Skip to content

Text · Opinion parliamentary committee

On the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council discontinuing seasonal changes of time and repealing Directive 2000/84/EC

Document JURI-AD-632863 · COM(2018)0639 – C80408/2018 – 2018/0332(COD)

Kind
Opinion parliamentary committee JURI-AD-632863
Date
21 February 2019
Committee
Committee on Legal Affairs
Rapporteur
Pavel Svoboda
Dossier
2018-0332
More facts (2)
Reference
COM(2018)0639 – C80408/2018 – 2018/0332(COD)
More

In short

A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.

AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-flash · 25 Sept 2026

The Committee on Legal Affairs gives its opinion on the Commission's proposal to end seasonal clock changes and repeal Directive 2000/84/EC. It welcomes the proposal but wants Member States to choose their own standard time, with more time to prepare and a coordination mechanism. It proposes amendments: a new coordination mechanism of Member State representatives and the Commission, notification of intended standard times by 1 April 2020, and a Commission power to postpone application by up to 12 months. It also asks for a comprehensive impact assessment and a cost/benefit analysis, and moves the implementation report to 31 December 2025 with emphasis on health effects. Member States would have to adopt national laws by 2020, and Directive 2000/84/EC would be repealed from 2020.

Position. The Committee on Legal Affairs welcomes the proposal but proposes amendments: Member States should choose their own standard time, a coordination mechanism should be set up, notification should be by 1 April 2020, the Commission should be able to postpone application by up to 12 months, and an impact assessment and cost/benefit analysis should be conducted.

Key points

  1. The rapporteur welcomes ending seasonal time changes in a harmonised way in all Member States, responding to Parliament's earlier calls.
  2. The rapporteur says seasonal changes affect the internal market and raise public health concerns, including for minority groups, and that accidents and heart attacks increase after clock changes.
  3. The rapporteur opposes a directly applicable Regulation prescribing standard or summer time, saying Member States should be free to choose and should get more time to prepare.
  4. The rapporteur regrets the Commission did not conduct a proper impact assessment or a full 12-week public and stakeholder consultation.
  5. The rapporteur agrees the directive should be adopted as soon as possible, preferably before the end of the current legislature.
  6. Amendment 1 adds a citation to the Commission's online consultation of 4 July 2018 to 16 August 2018.
  7. Amendments 2 to 4 update recitals to mention petitions, the 4.6 million responses to the 2018 consultation, and evidence of negative health effects and economic costs.
  8. Amendments 5 to 10 add recitals on subsidiarity, a coordination mechanism, transition costs, delegated acts, and coordinating standard times to avoid different time zones.
  9. Amendment 11 requires the Commission's monitoring report to be sufficiently substantiated.
  10. Amendment 12 lets Member States still apply a seasonal change in 2019, with notification under Article 2.
  11. Amendments 13 to 16 set up a coordination mechanism, require Member States to notify intentions by 1 April 2020, and empower the Commission to postpone application by up to 12 months via delegated acts.
  12. Amendments 17 to 21 move the implementation report to 31 December 2025 with health emphasis, require an impact assessment and cost/benefit analysis, set the information deadline at five years after adoption, and move national compliance and repeal to 2020.

Who is affected

  • Member States: would choose their own standard time, notify the Commission by 1 April 2020, and coordinate via a new mechanism.
  • The Commission: would set up and participate in the coordination mechanism, monitor arrangements, and report to Parliament and the Council.
  • Citizens and civil society: the consultation received 4.6 million responses, and health effects are highlighted.
  • Transport and communications sectors: would face transition costs and disruptions if time arrangements diverge.

Figures and deadlines

  • 4.6 million responses to the Commission's July-August 2018 public consultation on summer-time arrangements.
  • 1 April 2020: deadline for Member States to notify the Commission of their intentions on standard time.
  • Up to 12 months: maximum postponement of the directive's application by delegated act.
  • 31 December 2025: deadline for the Commission's implementation report.
  • Five years after adoption: deadline for Member States to provide relevant information to the Commission.
  • 2020: deadline for Member States to adopt national laws and for repeal of Directive 2000/84/EC.

Legal basis. Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Read the text · Report a problem

Text

The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.

Jump to an amendment (21)

Committee on Legal Affairs

2018/0332(COD)

21.2.2019

OPINION

Short justification

Your rapporteur welcomes the Commission’s proposal to put an end to seasonal time changes in a harmonised manner in all Member States, thereby taking Parliament up on its numerous calls for such measures over the last several years.

The practice of bi-annual clock changes, which has been prescribed by Union legislation for close to 40 years, has recently been met with much opposition by citizens and civil society.

