Text · Opinion parliamentary committee draft
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and marketing of forest reproductive material, amending Regulations (EU) 2016/2031 and 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 1999/105/EC (Regulation on forest reproductive material)
Full title
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and marketing of forest reproductive material, amending Regulations (EU) 2016/2031 and 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 1999/105/EC (Regulation on forest reproductive material)
Document ENVI-PA-757165 · COM(2023)0415 – C90237/2023 – 2023/0228(COD)
- Kind
- Opinion parliamentary committee draft ENVI-PA-757165
- Date
- 7 December 2023
- Committee
- Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
- Rapporteur
- Christophe Clergeau
- Dossier
- 2023/0228(COD)
More facts (3)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Subject matter
- SILV, SEME
- Reference
- COM(2023)0415 – C90237/2023 – 2023/0228(COD)
In short
A summary of the text written by AI; ¶ opens the paragraph it rests on.
AI: In short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
The draft opinion amends the proposed regulation on forest reproductive material (FRM) to strengthen prevention and contingency planning, expand definitions, and ensure genetic diversity and adaptability. It requires member states to draw up prevention and contingency plans, reviewed every four years, to secure FRM supply, prioritizing multispecies forests and local provenance. It extends FRM definition to include parts of plants, sets, and seedlings, adds agroforestry, and deletes provisions on new genomic techniques (NGTs) and color labels. It allows temporary authorizations for marketing FRM under less stringent requirements for up to three years, and for one year in case of supply difficulties, with plan revisions. It changes import rules to require conformity with Union rules instead of equivalence, and finances temporary experiments for improved alternatives.
Position. The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety proposes amendments to strengthen prevention and contingency planning, expand definitions, and ensure genetic diversity, while deleting NGT provisions.
Key points
- Member states must prepare prevention and contingency plans to ensure sufficient FRM supply in quantity and species, considering climate scenarios and prioritizing multispecies forests.
- Plans must include a resilience strategy to secure seed storage sites and nurseries, and be reviewed every four years.
- FRM definition is extended to include parts of plants, sets, and seedlings, and a definition for agroforestry is added.
- Provisions on NGT plants are deleted, as NGT scope is limited to annual crops.
- Temporary authorizations for marketing FRM not meeting all requirements are limited to three years.
- In case of general supply difficulties, the Commission may authorize for one year less stringent requirements, and member states must revise their plans.
- The Commission may finance temporary experiments to seek improved alternatives, not via implementing acts.
- Imports from third countries must conform to Union rules, not just be equivalent.
- Trees and stands must be able to adapt to climatic conditions, benefiting from sufficient intraspecific genetic variation.
Who is affected
- Member states: must draw up and publish prevention and contingency plans, and revise them after using derogations.
- FRM producers, forest owners, economic actors, and environmental associations: to be consulted on plans.
- Professional operators: must have access to their premises for contingency planning.
- Third-country producers: imports must conform to Union rules.
Figures and deadlines
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Jump to an amendment (36)
- Amendment 1
- Amendment 2
- Amendment 3
- Amendment 4
- Amendment 5
- Amendment 6
- Amendment 7
- Amendment 8
- Amendment 9
- Amendment 10
- Amendment 11
- Amendment 12
- Amendment 13
- Amendment 14
- Amendment 15
- Amendment 16
- Amendment 17
- Amendment 18
- Amendment 19
- Amendment 20
- Amendment 21
- Amendment 22
- Amendment 23
- Amendment 24
- Amendment 25
- Amendment 26
- Amendment 27
- Amendment 28
- Amendment 29
- Amendment 30
- Amendment 31
- Amendment 32
- Amendment 33
- Amendment 34
- Amendment 35
- Amendment 36
Short justification
Forest reproductive material (FRM) is fundamental to maintaining the sustainability of European forests, which cover more than 43 % of our land. Given the specific nature of forest management, it is only reasonable to have a separate regulation for FRM than for plant reproductive material, which is used in farming.
Forests suffer greatly from climate change, with the recurring heatwaves, droughts, fires, storms, disease and pest outbreaks having a direct impact on forest stands. Being able to use different FRM that are optimally adapted to given areas and also have the ability to adapt to climate change thanks to a high level of intraspecific genetic variation is one of the key levers for tackling extreme events. Although exchanges between different regions of provenance can be of interest, especially when it comes to increasing diversity, it would be best to first focus on the genetic potential of species within a given region to avoid any risk of maladaptation.
