Text · Opinion parliamentary committee
On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869
Full title
On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869
Document ENVI-AD-786822 · COM(2025)1006 – C100342/2025 – 2025/0399(COD)
- Kind
- Opinion parliamentary committee ENVI-AD-786822
- Date
- 24 June 2026
- Committee
- Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety
- Rapporteur
- Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
- Dossier
- 2025-0399
More facts (3)
- Formats
- Official page PDF Word
- Subject matter
- RTR, ENER
- Reference
- COM(2025)1006 – C100342/2025 – 2025/0399(COD)
Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
Short justification
In the current geopolitical context and following recent energy market disruptions, the rapporteur considers that the Union must strengthen its energy system to ensure security of supply, resilience and affordability, while remaining on track towards climate neutrality by 2050. The rapporteur underlines that achieving these objectives requires a well-functioning, fully integrated energy market supported by robust and forward-looking infrastructure planning covering electricity, renewable and low-carbon gases, hydrogen and other clean molecules.
The rapporteur underlines that, despite the challenges arising from the current geopolitical situation, the Union must remain firmly committed to its climate objectives and decarbonisation priorities. These objectives should not be weakened but rather pursued through a more integrated and efficient approach to energy system development. In this context, infrastructure projects should be designed in a complementary and mutually reinforcing manner, ensuring optimal system integration across electricity, gases and other energy carriers. The rapporteur emphasises that the core objective is to enable a coherent and integrated energy system that delivers on climate goals while ensuring cost-efficiency, avoiding unnecessary expenditure and maintaining energy infrastructure as a cornerstone of the Union’s economic stability and resilience.
The rapporteur considers that recent developments have demonstrated the necessity of diversification of energy sources and supply routes. No single technological pathway can address the needs of all Member States. The rapporteur therefore underlines the importance of home-grown energy, including renewable electricity as well as low-carbon solutions such as hydrogen, biomethane and synthetic fuels, where consistent with climate objectives and lifecycle emissions criteria, making use of the Union’s domestic potential, including agricultural resources and waste streams.
The rapporteur further considers that infrastructure planning must reflect the evolving composition of the energy system and increasing demand, including from emerging industrial uses, and should therefore avoid reliance on a single technological approach. In this context, the rapporteur underlines that system needs should be assessed holistically, including the contribution of firm and dispatchable low-carbon generation to system stability, congestion reduction and overall system efficiency.
A central objective of the amendments is to ensure the consistent application of the principle of technological neutrality, in line with Article 194(2) TFEU. The rapporteur considers that all relevant net-zero and low-carbon technologies should be assessed on the basis of their contribution to decarbonisation, security of supply and system stability, while fully respecting Member States’ right to determine their energy mix and ensuring consistency with the Union’s climate and environmental objectives.
The rapporteur also underlines the need to strengthen the resilience of the energy system, including through improved cyber and physical protection of critical infrastructure, as well as to ensure that infrastructure development is aligned with real system needs, avoids unnecessary costs and reduces environmental impact.
Consequently, the rapporteur considers robust governance indispensable to credible, implementable and environmentally sound infrastructure planning. The compromise confirms the Commission's central role in defining and adopting the central scenario, while ensuring it acts in cooperation with the Member States, in light of the national energy and climate plans, and adopts the final scenario only after consulting the Member States within the relevant Regional Groups. The technical expertise of ENTSO-E, ENTSOG and ENNOH is safeguarded and considered as crucial by the rapporteur, as they may develop additional models of the central scenario to identify needs not reflected in the Commission's modelling, acting as an early-warning mechanism for the robustness of the process.
Finally, the rapporteur considers that, in order to ensure the efficient use of existing assets and limit the need for new infrastructure, more emphasis should be put on the repurposing or/retrofitting of existing natural gas pipelines for the transport of renewable and low-carbon gases, including hydrogen, where technically and economically feasible. This approach reduces the need for resource-intensive new construction, thereby minimising environmental impacts, land use and ecosystem disruption, while supporting a cost-effective and timely energy transition in line with the Union’s climate objectives.
Back matter, 2
Parts that accompany the text rather than belong to it: explanatory statement, annexes, opinions appended by other committees. Collapsed.
Amendments 323 blocks
The Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety submits the following to the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible:
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (1) The Commission Communication of 26 February 2025 on the “Clean Industrial Deal”3 sets out a joint roadmap for competitiveness and decarbonisation. Securing affordable energy is a key condition for the competitiveness of the Union industry, especially for energy-intensive sectors. Access to affordable energy is therefore a cornerstone of the Clean Industrial Deal as well as the Action Plan for Affordable Energy4 . At the same time, decarbonisation policies are a powerful driver of growth when they are well integrated with industrial, competition, economic and trade policies as set out in the Commission Communication of 29 January 2025 on a “Competitiveness Compass for the EU”5 . With Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council6 , the Union has set out an ambitious framework to become a decarbonised economy by 2050. | (1) The Commission Communication of 26 February 2025 on the “Clean Industrial Deal”3 sets out a joint roadmap for competitiveness and decarbonisation. Securing clean, reliable, home-grown and affordable energy is a key condition for the competitiveness of the Union industry, especially for energy-intensive sectors. Access to affordable energy is therefore a cornerstone of the Clean Industrial Deal as well as the Action Plan for Affordable Energy4 . The Action Plan for Affordable Energy also indicates that every person, community, and business should benefit from the clean transition, and identifies investments in modernising and expanding the electricity network as essential to facilitate the deployment of renewables, electrification and new industrial and business demand. At the same time, decarbonisation policies are a powerful driver of growth when they are well integrated with industrial, competition, economic and trade policies as set out in the Commission Communication of 29 January 2025 on a “Competitiveness Compass for the EU”5 . With Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council6 , the Union has set out an ambitious framework to become a climate neutral economy by 2050. |
| 3 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 26 February 2025, “The Clean Industrial Deal: A joint roadmap for competitiveness and decarbonisation” (COM(2025) 85 final). | 3 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 26 February 2025, “The Clean Industrial Deal: A joint roadmap for competitiveness and decarbonisation” (COM(2025) 85 final). |
| 4 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 26 February 2025: “Action Plan for Affordable Energy - Unlocking the true value of our Energy Union to secure affordable, efficient and clean energy for all Europeans”, COM(2025) 79 final. | 4 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 26 February 2025: “Action Plan for Affordable Energy - Unlocking the true value of our Energy Union to secure affordable, efficient and clean energy for all Europeans”, COM(2025) 79 final. |
| 5 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 29 January 2025, “A Competitiveness Compass for the EU” (COM(2025) 30 final). | 5 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 29 January 2025, “A Competitiveness Compass for the EU” (COM(2025) 30 final). |
| 6 Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1119/oj). | 6 Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1119/oj). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (2) As part of the ambition of Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, the binding Union level target for renewable energy for 2030 has been increased to 42.5 % renewable energy in the Union’s energy mix by 2030, aiming for 45 %7 , and the binding Union level target for energy efficiency has been made more ambitious, with a reduction of Union final energy consumption by 11.7 % by 2030, compared to 2020 projections8 . With the intermediate target of at least 55 % net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction compared with 1990 levels by 2030 well on track, on 2 July 2025 the Commission proposed an amendment to Regulation (EU) 2021/11199 setting a Union climate target for 2040 of a 90 % reduction in net GHG emissions, compared to 1990 levels. | (2) As part of the ambition of Regulation (EU) 2021/1119, the binding Union level target for renewable energy for 2030 has been increased to 42.5 % renewable energy in the Union’s energy mix by 2030, aiming for 45 %7 , and the binding Union level target for energy efficiency has been made more ambitious, with a reduction of Union final energy consumption by 11.7 % by 2030, compared to 2020 projections8 . With the intermediate target of at least 55 % net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction compared with 1990 levels by 2030 well on track, on 2 July 2025 the Commission proposed an amendment to Regulation (EU) 2021/11199 setting a Union climate target for 2040 of a 90 % reduction in net GHG emissions, compared to 1990 levels and helps reduce dependency risks and shoring up the security of supply. |
| 7 Directive (EU) 2023/2413 of 18 October 2023 amending Directive (EU) 2018/2001, Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 and Directive 98/70/EC as regards the promotion of energy from renewable sources, and repealing Council Directive (EU) 2015/652 (OJ L, 2023/2413, 31.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/2413/oj). | 7 Directive (EU) 2023/2413 of 18 October 2023 amending Directive (EU) 2018/2001, Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 and Directive 98/70/EC as regards the promotion of energy from renewable sources, and repealing Council Directive (EU) 2015/652 (OJ L, 2023/2413, 31.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/2413/oj). |
| 8 Directive (EU) 2023/1791 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 on energy efficiency and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 (OJ L 231, 20.9.2023, p.1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/1791/oj). | 8 Directive (EU) 2023/1791 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 September 2023 on energy efficiency and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 (OJ L 231, 20.9.2023, p.1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/1791/oj). |
| 9 COM(2025) 524 final of 2 July 2025. | 9 COM(2025) 524 final of 2 July 2025. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3) Infrastructure needs to be in place to support the Union energy transition in accordance with those targets, including rapid electrification, scaling up renewable and fossil fuel free electricity generation, the increased use of renewable and low-carbon gases, energy integration and a higher uptake of innovative solutions. Current investments in cross-border energy infrastructure are clearly insufficient to transform and build the energy infrastructure needed to support those targets and there is a substantial gap between our cross-border electricity infrastructure needs and the speed and level of infrastructure development at both the transmission and distribution grid level.10 For electricity, about half of cross-border electricity needs for 2030 (41 of 88 GW) will remain unaddressed, and this gap is expected to increase the next decade. By 2040, cross-border electricity capacity needs will amount to 108 GW.11 . Increased investments in energy infrastructure are therefore necessary, and the Draghi report12 pointed in particular to the need to rapidly increase the deployment of cross-border energy infrastructure to decarbonise Europe’s industry. In the Clean Industrial Deal13 and the accompanying “Action Plan for Affordable Energy”14 , the Commission underlined the crucial role of completing the Energy Union by investing in energy infrastructure and cross-border grids for safeguarding the competitiveness of Union industry and the prosperity of people as well as for the affordability and security of energy supply. | (3) Infrastructure needs to be in place to support the Union energy transition in accordance with those targets, including rapid electrification, scaling up renewable, fossil fuel free electricity generation, the increased use of renewable and low-carbon gases, energy integration and a higher uptake of innovative solutions and solutions based on net-zero technologies as defined in Regulation (EU) 2024/17359a, in accordance with the principle of technological neutrality. Current investments in cross-border energy infrastructure are clearly insufficient to transform and build the energy infrastructure needed to support those targets and there is a substantial gap between our cross-border electricity infrastructure needs and the speed and level of infrastructure development at both the transmission and distribution grid level.10 For electricity, about half of cross-border electricity needs for 2030 (41 of 88 GW) will remain unaddressed, and this gap is expected to increase the next decade. By 2040, cross-border electricity capacity needs will amount to 108 GW.11 . Increased investments in energy infrastructure are therefore necessary, and the Draghi report12 pointed in particular to the need to rapidly increase the deployment of cross-border energy infrastructure to decarbonise Europe’s industry. In the Clean Industrial Deal13 and the accompanying “Action Plan for Affordable Energy”14 , the Commission underlined the crucial role of completing the Energy Union by investing in energy infrastructure and cross-border grids for safeguarding the competitiveness of Union industry and the prosperity of people as well as for the affordability and security of energy supply. To ensure consistency between Union funding instruments and the evolving policy framework supporting the deployment of net-zero technologies, the TEN-E should enable support for cross-border projects contributing to the deployment and system integration of net-zero technologies, in addition to projects based on renewable energy cooperation. |
