Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

Change 2

RemovedSHORT JUSTIFICATION

AddedTitle: establishing the Union Customs Code and the European Union Customs Authority, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 and Regulation (EU) 2022/2399

RemovedThe Council position at first reading reflects the agreement reached between the European Parliament and the Council in interinstitutional negotiations to be concluded at early second reading stage.

AddedRecital 3: (3) It is appropriate that customs legislation takes account of the rapid development of global trade patterns, technology, business models and the needs of stakeholders, including businesses, consumers and citizens. Therefore, a great number of amendments are required to be made to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. In the interests of clarity, that Regulation should be repealed and replaced.

AddedRecital 4: (4) In order to provide for effective means of achieving the objectives of the customs union, a number of rules and procedures regulating how goods are brought into or taken out of the customs territory of the Union should be revised, simplified and harmonised. A modern, integrated set of interoperable electronic services should be provided for collecting, processing and exchanging information relevant for implementing customs legislation (European Union Customs Data Hub, ‘EU Customs Data Hub’). A European Union Customs Authority (‘EU Customs Authority’) should be established as a central, operational capacity for the coordinated governance of the customs union in specific areas.

AddedRecital 5: (5) Since the adoption of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013, the role of customs authorities has evolved to increasingly cover the application of Union and national legislation laying down requirements on goods subject to customs supervision, in particular the non-financial requirements on goods that are necessary for these goods to enter and circulate in the internal market. Such non-financial tasks have increased exponentially over the years in line with growing expectations of Union businesses and citizens regarding safety, security, accessibility for persons with disabilities, sustainability, human, animal and plant health and life, the environment, the protection of human rights and Union values. New tools, such as the Digital Product Passport, are to be introduced to ensure that other legislation applied by the customs authorities related to products continues to respond to these expectations. It is therefore necessary to reflect the increasing number and complexity of non-financial risks by including in the mission of customs authorities a specific reference to protecting all these public interests and, where applicable, national legislation, in close cooperation with other authorities. It is equally important to note that a significant volume of goods processed in major harbors and airports are being transshipped, coming from and destined for other continents without entering the Union market. Such goods do not always need to comply with the same Union safety and product st…

AddedRecital 7: (7) Certain definitions set out in Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 should be adapted to take account of the broader scope of this Regulation, to align them with those set out in other Union acts, and to clarify terminology having different meanings in different sectors. New definitions should be included in customs legislation to clarify the roles and responsibilities of certain actors in the customs processes. In the case of the importer and the exporter, meaning any person involved in the distance sales of goods, new definitions should make those persons responsible towards customs for compliance of the goods, including for financial and non-financial risks, in accordance with product compliance legislation in order to strengthen customs supervision. In the case of the new concept of deemed importer, new definitions should ensure that in some cases, in the context of an online sale from outside the Union, an economic operator, as opposed to the consumer, is considered the importer and assumes the corresponding responsibilities, and should ensure that the relevant economic operator has complied with the relevant legislation applied by the customs authorities when the goods enter or exit the customs territory of the Union and is providing, keeping and making available appropriate records of such compliance. New definitions should also be introduced in relation to the broader scope of the provisions of customs supervision, risk management and customs controls.

AddedRecital 8: (8) Beyond their traditional role of collecting customs duties, VAT and excise and applying customs legislation, customs authorities also play a critical role in enforcing other Union and, where applicable, other national legislation on customs matters. A definition of this ‘other legislation applied by the customs authorities’ should be introduced in order to build an effective framework for regulating the application and supervision of these particular requirements on goods, in accordance with Regulation 2019/1020 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a on market surveillance and compliance of products, and within the specific customs controls and procedures established under this Regulation. Such prohibitions and restrictions can be justified on grounds of, inter alia, public morality, public policy or public security, the protection of the health and life of humans, animals or plants, the protection of the environment, the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value and the protection of industrial or commercial property and other public interests, including controls on drug precursors, goods infringing certain intellectual property rights and cash. The notion of other legislation applied by the customs authorities should also include commercial policy measures, trade policy measures including multilateral environmental agreements, and fishery conservation and management measures, as well as restrictive measures adopted o…

AddedRecital 10: (10) The consequence of the failure of a customs authority to take a decision upon application within the established time-limits should be clarified. The principle that in such case the application is deemed to be subject to a negative decision and that the applicant may lodge an appeal, in accordance with the general rule on customs decisions should also be established. In order to ensure that trade is not paralysed in case of large-scale failure of the centralised electronic systems, the Commission and the EU Customs Authority should work with Member States on fall-back procedures.

