Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report
INTA-PR-779615 → A-10-2025-0254
- From
- INTA-PR-779615 report parliamentary committee draft of 20 Nov 2025
- To
- A-10-2025-0254 Plenary report of 9 Dec 2025
- Changes
- 3 changes to the text
- Paragraphs
- +66 added · −2 removed · 3 changed
More facts (3)
- Dossier
- 2025/0322(COD)
- Title (from)
- on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products
- Title (to)
- on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
Strengthens monitoring and reporting for sensitive products, including quarterly reports and possible extension to other sectors.1 Lowers thresholds for prima facie evidence of injury and speeds up investigations and provisional measures for sensitive products.1 Adds anti-circumvention measures and extends the list of sensitive products to include eggs and citrus.1 Replaces the explanatory statement with a letter from the Agriculture Committee urging stronger safeguards and faster procedures.3 The versions differ only in formal points: the title is updated and the date changed.2
The notes class 2 changes as substance, 0 as formal, 1 as wording only.
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 2 of 3: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Change 2
ChangedThis proposal for a Regulation implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur AssociationPartnership Agreement and the Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products constitutes a key instrument to ensure that trade liberalisation is accompanied by effective protection mechanisms for the Union’s most sensitive agricultural sectors. It strengthens the EU’s ability to react swiftly, proportionately and with legal certainty when imports from Mercosur countries cause, or threaten to cause, serious injury to EU producers.
European farmers have consistently expressed concerns about the potential impact of the agreement on agricultural markets. The safeguard mechanism proposed by the Commission responds adequately to these concerns. It establishes clear procedures, strict timelines, objective criteria and a robust operational framework that together ensure market stability and provide credible protection against sudden disturbances.
The Rapporteur considers that the Commission proposal strikes the appropriate balance between legal certainty, operational effectiveness and proportionality. The mechanism is consistent with established EU practice in other trade agreements and offers a reliable safeguard in a context where the confidence of the agricultural sector is essential for the overall acceptance of the EU-Mercosur Agreement.
Change 3
RemovedGiven the technical nature of the Regulation and the importance of ensuring its swift adoption, the Rapporteur has decided not to table amendments. Preserving the text as proposed by the Commission will facilitate rapid progress on an instrument that is essential for safeguarding European agriculture within the framework of the EU-Mercosur Agreement.
AddedThis Regulation is not merely a technical exercise. It reflects the Union’s broader commitment to protecting its agricultural production, ensuring market stability, maintaining the competitiveness of its farmers and providing solid guarantees against potential market disruptions arising from trade liberalisation. Its timely adoption is therefore both necessary and strategically important.
RemovedThis Regulation is not merely a technical exercise. It reflects the Union’s broader commitment to protecting its agricultural production, ensuring market stability, maintaining the competitiveness of its farmers and providing solid guarantees against potential market disruptions arising from trade liberalisation. Its timely adoption, without modifications, is therefore both necessary and strategically important.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/INTA-PR-779615/compare/A-10-2025-0254?all=1&part=2
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 27 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Changes between INTA-PR-779615 and A-10-2025-0254”. Text, 9 December 2025. from INTA-PR-779615, to A-10-2025-0254, reference 2025/0322(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/INTA-PR-779615/compare/A-10-2025-0254?all=1&part=2 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-12-09,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between INTA-PR-779615 and A-10-2025-0254}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-12-09},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/INTA-PR-779615/compare/A-10-2025-0254?all=1&part=2}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/INTA-PR-779615/compare/A-10-2025-0254?all=1&part=2},
urldate = {2026-09-27},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from INTA-PR-779615, to A-10-2025-0254, reference 2025/0322(COD). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}