Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to report parliamentary committee draft

RemovedEXPLANATORY STATEMENT

RemovedI. Background

RemovedSoil is a precious, but very fragile, non-renewable and finite resource that is under increasing pressure. Only in the EU, its health is threatened among others by sealing, compaction, unsustainable soil management, erosion, floods and landslides, droughts, hydrogeological instability, loss of soil organic matter, fires, storms, salinisation, contamination, loss of soil biodiversity, acidification and desertification. Most of the ongoing degradation processes are not adequately addressed or are not addressed at all in existing EU and national legislation.

RemovedHealthy soils are a prerequisite to ensure a sustainable and resilient economy, society and environment as they increase our resilience to climate change, to extreme weather events, drought and floods, store and filter water, provide services such as provision of food and biomass for bioeconomy and support our well-being.

RemovedGiven the above mentioned and the fact that it can take up to 1 000 years to produce just 1 centimetre of top soil, which can be lost with just one heavy rainfall if it is not protected, there is an urgent need to ensure adequate monitoring of soil health and concrete measures to be taken by Member States to ensure healthy soils by 2050.

RemovedBy this proposal, the Commission respected to vast extent the call of the European Parliament to design an EU-wide common legal framework, with full respect for the subsidiarity principle, for the protection and sustainable use of soil, addressing all major soil threats.

RemovedII. Position of the rapporteur

RemovedChapter I: General provisions

RemovedThe rapporteur considers that due to the urgency related to the state of soil in the EU, the overall target to achieve healthy soils in the EU by 2050 should be binding, with flexibility being given to the Member States in the measures taken to ensure improvement and increasing trends in soils health. Intermediate targets in 2040 may be set, depending on the progress done by the Member States, following the first assessment by the European Commission.

RemovedThe rapporteur welcomes the bottom-up approach taken by the Commission when proposing Soil Districts, giving sufficient flexibility to the Member States, while ensuring homogeneity based on environmental conditions. Nevertheless, he suggests closer sharing of knowledge and coordinated approach in neighbouring countries with the same soils, as sometimes more similarities can be found between two countries than between districts in one Member State. The Commission should assist to this aim inter alia by setting up a working group, whose role would also be to boost synergies and to facilitate harmonisation of monitoring systems across the Union. In addition, the rapporteur proposes following to assist the Member States and improve exchange of practices, knowledge and better use of resources:

Removed- Article 6a (new) on Efficient use and preservation of soil samples that shall ensure that samples taken in field are used to generate as much information as possible at the time of extraction or in the future, including for further research and innovations.

Removed- Development of Sustainable Soil Management Toolbox (Article 10a new) that would serve as a living tool where context-specific information and best practices could be found.

Removed- That the Commission provides the necessary capacity building, assistance and consulting services to Member States, including with regard to their monitoring initiatives.

RemovedChapter II: Monitoring and assessment of soil health

RemovedAssessment of soil health based on 5 ecological classes

RemovedThe rapporteur is proposing a different approach to be taken to assess soil health by moving from classification of soils as healthy or unhealthy in Article 9, to a more gradual approach inspired by the Water Framework Directive, that is familiar to Member States. Therefore, he incorporates in the respective articles 6 to 9, monitoring and assessment of ecological status distinguishing 5 classes of soils (from critically degraded to high ecological status). The soils will be considered healthy if they fall in the two best categories -i.e. having “high soil ecological status” or “good ecological status”. For soils that will fall within “moderate”, “degraded soils” or “critically degraded soils”, a realistic timeline to move to a better category is proposed. Soil Districts are not obliged, but encouraged to establish coherent Soil District Plans setting up measures applicable on their territory to ensure improvement of soil ecological status, or to achieve improvement of soils in view achieving the 2050 target for healthy soils, by other means. He believes that the Soil Districts shall aim at inclusive internal processes empowering local citizens, lands owners, farmers, researchers and other stakeholders to actively participate and contribute to achieving the overall objective.