AddedRecital 14: (14) The obligations of the deemed importers, which are different from the obligations applicable to [the rest of] importers, should also be clarified. In particular, it should be clarified that the notion of the deemed importer is created for the purpose of effective and efficient collection of customs duties. The deemed importer is usually not in possession of the goods and the transfer of ownership of the goods occurs between the importer and the customer. Consequently, the deemed importer will often depend on the accuracy of the information provided by the importers before or at the latest upon check-out to be able to ensure correct duties treatment (payment and reporting obligations) of the transaction. It should also be provided that the deemed importer should provide to the customs authorities not only the data necessary for the release for free circulation of the sold goods but also the information that the deemed importer must collect for VAT purposes. This information is detailed in Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/201143 . / 43 Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 of 15 March 2011 laying down implementing measures for Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 077, 23.3.2011, p. 1).

AddedRecital 15: (15) Economic operators meeting certain criteria and conditions to be considered compliant and trustworthy traders by customs authorities can be granted the status of AEO and thereby benefit from facilitations in customs processes. While ensuring that the traders dealing with most of Union trade are trustworthy, the AEO scheme suffers from certain weaknesses highlighted in the evaluation of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 and in the findings of the European Court of Auditors. To deal with those concerns, in particular about the divergent national practices and challenges regarding AEO compliance monitoring, the rules should be amended to introduce the customs authorities’ obligation to monitor compliance at least every 3 years. This obligation should also be monitored by the new EU Customs Authority.

AddedRecital 16: (16) The changes in the customs processes and the way of operating the customs authorities requires a new partnership with economic operators, that is the Trust and Check traders scheme. The criteria and conditions to become a Trust and Check trader should build on the AEO criteria but should also ensure that the trader is considered transparent for the customs authorities. It is therefore appropriate to require Trust and Check operators to grant the customs authorities access to their electronic systems keeping record of their compliance and the movement of their goods, provided that such access is proportionate and strictly necessary. The transparency should be accompanied by certain benefits, notably the possibility to release the goods on behalf of customs without the necessity for their active intervention, except where a pre-release approval is required by other legislation applied by the customs authorities and to defer the payment of the customs debt.

AddedRecital 17: (17) The changes in the customs processes also require clarifying the role of customs representatives. Both direct and indirect representation should continue to be possible but it should be clarified that the indirect representative of an importer or an exporter assumes all the obligations of importers or exporters, not only the obligation to pay or guarantee the customs debt but also the respect of other legislation applied by the customs authorities. For that reason, customs representatives must be resident in the customs territory of the Union where they represent importers or exporters, to ensure proper accountability for financial and non-financial aspects. The use of an indirect customs representative established in the Union is therefore an available and proportionate alternative for importers and exporters who do not have a commercial presence in the Union. Moreover, customs representatives established in third countries can continue providing their services in the Union where they represent persons who are not required to be established within the customs territory of the Union. Identifying reliable customs representatives is a challenge for economic operators, especially micro, small and medium-sized enterprises.

AddedRecital 17 a (new): (17 a) It is also important to recognise the specific challenges for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises as defined in Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC1a in fulfilling customs requirements and how this can be facilitated by direct and indirect representation. This is especially true where a micro or small and medium-sized enterprise does not hold the status of a Trust and Check trader. They should continue to be able to benefit from having indirect representation. The Commission and the EU Customs Authority should evaluate how this arrangement is working based on information received from relevant authorities. The Commission should present this evaluation in the form of a report to the European Parliament and the Council. On the basis of that report, the Commission should decide whether to propose a legislative solution for a specific regime to better determine the relationship between small and micro enterprises and customs representatives with a view to facilitating trade and ensuring a fair balance of responsibilities. / 1a Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36.

AddedRecital 18 a (new): (18 a) Before the EU Customs Data Hub becomes fully operational, the Commission should have the option to plan and establish a pilot phase to test the functionalities that are relevant for the hub. Such a pilot phase should be voluntary for customs authorities, other authorities, and economic operators.

AddedRecital 23 a (new): (23 a) Without prejudice to the data protection rules, especially rules on sensitive customs data and commercially sensitive data, non-personal data should be made available to third parties for specific purposes, subject to appropriate justification and upon request. Economic operators should be given the choice to not allow such disclosure.

