Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to report parliamentary committee draft

ENVI-PR-757117 → ENVI-PR-778296

From
ENVI-PR-757117 report parliamentary committee draft of 6 Dec 2023
To
ENVI-PR-778296 report parliamentary committee draft of 14 Oct 2025
Changes
Not comparable
Paragraphs
+10 added · −68 removed · 8 changed
More facts (2)
Title (from)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventing plastic pellet losses to reduce microplastic pollution
Title (to)
on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventing plastic pellet losses to reduce microplastic pollution

These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph (under 15 % of their paragraphs match): they are different documents rather than versions of one — for example a group’s motion and the joint text that was adopted.

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 3 of 3: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedAccording to research, there is currently more than 2 million tonnes of microplastics floating in the sea. Data from the United Nations Environment Programme points to more than 430 million tonnes of plastic produced annually. Two-thirds are short-lived products that soon become waste, filling the ocean and, often, working their way into the human food chain.

RemovedAs the Commission clearly states in its impact assessment, which is also widely acknowledged by the stakeholders of this sector, the biggest issue with microplastics from pellets plastic production lies on the handling and transporting of these products. Once in the environment, these microplastics are almost impossible to capture. Therefore, all major efforts should be put into monitoring and prevention, thus avoiding any kind of preventable losses.

RemovedThe impact of microplastics, once lost in the environment, are prejudicial for nature, ecosystems and biodiversity, but also for food chains and to human health. They also contribute to the increase of carbon emissions and negatively impact other agents that are responsible for carbon captures in the sea. Furthermore, the fact that they are of a very small dimension (no bigger than 5mm), contributes to its very high mobility, which means that they can easily be moved by different means, including air, land, surface waters and marine currents. They can also be found in soil, comprising agricultural land, whether directly or through the reuse of residual waters for agriculture, which can be detrimental to the quality of soils food consumption and human health.

RemovedThere is also recognition that plastic pellets are the third main source of microplastics pollution through unintentional releases, which also include paints, tyres and textiles as other major sources. The current Regulation presented by the Commission aims at tackling the specific pollution from pellets releases into the environment, which shall be complemented by a much-needed revision of the REACH regulation, besides other relevant EU legislation such as the EURO 7, the Plastics Strategy, the Circular Economy Action Plan and the Zero Pollution Action Plan, among others.

RemovedConsidering the Commission’s approach, it is the Rapporteur’s understanding that it sets a solid base for tackling the main challenge, namely the handling and transport of plastic pellets, based on a comprehensive impact assessment. It insists on the idea of increasing and improving monitoring, reporting and certification methods and instruments, thus providing a better overview of the total actual amount of the losses.

RemovedIt also sets the different actions and measures to be taken by the different agents of the value chain, such as producers, operators and carriers, as well as the role of competent authorities in the Member-states. At the same time, it sets different approaches and targets according to the size of the enterprise, creating exemptions and introducing less costly procedures for SMEs.

RemovedHowever, it is the Rapporteur’s opinion that there is room for improvement of the proposal.

RemovedThe first matter of improvement is the definition of microplastics, which is consensually understood by the scientific community to include also powders, flakes and dust, which was omitted in the Commission’s proposal.

RemovedSecondly, the Rapporteur wants to introduce the possibility for a reduction of the tonnage per year which would allow for exemptions according to the Commission’s proposal, from 1000 tonnes to 250 tonnes. The same logic shall apply to exemptions to Small and Medium Enterprises, as the Rapporteur believes that the proposed exemptions should only apply to Micro Enterprises. This is also the approach established by the OSPAR Recommendation.

RemovedFinally, the Rapporteur’s approach on the previous points derives from the conviction that not only preventive measures, as well as repairing of detected flaws, is much more cost effective for enterprises, by allowing a return on investment on the recovery of the losses, but also by driving the ambition up in reducing the quantity of microplastics in the environment and all its collateral consequences, including for human health.

RemovedThe Rapporteur strongly feels that there is a broad consensus in society regarding the need to reduce the presence of microplastics in the environment. For this reason, following the good recommendation elaborated by OSPAR and the openness and availability of the economic sector to improve the initial proposal of the Commission, this Report aims at improving the requisites of spilling prevention in all phases of pellets production and handling, including transportation, while at the same time guaranteeing important safeguards for companies to not significantly impact their economic operations.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Changes between ENVI-PR-757117 and ENVI-PR-778296”. Text, 14 October 2025. from ENVI-PR-757117, to ENVI-PR-778296. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ENVI-PR-757117/compare/ENVI-PR-778296?all=1&part=3 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-10-14,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between ENVI-PR-757117 and ENVI-PR-778296}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-14},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ENVI-PR-757117/compare/ENVI-PR-778296?all=1&part=3}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ENVI-PR-757117/compare/ENVI-PR-778296?all=1&part=3},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from ENVI-PR-757117, to ENVI-PR-778296. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}