RemovedMonitoring design underpinning the assessment of soils

RemovedThe rapporteur gives more flexibility to Member States in their choice of monitoring design, ensuring balance between harmonisation of soil monitoring systems for comparison of results and keeping them the possibility to use and build on their existing monitoring systems (e.g. those using systematic stratifier as an alternative to stratified random sampling). Member States are asked to follow at least Tier I approach that builds on the Commission's proposal. Nevertheless, they can benefit from autonomy when selecting the most appropriate Tier for the soil monitoring design and the respective assessment on their territory, provided that they meet the conditions laid down in Annex I for the Tiers. Tiers I, II and III encompass a balanced range of soil descriptors (their thresholds to be differentiated for all 5 soil ecological status groups, taking into consideration local conditions) introduced gradually following the respective Tiers.

RemovedThe rapporteur deletes the values proposed by the Commission that would lead to a classification of soils either as healthy or unhealthy. He proposes a more nuanced approach with values to be set for Tier I & Tier II for the five-level classification explained above. Member States choosing Tier II approach, may benefit from bigger flexibility in the sampling design and should be able to establish their own threshold values for the assessment of soils, assuming a maximum variation of 20 % from the EU-set thresholds. Therefore, they will be allowed to refine the classification and mapping of soil ecological status within their border. Nevertheless, they will have to include additional descriptors in their monitoring compared to Tier I.

RemovedChapter III: Sustainable soil management

RemovedThe rapporteur welcomes that the European Commission reflected on the calls of the Parliament and introduced, in Annex III, the principles of sustainable soil management that should be further defined by the Member States. Additionally, he recognizes the added value of future definitions of practices which affect the state of soil negatively.

RemovedHe believes that it is of importance that Member States facilitate the up-take of sustainable soil management practices in all soil districts without exception, to leave no soil and soil district behind. This would be achieved not only via necessary access to training, capacity building, and citizen science, but also via the introduction of the Sustainable Soil Management Toolbox, which should become an essential tool for sharing best practices across soil districts and Member States.

RemovedChapter IV: Contaminated sites, point source and diffuse pollution

RemovedAccording to the European Environment Agency (EEA), around 300 000 contaminated sites in Europe still require clean-up. As exposure to contamination from soil may lead to serious health diseases and as it is challenging to ensure safe redevelopment of contaminated sites, decontamination (in or ex-situ remediation) should be always considered, when feasible. The costs of implementation of risk reduction measures should be covered by the polluter responsible for contamination, in line with the polluter pays principle. Finally, the rapporteur believes that the Member States shall involve human health organisations in the process of identification of contaminated sites as well as in the assessment of what constitutes an (un)acceptable risk and measures to be taken to ensure protection.

RemovedIn addition, in line with the EP´s resolution on soil protection, the Directive should reflect the scientific evidence and provide a framework to tackle diffuse soil contaminants and contaminants of emergency concerns, such as PFAS or materials like microplastics. The rapporteur therefore believes that following the first monitoring done by the Member States and based on the collected data on the EU and Member States level, an EU list of priority substances could be developed, together with a watch list to improve information on substances when more data is needed. It should be noted that the European Commission committed in the European Soil Strategy for 2030 to the establishment of an EU priority list for contaminants of major and/or emerging concern by 2024.

RemovedFinally, the rapporteur introduces a procedure that allows submission of evidence such as human biomonitoring data, by a natural or legal person, to be considered for possible action (e.g. adoption of risk mitigation measures or update of list of contaminated sites).

RemovedChapter V: Financing

RemovedGiven the urgency of action, the rapporteur invites the Member States to seek and use available resources. He invites the Commission to monitor and to help increase the absorption capacity of Member States to achieve results on the ground swiftly. He considers that a permanent dedicated budget line should be established for the financing of monitoring under the Multiannual Financial Framework. Understanding the importance of private capital mobilisation and policy coherence, he wishes to engage the European Investment Bank to facilitate the use of innovative mechanisms and the Do No Significant Harm principle to be observed as general rule.

RemovedChapter VII: Access to justice and review

RemovedEffective participation of local stakeholders, availability of information, free of charge and in an accessible form and transparency is an important aspect of this Directive that enables monitoring of progress towards achieving healthy soils by 2050. Rapporteur inserts to Article 22 provision that should disallow additional procedural standing rules, that would restrict access to justice e.g. in cases when public would not participate in preceding public consultation, against the provisions of Aarhus Convention.