AddedRecital 24: (24) To ensure that the European Anti-Fraud Office (‘OLAF’) can exercise its investigations powers in relation to fraudulent activities that are affecting the interests of the Union, it is appropriate that it has access to data from the EU Customs Data Hub that is very similar to the access by the Commission. OLAF should therefore be entitled to process the data in accordance with the conditions relating to data protection in the relevant Union legislation, including Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council47 and Council Regulation (EC) No 515/9748 . To ensure that EPPO can conduct its investigations on customs-related matters, it should be entitled to have access to and process the data in the EU Customs Data Hub. To preserve the functions that are performed in Member States’ national IT systems, the tax authorities of the Member States should either obtain the possibility to process data directly within the EU Customs Data Hub or to extract data from the EU Customs Data Hub and process it through different means. As such, authorities responsible for food safety in accordance with Regulation Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council49 and the authorities responsible for market surveillance in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 should be provided with the right services and tools in the EU Customs Data Hub so that they can use the relevant customs data to contribute to enforcing the relevant Union l…

AddedRecital 24 a (new): (24 a) Pursuant to Article 24 of Council Regulation (EU) 2017/19391a, the competent customs authorities should without undue delay report to the EPPO any criminal conduct in respect of which it could exercise its competence in accordance with Article 22 and Article 25(2) and (3) of that Regulation. The competent customs authorities should refrain from taking measures which could jeopardize the confidentiality of criminal investigations into the same facts of the competent national judicial or law enforcement authority or the EPPO, when requested to do so by these authorities. / 1a Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (‘the EPPO’) (OJ L 283, 31.10.2017, p. 1).

AddedRecital 26: deleted

AddedRecital 27: (27) It is appropriate that the EU Customs Data Hubs stores personal data for a maximum period of 10 years. This period is justified in light of the possibility for customs authorities to notify the customs debt up to 10 years after having received the necessary information about a consignment, as well as to ensure that the Commission, the EU Customs Authority, OLAF, EPPO, customs and authorities other than customs can cross-check the information in the EU Customs Data Hub against the information stored in and exchanged with other systems. Moreover, this period of time should be aligned with the storage period required by other legislation applied by the customs authorities, where such legislation is relevant for customs controls. It is also appropriate that whenever personal data is required for the purposes of judicial and administrative proceedings, investigations and during post-clearance controls, the retention period is suspended to avoid that personal data is erased and cannot be used for those purposes.

AddedRecital 30: (30) The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 and delivered an opinion on 11 July 2023. The European Data Protection Supervisor recalls, from his nine recommendations, that the risk criteria to be used to select persons by means of an automated processing, when resulting in individual decisions, should be based on circumstances that are reliable and directly linked to objective factors, not entail a direct or indirect risk of discrimination, such as race, ethnic origin, religion, political orientation, sexual orientation, and not be excessively broad.

AddedRecital 30 a (new): (30 a) In order to establish a common framework for the customs union, it is necessary for the European Union Single Window Environment for Customs (the ‘EU Single Window Environment for Customs’) to be integrated in the Union Customs Code. Therefore, Regulation (EU) 2022/2399 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a should be repealed and the EU Single Window Environment for Customs is added to this Regulation. / 1a Regulation (EU) 2022/2399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2022 establishing the European Union Single Window Environment for Customs and amending Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 (OJ L 317, 9.12.2022, p. 1)

AddedRecital 30 b (new): (30 b) To achieve a fully digital environment and an efficient goods clearance process for all parties involved in international trade, it is necessary to establish common rules for a harmonised and integrated EU Single Window Environment for Customs. That environment should include the EU Customs Data Hub and the Union non-customs systems referred to in Annex Ia of this Regulation. The EU Customs Data Hub should enable the exchange of information with Union non-customs systems in accordance with the Single Window Environment for Customs. The EU Single Window Environment for Customs should be developed taking account of the possibilities for trustworthy identification and authentication offered by Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a and the ‘once-only’ principle, where appropriate, as reiterated in Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 of the European Parliament and of the Council1b. To implement the EU Single Window Environment for Customs, it is necessary to establish, on the basis of the pilot project, a certificates exchange system, namely the electronic European Union Customs Single Window Certificates Exchange System (EU CSW-CERTEX), that interconnects the EU Customs Data Hub and Union non-customs systems managing specific non-customs formalities. It is also necessary to integrate the EU Customs Data Hub into the EU Single Window Environment for Customs, and establish a set of rules on digital administrative cooperation within the EU Single W…