| 9a Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology manufacturing ecosystem and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (OJ L, 2024/1735, 28.6.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1735/oj). | |
| 10 ACER (2024): Electricity infrastructure development to support a competitive and sustainable energy system (2024 Monitoring Report) | 10 ACER (2024): Electricity infrastructure development to support a competitive and sustainable energy system (2024 Monitoring Report) |
| 11 ENTSO-E (2025), TYNDP 2024. Opportunities for a more efficient European power system by 2050. Infrastructure Gaps Report. | 11 ENTSO-E (2025), TYNDP 2024. Opportunities for a more efficient European power system by 2050. Infrastructure Gaps Report. |
| 12 M. Draghi (2025): “The future of European competitiveness”. | 12 M. Draghi (2025): “The future of European competitiveness”. |
| 13 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 26 February 2025, “The Clean Industrial Deal: A joint roadmap for competitiveness and decarbonisation”, COM(2025) 85 final. | 13 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 26 February 2025, “The Clean Industrial Deal: A joint roadmap for competitiveness and decarbonisation”, COM(2025) 85 final. |
| 14 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 26 February 2025, “Action Plan for Affordable Energy - Unlocking the true value of our Energy Union to secure affordable, efficient and clean energy for all Europeans” (COM(2025) 79 final). | 14 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 26 February 2025, “Action Plan for Affordable Energy - Unlocking the true value of our Energy Union to secure affordable, efficient and clean energy for all Europeans” (COM(2025) 79 final). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3a) Increasing pressure on electricity grids due to rapid electrification and rising demand underscores the need for firm, dispatchable generation that can strengthen grid stability and alleviate transmission congestion. Nuclear energy, particularly advanced technologies, may, for Member States that choose to include this energy source in their national energy mix, provide a reliable source of electricity that enhances system performance by delivering flexible, dispatchable power with grid-supporting characteristics that maintain frequency stability, reduce fluctuations, and may contribute to enabling the integration of variable renewable energy. For those Member States, and where relevant, the infrastructure required to connect this capacity to trans-European transmission networks could be part of the cross-border projects considered in the Union-level planning alongside offshore and onshore renewable energy infrastructure, supporting energy security, market integration, and affordable energy prices. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3b) The expansion, upgrade, development, and integration of the trans-European energy network should be planned and deployed in accordance with the principle of technological neutrality. This implies that Union support should not favour or discriminate against specific technologies or technical solutions, where different technologies are capable of contributing to environmental sustainability and climate objectives, as well as to deliver future-proof, interoperable, and resilient infrastructure. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (3c) In the current geopolitical context, strengthening the Union’s energy security, industrial competitiveness and strategic resilience require the accelerated deployment of cross-border energy infrastructure that supports electrification, the integration of renewable and low-carbon energy sources and system flexibility. Existing Union legislation and instruments, including the Clean Industrial Deal, the Action Plan for Affordable Energy, the Net-Zero Industry Act, the decarbonised gas and hydrogen package, the Innovation Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility, provide dedicated frameworks and support mechanisms to facilitate the development of net-zero technologies and industrial decarbonisation. In this context, this Regulation should focus on those cross-border infrastructure projects that deliver clear European added value, contribute to market integration, affordability, security of supply and climate neutrality, while ensuring the efficient use, modernisation and repurposing of existing assets, where technically and economically justified. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (5) While the objectives of Regulation (EU) 2022/869 remain largely valid, the current trans-European energy networks framework should be adjusted to fully reflect the expected changes to the energy system that will result from the new policy context and in particular the 2050 climate neutrality objective and the proposed intermediary target for 2040. In particular, there is a need for more integrated grid planning to support an increasingly interdependent and decentralised internal energy market, faster permit granting processes and to ensure the security and resilience of cross-border energy infrastructure to be adequately reflected in the revised trans-European energy networks framework. Besides the new political context and objectives, technological development has been rapid in the past decade. That development should be taken into account in the energy infrastructure categories covered by this Regulation, the selection criteria for projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest as well as the priority corridors and areas. At the same time, the provisions of this Regulation should not affect a Member State’s right to determine the conditions for exploiting its energy resources, its choice between different energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply, in accordance with Article 194 of the Treaty. | (5) While the objectives of Regulation (EU) 2022/869 remain largely valid, the current trans-European energy networks framework should be adjusted to fully reflect the expected changes to the energy system that will result from the new policy context and in particular the 2050 climate neutrality objective and the proposed intermediary target for 2040. In particular, there is a need for more integrated grid planning, including super grids connecting Member States and the Union's neighbouring regions, to support an increasingly interdependent and decentralised internal energy market, faster permit granting processes and to ensure the security and resilience of cross-border energy infrastructure to be adequately reflected in the revised trans-European energy networks framework. Besides the new political context and objectives, technological development has been rapid in the past decade. That development should be taken into account in the energy infrastructure categories covered by this Regulation, the selection criteria for projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest as well as the priority corridors and areas. At the same time, the provisions of this Regulation should not affect a Member State’s right to determine the conditions for exploiting its energy resources, its choice between different energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply, in accordance with Article 194 of the Treaty. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (5a) In order to ensure cost-efficiency, affordability for consumers and alignment with Union climate objectives, the selection of infrastructure under this Regulation should be based on technologies and system solutions that are mature, scalable and economically competitive. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (6) The implementation of the identified 13 trans-European energy infrastructure priority corridors and thematic areas is essential for the achievement of the Union’s energy and climate targets including further market integration, energy security, the 2050 climate neutrality objective as well as affordability of energy prices. Those priorities cover investments in electricity transmission and storage, offshore grids for renewable energy, smart electricity grids, equipment and installation designed to ensure protection and resilience of existing critical network elements, hydrogen transmission, storage and terminals, electrolysers, and the transport and storage of carbon dioxide as well as monitoring, control and digitalisation equipment and installation essential for existing high-voltage networks of cross-border relevance. | (6) The implementation of the identified 13 trans-European energy infrastructure priority corridors and thematic areas is essential for the achievement of the Union’s energy and climate, pollution and biodiversity targets including further market integration, energy security, the 2050 climate neutrality objective as well as affordability of energy prices. Those priorities cover investments in electricity transmission, conversion and storage, offshore grids for renewable energy, super grids, smart electricity grids, strategic infrastructure supporting the production, integration and transport of fossil-fuel-free energy, and transport of biomethane produced from renewable sources, equipment and installation designed to ensure protection and resilience of existing critical network elements, hydrogen transmission, conversion, storage and terminals, electrolysers and the transport and storage of carbon dioxide as well as monitoring, control and digitalisation equipment and installation essential for existing high-voltage networks of cross-border relevance. The priority corridors also cover investments in stand-alone or supporting infrastructure, including connection components and other eligible technologies, where such elements enable the cost-effective deployment, integration or use of the network or of diverse generation mixes in line with the objectives of this Regulation. Where applicable and economically justified, the connection of energy generation facilities to transmission or distribution networks, where such connection forms an integral part of the project and effectively enables the integration, operation or use of the network, may be considered as contributing to the cost-effective deployment of infrastructure and to the integration of diverse generation mixes in line with the objectives of this Regulation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (6a) Achieving the Union’s objectives of climate neutrality by 2050, security of supply, and industrial competitiveness requires, in line with the principle of technological neutrality, the timely deployment and system integration of a broad range of net-zero technologies. Cross-border cooperation can help overcome coordination challenges, reduce costs, and accelerate deployment, particularly for projects involving multi-jurisdictional permitting, shared benefits and risks, or coordinated planning and investment across Member States. Therefore, in addition to the priorities identified in the TEN-E Regulation, this Regulation should support cross-border energy and infrastructure projects contributing to the deployment of net-zero technologies recognised under Union law, including those within the scope of Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 and activities substantially contributing to climate change mitigation under Regulation (EU) 2020/852, where such projects demonstrably address cross-border coordination needs or deliver system-wide benefits that would not be realised through national action alone, without prejudice to Member States’ right to determine their energy mix in accordance with the Treaties. