposition | Scrutiny by the EUIPO and publication for opposition |
EUIPO is already getting technical inputs from several Commission units with the geographical indication file to be pre-examined.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. The Commission shall scrutinise any application for registration that it receives pursuant to Article 16(1). Such scrutiny shall consist of a check that there are no manifest errors, that the information provided in accordance with Article 15 is complete and that the single document referred to in Article 13 is precise and technical in nature. It shall take into account the outcome of the national procedure carried out by the Member State concerned. It shall focus in particular on the single document referred to in Article 13. | 1. The EUIPO shall scrutinise any application for registration that it receives pursuant to Article 16(1). Such scrutiny shall consist of a check that there are no manifest errors, that the information provided in accordance with Article 15 is complete and that the single document referred to in Article 13 is precise and technical in nature. It shall take into account the outcome of the national procedure carried out by the Member State concerned and the opinion of the Commission. It shall focus in particular on the single document referred to in Article 13. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Scrutiny should not exceed a period of 6 months. In the event that the scrutiny period exceeds or is likely to exceed 6 months the Commission shall inform the applicant of the reasons for the delay in writing. | 2. Scrutiny should not exceed a period of 6 months. In the event that the scrutiny period exceeds or is likely to exceed 6 months the EUIPO shall inform the applicant of the reasons for the delay in writing. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. The Commission may seek supplementary information from the applicant. | 3. The EUIPO may seek supplementary information from the applicant. |
In the AM 4 the JURI rapporteur proposes to entrust EUIPO with seeking supplementary information from the applicant. For the sake of efficiency, the JURI rapporteur would suggest to leave this part of the process for the EUIPO.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 84 supplementing this Regulation by rules on entrusting EUIPO with the tasks set out in this Article. | deleted |
The JURI rapporteur believes the new tasks transferred to the EUIPO should be set here, in this Regulation, by the co-legislators and not be left up to the Commission
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5a. The EUIPO shall perform all the necessary technical scrutiny tasks. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The Commission shall be exempted from the obligation to meet the deadline to perform the scrutiny referred to in Article 17(2) and to inform the applicant of the reasons for the delay where it receives a communication from a Member State, concerning an application for registration in accordance with Article 9(6), which: | 2. The EUIPO shall be exempted from the obligation to meet the deadline to perform the scrutiny referred to in Article 17(2) and shall inform the applicant of the reasons for the delay where it receives a communication from a Member State, concerning an application for registration in accordance with Article 9(6), which: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Within 3 months from the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the single document and the reference to the product specification pursuant to Article 17(4), the authorities of a Member State or of a third country, or a natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, established or resident in a third country, may lodge an opposition or a notice of comment with the Commission. | 1. Within 3 months from the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the single document and the reference to the product specification pursuant to Article 17(4), the authorities of a Member State or of a third country, or a natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, established or resident in a third country, may lodge an opposition with the Commission. |
The notice of comment is not an opposition procedure and should therefore not be dealt with in the same article. A certain level of coherence between this report and Mrs Walsmann's on geographical indications for craft and industrial products is important.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, established or resident in a Member State other than the one from which the Union application for registration was submitted, may lodge an opposition with the Member State, in which it is established or resident, within a time limit permitting an opposition or notice of comments to be lodged pursuant to paragraph (1). | 2. Any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, established or resident in a Member State other than the one from which the Union application for registration was submitted, may lodge an opposition with the Member State, in which it is established or resident, within a time limit permitting an opposition to be lodged pursuant to paragraph (1). |
The notice of comment is not an opposition procedure and should therefore not be dealt with in the same article.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. After completion of the opposition procedure, the Commission shall finalise its assessment of the Union application for registration, taking into account any request for transitional periods, the outcome of the opposition procedure, any notice of comments received and any other matters arising subsequently to its scrutiny that may imply a change of the single document. | 9. After completion of the opposition procedure, the Commission shall finalise its assessment of the Union application for registration, taking into account any request for transitional periods, the outcome of the opposition procedure received and any other matters arising subsequently to its scrutiny that may imply a change of the single document. |
The notice of comment is not an opposition procedure and should therefore not be dealt with in the same article.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 84 supplementing this Regulation by detailed procedures and deadlines for the opposition procedure, for the official submission of comments by national authorities and persons with a legitimate interest, which will not trigger the opposition procedure and by rules on entrusting its tasks set out in this Article to EUIPO. | deleted |
The JURI rapporteur believes the new tasks transferred to the EUIPO should be set here, in this Regulation, by the co-legislators and not be left up to the Commission
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10a. The EUIPO shall support the Commission in: | |
| (a) providing technical assistance in opposition procedures; | |
| (b) receiving the oppositions referred to in paragraph 1; | |
| (c) checking the admissibility of the oppositions; | |