AddedRecital 30 c (new): (30 c) The EU Single Window Environment for Customs should be aligned to and made as interoperable as possible with other existing or future customs-related systems, such as the system of centralised clearance under this Regulation. Where relevant, synergies between the European Maritime Single Window environment established by Regulation (EU) 2019/1239 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a and the EU Single Window Environment for Customs should be sought. / 1a Regulation (EU) 2019/1239 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 establishing a European Maritime Single Window environment and repealing Directive 2010/65/EU (OJ L 198, 25.7.2019, p. 64).

AddedRecital 30 d (new): (30 d) It is necessary for the EU Single Window Environment for Customs to integrate solutions that ensure a high level of cybersecurity in order, as far as possible, to prevent attacks that could disrupt the customs and non-customs systems, harm security of trade or inflict damage on the economy of the Union. The cybersecurity standards should be designed to evolve at the same pace as the regulatory requirements for network information security. In developing, operating and maintaining the EU Single Window Environment for Customs, the Commission and the Member States should follow appropriate guidelines issued by the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) regarding cybersecurity.

AddedRecital 30 e (new): (30 e) The exchange of digital information through EU CSW-CERTEX should cover Union non-customs formalities laid down in Union legislation other than customs legislation that customs authorities are entrusted to enforce. Union non-customs formalities comprise all operations which are to be carried out by a natural person, an economic operator or a partner competent authority for the international movement of goods, including the part of the movement between Member States, when required. Those formalities impose different obligations for the import, export or transit of certain goods, and their verification through customs controls is fundamental to the effective functioning of the EU Single Window Environment for Customs. EU CSW-CERTEX should cover digitalised formalities laid down in Union legislation and managed by partner competent authorities in electronic Union non-customs systems, storing the relevant information from all Member States required for goods clearance. It is therefore appropriate to identify the Union non-customs formalities and the respective Union non-customs systems that should be subject to digital cooperation through EU CSW-CERTEX. In particular, the definition of Union non-customs systems should be broad and should encompass the different situations and legal formulations in the Union legal acts that have enabled or will enable the creation and use of those systems. Moreover, it is also appropriate to specify the dates by which the specific Union non-…

AddedRecital 30 f (new): (30 f) EU CSW-CERTEX should facilitate information exchange between the EU Customs Data Hub and Union non-customs systems. Accordingly, when an economic operator submits a customs declaration or re-export declaration, which requires Union non-customs formalities to have been fulfilled, it should be possible for customs authorities and partner competent authorities to automatically and effectively exchange and verify the information that is required for the customs clearance process. Improved digital cooperation and coordination between customs authorities and partner competent authorities should lead to more integrated, faster and simpler paperless processes for goods clearance and better enforcement of and compliance with Union non-customs formalities.

AddedRecital 30 g (new): (30 g) The Commission, in collaboration with the Member States, should develop, integrate and operate EU CSW-CERTEX, including the provision of appropriate training on its functioning and implementation to Member States. To provide appropriate, harmonised and standardised single window services at Union level for Union non-customs formalities, the Commission should connect each of the Union non-customs systems with EU CSW-CERTEX. The Commission should be responsible for interconnecting the EU Customs Data Hub with EU CSW-CERTEX, assisted, where necessary, by the EU Customs Authority.

AddedRecital 31: (31) A Union-level customs risk management layer is fundamental for ensuring a harmonised application of customs controls in Member States. There is currently a common risk management framework comprising the possibility of identifying common priority controls areas and common risk criteria and standards in the financial risk arena for carrying out customs controls, but it has significant shortcomings. In order to address the lack of harmonised application of customs controls and of harmonised risk management harming the financial and non-financial interests of the Union and of the Member States, it is appropriate to revise the rules to establish a more solid risk management approach addressing both financial and non-financial risks. This includes tackling the structural challenges on the risk management of financial risks identified by the European Court of Auditors. In particular, it is appropriate to describe which activities are comprised in customs risk management, in a cyclical approach. It is also important to identify the roles and responsibilities of the Commission, the EU Customs Authority and the customs authorities of the Member States. It is also essential to provide that the Commission may establish common priority controls areas and common risk criteria and standards, and may identify specific areas in the domain of other legislation applied by the customs authorities that deserve priority for common risk management and controls, without compromising security. …