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (6b) The integration of clean molecules other than hydrogen could play a role in the future for the decarbonisation, resilience, interoperability and flexibility of the Union's energy system. Infrastructure enabling the transport, storage, conversion and system integration of renewable gases, may support sector integration across the electricity, gas, thermal and industrial systems, and contribute to security of supply. The development of such infrastructure could complement existing infrastructure priorities under this Regulation. Therefore, the Commission may take such integration into account, where appropriate, in the context of a review of this Regulation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (7) The Union’s energy infrastructure should be upgraded in order to increase its resilience against natural or man-made disasters, adverse effects of climate change, deliberate hostile actions and threats to its security, in particular as regards European critical infrastructures pursuant to Directive 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council16 . | (7) The Union’s energy infrastructure should be upgraded in order to increase its resilience against natural or man-made disasters, adverse effects of climate change and geopolitical crises, deliberate hostile actions, threats to its security and external interference, in particular as regards European critical infrastructures pursuant to Directive 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council16 . and a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union pursuant to Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council16a. A well-functioning, resilient and interconnected energy infrastructure is essential for the Union’s security of supply, the functioning of the internal energy market, and solidarity among Member States. Given the increasing geopolitical, cyber, climate and technical risks, Union-funded energy infrastructure should support system resilience, including preparedness for disruptions and rapid recovery in case of failure. Network planning and design should also consider these and other risks, with particular attention to the vulnerability of centralized infrastructure to natural and man-made disasters and the effects of sustained climate variability on the energy system and its elements. The resilience of trans-European energy infrastructure is a cross-cutting objective encompassing two complementary requirements: the capacity to withstand deliberate hostile actions, sabotage, and other security threats, including physical, cyber, and hybrid threats; and the ability to adapt to the adverse effects of climate change, including the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events and long-term changes in average climate conditions that may reduce the capacity, efficiency and lifespan of energy infrastructure assets. These requirements apply to all energy infrastructure categories and carriers subject to this Regulation and are relevant across interconnected networks. Given these systemic interdependencies, infrastructure resilience should be addressed in a comprehensive, integrated and cross-sectoral manner, consistent with the 'one energy system' concept referred to in this Regulation, and should not be limited to individual infrastructure categories or specific types of hazard. Infrastructure projects should align with the principles outlined in the Commission Notice Technical Guidance on the climate proofing of infrastructure in the period 2021-202716b. The integration from the earliest planning and design stages of ecosystem-based features into infrastructure projects can enhance efficiencies, support climate change mitigation and resilience, reduce pollution, increase biodiversity, and benefit human well-being and health, while ensuring that the infrastructure remains safe, functional and adaptable throughout its lifecycle. Where relevant, the planning and design processes should include an assessment of the potential for integrating such features. The Commission should provide guidance and a template to facilitate this assessment. |
| 16 Directive EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on the resilience of critical entities and repealing Council Directive 2008/114/EC (OJ L 333, 27.12.2022, p. 164, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2557/oj). | 16 Directive EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on the resilience of critical entities and repealing Council Directive 2008/114/EC (OJ L 333, 27.12.2022, p. 164, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2557/oj). |
| 16a Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union, amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2018/1972, and repealing Directive (EU) 2016/1148 (NIS 2 Directive) (OJ L 333, 27.12.2022, p. 80, ELI http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2555/oj). | |
| 16b Commission Notice ‘Technical Guidance on the climate proofing of infrastructure in the period 2021-2027’, C(2021) 5430 final. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (8) In the current geopolitical context, it is important to ensure the uninterrupted flow of electricity across borders to ensure security of supply. This depends not only on the resilience of interconnectors between Member States, but also on the resilience of critical network elements. Therefore, this Regulation should introduce a new infrastructure category in the form of investments into equipment and installations directly connected to and designed to enhance the critical network elements’ resilience and protection. That new infrastructure category should cover critical network elements, as set out in Regulation (EU) 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council17 , that support network security and supply security in accordance with the Member States’ crisis scenarios and risk preparedness plans under Regulation (EU) 2019/941 of the European Parliament and of the Council18 . | (8) In the current geopolitical context, it is important to ensure the uninterrupted flow of electricity across borders to ensure security of supply. To this end, the Commission’s upcoming proposal for the revision of the energy security framework should aim to strengthen the Union’s energy security by ensuring that the Union energy system remains secure, resilient and adaptable to an evolving energy, climate and geopolitical landscape. The resilience of energy infrastructure constitutes a shared challenge across all network sectors, and the protection of critical network elements needs therefore to be addressed in a comprehensive manner across electricity, hydrogen, renewable gas, carbon dioxide transport and storage, and other eligible energy infrastructure and carriers subject to this Regulation. Security of supply depends not only on the resilience of interconnectors between Member States, but also on the resilience of critical network elements. Therefore, this Regulation should introduce a new infrastructure category, in the form of investments into equipment and installations directly connected to and designed to enhance the resilience and protection of critical network elements. That new infrastructure category should cover critical network elements across all network sectors covered by Regulation (EU) 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council17 , that support network security and supply security in accordance with the Member States’ crisis scenarios and risk preparedness plans under Regulation (EU) 2019/941 of the European Parliament and of the Council18 . Where relevant, energy infrastructure projects may include interoperability or interface capacity with strategic systems for the purpose of enhancing crisis response capabilities. |
| 17 Regulation (EU) 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the internal market for electricity (OJ L 158, 14.6.2019, p. 54, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/943/oj). | 17 Regulation (EU) 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the internal market for electricity (OJ L 158, 14.6.2019, p. 54, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/943/oj). |
| 18 Regulation (EU) 2019/941 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on risk-preparedness in the electricity sector and repealing Directive 2005/89/EC (OJ L 158, 14.6.2019, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/941/oj). | 18 Regulation (EU) 2019/941 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on risk-preparedness in the electricity sector and repealing Directive 2005/89/EC (OJ L 158, 14.6.2019, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/941/oj). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (12) Regional groups (Groups) should be established for the purpose of proposing and reviewing projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest, leading to the establishment of regional lists of projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest. In order to ensure broad consensus, those Groups should include and ensure close cooperation between Member States, national regulatory authorities, project promoters and relevant stakeholders. In the context of that cooperation, national regulatory authorities should, where necessary, advise Groups, inter alia, on the feasibility of the national regulatory aspects of proposed projects and on the feasibility of the proposed timetable for regulatory approval. | (12) Regional groups (Groups) should be established for the purpose of proposing and reviewing projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest, leading to the establishment of regional lists of projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest. In order to ensure broad consensus, those Groups should include and ensure close cooperation between Member States, national regulatory authorities, project promoters and relevant stakeholders. The composition, the activity and decisions of Regionals Groups should be accessible to public and published on the PCI transparency Platform website. In the context of that cooperation, national regulatory authorities should, where necessary, advise Groups, inter alia, on the feasibility of the national regulatory aspects of proposed projects and on the feasibility of the proposed timetable for regulatory approval. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (15) A new Union list of projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest (“the Union list”) should be established every two years. Projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest that have been completed or that no longer fulfil the relevant criteria and requirements as set out in this Regulation should not appear on the subsequent Union list. | (15) A new Union list of projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest (“the Union list”) should be established every two years. Projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest that have been completed or that no longer fulfil the relevant criteria and requirements as set out in this Regulation should not appear on the subsequent Union list. In light of evolving political priorities and the rapid technological developments, those developments should be taken into account in the energy infrastructure categories covered by future reviews of this Regulation, as well as in the selection criteria for projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest and the definition of priority corridors and areas. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (18) Projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest should comply with common, transparent and objective general and specific criteria in view of their contribution to the energy policy objectives. In order to be eligible for inclusion in the Union list, proposed electricity projects, with the exception of smart electricity grids and projects specifically designed to provide protection and resilience to existing critical network elements, should be part of the latest available Union-wide ten-year network development plan. Likewise, proposed hydrogen and electrolyser projects should be part of the latest available Union-wide ten-year network development plan. | (18) Projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest should comply with common, transparent and objective general and specific criteria in view of their contribution to the energy policy objectives, including supply security, industrial competitiveness, and energy infrastructure resilience, without unjustified technological discrimination. In order to be eligible for inclusion in the Union list, proposed electricity projects, with the exception of smart electricity grids and projects specifically designed to provide protection and resilience to existing critical network elements, should be part of the latest available Union-wide ten-year network development plan. Likewise, proposed hydrogen and electrolyser projects should be included, together with projects involving the adaptation or repurposing of existing infrastructure and equipment, where technically feasible and most efficient, in the latest available Union-wide ten-year network development plan. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (21) The Union should facilitate infrastructure projects linking Union networks directly with third-country networks which are mutually beneficial and necessary for the energy transition and the achievement of the climate targets, and which also meet the specific criteria of the relevant infrastructure categories pursuant to this Regulation. To reinforce the focus on cross-border projects and to maintain complementarity with the Union’s external policy, in the case of projects of mutual interest, the projects should directly connect a Member State with the first electricity network connection point or the first hydrogen or carbon dioxide connection point in the third country. | (21) The Union should facilitate infrastructure projects linking Union networks directly with third-country networks, including cross-border and super grids, which are mutually beneficial and necessary for the energy transition and the achievement of the climate targets, and which also meet the specific criteria of the relevant infrastructure categories pursuant to this Regulation. To reinforce the focus on cross-border projects and to maintain complementarity with the Union’s external policy, in the case of projects of mutual interest, the projects should directly connect a Member State with the first network connection point of corresponding infrastructure located in the third country. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (23) It is necessary to ensure that projects of mutual interest, which are granted priority treatment, genuinely advance the Union’s internal market, security of supply and climate neutrality objectives. Therefore, projects of mutual interest should be eligible for inclusion in the Union list only where the policy framework of a third country involved has a high level of convergence and is supported by enforcement mechanisms, and such projects demonstrate a contribution to the Union’s and the third countries’ overall energy and climate policy objectives in terms of security of supply and decarbonisation. | (23) It is necessary to ensure that projects of mutual interest, which are granted priority treatment, genuinely advance the Union’s internal market, circular economy, security of supply and climate neutrality objectives, in full alignment with the principle of technological neutrality. Therefore, projects of mutual interest should be eligible for inclusion in the Union list only where the policy framework of a third country involved has a high level of convergence and is supported by enforcement mechanisms, and such projects demonstrate a contribution to the Union’s and the third countries’ overall energy and climate policy objectives in terms of security of supply and decarbonisation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (29) The permit-granting process should neither lead to administrative burdens which are disproportionate to the size or complexity of a project, nor create barriers to the development of the trans-European networks and market access. | (29) The permit-granting process should neither lead to administrative burdens which are disproportionate to the size or complexity of a project, nor create barriers to the development of the trans-European networks and market access. The process should include adequate information provision and stakeholder consultation, while upholding Union or national laws regarding access to justice in environmental matters. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (37) In order to speed up the deployment of the trans-European energy network, the conditions for applying specific derogations as set out in Union environmental legislation should be clear. In particular, when assessing whether there are satisfactory alternative solutions to energy projects, the scope of such assessment should be limited to alternative solutions that ensure the achievement of the same objective within the same or similar timeframe and without resulting in significantly higher costs. When comparing the timeframe and the cost of satisfactory alternative solutions, the relevant authorities should be able to take into account the need to deploy projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest in an accelerated and cost-effective manner in accordance with the priorities set out in their integrated national energy and climate plans and updates thereof submitted to the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1999. | (37) In order to speed up the deployment of the trans-European energy network, the conditions for applying specific derogations as set out in Union environmental legislation should be clear. In particular, when assessing whether there are satisfactory alternative solutions to energy projects, the scope of such assessment should be limited to alternative solutions that ensure the achievement of the same objective within the same or similar timeframe, without significantly increasing costs or reducing system resilience. The assessment should rely on the best available scientific and technical knowledge. When comparing the timeframe and the cost of satisfactory alternative solutions, the relevant authorities should be able to take into account the need to deploy projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest in an accelerated and cost-effective manner in accordance with the priorities set out in their integrated national energy and climate plans and updates thereof submitted to the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1999. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (46) It is important to streamline and improve the permit-granting process, while respecting, to the extent possible and with due regard to the principle of subsidiarity, national competences and procedures for the construction of new energy infrastructure. Given the urgency of developing energy infrastructures, the simplification of the permit-granting process should set a clear time limit for the decision of the relevant authorities regarding the construction of the project. That time limit should stimulate an efficient definition and handling of procedures. This Regulation should establish maximum time limits. However, Member States can strive to achieve shorter time limits where feasible, in particular, as regards projects such as smart grids, which may not require as complex a permit-granting process as the one for transmission infrastructure. | (46) It is important to streamline and improve the permit-granting process, while respecting, to the extent possible and with due regard to the principle of subsidiarity, national competences and procedures for the construction of new energy infrastructure. Given the urgency of developing and strengthening energy infrastructures, the simplification of the permit-granting process should set a clear time limit for the decision of the relevant authorities regarding the construction of the project. That time limit should stimulate an efficient definition and handling of procedures. This Regulation should establish maximum time limits. However, Member States can strive to achieve shorter time limits where feasible, in particular, as regards projects such as smart grids, which may not require as complex a permit-granting process as the one for transmission infrastructure. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (47) The lack of resources of permit-granting authorities and the lack of digitalisation of permit-granting processes and data availability are bottlenecks slowing down permit-granting processes. Digitalisation and an appropriate use of artificial intelligence features are expected to speed up procedures and to increase efficiency of processes by allowing for faster handling of applications and increase transparency through improved access to information on procedural steps and requirements. However, digitalisation of permit-granting processes is lagging behind, with data often scattered across different competent authorities without unified digital processes or platforms, and without interoperability being ensured. That leads to lack of clarity on the status of the applications and hindering the identification of bottlenecks. Therefore, Member States should set up a digital platform at national level for all the steps of the permit-granting processes for renewable energy, storage and grid projects so that the digitalisation of procedures is uniform, interoperable and transparent maximising its benefits in terms of speeding up the permit-granting process. Such platforms should enable project promoters to file applications and check their status, attribute them to the competent authorities, and allow authorities to process them by having access to all relevant data and information, without the need for intermediate paper-based steps. In addition, such platform should allow for the extraction of statistics on the overall progress of permit-granting processes in Member States. Such digital platforms should rely on secure and interoperable means provided through European Digital Identity Wallets, in compliance with the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, for natural persons and, in the future, with European Business Wallets, in compliance with [Regulation (EU) No XXX/20YY], for legal persons, for enabling electronic identification and authentication, signing or sealing of documents, submission of documents and sending or receiving notifications between competent authorities and economic operators | (47) The lack of resources of permit-granting authorities and the lack of digitalisation of permit-granting processes and data availability are bottlenecks slowing down permit-granting processes. Digitalisation and an appropriate use of artificial intelligence features are expected to speed up procedures and to increase efficiency of processes by allowing for faster handling of applications and increase transparency through improved access to information on procedural steps and requirements. However, digitalisation of permit-granting processes is lagging behind, with data often scattered across different competent authorities without unified digital processes or platforms, and without interoperability being ensured. That leads to lack of clarity on the status of the applications and hindering the identification of bottlenecks. Therefore, Member States should make available a digital portal at national level for all the steps of the permit-granting processes for renewable energy, storage and grid projects so that the digitalisation of procedures is uniform, interoperable and transparent maximising its benefits in terms of speeding up the permit-granting process. Such portals should enable project promoters to file applications and check their status, attribute them to the competent authorities, and allow authorities to process them by having access to all relevant data and information, without the need for intermediate paper-based steps. In addition, such portals should allow for the extraction of statistics on the overall progress of permit-granting processes in Member States. Such portals should rely on secure and interoperable means provided through European Digital Identity Wallets, in compliance with the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, for natural persons and, in the future, with European Business Wallets, in compliance with [Regulation (EU) No XXX/20YY], for legal persons, for enabling electronic identification and authentication, signing or sealing of documents, submission of documents and sending or receiving notifications between competent authorities and economic operators. Portal operators should provide a dedicated contact point that project promoters and other stakeholders can reach out to in case of technical issues with the digital portal. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (52) The Union-wide ten-year network development plan process provides a solid basis for the identification of projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest. While the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH) and TSOs continue to play an important role in the process, more streamlining and steering is required, in particular as regards defining the scenarios for the future, identifying long-term infrastructure gaps and energy infrastructure bottlenecks and addressing those gaps with most adequate solutions, to increase the political weight, pertinence and robustness of the process. Therefore, the Agency and the Commission should have an increased role in the process for drawing up the Union-wide ten-year network development plans pursuant to Regulations (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789. | (52) The Union-wide ten-year network development plan process provides a solid basis for the identification of projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest. While the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO for Electricity), the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSO for Gas), the European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen (ENNOH) and TSOs continue to play an important role in the process, more streamlining and steering is required, in particular as regards defining the scenarios for the future, identifying long-term infrastructure gaps and energy infrastructure bottlenecks and addressing those gaps with most adequate solutions, to increase the political weight, pertinence and robustness of the process. The Agency and the Commission should enhance their planning and coordination role in the process for drawing up the Union-wide ten-year network development plans pursuant to Regulations (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789, leveraging the increasing involvement of ENTSO for Electricity, ENTSO for Gas, ENNOH, and TSOs in identifying infrastructure needs and providing relevant input to the network development plans, while preventing possible conflicts of interest resulting from the joint role of system planner and project promoter. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (53) Considering that the selected scenario and its underlying assumptions play a major role in the Union-wide network development planning process, the Commission should play a central role in defining it. That should help streamline the inputs and ensure better compliance with the Union’s policy targets. It is also appropriate for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans to be based on one central scenario, with possible sensitivity analyses to the scenario in case of change of external conditions, because the main purpose of the scenario is to provide a common basis for the assessment of the infrastructure gaps and benefits of candidate projects of common interest and project of mutual interest. The increased importance of the central scenario requires close involvement of the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, and the ENTSO for Gas, the Member States and the Agency to ensure that relevant data and information is provided, and that the scenario is aligned with national developments. The Stakeholder Reference Group should continue providing coordinated stakeholder input and advice on scenario development. | (53) Considering that the selected scenario and its underlying assumptions play a major role in the Union-wide network development planning process, the Commission should play a central role in defining it. That should help streamline the inputs and ensure better compliance with the Union’s policy targets. It is also appropriate for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans to be based on one central scenario, with sensitivity analyses to the scenario structured by different pathways to the Union’s policy targets that reflect a variety of external conditions and stress factors, because the main purpose of the scenario is to provide a common basis for the assessment of the infrastructure gaps for long-term planning of the Union’s energy networks, as well as for assessing the benefits of candidate projects of common interest and project of mutual interest. Additional sensitivity analyses may be carried out in case of change to external conditions or additional uncertainties that could significantly impact the validity or outcomes of the original scenario, ensuring a comprehensive and resilient planning process that accounts for a range of potential future developments. The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH may develop additional models of the central scenario based on the assumptions and data provided by the Commission, to identify infrastructure needs or system parameters potentially not captured in the Commission’s modelling and to serve as an early warning mechanism for the robustness of the infrastructure needs and planning. The increased importance of the central scenario requires close involvement of the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENNOH, and the ENTSO for Gas, the Member States and the Agency to ensure that relevant data and information is provided, and that the scenario is aligned with national developments. The Stakeholder Reference Group should continue providing coordinated stakeholder input and advice on scenario development. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (53a) In order to ensure the robustness of infrastructure assessments and to facilitate regulatory reality checks consistent with national circumstances, the systematic development of sensitivity analyses and additional scenarios based on national data and conditions should be encouraged. The use of such sensitivities and alternative scenarios enables project promoters and decision-makers to assess infrastructure needs and the value of projects under varying conditions. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (55a) Grid infrastructure planning should reflect the full range of system-level solutions available to address identified infrastructure needs, including both network-side and generation-side contributions to system stability and congestion relief. Stable, predictable, and dispatchable clean power generation, can reduce peak flows on interconnectors and transmission corridors. Transmission system operators and the ENTSO for Electricity should therefore assess, as part of the infrastructure needs identification process, the flexibility needs of the system. That approach supports efficient use of public and private investment and avoids unnecessary expansion of grid infrastructure where system-level alternatives provide equivalent or superior outcomes. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (57) The Union-wide ten-year network development plan should provide a comprehensive overview of planned infrastructure projects having cross-border impacts in the Union. Non-wire and flexibility solutions should form an intrinsic part of the plan so that it provides a full picture of future investments necessary for optimal operation of the electricity and hydrogen networks. A specific consideration should also be given to projects improving security and resilience of the network. | (57) The Union-wide ten-year network development plan should provide a comprehensive overview of planned infrastructure projects having cross-border impacts in the Union. Non-wire and flexibility solutions should form an intrinsic part of the plan so that it provides a full picture of future investments necessary for optimal operation of the electricity and hydrogen and other carriers pursuant to this Regulation. A specific consideration should also be given to projects improving security and resilience of the network, including the interaction of different supply and flexibility resources in ensuring adequacy and stability of the energy system. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (59) Energy infrastructure planning should properly reflect sector coupling and cross-linkages between energy carriers. The scenarios’ development, the process of identifying infrastructure needs and the methodologies for cost-benefit analysis should be based on an integrated, long-term and optimised ‘one energy system’ approach and modelling which uses common assumptions and consistent methodologies. Greater coordination of infrastructure planning across sectors should help prioritise and deploy new infrastructure solutions in a more optimal manner. | (59) Energy infrastructure planning should properly reflect sector coupling and cross-linkages between energy carriers. The scenarios’ development, the process of identifying infrastructure needs and the methodologies for cost-benefit analysis should be based on an integrated, long-term and optimised ‘one energy system’ approach and modelling which uses common assumptions and consistent methodologies. Greater coordination of infrastructure planning across sectors should help prioritise and deploy new infrastructure solutions in a more optimal manner, including the interaction of different supply and flexibility resources in ensuring system adequacy and stability. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (60a) Grid-supportive and grid-optimization assets, including non-wire solutions, flexibility and energy storage, among others, should be considered in identifying infrastructure needs and optimising the use of existing electricity networks by Member States and National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs). Such solutions should be considered at all voltage levels, including transmission networks, and their value assessed and reflected in grid planning and remuneration methodologies of said investments. Such assets can contribute to decarbonization, reaching the Union's climate neutrality objectives, congestion relief, efficient use of network capacity, system security and cross-border integration, in line with the objectives of this Regulation and without prejudice to the application of Directive (EU) 2019/944. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (63a) The completion of an integrated and efficient internal electricity market requires significant investment in cross-border infrastructure and measures addressing structural network constraints. Congestion income generated within Member States as a result of price differences between bidding zones should be used in accordance with the objectives set out in Article 19(2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943. Where those objectives have been adequately fulfilled, congestion revenues may be used, in accordance with Union electricity market design rules, for investments that contribute to reducing structural congestion and improving system efficiency. This should contribute to a fair allocation of infrastructure costs and help avoid the disproportionate externalisation of costs arising from persistent structural congestion, while respecting Member States' discretion over the use of congestion revenues in accordance with Union law. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (64) In an increasingly interconnected internal energy market, clear and transparent rules for cross-border cost-allocation are necessary in order to accelerate investment in cross-border infrastructure and in projects with a cross-border impact. As cross-border energy infrastructure becomes more integrated, more projects deliver benefits beyond the territories where they are built. That makes fair and transparent cost-sharing essential to avoid disproportionate burdens on local consumers. The discussion on the appropriate allocation of costs should be based on the analysis of the costs and benefits of an infrastructure project carried out on the basis of a harmonised methodology for energy-system-wide analysis, using the central scenario and any sensitivity analysis established for the purpose of the Union-wide ten-year network development plans prepared pursuant to Regulations (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789, allowing for a robust analysis of the contribution of the project of common interest or mutual interest to the Union energy policies of decarbonisation, market integration, competition, sustainability and security of supply. Member States and national regulatory authorities in which at least 10 % of the benefits of a project are located should participate in discussions on cost allocation to ensure that the project can be implemented and its benefits delivered. Furthermore, cross-border cost allocation agreements should consider ex-post arrangements to ensure fair and proportionate participation of non-host countries, provided that such adjustments are clearly defined and structured in a way that safeguards investment certainty. | (64) In an increasingly interconnected internal energy market, clear and transparent rules for cross-border cost-allocation are necessary in order to accelerate investment in cross-border infrastructure and in projects with a cross-border impact. As cross-border energy infrastructure becomes more integrated, more projects deliver benefits beyond the territories where they are built. That makes fair and transparent cost-sharing essential to avoid disproportionate burdens on local consumers. The discussion on the appropriate allocation of costs should be based on the analysis of the costs and benefits of an infrastructure project carried out on the basis of a harmonised methodology for energy-system-wide analysis, using the central scenario and any sensitivity analysis established for the purpose of the Union-wide ten-year network development plans prepared pursuant to Regulations (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789, allowing for a robust analysis of the contribution of the project of common interest or mutual interest to the Union energy policies of decarbonisation, market integration, competition, circular economy, sustainability and security of supply. Member States and national regulatory authorities involved in infrastructure developments and in which at least 10 % of the benefits of a project are located should participate in discussions on cost allocation to ensure that the project can be implemented and its benefits delivered. Furthermore, cross-border cost allocation agreements should consider ex-post arrangements to ensure fair and proportionate participation of non-host countries, provided that such adjustments are clearly defined and structured in a way that safeguards investment certainty. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (70a) The development of a European hydrogen network is necessary to support the decarbonisation of hard-to-abate sectors, strengthen energy system integration and contribute to the Union's climate and energy objectives. To reduce investment risks arising from the emerging nature of the hydrogen market, network development requires support from Union-level mechanisms established to facilitate cross-border hydrogen infrastructure and market development, including Regulation (EU) 2024/1789 and other relevant Union financial instruments that can further contribute to improve market visibility, support the efficient rollout of hydrogen infrastructure and prevent prohibitive network charges in the early phase. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (75) The Union should facilitate energy projects in disadvantaged, less connected, peripheral, outermost or isolated regions to enable access to the trans-European energy networks in order to accelerate the decarbonisation process and reduce dependency on fossil fuels. | (75) The Union should facilitate energy projects, in line with the technological neutrality principle, in disadvantaged, less connected, peripheral, outermost or isolated regions to enable access to the trans-European energy networks in order to accelerate the decarbonisation process and reduce dependency on fossil fuels. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (79a) Acknowledges that the Union energy system is dynamic and that technological advancements, the growing capacity for home-grown energy production and new energy carriers are going to be part of the Union’s future decarbonized energy system. That system also operates in a geopolitical environment that can change rapidly and unpredictably, with direct consequences for the security and affordability of the Union's energy supply, scaling up domestically produced renewable gases, in particular biomethane is therefore a matter of both decarbonisation and strategic resilience. In this regard the Commission should, ahead of its next review, carry out an assessment of new energy vectors that are market-mature and whose deployment may require the development of trans-European infrastructure and consider their inclusion in future reviews of this regulation, provided that these contribute to the Union’s energy and climate goals. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. This Regulation lays down guidelines for the timely development and interoperability of the priority corridors and areas of trans-European energy infrastructure (energy infrastructure priority corridors and areas) set out in Annex I, that contribute to ensuring climate change mitigation, in particular achieving the Union’s targets for energy and climate and its climate neutrality objective by 2050 at the latest, and to ensuring interconnections, energy security, market and system integration and competition that benefits all Member States, as well as affordability of energy prices. | 1. This Regulation lays down guidelines for the timely development and interoperability of the priority corridors and areas of trans-European energy infrastructure (energy infrastructure priority corridors and areas) set out in Annex I, that contribute to ensuring: |