| (d) inviting the authority or the person that lodged the opposition and the authority or the applicant producer group that lodged the application to engage in appropriate consultations if the opposition is admissible; | |
| (e) extending the deadline for the consultation; | |
| (f) receiving the notification of the result of consultation and of the opponent’s position at the end of the consultation, or any consequent changes to the application for registration; | |
| (g) repeating the scrutiny and publishing once more the application in the cases referred to in paragraph 7 (repetition of the scrutiny in the event that, following the end of the consultations, the data published in the single document have been modified, and, where the application for registration has been modified in a substantial manner and meets the conditions for registration, re-publication of the single document); | |
| (h) providing an assessment of the Union application for registration. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 20a | |
| Notice of comment procedure | |
| 1. In order to correct inaccuracies in an ongoing registration procedure for a geographical indication, a competent authority of a Member State or of a third country, or a natural or legal person having a legitimate interest and established or resident in a third country or in another Member State may lodge a notice of comment with the EUIPO within three months of the date of publication of the single document and the product specification reference in the Union register. | |
| 2. The notice of comment referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall not be based on the grounds for opposition referred to in Article 19. The competent authority or person that lodges a notice of comment shall not be considered to be a party to the procedure. | |
| 3. The EUIPO shall share the notice of comment with the applicant and shall take the notice of comment into consideration when deciding on the application of the registration, unless it is unclear or obviously incorrect. | |
| 4. In order to facilitate the management of the notice of comment procedure, the Commission may adopt implementing acts laying down rules on the submission of such notice of comments and specifying their format and online presentation. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 53(2). |
It has to be clarified what the notice of comment procedure is, since this is not an opposition but corrective remarks in the registration procedure. A certain level of coherence between this draft opinion and Mrs Walsmann's draft report on geographical indications for craft and industrial products is important.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1a. The Union register as referred to in paragraph 1 shall be developed, kept up-to-date and maintained by the EUIPO for the management of geographical indications protected under this Regulation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. The Commission shall make public and regularly update the list of the international agreements referred to in paragraph (3) as well as the list of geographical indications protected under those agreements. | 5. The Commission shall make public and, in the event of changes, update the list of the international agreements referred to in paragraph (3) as well as the list of geographical indications protected under those agreements. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 84 supplementing this Regulation by rules on entrusting EUIPO to operate the Union register of geographical indications. | deleted |
The JURI rapporteur believes the new tasks transferred to the EUIPO should be set here, in this Regulation, by the co-legislators and not be left up to the Commission
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Where a producer group has been recognised by the national authorities in accordance with Article 33, that group shall be identified as the rights' holder of the geographical indication in the Union register of geographical indications and in the official extract referred to in paragraph (1). | 2. Where a producer group has been recognised by the national authorities in accordance with Article 33 or by an authority of a third country, that group shall be identified as the rights' holder of the geographical indication in the Union register of geographical indications and in the official extract referred to in paragraph (1). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. A standard amendment shall be considered as a temporary amendment when it concerns a temporary change in the product specification resulting from the imposition of obligatory sanitary and phytosanitary measures by the public authorities or a temporary amendment necessary because of a natural disaster or adverse weather conditions formally recognised by the competent authorities. | 5. A temporary amendment shall be considered as a standard amendment when it concerns a temporary change in the product specification resulting from the imposition of obligatory sanitary and phytosanitary measures by the public authorities or a temporary amendment necessary because of a natural disaster, adverse weather conditions or the consequences of an exceptional geopolitical event formally recognised by the competent authorities. |
Recent events show that it would be useful to take into account geopolitical situations such as war to allow for temporary changes to specifications.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Union amendments shall be approved by the Commission. The approval procedure shall follow, mutatis mutandis, the procedure laid down from Article 8 to Article 22. | 6. Union amendments shall be assessed and approved by the Commission. The approval procedure shall follow, mutatis mutandis, the procedure laid down from Article 8 to Article 22. |
The DG AGRI should remain responsible for the examination of EU amendments given the low administrative burden it represents and the high expertise DG AGRI has on this field.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Standard amendments shall be approved by Member States or third countries in whose territory the geographical area of the product concerned is located and communicated to the Commission. The Commission shall make those amendments public. | 9. Standard amendments shall be approved by Member States or third countries in whose territory the geographical area of the product concerned is located and communicated to the Commission. Following such approval, the Commission shall transmit those amendments to the EUIPO, which shall make those amendments public |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 84 supplementing this Regulation by provisions entrusting EUIPO with the publication of standard amendments referred to in paragraph (9). | deleted |
The JURI rapporteur believes the new tasks transferred to the EUIPO should be set here, in this Regulation, by the co-legislators and not be left up to the Commission