AddedRecital 32: (32) It is therefore appropriate to introduce Union-level risk management activities and provisions to ensure the collection at Union level of comprehensive data relevant for risk management including results and evaluation of all controls. It provides for common risk analysis and the issue of corresponding Union control recommendations to customs authorities. Those control recommendations should be implemented, or reasons provided as to why they were not applied. In line with the principle of 'comply or explain', these control recommendations should be implemented, or compelling reasons provided for not applying them. A framework should be established to give certainty on situations where it is permissible to deviate from these recommendations, for instance, when other pressing priorities prevail. The possibility to issue an instruction that goods destined for the Union may not be loaded or transported should also be provided for. The analysis of Union-level risks and threats should be based on constantly updated Union-level data and should identify the measures and controls to be performed at the border crossing points of entry and exit of the Union territory. In the context of cooperation with law enforcement and security authorities in particular, Union-level risk management should, where possible, contribute to and benefit from strategic analyses and threat assessments conducted at Union level, including those carried out by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement …

AddedRecital 35: (35) The customs authorities responsible for the place of first entry of the goods should carry out a risk analysis of the available information on those goods and be entitled to take a wide range of mitigation measures if they detect a risk, including requesting controls before loading or upon arrival of the goods to the customs territory of the Union, by another customs authority or by other authorities. The carrier is generally in the best position to know when the goods have arrived so they should notify customs of such arrival, using where applicable the European Maritime Single Window Environment pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/1239. However, to cater for the more complex supply chains and transport networks, other persons may be required to notify the arrival of the goods to the customs authorities for their risk analysis. In order to ensure that the customs authorities have advance cargo information on all goods brought to the customs territory of the Union, the carrier should be prevented from unloading goods for which there is no information, unless the customs authorities have requested the carrier to present the goods or there is an emergency situation requiring the unloading of the goods. By contrast, to smoothen the process of entry of goods for which the customs authorities have the appropriate advance cargo information, the carrier should not be required to present the goods to customs in all cases but only where the customs authorities so request or where ot…

AddedRecital 38: (38) Once the customs authorities have the information necessary for the relevant procedure, based on risk analysis, they should decide whether to perform further controls on the goods, to release them, to refuse or suspend their release or to let the time pass so the goods are considered released. The customs authorities should do so in cooperation with other authorities, where necessary. Accordingly, the customs authorities should refuse the release of the goods where they have evidence that the goods do not comply with applicable legal requirements. Where the customs authorities need to consult other authorities to determine whether or not the goods comply, they should suspend the release at least until the consultation takes place. In these cases, the customs authorities’ subsequent decision on the goods should depend on the other authorities’ reply. To avoid blocking both traders and authorities in the cases in which concluding on compliance requires some time, the customs authorities should have the possibility to release the goods on the condition that the trader continues informing about the location of the goods. Finally, in order to provide legal certainty to the traders that have provided the information on time without obliging the customs authorities to react to every consignment, the goods that have not been selected for a control as soon as possible and at the latest within 30 calendar days should be considered released.

AddedRecital 39: (39) To the extent that Trust and Check traders provide customs full access to their systems, records and operations and are considered reliable, they should be able to release their goods under the supervision of the customs authorities but without waiting for their intervention. Accordingly, Trust and Check traders should be able to release goods for any entry procedure at receipt at final destination of the goods or for any exit procedure at the place of delivery of the goods. As the Trust and Check traders are considered transparent, the arrival and/or the delivery should be properly recorded in the EU Customs Data Hub. These operators should be obliged to inform the customs authorities where a problem arises so that those authorities can take a final decision on the release. Where the internal controls systems of the Trust and Check traders are robust enough, the customs authorities should be able, in cooperation with other authorities, to authorise the traders to perform certain checks on their own. However, the customs authorities should retain the possibility to control the goods at any time. Trust and Check status should not be given to persons with repeated or serious infringements to other Union legislation applied by customs authorities.