The main achievement of this regulation is that each Member State will have to prepare a national plan to ensure they do not run out of FRM. However, the rapporteur believes that to prevent derogations from being used abusively, the best way to approach dealing with the now recurring crises is to put preventative measures in place, to boost the resilience of seed (cones, infructescenses, fruits and seeds) storage facilities and nurseries.
Furthermore, the rapporteur suggests improving the criteria relating to sustainability in selection by specifying that the potential for adaptation depends primarily on the genetic diversity within the tree species concerned. In view of the high level of uncertainty over the global warming scenarios we could face, it is also important to remember that multi-species plantations clearly have a lower risk of maladaptation to climate change.
Lastly, the rapporteur proposes extending the definition of FRM to include parts of plants, sets and seedlings, creating a definition for agroforestry, and increasing the number of species in Annex I.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (22) The requirements for basic material intended for the purpose of conservation and sustainable use of forest genetic resources are different from those for basic material intended for the production of FRM for commercial purposes, because of the different selection criteria applied for these two types of basic material. For the purpose of conserving and sustainably using forest genetic resources, all trees from a stand of trees in the forest should be kept. This is necessary to help increase the genetic diversity within a single tree species. On the other hand, only trees with superior characteristics should be selected in the case of basic material intended for the production of FRM for commercial purposes. Member States should therefore be allowed to derogate from the applicable rules as regards the approval of basic material and notify this basic material intended for the purpose of conserving forest genetic resources to the competent authority. | (22) The requirements for basic material intended for the purpose of conservation and sustainable use of forest genetic resources are different from those for basic material intended for the production of FRM for commercial purposes, because of the different selection criteria applied for these two types of basic material. For the purpose of conserving and sustainably using forest genetic resources, all trees from a stand of trees in the forest should be kept. This is necessary to help increase the genetic diversity within a single tree species. On the other hand, only trees with characteristics of interest should be selected in the case of basic material intended for the production of FRM for commercial purposes. Member States should therefore be allowed to derogate from the applicable rules as regards the approval of basic material and notify this basic material intended for the purpose of conserving forest genetic resources to the competent authority. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) help create resilient forests, conserve biodiversity and restore forest ecosystems; | (b) help create resilient forests, conserve biodiversity and restore forest ecosystems by promoting interspecific and intraspecific genetic variation; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) FRM produced for export to third countries; | deleted |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (1) ‘forest reproductive material’ (‘FRM’) means cones, infructescenses, fruits and seeds intended for the production of a planting stock, that belong to tree species and artificial hybrids thereof listed in Annex I to this Regulation and used for afforestation, reforestation and other tree planting for any of the following purposes: | (1) ‘forest reproductive material’ (‘FRM’) means cones, infructescenses, fruits and seeds, parts of plants, sets and seedlings that belong to tree species and artificial hybrids thereof listed in Annex I to this Regulation and used for afforestation, reforestation and other tree planting for any of the following purposes: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ca) setting up or restoring agroforestry systems; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3a) ‘agroforestry’ means the integration of trees on agricultural land without changing the classification of that land; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (40) ‘NGT plant’ means plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques as defined in Article 3, point 2 of Regulation (EU) [Office of Publications, please insert reference to Regulation on plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed] of the European Parliament and of the Council38 ; | deleted |
| 38 Regulation (EU)… /... of the European Parliament and of the Council on plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed, and amending Directives 68/193/EEC, 1999/105/EC, 2002/53/EC, 2002/55/EC, and Regulation (EU) 2017/625 (OJ ...). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) FRM of the tree species and artificial hybrids listed in Annex I, which contain or consist of a category 1 NGT plant as defined in Article 3(7) of Regulation (EU) …/… (Office of Publications, please insert reference to NGT Regulation ...), may only be marketed if: | deleted |
| (i) it is of the ‘tested’ category, and | |
| (ii) it has been derived from basic material which has been approved pursuant to Article 4 and which meets the requirements of Annex V; and | |
| (iii) the plant has obtained a declaration of category 1 NGT plant status pursuant to Article 6 or 7 of Regulation (EU) …/… (Office of Publications, please insert reference to NGT Regulation ...) or is progeny of such plant(s); |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Competent authorities may temporarily authorise the marketing of FRM derived from approved basic material which does not meet all the requirements of the appropriate category referred to in Article 5(1), following the adoption of the delegated act referred to in paragraph 2. | Competent authorities may temporarily authorise, for a period of no longer than three years, the marketing of FRM derived from approved basic material which does not meet all the requirements of the appropriate category referred to in Article 5(1), following the adoption of the delegated act referred to in paragraph 2. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Contingency plan and national register | Prevention and contingency plan and national register |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Each Member State shall draw up one or more contingency plan to ensure a sufficient supply of FRM to reforest areas affected by extreme weather events, wildfires, disease and pest outbreaks, disasters or any other event, as relevant and identified in the national risk assessments develop in accordance with Article 6(1) of Decision No 1313/2013/EU 39 . | Each Member State shall draw up one or more prevention and contingency plan to ensure a sufficient supply of FRM in quantity and number of species to reforest areas affected by extreme weather events, wildfires, disease and pest outbreaks, disasters or any other event, as relevant and identified in the national risk assessments develop in accordance with Article 6(1) of Decision No 1313/2013/EU39. |