It is important to underline that such seasonal changes of time affect not only the functioning of the internal market but also raise multiple public health concerns, not least related to the protection of specific minority groups which are disproportionately affected by the disruption of the circadian cycle. Studies have furthermore shown that the number of accidents and heart attacks increase during the days following a clock change.

While it is clear that action is needed at Union level in order to harmonise the end of seasonal time changes, rules in the form of a directly applicable Regulation which would prescribe the use of either standard time or summer time in all Member States would be needlessly over-reaching and would not take into account different needs and conditions in different parts of the EU. The Member States should therefore be free to make their own choice. They should however be given more time before the Directive starts to apply in order to prepare for the change, which should be implemented in a concerted and coordinated manner.

Your rapporteur regrets that the Commission did not conduct any proper impact assessment and did not hold a full 12 weeks long public and stakeholder consultation before it presented the proposal to update Directive 2000/84/EC. It must be underlined that in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making, the institutions have committed to the understanding that impact assessments and consultations constitute essential tools for improving the quality of Union legislation.

This rapporteur nevertheless fully agrees with the rapporteur in the lead committee that this directive should be adopted as soon as possible, and preferably before the end of the current legislature in order to ensure legal certainty and to allow Member States to well prepare for the upcoming changes.

AMENDMENTS

The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:

Amendment 1

Proposal for a directive

Citation 4 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Having regard to the results of the online consultation conducted by the European Commission between 4 July 2018 - 16 August 2018

Amendment 2

Proposal for a directive

Recital 2

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(2) In its resolution of 8 February 2018, the European Parliament called on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the summer-time arrangements provided by Directive 2000/84/EC and, if necessary, to come up with a proposal for its revision. That resolution also confirmed that it is essential to maintain a harmonised approach to time arrangements throughout the Union.(2) Against the background of several petitions and numerous initiatives from citizens, parliamentary questions and a public hearing on the matter, the European Parliament, in its resolution of 8 February 2018, called on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the summer-time arrangements provided by Directive 2000/84/EC and, if necessary, to come up with a proposal for its revision. That resolution also confirmed that it is essential to maintain a harmonised approach to time arrangements throughout the Union.

Amendment 3

Proposal for a directive

Recital 3

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(3) The Commission has examined available evidence, which points to the importance of having harmonised Union rules in this area to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services. Evidence is not conclusive as to whether the benefits of summer-time arrangements outweigh the inconveniences linked to a biannual change of time.(3) Harmonised Union rules must ensure the proper functioning of the internal market with a long term focus and predictability, and avoid, inter alia, disruptions to the scheduling of transport operations and the functioning of information and communication systems, higher costs to cross-border trade, or lower productivity for goods and services, which are issues with a significant impact both on the proper functioning of the internal market, business activity and the lives of citizens. Evidence is not conclusive that there are no significant benefits from the biannual change of time, although numerous scientific studies, including the European Parliamentary Research Service study of October 2017 on EU summer-time arrangements under Directive 2000/84/EC, indicate the existence of negative effects on human health, in particular for certain groups such as children and the elderly, and suggest a link with cardiovascular diseases through the internal chronodisruption. From an economic perspective, bi-annual change implies additional costs and administrative burdens for many sectors.

Amendment 4

Proposal for a directive

Recital 4

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(4) A lively public debate is taking place on summer-time arrangements and some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements.(4) A public consultation on summer-time arrangements held by the Commission in July-August 2018 received 4.6 million responses, which is the largest number ever received in any Commission consultation, and indicated that it is the citizens preference to stop bi-annual clock changes. Also, some Member States have already expressed their preference to discontinue the application of such arrangements. In the light of these developments, it is necessary to continue safeguarding the proper functioning of the internal market and to avoid any significant disruptions thereto caused by divergences between Member States in this area. Therefore, it is appropriate to put an end in a coordinated way to summer-time arrangements.

Amendment 5

Proposal for a directive

Recital 5

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. However, in order to ensure that the application of summer-time arrangements by some Member States only does not disrupt the functioning of the internal market, Member States should refrain from changing the standard time in any given territory under their jurisdiction for reasons related to seasonal changes, be such change presented as a change of time zone. Moreover, in order to minimise disruptions, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, they should notify the Commission in due time of their intention to change their standard time and subsequently apply the notified changes. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States so that they can take all necessary measures. It should also inform the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information.(5) This Directive should not prejudice the right of each Member State, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, to decide on the standard time or times for the territories under its jurisdiction and falling under the territorial scope of the Treaties, and on further changes thereto. In in order to minimise disruptions to the functioning of the internal market relating to, inter alia, to transport, communications and other concerned sectors, and to allow for coordination, they should notify the Commission by 1 April 2020 of their intention to change their standard time. The Commission should, on the basis of that notification, inform all other Member States, the general public and stakeholders by publishing this information in an appropriate and timely manner. It should also assess the impact on the functioning of the internal market of the envisaged changes of standard time and conduct an expert analysis on the subject, taking into account nature, health and social aspects as well as geographical differences among Member States.