AddedRecital 48: (48) Certain rules of the Code on tariff classification, origin and customs value should be amended to provide for the simplifications applicable on a voluntary basis by the deemed importer when determining the customs duty in a business-to-consumer transaction qualifying as distance sales for VAT purposes. The simplifications should consist in the possibility to calculate the customs duty due by applying one of the new bucket tariffs in the Combined Nomenclature to a value calculated in a simpler way. Under the simplified rules for business-to-consumer e-commerce transactions, the net purchase price without VAT but including the total transport costs until the final destination of the product should be considered as the customs value and no origin should be required. However, if the deemed importer wishes to benefit from preferential tariff rates by proving the originating status of the goods, that person can do so by applying the standard procedures. / (deleted) / (deleted)

AddedRecital 52: (52) A crisis management mechanism should be put in place to address potential crises in the customs union. The lack of such a mechanism at Union level was highlighted in the Customs Action Plan55 . A mechanism should therefore be established that involves the EU Customs Authority as a pivotal actor in preparing, coordinating and monitoring the implementation of the practical measures and arrangements that the Commission decides to put in place when a crisis occurs. The EU Customs Authority should maintain the crisis response readiness on a permanent basis during the whole duration of the crisis. The EU Customs Authority should report back to the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the practical measures and arrangements.

AddedRecital 53: (53) The existing governance framework of the customs union lacks a clear operational management structure and does not reflect the evolution of customs since its creation in 1968. Under Regulation (EU) No 952/2013, the activities related to the management of risks in trade flows, such as implementation and decisions on controls on the ground, are the responsibility of national customs authorities. The intensity of external border traffic of goods is not equal across the Union. Despite the cooperation between national customs administrations that has existed since the creation of the customs union and that has led to the exchange of best practices, expertise, and the development of common guidelines, it has not resulted in the development of a harmonised approach and operational framework. Currently, divergent practices exist in Member States that weaken the customs union. There is no central risk analysis capacity, no common view on risk prioritisation, limited coordinated customs action and controls, and no cooperation framework of various authorities serving the internal market. A central operational Union layer to pool expertise, resources and take decisions together should address such weaknesses in areas such as data management, risk management and training to make the customs union ‘act as one’. Therefore, it is appropriate that an EU Customs Authority is established. The creation of this new Authority is crucial to ensure the efficient and adequate functioning of the …

AddedRecital 55 a (new): (55 a) Member States and the Commission have the responsibility to ensure that customs authorities are properly resourced, trained, and equipped to have the capacity to fulfil their mission, including proper investigative powers.

AddedRecital 55 b (new): (55 b) Customs are in need of serious investments, especially in view of a sufficient number of properly trained staff in order to guarantee the functioning of Union’s customs systems which are facing an exponential increase in demands; whereas without the necessary investments into staff, digital solutions cannot achieve their full potential. Therefore, investments into digital systems should guarantee sufficient funding for staff and their training in order to require the necessary skills for state-of-the-art equipment, technology for big data analytics, detection and controls and thus, to guarantee that customs controls are conducted uniformly across the Union.

AddedRecital 56: (56) The Member States, the Commission and the European Parliament should be represented on a Management Board, in order to ensure the effective functioning of the EU Customs Authority. The composition of the Management Board, including the selection of its Chairperson and Deputy-Chairperson, should respect the principles of gender balance, experience and qualification. Given the Union’s exclusive competence on the customs union, and the close link between customs and other policy fields, it is appropriate that its chairperson is elected from among those Commission representatives. In view of the effective and efficient functioning of the EU Customs Authority, the Management Board should, in particular, adopt a Single Programming Document including annual and multiannual programming, carry out its functions relating to the Authority’s budget, adopt the financial rules applicable to the Authority, appoint an Executive Director, and establish procedures for taking decisions relating to the operational tasks of the Authority by the Executive Director. The Management Board should be assisted by an Executive Board and a consultative body representing consumer organisations, business associations and other relevant non-state actors.

AddedRecital 56 a (new): (56 a) The EU Customs Authority should establish the Customs Advisory Board, which should assist its Executive Board. It should be tasked to provide advice on the implementation of technical actions and decisions, including risk management and priority areas of control, on implementation and standardisation issues, including harmonisation activities or the need for the adaptation of the rules, provide advice on the customs dimensions of other legislation applied by customs, and provide advice in the context of any other activities of the Authority. The Customs Advisory Board should endeavour to a balanced stakeholder representation between commercial and non-commercial interest and, within the category of commercial interests, with regard to SMEs and other undertakings.