| 39 OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 924. | 39 OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 924. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| That contingency plan shall be prepared for those tree species and artificial hybrids thereof listed in Annex I, that are deemed suitable for the current and projected future climatic and ecological conditions of the Member State concerned. | That prevention and contingency plan shall be prepared for those tree species and artificial hybrids thereof listed in Annex I, that are considered to be suitable for the current and projected future climatic and ecological conditions of the Member State concerned, in particular in view of their high level of intraspecific variation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The contingency plan shall take into account the projected future distribution of the relevant tree species and artificial hybrids thereof, on the basis of national and/or regional climate model simulations for the Member State concerned. | The prevention and contingency plan shall take into account the different scenarios of distribution of the relevant tree species and artificial hybrids thereof, on the basis of the national and/or regional climate model simulations for the Member State concerned. It shall prioritise the replanting of multispecies forests with FRM from the closest regions of provenance to reduce the risk of maladaptation to climate change. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. Member States shall, at an appropriate stage, consult all relevant stakeholders in the process of drawing up and keeping up to date such contingency plans. | 2. Member States shall, at an appropriate stage, consult all relevant stakeholders, in particular FRM producers, forest owners, economic actors and environmental associations, in the process of drawing up and keeping up to date such prevention and contingency plans. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Each contingency plan shall include the following: | Each prevention and contingency plan shall include the following: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the roles and responsibilities of the bodies involved in the execution of the contingency plan in case of any event causing a major shortage of FRM, as well as the chain of command and procedures for the coordination of actions to be taken by competent authorities, other public authorities, delegated bodies or natural persons involved, laboratories and professional operators, including the coordination with neighbouring Member States and neighbouring third countries, where appropriate; | (a) the roles and responsibilities of the bodies involved in the execution of the prevention and contingency plan in case of any event causing a major shortage of FRM, as well as the chain of command and procedures for the coordination of actions to be taken by competent authorities, other public authorities, delegated bodies or natural persons involved, laboratories and professional operators, including the coordination with neighbouring Member States and neighbouring third countries, where appropriate; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (aa) a resilience strategy focused on pinpointing vulnerabilities that could justify the funding of preventive measures, such as making seed storage sites and nurseries more secure, and increasing the number of storage sites and nurseries; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) access of competent authorities to supplies of FRM that have been maintained for the purpose of contingency planning, premises of professional operators, in particular forest nurseries and laboratories producing FRM, other relevant operators and natural persons; | (b) access of competent authorities to supplies of FRM that have been maintained for the purpose of prevention and contingency planning, premises of professional operators, in particular forest nurseries and laboratories producing FRM, other relevant operators and natural persons; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Member States shall regularly review and, where appropriate, update their contingency plans to take account of the technical and scientific developments in relation to climate model simulations addressing the projected future distribution of the relevant tree species and artificial hybrids thereof. | Member States shall review every four years and, where appropriate, update their contingency plans to take account of the technical and scientific developments in relation to climate model simulations addressing the projected future distribution of the relevant tree species and artificial hybrids thereof. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) takes account of the projected future distribution of those tree species and artificial hybrids thereof. | (b) takes account of the different potential scenarios of future distribution of those tree species and artificial hybrids thereof. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Member States shall collaborate with each other and with all relevant stakeholders for the establishment of their contingency plans, on the basis of an exchange of best practices and experience gained with the establishment of those plans. | 5. Member States shall collaborate with each other and with all relevant stakeholders for the establishment of their prevention and contingency plans, on the basis of an exchange of best practices and experience gained with the establishment of those plans. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Member States shall make their contingency plans available to the Commission, the other Member States and all relevant professional operators through publication in FOREMATIS. | 6. Member States shall make their prevention and contingency plans available to the Commission, the other Member States and all relevant professional operators through publication in FOREMATIS. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (c) colour of the label for specific categories or other types of FRM; | deleted |
The introduction of a colour code will create significant red tape with no added value given the amount of information on the label.