Amendment 6

Proposal for a directive

Recital 5 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(5a) For the purpose of ensuring a harmonised implementation of this directive, Member States should coordinate in advance their decision on the envisaged standard times. The Commission should therefore establish a coordination mechanism with the aim to ensure a harmonised and coordinated approach to time arrangements throughout the Union. The coordination mechanism should consist of one designated representative of each Member State and one representative of the Commission.

Amendment 7

Proposal for a directive

Recital 6

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6) Therefore, it is necessary to put an end to the harmonisation of the period covered by summer-time arrangements as laid down in Directive 2000/84/EC and to introduce common rules preventing Member States from applying different seasonal time arrangements by changing their standard time more than once during the year and establishing the obligation to notify envisaged changes of the standard time. This Directive aims at contributing in a determined manner to the smooth functioning of the internal market and should, consequently, be based on Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as interpreted in accordance with the consistent case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.(6) Therefore, it is necessary to put an end to the harmonisation of the period covered by summer-time arrangements as laid down in Directive 2000/84/EC and to introduce common rules preventing Member States from applying different seasonal time arrangements. This Directive aims at contributing in a determined manner to the smooth functioning of the internal market and should, consequently, be based on Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, as interpreted in accordance with the consistent case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.

Amendment 8

Proposal for a directive

Recital 6 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(6a) A time change unrelated to seasonal shifts will lead to transition costs, especially with regard to IT systems in transport and other sectors. In order to reduce significantly the costs of transition, a reasonable preparation period is needed for implementation of this Directive.

Amendment 9

Proposal for a directive

Recital 7

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(7) This Directive should apply from 1 April 2019, so that the last summer-time period subject to the rules of Directive 2000/84/EC should start, in every Member State, at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 31 March 2019. Member States that, after that summer-time period, intend to adopt a standard time corresponding to the time applied during the winter season in accordance with Directive 2000/84/EC should change their standard time at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 2019, so that similar and lasting changes occurring in different Member States take place simultaneously. It is desirable that Member States take the decisions on the standard time that each of them will apply as from 2019 in a concerted manner.(7) In order to ensure a concerted and coordinated harmonisation of standard time in accordance with the aim of this Directive, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of postponing the date of application of this Directive in when time arrangements would have the potential to seriously disrupt the proper functioning of the internal market. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts.

Amendment 10

Proposal for a directive

Recital 7 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(7a) Member States should coordinate among themselves the standard times for which they opt, which should be as fully harmonised between Member States as possible in order to avoid excessively different time zones in the EU, so as to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and make it predictable for the citizens, consumers and sectors concerned.

Amendment 11

Proposal for a directive

Recital 8

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
(8) Implementation of this Directive should be monitored. The results of this monitoring should be presented by the Commission in a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. That report should be based on the information that is made available to the Commission by the Member States in a timely fashion to allow for the report to be presented at the specified time.(8) Implementation of this Directive should be monitored. The results of this monitoring should be presented by the Commission in a sufficiently substantiated report to the European Parliament and to the Council. That report should be based on the information that is made available to the Commission by the Member States in a timely fashion to allow for the report to be presented at the specified time.

Amendment 12

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 2

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time or times in 2019, provided that they do so at 1.00 a.m., Coordinated Universal Time, on 27 October 2019. The Member States shall notify this decision in accordance with Article 2.2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, Member States may still apply a seasonal change of their standard time. The Member States shall notify this decision in accordance with Article 2.

Amendment 13

Proposal for a directive

Article 2

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. Without prejudice to Article 1, if a Member State decides to change its standard time or times in any territory under its jurisdiction, it shall notify the Commission at least 6 months before the change takes effect. Where a Member State has made such a notification and has not withdrawn it at least 6 months before the date of the envisaged change, the Member State shall apply this change.1. The Commission shall establish a coordination mechanism with the aim to ensure a harmonised and coordinated approach to time arrangements throughout the Union. The coordination mechanism shall consist of one representative for each Member State and one representative of the Commission.
2. Within 1 month of the notification, the Commission shall inform the other Member States thereof and publish that information in the Official Journal of the European Union.2. Member States shall notify to the Commission of their intentions according to Article 1 by 1 April 2020. Without delay, the coordination mechanism shall discuss and assess the potential impact of the envisaged change on the functioning of the internal market, in order to avoid significant disruptions.
3. Where on the basis of the assessment referred to in paragraph 2, the Commission considers that an envisaged change will significantly disrupt the functioning of the internal market, it shall inform the Member State in question.
4. By 31 October 2020 at the latest, the Member States shall decide whether to maintain its intention or not. It shall provide a detailed explanation how it will address the negative impact of the change on the functioning of the internal market.