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 10a. The EUIPO shall be responsible for the publication of standard amendments referred to in paragraph 9. The EUIPO shall perform the technical scrutiny of the Union amendments and prepare the observations, which shall be verified and sent to the applicants by the Commission. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Before adopting the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall consult the authorities of the Member State, the authorities of the third country or, where possible, the third country producer which had originally applied for the registration of the geographical indication concerned, unless the cancellation is directly requested by those original applicants. | 5. Before adopting the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall consult the authorities of the Member State, the authorities of the third country or, where possible, the third country producer which had originally applied for the registration of the geographical indication concerned, unless the cancellation is directly requested by those original applicants. The registration of the name on the market and its protection under another intellectual property right shall be prohibited for a period of at least 10 years following the date of cancellation of a geographical indication. |
Looking at recent cancellation requests which have led to a privatisation of some GIs, it would be useful to introduce rules.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 84 supplementing this Regulation by rules entrusting EUIPO with the tasks set out in paragraph (5). | 6. The EUIPO shall carry out the tasks set out in Article 26(5). |
The JURI rapporteur believes the new tasks transferred to the EUIPO should be set here, in this Regulation, by the co-legislators and not be left up to the Commission
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Geographical indications entered in the Union register of geographical indications shall be protected against: | 1. Geographical indications entered in the Union register of geographical indications and those protected by international agreements in the Union shall be protected against: |
GIs that are protected by bilateral or multilateral agreements should not be automatically included in the Union register.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Article 31 | deleted |
| Trade marks | |
| A name shall not be registered as a geographical indication where, in the light of a trade mark's reputation and renown, registration of the name proposed as a geographical indication could mislead the consumer as to the true identity of the product. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Conflicting trade marks | Conflict between trade marks and geographical indications |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2a. An application for the registration of a geographical indication shall be rejected where, in the light of a well-known trade mark and its reputation, the name proposed as a geographical indication is liable to mislead the consumer as to the true identity of the product. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 84 supplementing this Regulation by rules on entrusting EUIPO with the scrutiny of third country geographical indications, other than geographical indications under the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications, proposed for protection pursuant to international negotiations or international agreements. | The EUIPO shall carry out the technical scrutiny of third country geographical indications, other than geographical indications under the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications, proposed for protection pursuant to international negotiations or international agreements. |
The JURI rapporteur believes the new tasks transferred to the EUIPO should be set here, in this Regulation, by the co-legislators and not be left up to the Commission
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. Where the Commission exercises any of the empowerments provided for in this Regulation to entrust tasks to EUIPO, it shall also be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 84 to supplement this Regulation by criteria for monitoring performance in the execution of such tasks. Such criteria may include: | 1. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 84 to supplement this Regulation by criteria for monitoring performance in the execution of the tasks entrusted to the EUIPO in accordance with this Regulation. Such criteria may include: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) reduction of processing time for the scrutiny of applications; |
EUIPOs intervention will have to be assessed in terms of how it could reduce the duration of procedures.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. No later than 5 years after the first delegation of any tasks to EUIPO, the Commission shall prepare and submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the results and experience of the exercise of these tasks by EUIPO. | 2. No later than ... [5 years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall prepare and submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the results and experience of the exercise of these tasks by EUIPO. |
| That report may be accompanied, where necessary, by legislative proposals. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (f) administration of geographical indications, notably the tasks conferred on it by means of Commission delegated acts adopted in accordance with Article […] of Regulation (EU) …/… of the European Parliament and of the Council[Regulation on GIs] | (f) administration and promotion of geographical indications, and the tasks conferred on it by means of Regulation (EU) …/… of the European Parliament and of the Council [Regulation on GIs]. |
EUIPO could be in charge of promotion of GIs, similarly as it is envisaged in the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on geographical indication protection for craft and industrial products (Art. 61).
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2022). “DRAFT OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council European Union geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products, amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) 2017/1001 and (EU) 2019/787 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012”. Text, 20 October 2022. docId JURI-PA-736693. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PA-736693 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/JURI-PA-736693 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-juri-pa-736693,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{DRAFT OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council European Union geographical indications for wine, spirit drinks and agricultural products, and quality schemes for agricultural products, amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) 2017/1001 and (EU) 2019/787 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012}},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-10-20},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PA-736693}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-PA-736693},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId JURI-PA-736693. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}