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Basic material referred to in paragraph 1 shall be notified to the competent authorities in accordance with the format of FOREMATIS. | Basic material referred to in paragraph 1 shall be notified to the competent authorities in accordance with the format of EUFGIS. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. In order to overcome any temporary difficulties in the general supply of FRM that occur in one or more Member States, the Commission may, at the request of at least one Member States affected, temporarily authorise the Member States to approve for marketing, by means of an implementing act, FRM of one or more species that has been derived from basic material, which satisfies less stringent requirements than the ones set out in Article 4(1) and (2). | 1. In order to overcome any temporary difficulties in the general supply of FRM that occur in one or more Member States despite the prevention and contingency plan defined in Article 9, the Commission may, at the request of at least one Member States affected, authorise for one year the Member States to approve for marketing, by means of an implementing act, FRM of one or more species that has been derived from basic material, which satisfies less stringent requirements than the ones set out in Article 4(1) and (2). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2a. Where the Commission has to take action pursuant to paragraph 1, it shall require the Member States concerned to revise their prevention and contingency plans so they no longer have to have recourse to that derogation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| By way of derogation from Articles, 1, 4 and 5, the Commission may decide, by means of implementing acts, on the organisation of temporary experiments to seek improved alternatives to provisions of this Regulation concerning the species or artificial hybrids it applies to, the requirements for the approval of basic material and the production and marketing of FRM. | By way of derogation from Articles, 1, 4 and 5, the Commission may finance temporary experiments to seek improved alternatives to provisions of this Regulation concerning the species or artificial hybrids it applies to, the requirements for the approval of basic material and the production and marketing of FRM. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The implementing acts referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 27(2) and shall specify one or more of the following elements: | The experiments referred to in paragraph 1 shall concern one or more of the following elements: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Those acts shall take into account the evolution of: | Those experiments shall take into account the evolution of: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Those acts shall adapt to the evolution of techniques for production of the FRM concerned, and be based on any comparative trials and tests carried out by the Member States. | Those experiments shall adapt to the evolution of techniques for production of the FRM concerned, and be based on any comparative trials and tests carried out by the Member States. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Imports on the basis of Union equivalence | Imports on the basis of conformity with Union rules |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. FRM may be imported from third countries to the Union only if it is established, pursuant to paragraph 2, that it fulfils requirements equivalent to those applicable to FRM produced and marketed in the Union. | 1. FRM may be imported from third countries to the Union only if it is established, pursuant to paragraph 2, that it fulfils requirements in conformity with those applicable to FRM produced and marketed in the Union. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The Commission may decide, by means of implementing acts, if FRM of specific genera, species οr categories produced in a third country, fulfils requirements equivalent to those applicable to FRM produced and marketed in the Union, on the basis of all of the following: | The Commission may decide, by means of implementing acts, if FRM of specific genera, species οr categories produced in a third country, fulfils requirements in conformity with those applicable to FRM produced and marketed in the Union, on the basis of all of the following: |
| Abies alba Mill. |
| Abies cephalonica Loud. |
| Abies grandis Lindl. |
| Abies pinsapo Boiss. |
| Acer platanoides L. |
| Acer pseudoplatanus L. |
| Alnus glutinosa Gaertn. |
| Alnus incana Moench. |
| Betula pendula Roth. |
| Betula pubescens Ehrh. |
| Carpinus betulus L. |
| Castanea sativa Mill. |
| Cedrus atlantica Carr. |
| Cedrus libani A. Richard |
| Fagus sylvatica L. |
| Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. |
| Fraxinus excelsior L. |
| Larix decidua Mill. |