Amendment 14

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 2a
1. The Commission, in close cooperation with the coordination mechanism referred to in Article 2, shall closely monitor the foreseen time arrangements throughout the Union.
2. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 2b in order to postpone the date of application of this Directive, by no more than 12 months, where it determines that the foreseen time arrangements, as notified by the Member States, have the potential to seriously disrupt the functioning of the internal market.
3. Where imperative grounds of urgency so require, the procedure provided for in Article 2c shall apply to delegated acts adopted pursuant to this Article.

Amendment 15

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 b (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 2b
1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article.
2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 2a shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of [TBD] years from the [date of entry into force of the Directive].
3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 2a may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making of 13 April 2016.
5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council.
6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 2a shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or by the Council within a period of [TBD] months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by [TBD] months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.

Amendment 16

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 c (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Article 2c
1. Delegated acts adopted under this Article shall enter into force without delay and shall apply as long as no objection is expressed in accordance with paragraph 2. The notification of a delegated act to the European Parliament and to the Council shall state the reasons for the use of the urgency procedure.
2. Either the European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 2b. In such a case, the Commission shall repeal the act immediately following the notification of the decision to object by the European Parliament or by the Council.

Amendment 17

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 2024 at the latest.1. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the implementation of this Directive by 31 December 2025 at the latest. In this implementation report, a special emphasis shall be put on the effects on human health.

Amendment 18

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
1a. The Commission shall conduct a comprehensive impact assessment and a cost / benefit analysis regarding the discontinuing seasonal changes of time in the EU.

Amendment 19

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 2

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April 2024 at the latest.2. Member States shall provide the Commission with the relevant information by 30 April five years after the adoption of this Directive at the latest.

Amendment 20

Proposal for a directive

Article 4 – paragraph 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Member States shall adopt and publish, by 1 April 2019 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.Member States shall adopt and publish, by 2020 at the latest, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those provisions.

Amendment 21

Proposal for a directive

Article 5 – paragraph 1

Amendment: Text proposed by the Commission and Amendment
Text proposed by the CommissionAmendment
Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 1 April 2019.Directive 2000/84/EC is repealed with effect from 2020.

Procedure pages and committee votes

How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.

Procedure – committee asked for opinion 1 block
Table from the text: Title
TitleDiscontinuing seasonal changes of time
ReferencesCOM(2018)0639 – C8-0408/2018 – 2018/0332(COD)
Committee responsible Date announced in plenaryTRAN 13.9.2018
Opinion by Date announced in plenaryJURI 13.9.2018
Rapporteur Date appointedPavel Svoboda 24.9.2018
Discussed in committee23.1.2019
Date adopted19.2.2019
Result of final vote+: –: 0:21 1 0
Members present for the final voteMax Andersson, Joëlle Bergeron, Jean-Marie Cavada, Kostas Chrysogonos, Mady Delvaux, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Enrico Gasbarra, Sajjad Karim, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Gilles Lebreton, António Marinho e Pinto, Emil Radev, Evelyn Regner, Pavel Svoboda, Axel Voss, Francis Zammit Dimech, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Substitutes present for the final votePascal Durand, Angelika Niebler, Tiemo Wölken, Kosma Złotowski
Substitutes under Rule 200(2) present for the final voteIngeborg Gräßle, Joëlle Mélin
Final vote by roll call in committee asked for opinion 6 blocks

21 · For

ALDE
Jean-Marie Cavada, António Marinho e Pinto
ECR
Sajjad Karim, Kosma Złotowski
EFDD
Joëlle Bergeron
ENF
Gilles Lebreton, Joëlle Mélin
EPP
Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Ingeborg Gräßle, Emil Radev, Pavel Svoboda, Axel Voss, Francis Zammit Dimech, Tadeusz Zwiefka
S&D
Mady Delvaux, Enrico Gasbarra, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Evelyn Regner, Tiemo Wölken
VERTS/ALE
Max Andersson, Pascal Durand

1 · Against

GUE/NGL
Kostas Chrysogonos

0 · Abstained

+ : in favour

- : against

0 : abstention

Connections

The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.

No connections found for this item.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2019). “OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council discontinuing seasonal changes of time and repealing Directive 2000/84/EC”. Text, 21 February 2019. docId JURI-AD-632863. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-AD-632863 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/JURI-AD-632863 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-juri-ad-632863,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{OPINION on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council discontinuing seasonal changes of time and repealing Directive 2000/84/EC}},
  year = {2019},
  date = {2019-02-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-AD-632863}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/JURI-AD-632863},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. docId JURI-AD-632863. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}