AddedRecital 58: (58) To fulfil their mission, customs authorities cooperate closely and regularly with market surveillance authorities, sanitary and phytosanitary control authorities, law-enforcement bodies, border management authorities, environmental protection bodies, experts on cultural goods, and many other authorities in charge of sectoral policies. Considering the evolution of the internal market and the evolving role of customs, the increase in prohibitions and restrictions and e-commerce, it is necessary to structure and reinforce this cooperation at national, Union and international level. Instead of a cooperation focused on individual consignments or specific events along the supply chain, a structured cooperation framework between customs authorities and other authorities responsible for relevant policy areas should be established. Such cooperation framework should include the following aspects: the development of legislation and of policy needs in a specific area, the exchange and analysis of information, the building of overall cooperation strategy in the form of joint supervision strategies and, finally, cooperation on operational implementation, monitoring and controls. The Commission should also facilitate the application of part of the other legislation applied by the customs authorities by drawing a list of Union legislation imposing requirements on goods subject to customs controls aimed at protecting public interests such as human, animal or plants health and life, the c…

AddedRecital 59: (59) In order to increase clarity and make the cooperation framework between customs and other partner authorities more efficient, a list of services offered by customs authorities should define clearly the possible role of customs in the application of other relevant policies at the borders of the Union. In addition, the application of the cooperation framework should be monitored by the EU Customs Authority. The EU Customs Authority should work closely and cooperate with the Commission, OLAF, other relevant Union agencies and bodies, such as Europol, the EPPO and Frontex as well as specialised agencies and networks in the respective policy fields, such as the EU Product Compliance Network.

AddedRecital 60: (60) In an increasingly connected world, customs diplomacy and international cooperation are important aspects in the work of customs authorities around the world. International cooperation should envisage the possibility of exchange of customs data, on the basis of international agreements or autonomous legislation of the Union, through appropriate and secure means of communication, subject to the respect of confidential information and the protection of personal data, such as through the EU Customs Data Hub. That legal framework should not infringe upon the competence of Member States regarding bilateral or multilateral engagements with third countries on national tasks.

AddedRecital 61: (61) Despite the fact that customs legislation is harmonised through the Code, Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 only included the obligation for Member States to provide for penalties for failure to comply with the customs legislation and required such penalties to be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Member States have, therefore, the choice of customs penalties, which vary greatly across Member States and are subject to evolution over time. A common framework establishing a minimum core of customs infringements and of non-criminal sanctions should be laid down. Non-compliance with importer, exporter and deemed importer obligations could be included in the list of customs infringements. Such framework is necessary to address the lack of uniform application and the significant divergences between Member States in the application of sanctions against breaches of customs legislation that can lead to a distortion of competition, loopholes and ‘customs shopping’. The framework should be composed of a common list of acts or omissions that should constitute customs infringements in all Member States. In determining the sanction applicable, customs authorities should define if these acts or omissions are committed intentionally or by obvious negligence. Sanctions and liabilities imposed on economic operators should be proportionate to their role in the transaction process, ensuring fairness and clarity in their application. The Commission, Member States and the EU Customs Authorit…

AddedRecital 64: (64) It is also necessary to establish a common minimum core of non-criminal sanctions providing for minimum amounts of pecuniary charges, the possibility of revocation, suspension or amendment of customs authorisations, including for Authorised Economic Operators and Trust and Check traders, as well as the confiscation of the goods. The minimum amounts of pecuniary charges should depend on whether the customs infringement has been committed intentionally or not and whether or not it has an impact on the amount of customs duties and other charges and on prohibitions or restrictions. This minimum common core of non-criminal sanctions should apply without prejudice to the national legal order of Member States, which can instead provide for criminal sanctions. Member States, the Commission and the EU Customs Authority should collaborate to gradually increase the coherence of non-criminal sanctions and their application across the Union.