| Larix x eurolepis Henry |
| Larix kaempferi Carr. |
| Larix sibirica Ledeb. |
| Picea abies Karst. |
| Picea sitchensis Carr. |
| Pinus brutia Ten. |
| Pinus canariensis C. Smith |
| Pinus cembra L. |
| Pinus contorta Loud |
| Pinus halepensis Mill. |
| Pinus leucodermis Antoine |
| Pinus nigra Arnold |
| Pinus pinaster Ait. |
| Pinus pinea L. |
| Pinus radiata D. Don |
| Pinus sylvestris L. |
| Populus spp. et hybrides artificiels de ces essences |
| Prunus avium L. |
| Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco |
| Quercus cerris L. |
| Quercus ilex L. |
| Quercus petraea Liebl. |
| Quercus pubescens Willd. |
| Quercus robur L. |
| Quercus rubra L. |
| Quercus suber L. |
| Robinia pseudoacacia L. |
| Tilia cordata Mill. |
| Tilia platyphyllos Scop. |
| Abies alba Mill. |
| Abies bornmulleriana |
| Abies cephalonica Loud. |
| Abies grandis Lindl. |
| Abies pinsapo Boiss. |
| Acer campestre |
| Acer platanoides L. |
| Acer pseudoplatanus L. |
| Alnus cordata |
| Alnus glutinosa Gaertn. |
| Alnus incana Moench. |
| Betula pendula Roth. |
| Betula pubescens Ehrh. |
| Carpinus betulus L. |
| Castanea sativa Mill. |
| Cedrus atlantica Carr. |
| Cedrus libani A. Richard |
| Eucalyptus globulus |
| Eucalyptus gunni |
| Eucalyptus gunnii x dalrympleana hybrid |
| Eucalyptus nitens |
| Fagus sylvatica L. |
| Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. |
| Fraxinus excelsior L. |
| Juglans major x regia |
| Juglans nigra |
| Juglans nigra x regia |
| Juglans regia |
| Larix decidua Mill. |
| Larix x eurolepis Henry |
| Larix kaempferi Carr. |
| Larix sibirica Ledeb. |
| Malus sylvestris |
| Picea abies Karst. |
| Picea sitchensis Carr. |
| Pinus brutia Ten. |
| Pinus canariensis C. Smith |
| Pinus cembra L. |
| Pinus contorta Loud |
| Pinus halepensis Mill. |
| Pinus leucodermis Antoine |
| Pinus nigra Arnold |
| Pinus pinaster Ait. |
| Pinus pinea L. |
| Pinus radiata D. Don |
| Pinus sylvestris L. |
| Pinus taeda |
| Populus nigra |
| Populus spp. et hybrides artificiels de ces essences |
| Populus tremula |
| Prunus avium L. |
| Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco |
| Quercus cerris L. |
| Quercus ilex L. |
| Quercus petraea Liebl. |
| Quercus pubescens Willd. |
| Quercus robur L. |
| Quercus rubra L. |
| Quercus suber L. |
| Robinia pseudoacacia L. |
| Sorbus domestica |
| Sorbus torminalis |
| Tilia cordata Mill. |
| Tilia platyphyllos Scop. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) The trees shall be well-adapted to the climatic and ecological conditions including the biotic and abiotic factors prevailing in the region of provenance. | (a) The trees shall be able to adapt to the climatic and ecological conditions including the biotic and abiotic factors prevailing in the region of provenance, as they shall benefit from sufficient intraspecific genetic variation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) Stands shall be well-adapted to the climatic and ecological conditions, including the biotic and abiotic factors prevailing in the region of provenance. | (a) Stands shall be able to adapt to the climatic and ecological conditions, including the biotic and abiotic factors prevailing in the region of provenance, as they shall benefit from sufficient intraspecific genetic variation. |
Back matter, 1
Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.
Annexe: entités ou personnes dont le rapporteur pour avis a reçu des contributions 1 block
| Liste des entités ou personnes ayant apporté leur contribution au rapporteur |
| UCFF - Union des Coopératives Forestières Françaises |
| France Bois Forêt |
| Office National des Fôrets |
| Euraf - European Agroforestry Federation |
| Université de Picardie |
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2023). “DRAFT OPINION Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and marketing of forest reproductive material, amending Regulations (EU) 2016/2031 and 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 1999/105/EC (Regulation on forest reproductive material)”. Text, 7 December 2023. docId ENVI-PA-757165. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ENVI-PA-757165 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/ENVI-PA-757165 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-envi-pa-757165,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{DRAFT OPINION Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and marketing of forest reproductive material, amending Regulations (EU) 2016/2031 and 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 1999/105/EC (Regulation on forest reproductive material)}},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-12-07},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ENVI-PA-757165}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ENVI-PA-757165},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId ENVI-PA-757165. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}