AddedRecital 65: (65) The performance of the customs union should be evaluated at least on an annual basis to allow the Commission, with the help of the Member States, to take the appropriate policy orientations and that evaluation report should be published.. The collection of information from customs authorities should be formalised and deepened, as more comprehensive reporting would improve benchmarking and could help to homogenise practices and assess the impact of customs policy decisions. It is, therefore, appropriate to introduce a legal framework for the evaluation of the performance of the customs union. To allow sufficient granularity of analysis, the performance measurement should be done not only at national level but also at border crossing point level. The EU Customs Authority should support the Commission in the evaluation process by gathering and analysing the data in the EU Customs Data Hub and identifying how customs activities and operations support the achievement of the strategic objectives and priorities of the customs union and contribute to the mission of customs authorities. In particular, the EU Customs Authority should identify key trends, strengths, weaknesses, gaps, and potential risks, and provide recommendations for improvement to the Commission. In the context of cooperation with law enforcement and security authorities in particular, the EU Customs Authority should also participate, from the operational perspective, in strategic analyses and threat assessments…

AddedRecital 67 – indent 10: deleted

AddedRecital 74: (74) From 1 January 2029, economic operators should have the right to start using, on a voluntary basis, the capabilities of the EU Customs Data Hub. By 31 December 2032, the EU Customs Data Hub should be fully developed, and all economic operators shall use it. Trust and Check traders and deemed importers will be supervised by the Member State of their establishment. By derogation and subject to review, operators that are neither Trust and Check traders nor deemed importers will remain under the supervision of the customs authority of the Member State where the goods are physically located. By 31 December 2035, the Commission should evaluate the two supervision models, including as regards their effectiveness for detecting and preventing fraud. The evaluation should also consider indirect taxation aspects. Based on this evaluation, the Commission should be entitled to decide by delegated act whether the two models should continue or whether, in all cases, the customs authority responsible for the place of establishment of the trader should release the goods. The place of incurrence of customs debt should also be regulated in accordance with the determination of the responsible customs authority,

AddedArticle 1 – paragraph 1 a (new): 1 a. This Regulation establishes a European Union Single Window Environment for Customs (the ‘EU Single Window Environment for Customs’) that provides an integrated set of interoperable electronic services, at Union level, to support interaction and enhance information exchange between the EU Customs Data Hub and the Union non-customs systems referred to in Annex Ia. / It lays down rules for digital administrative cooperation and information sharing through interoperable data sets, within the EU Single Window Environment for Customs.

AddedArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point a: (a) ensuring the efficient and proper collection of customs duties and other charges;

AddedArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point b: (b) ensuring that goods that are destined for circulation in the internal market but present a risk for the safety of citizens and residents do not enter the customs territory of the Union, by putting in place the appropriate measures for controls of goods and supply chains;

AddedArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new): (b a) ensuring that goods presenting a risk for the security of citizens and residents do not enter the customs territory of the Union, by putting in place the appropriate measures for controls of goods and supply chains;

AddedArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point d: (d) protecting the Union from unfair, non-compliant and illegal trade, including counterfeit and goods that are not in compliance with other legislation applied by the customs authorities through a close monitoring of economic operators, sectors and supply chains and a minimum core of customs infringements and penalties;

AddedArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point e: (e) supporting all legitimate business activity, by maintaining a proper balance between customs controls and facilitation of legitimate trade and simplifying customs processes and procedures through robust real-time risk analysis made possible, including by the artificial intelligence systems, referred to in Article 29(1), point (d);

AddedArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new): (e a) promoting cost-efficiency by avoiding duplication, and promoting effectiveness in customs processes and an efficient use of related resources at Union and national level;

AddedArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new): (e b) gathering, analysing and exchanging relevant information to support evidence-based decision making;

AddedArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point e c (new): (e c) contributing to the improvement of the overall enforcement of Union legal acts in other fields, such as those protecting the safety and security of citizens, residents and consumers, the environment and supply chains;

AddedArticle 2 – paragraph 2 – point e d (new): (e d) ensuring, where the internal market emergency mode has been activated in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EU).../... of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Single Market emergency instrument and repealing Council Regulation No (EC) 2679/98 in times of crisis*+, the flow of crisis-relevant goods as defined in Article 3(1), point (6) of that Regulation. / * Regulation (EU) ... /... of the European Parliament and of the Council of ... on … (OJ L ..., …, ELI: …). / + OJ: Please insert in the text the number of the Regulation contained in document PE-CONS .../... (2022/0278(COD)) and insert the number, date, title and OJ reference of that Regulation in the footnote.

AddedArticle 4 – paragraph 1: deleted

AddedArticle 5 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point d: (d) customs provisions contained in international agreements, insofar as they are applicable in the Union. This includes inter alia the relevant multilateral environmental agreements to which the Union and the Member States are a party, insofar they regulate the conformity of goods;