| a) climate change mitigation, in particular achieving the Union’s targets for energy and climate and its climate neutrality objective by 2050 at the latest; | |
| b) the achievement of the Union’s goals of enhancing adaptive capacity, strengthening resilience and reducing vulnerability to climate change; | |
| c) the achievement of the Union’s environmental and biodiversity objectives; | |
| d) interconnections, energy security, market and system integration and competition that benefits all Member States, as well as affordability of energy prices. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (19a) ‘energy efficiency first’ means energy efficiency first as defined in Article 2, point 18, of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council 1a; | |
| 1a Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1). |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. Projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest that fall under the energy infrastructure categories set out in points (1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (f) and (h) of Annex II, as relevant, shall become an integral part of the relevant regional investment plans adopted in accordance with Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and of the relevant national ten-year network development plans adopted in accordance with Article 51 of Directive (EU) 2019/944. Projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest that fall under the energy infrastructure categories set out in point (2) of Annex II ,as relevant, shall become an integral part of the ten-year network development plan for hydrogen under Article 55 of Directive (EU) 2024/1788 and other national infrastructure plans, as appropriate. Those projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest shall be conferred the highest possible priority within each of those national plans. This paragraph shall not apply to competing projects or projects that have not reached a sufficient degree of maturity to provide a project-specific cost-benefit analysis as referred to in Section 2, point (1)(d), of Annex III. | 6. Projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest that fall under the energy infrastructure categories set out in points (1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (f) and (h) of Annex II, as relevant, shall become an integral part of the relevant regional investment plans adopted in accordance with Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and of the relevant national ten-year network development plans adopted in accordance with Article 51 of Directive (EU) 2019/944, as well as of the integrated national energy and climate plans (NECPs) adopted in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999. Projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest that fall under the energy infrastructure categories set out in point (2) of Annex II, as relevant, shall become an integral part of the ten-year network development plan for hydrogen under Article 55 of Directive (EU) 2024/1788 and other national infrastructure plans, as appropriate. Those projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest shall be conferred the highest possible priority within each of those national plans. This paragraph shall not apply to competing projects or projects that have not reached a sufficient degree of maturity to provide a project-specific cost-benefit analysis as referred to in Section 2, point (1)(d), of Annex III. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) for electricity transmission, distribution and storage projects falling under the energy infrastructure categories set out in points (1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (f) and (h) of Annex II, the project contributes significantly to sustainability through the integration of renewable energy into the grid, the transmission or distribution of renewable generation to major consumption centres and storage sites, and to reducing energy curtailment, where applicable, and contributes to at least one of the following specific criteria: | (a) for electricity transmission, distribution and storage projects falling under the energy infrastructure categories set out in points (1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (f) and (h) of Annex II, the project contributes significantly to sustainability through the integration of renewable energy into the grid, including the development of super grids as enablers of efficient, long-distance, large-scale power flows, the transmission or distribution of renewable and low-carbon generation to major consumption centres and storage sites, improving regional energy security through the elimination of structural bottlenecks, and to reducing energy curtailment, where applicable, and contributes to at least one of the following specific criteria: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ii) security of supply, including through interoperability, system flexibility, cybersecurity, appropriate connections and secure and reliable system operation; | (ii) security of supply, resilience of the energy systems, including through interoperability, system flexibility, cybersecurity, appropriate connections and secure and reliable system operation; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (iii) network security, flexibility and quality of supply, including through higher uptake of innovation in balancing, flexibility markets, cybersecurity, monitoring, system control and error correction; | (iii) network security, resilience of the energy systems, flexibility and quality of supply, including through the use of digital technologies and data-driven methods and higher uptake of innovation in forecasting climate-related risks, balancing, flexibility markets, cybersecurity, monitoring, system control, error correction, disruption prevention and effective response and recovery, ensuring that such digital and physical solutions are provided by trusted providers and originate from jurisdictions that adhere to high standards of transparency, reciprocity, and the protection of the Union’s essential security interests; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ii) network security, including through measures facilitating a higher degree of physical security and cybersecurity, monitoring, and system control; | (ii) network security, resilience of the energy systems, including through measures facilitating a higher degree of physical security and cybersecurity, monitoring, and system control; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ii) increasing the resilience and security of transport and storage of carbon dioxide; | (ii) increasing the resilience, efficiency and security of transport and storage of carbon dioxide; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (e) for hydrogen projects falling under the energy infrastructure categories set out in point (2) of Annex II, the project contributes significantly to sustainability, including by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, by enhancing the deployment of renewable or low carbon hydrogen, with an emphasis on hydrogen from renewable sources in particular in end-use applications, such as hard-to-abate sectors, in which more energy efficient solutions are not feasible, and supporting variable renewable power generation by offering flexibility, storage solutions, or both, and the project contributes significantly to at least one of the following specific criteria: | (e) for hydrogen projects falling under the energy infrastructure categories set out in point (2) of Annex II, the project contributes significantly to sustainability, including by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, by enhancing the deployment of domestically produced renewable or low carbon hydrogen, with an emphasis on hydrogen from renewable sources in particular in end-use applications, such as hard-to-abate sectors, in which more energy efficient solutions are not feasible, ensuring security of supply, and supporting variable renewable power generation by offering flexibility, storage solutions, or both, and the project contributes significantly to at least one of the following specific criteria: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4a. When assessing projects under this Article, the Groups shall take into account the specific contribution of a project to the security of supply in regions particularly affected by energy isolation or structural network constraints, ensuring a balanced development of infrastructure across the Union. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) the urgency and the contribution of each proposed project in order to meet the Union’s targets for energy and climate and its 2050 climate neutrality objective, market integration, competition, sustainability, and security of supply; | (a) the urgency and the contribution of each proposed project in order to meet the Union’s targets for energy and climate and its 2050 climate neutrality objective, market integration, competition, sustainability, affordability and security of supply, considering the application of the principle of ‘energy efficiency first’; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5a. In prioritising projects of common and mutual interest, the assessment shall take into account each project's contribution to the Union's energy and climate targets, to sustainability, to market integration, competition and security of supply, as well as its cost-effectiveness and potential cross-border and system-wide impacts. The assessment shall be carried out in accordance with the principle of technological neutrality. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Where Member States apply the exemptions under paragraph 7, they shall ensure that rules on effective mitigation measures to be adopted for the projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in Annex II point (1) are identified based on the National Development Plan, in order to avoid the adverse environmental impact that may arise or, where that is not possible, to significantly mitigate it. Member States shall ensure that the appropriate mitigation measures are applied in a timely manner to ensure compliance with the obligations laid down in Article 6(2) of Directive 92/43/EEC and Article 4(1), point (a)(i), of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and to avoid deterioration and achieve good ecological status or good ecological potential in accordance with Article 4(1), point (a), of Directive 2000/60/EC. | Where Member States apply the exemptions under paragraph 7, they shall ensure that rules on effective mitigation measures to be adopted for the projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in Annex II point (1) are identified based on the National Development Plan, in order to avoid the adverse environmental impact that may arise or, where that is not possible, to significantly mitigate it. Member States shall ensure that the appropriate mitigation measures are applied in a timely manner to ensure compliance with the obligations laid down in Article 6(2) of Directive 92/43/EEC and Article 4(1), points (a)(i) and (b)(i), of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and to avoid deterioration and achieve good ecological status or good ecological potential in accordance with Article 4(1), point (a), of Directive 2000/60/EC, |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 9. Member States shall ensure public participation regarding the National Development Plan in accordance with Articles 6 and 7 of Directive 2001/42/EC, including identifying the public affected or likely to be affected as well as the Member States that may be affected by the implementation of that Plan and the projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in point (1) of Annex II to this Regulation included in that Plan. | 9. Member States shall ensure effective public participation regarding the National Development Plan in accordance with Articles 6 and 7 of Directive 2001/42/EC, including identifying the public affected or likely to be affected as well as the Member States that may be affected by the implementation of that Plan and the projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in point (1) of Annex II to this Regulation included in that Plan. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The second subparagraph and the exemption provided for in point (a) of the seventh subparagraph are without prejudice to a Member State’s obligations under the Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 13. When assessing whether satisfactory alternative solutions to projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation, exist for the purposes of Articles 6(4) and Article 16(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Article 4(7), point (d), of Directive 2000/60/EC and Article 9(1) of Directive 2009/147/EC, the condition of having no satisfactory alternatives shall be fulfilled if there are no satisfactory alternative solutions capable of achieving the same objective of the project in question, in terms of the development of the same capacity through the same technology within the same or similar timeframe and without resulting in significantly higher costs. | 13. When assessing whether satisfactory alternative solutions to projects on the Union list falling under the infrastructure categories referred to in points (2), (3) and (4) of Annex II to this Regulation, exist for the purposes of Articles 6(4) and Article 16(1) of Directive 92/43/EEC, Article 4(7), point (d), of Directive 2000/60/EC and Article 9(1) of Directive 2009/147/EC, the condition of having no satisfactory alternatives shall be fulfilled if, based on the best available scientific and technical knowledge, there are no satisfactory alternative solutions capable of achieving the same objective of the project in question, in a manner that is the least damaging for the habitats and species concerned and the integrity of the Natura 2000 site or sites concerned, in terms of the development of the same capacity through the same technology within the same or similar timeframe and without resulting in significantly higher costs. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (iii) the national competent authority shall, after consulting the other authorities concerned, establish on a case-by-case basis a reasonable time limit within which the individual decisions shall be issued with the aim to minimise the duration of the process without prejudice to time limits set out in Article 10(1) and (2); | (iii) the national competent authority shall, after consulting the other authorities concerned, establish on a case-by-case basis a reasonable time limit within which the individual decisions shall be issued with the aim to minimise the duration of the process without prejudice to time limits set out in Article 10(1) and (2) and without compromising the quality of the decision-making process. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. By 24 October 2027, the Member State or national competent authority shall, where necessary, in collaboration with other authorities concerned, publish an updated manual of procedures for the permit-granting process applicable to projects on the Union list to include at least the information specified in point (1) of Annex VI. The manual shall not be legally binding, but it shall refer to or quote relevant legal provisions. The national competent authorities shall, where relevant, cooperate and find synergies with the authorities of neighbouring countries with a view to align timelines and facilitating the permit-granting process for projects, including for the development of the manual of procedures. | 1. By 24 October 2027, the Member State or national competent authority shall, where necessary, in collaboration with other authorities concerned, publish an updated manual of procedures for the permit-granting process applicable to projects on the Union list to include at least the information specified in point (1) of Annex VI. The manual shall not be legally binding, but it shall refer to or quote relevant legal provisions. The national competent authorities shall, where relevant, cooperate and find synergies with the authorities of neighbouring countries with a view to align timelines, enhance administrative coordination and facilitate the permit-granting process for projects, including for the development of the manual of procedures. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one early-stage public consultation, before the submission of the final and complete permitting application to the national competent authority pursuant to Article 10(10). The public consultation may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU. | 5. Where it is not already required under national law, the project promoter shall carry out at least one early-stage public consultation, before the submission of the final and complete permitting application to the national competent authority pursuant to Article 10(10). The public consultation may be carried out in combination with any public consultation after submission of the request for development consent pursuant to Article 6(2) of Directive 2011/92/EU. Any exemption from environmental assessment in respect of Directive 2011/92/EU under this Regulation is without prejudice to Member State obligations for public participation. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 6. The public consultation required in the previous paragraph shall comply with the minimum requirements set out in point (5) of Annex VI and shall inform the stakeholders referred to in point (3)(a) of Annex VI about the project at an early stage and shall help to identify the most suitable location, trajectory or technology, including, where relevant, in view of adequate climate adaptation and security considerations for the project, all impacts relevant under Union and national law, and the relevant issues to be addressed in the application file. | 6. The public consultation required in the previous paragraph shall comply with the minimum requirements set out in point (5) of Annex VI and shall inform the stakeholders referred to in point (3)(a) of Annex VI about the project at an early stage and shall help to identify alternatives, where feasible, the most suitable location, trajectory or technology, including, where relevant, in view of adequate climate mitigation and adaptation and security considerations for the project, all impacts relevant under Union and national law, and the relevant issues to be addressed in the application file. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| However, where the national competent authority considers that one or both of the procedures will not be completed within the time limits set out in paragraph 1, it may extend one or both of those time limits before their expiry and on a case-by-case basis. The national competent authority shall not extend the combined duration of the two procedures for more than six months other than in exceptional circumstances. | However, where the national competent authority considers that one or both of the procedures will not be completed within the time limits set out in paragraph 1, it may extend one or both of those time limits before their expiry and on a case-by-case basis. The national competent authority shall not extend the combined duration of the two procedures for more than six months other than in exceptional circumstances, while not compromising the quality of the decision-making process. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| This paragraph does not produce effects for environmental decisions, and where the principle of administrative tacit approval does not exist in the legal system of the Member State concerned. | This paragraph does not produce effects for environmental decisions, including, where appropriate, decisions on, or screening for, environmental assessments, and where the principle of administrative tacit approval does not exist in the legal system of the Member State concerned. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Member States shall ensure that dedicated digital platforms are established to manage permitting applications, permitting processes, ongoing permitting decisions, and decisions issued in an easily accessible format. | Member States shall aim to streamline and speed up administrative permit-granting procedures by establishing dedicated digital portals to manage permitting applications, permitting processes, ongoing permitting decisions, and decisions issued in a clear and easily accessible format. Those digital portals shall be designed for maximum efficiency and ensure interoperability with existing portals used by System Operators. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 7. The national competent authorities shall take into consideration, in the screening for establishing the requirements for the permit-granting process, any studies conducted and permits or authorisations issued up to five years before the project entered the permit-granting process in accordance with this Article, including assessments conducted for the deployment of other projects that are relevant and can be reused, and shall not require unnecessary or duplicate studies, assessments, permits or authorisations. | 7. The national competent authorities shall take into consideration, in the screening for establishing the requirements for the permit-granting process, any studies conducted and permits or authorisations issued up to five years before the project entered the permit-granting process in accordance with this Article, including assessments conducted for the deployment of other projects that are relevant and can be reused, and shall not require unnecessary or duplicate studies, assessments, permits or authorisations, unless the competent authority decides that there have been material developments which render such studies and assessments insufficient and out of date for the purposes of assessments. |
| Data older than five years may be taken into consideration by national competent authorities as supportive evidence insofar as it remains scientifically valid and relevant to the respective project configuration and shall, when necessary, be complemented by targeted updates. | |
| If permit-granting is significantly delayed, the Commission, the Member States, and the project promoter shall engage in a formal dialogue to address administrative bottlenecks within a reasonable timeframe before any penalties or status downgrades are applied. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| as soon as possible and no later than three months following the notification by the project promoter referred to in paragraph 5, the national competent authority shall determine, and notify the project promoter of the authorisations, permits and assessments required to complete permit-granting process. | as soon as possible and no later than three months following the notification by the project promoter referred to in paragraph 5, the national competent authority shall determine, and notify the project promoter of the authorisations, permits and assessments required to complete permit-granting process, and shall make this information publicly available subject to national or EU confidentiality rules. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation. | 1. By [two years after entry into force] and at least every four years thereafter, in cooperation with Member States and considering the NECPs, the Commission shall develop a central scenario for the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors to be used for the Union-wide ten-year network development plans referred to in: Article 48 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and Article 59 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1789, the infrastructure needs identification process referred to in Article 12 of this Regulation, the energy system wide cost-benefit analysis referred to in Article 14 of this Regulation, and the cross-border cost allocation referred to in Article 17 of this Regulation. The final results of the central scenario, including the underlying assumptions, shall be adopted by the Commission after consulting the Member States within the relevant Regional Groups. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective; | (a) be consistent with the Union’s targets for energy and climate, observe the latest available NECPs, the latest policies and technology cost development, and include a long-term perspective until at least 2050 in accordance with the Union’s climate neutrality objective and, where relevant, the technological neutrality principle; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency; | (b) take a cross-sectoral approach ensuring consistency between the electricity, hydrogen and gas sectors, optimizing system efficiency considering the integrated NECPs adopted in accordance with Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH may develop additional models of the central scenario on the basis of the framework of assumptions and the final input data provided by the Commission, including those relating to environmental factors, with a view to identifying any infrastructure needs or system parameters not reflected in the Commission's modelling. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) ensure forward-looking climate and extreme weather risk scenarios, including the potential of non-wire and digital solutions to prevent system failures, and reflect decarbonisation needs. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (db) in the case of the infrastructure needs identification report, in line with Annex VII, assess the impact of repurposing gas infrastructure to renewable hydrogen and retrofitting to other renewable gases especially concerning security of supply and the whole energy system stability. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the assessment of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article. | 4. Within six months of the publication of a central scenario pursuant to Article 11, except where the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall submit their respective draft infrastructure needs identification report, including the comparison of how projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan match the needs identified, to the TEN-E Group. In case the publication is limited to adding a sensitivity analysis, the Commission may request the ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH to develop a new infrastructure needs identification report in accordance with the procedure laid down in this Article. Where relevant, projects repurposing existing gas infrastructure for the transport of renewable hydrogen, or retrofitting it for the transport of other renewable gases shall be taken into account in the assessment of identified needs, provided that such repurposing or retrofitting demonstrably contributes to the decarbonisation of the energy system and does not create long-term dependency on fossil-based energy sources, and without prejudice to the security of energy supply. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. When the infrastructure needs identification report for electricity concludes that projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan do not fully meet the infrastructure needs identified pursuant to Article 12, the Commission may launch a process to identify possible solutions to address the unmatched needs. | 1. When the infrastructure needs identification and system assessment reports pursuant to Article 12 of this Regulation conclude that projects submitted for inclusion in the Union wide ten-year network development plan do not fully match the infrastructure needs identified, the Commission may launch a process to identify possible solutions to address the unmatched needs. In doing so, the Commission shall take into account the regional investment plans pursuant to Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and network development plans pursuant to Article 40a of Directive (EU) 2019/944, as well as, where relevant, socio-economic, security, environmental and geopolitical considerations. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| To provide an early assessment of emerging infrastructure gaps and enable timely corrective action, the TEN-E Group, based on the modelling provided by the ENTSOs and in close cooperation with the Commission, may identify and periodically review regional cross-border infrastructure needs and emerging bottlenecks as a complement to the infrastructure needs identification report referred to in Article 12. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 2. The Commission, in cooperation with the ENTSO for Electricity, the Member States and the Agency, shall invite system operators in the relevant Groups to propose, within six months of the invitation, projects capable of addressing the unmatched needs. The Commission shall submit the proposed projects to the relevant Groups established in accordance with Article 3 for discussion. The Commission may involve other relevant stakeholders and other regional cooperation fora. Project promoters capable of addressing the unmatched needs shall submit eligible projects as soon as possible for inclusion in the subsequent national development plans, the Union-wide ten-year network development plan and the Union list. | 2. The Commission, in cooperation with the ENTSO for Electricity, the Member States and the Agency, shall invite system operators in the relevant Groups to propose, within twelve months of the invitation, cross-border projects capable of addressing the unmatched needs. The Commission shall submit the proposed projects to the relevant Groups established in accordance with Article 3 for discussion. The Commission may involve other relevant stakeholders and other regional cooperation fora. Project promoters capable of addressing the unmatched needs shall submit eligible projects as soon as possible for inclusion in the subsequent national development plans, the Union-wide ten-year network development plan and the Union list. The calls for proposals shall be launched by the Commission following recommendations from the Regional Groups and after consulting with the TEN-E Group. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 3. Where the process under paragraph 2 does not identify projects capable of addressing the unmatched needs, the Commission may launch a call for proposals open to any third party capable of becoming a project promoter to propose projects capable of addressing the unmatched needs. Project promoters capable of addressing the unmatched needs shall submit eligible projects as soon as possible for inclusion in the subsequent national development plans, the Union-wide ten-year network development plan and the Union list. | 3. Where the process under paragraph 2 does not identify projects capable of addressing the unmatched needs, following the recommendations from the Regional Groups and after consulting with the TEN-E Group, the Commission, may launch calls for proposals open to any third party capable of becoming a project promoter to propose projects capable of addressing the unmatched needs. Project promoters capable of addressing the unmatched needs, after consulting the relevant system operators, national regulatory authorities and concerned Member States, shall submit eligible projects as soon as possible for inclusion in the subsequent national development plans, the Union-wide ten-year network development plan and the Union list. The projects shall follow the established processes and meet the requirements for inclusion in the relevant network development plans, in the Union-wide ten-year network development plan and in the Union list. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| 1. TSOs shall set aside 25 % of the congestion rents not spent for guaranteeing the actual availability of the allocated capacity pursuant to Article 19(2), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and for compensation to offshore renewable electricity generation plant operators pursuant to Article 19(2), point (c), of Regulation (EU) 2019/943, for network investments into projects on the Union list relevant to reducing interconnector congestion pursuant Article 19(2), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 2019/943. | 1. TSOs shall set aside 25 % of the congestion rents not spent for guaranteeing the actual availability of the allocated capacity pursuant to Article 19(2), point (a) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 and for compensation to offshore renewable electricity generation plant operators pursuant to Article 19(2), point (c) of Regulation (EU) 2019/943, for network investments into projects on the Union list relevant to reducing interconnector congestion pursuant to Article 19(2), point (b), of Regulation (EU) 2019/943. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (da) the presence of new market-ready energy vectors that contribute to the Union’s decarbonization goals and the potential for corresponding development of trans-European infrastructure; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (-1) in Article 32, paragraph 2, the following point is added: | |
| '(ca) assess the impact of repurposing gas infrastructure for the transport of renewable hydrogen and/or retrofitting it for the transport other renewable gases, especially concerning security of supply and the sustainability of the whole energy system.’; |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| Smart electricity grids deployment: adopting smart grid technologies across the Union to efficiently integrate the behaviour and actions of all users connected to the electricity network, in particular the generation of large amounts of electricity from renewable or distributed energy sources and demand response by consumers, energy storage, electric vehicles and other flexibility sources and, in addition, as regards islands and island systems, decreasing energy isolation, supporting innovative and other solutions involving at least two Member States with a significant positive impact on the Union’s targets for energy and climate and its 2050 climate neutrality objective, and contributing significantly to the sustainability of the island energy system and that of the Union. | Smart electricity grids deployment: adopting smart grid technologies across the Union to efficiently integrate the behaviour and actions of all users connected to the electricity network, in particular the generation of large amounts of electricity from renewable or distributed energy sources and demand response by consumers, energy storage, electric vehicles and other flexibility sources and, in addition, as regards islands and island systems, decreasing energy isolation, supporting innovative and other solutions with a significant positive impact on the Union’s targets for energy and climate and its 2050 climate neutrality objective, and contributing significantly to the sustainability of the island energy system and that of the Union. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| With regard to energy infrastructure falling under the competence of national regulatory authorities, each Group shall be composed of representatives of the Member States, national regulatory authorities, TSOs as well as the Commission, the Agency, the EU DSO entity and either the ENTSO for Electricity or the ENNOH. | With regard to energy infrastructure falling under the competence of national regulatory authorities, each Group shall be composed of representatives of the Member States, national regulatory authorities, TSOs as well as the Commission, the Agency, the EU DSO entity and either the ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas or the ENNOH. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| The ENTSO for Electricity, and the ENNOH shall consult the Commission and the Agency about their respective draft guidelines for inclusion of projects in the Union-wide ten-year network development plans and take due account of the Commission’s and the Agency’s recommendations before the publication of the final guidelines. | The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall consult the Commission and the Agency about their respective draft guidelines for inclusion of projects in the Union-wide ten-year network development plans and take due account of the Commission’s and the Agency’s recommendations before the publication of the final guidelines. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (6) The ENTSO for Electricity and the ENNOH shall provide information to the TEN-E Group as to how they applied the guidelines to evaluate inclusion in the Union-wide ten-year network development plans. | (6) The ENTSO for Electricity, the ENTSO for Gas and the ENNOH shall provide information to the TEN-E Group as to how they applied the guidelines to evaluate inclusion in the Union-wide ten-year network development plans. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (ia) for any project to qualify as a project of common interest, regardless of the technology it concerns, the project must have a proven level of technological maturity, sufficient real demand and offer for the energy vector concerned in the Union market and is a cost-effective project. |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (a) transmission of renewable energy generation to major consumption centres and storage sites, measured in line with the analysis made in the latest available Union-wide ten-year network development plan in electricity, in particular by: | (a) transmission of renewable and low carbon energy generation to major consumption centres and storage sites, measured in line with the analysis made in the latest available Union-wide ten-year network development plan in electricity, in particular by: |
| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
|---|---|
| (i) for electricity transmission set out in point (1)(a), (b), (d), (f) and (h) of Annex II, estimating the amount of generation capacity from renewable energy sources (by technology, in MW), which is connected and transmitted due to the project, compared to the amount of planned total generation capacity from those types of renewable energy sources in the Member State concerned according to the National Energy and Climate Plans submitted by Member States in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1999; | (i) for electricity transmission set out in point (1)(a), (b), (d), (f) and (h) of Annex II, estimating the amount of generation capacity from renewable and low carbon energy sources (by technology, in MW), which is connected and transmitted due to the project, compared to the amount of planned total generation capacity from those types of renewable energy sources in the Member State concerned according to the National Energy and Climate Plans submitted by Member States in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1999; |
Annex: declaration of input 4 blocks
Pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure, the rapporteur for opinion declares that she included in her draft opinion input on matters pertaining to the subject of the file that she received, in the preparation of the draft opinion, from the following interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register, or from the following representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies:
| 1. Interest representatives falling within the scope of the Interinstitutional Agreement on a mandatory transparency register |
| PSE – Polish electricity transmission system operator |
| ENNOH - European Network of Network Operators for Hydrogen |
| GIE – Gas Infrastructure Europe |
| Nuclear Europe |
| IRU - International Road Union |
| 2. Representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies |
Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur for opinion declares that she has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament's Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.
Procedure pages and committee votes
How the committees handled the text and how their members voted on it. Collapsed.
Procedure – committee asked for opinion 1 block
| Title | Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 |
| References | COM(2025)1006 – C10-0342/2025 – 2025/0399(COD) |
| Committee(s) responsible Date announced in plenary | ITRE 12.2.2026 |
| Opinion by Date announced in plenary | ENVI 12.2.2026 |
| Rapporteur for opinion Date appointed | Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska 9.3.2026 |
| Discussed in committee | 5.5.2026 |
Final vote by roll call by the committee asked for opinion 3 blocks
51 · For
- ECR
- Sergio Berlato, Pietro Fiocchi, Paolo Inselvini, Sander Smit, Aurelijus Veryga, Anna Zalewska
- EPP
- Bartosz Arłukowicz, Alexander Bernhuber, Daniel Buda, Hanna Gronkiewicz-Waltz, Michalis Hadjipantela, Niels Flemming Hansen, Esther Herranz García, Radan Kanev, Ewa Kopacz, Peter Liese, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Dolors Montserrat, Letizia Moratti, Virgil-Daniel Popescu, Massimiliano Salini, Susana Solís Pérez, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Matej Tonin, Dimitris Tsiodras, Andrea Wechsler
- Patriots
- Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain, Valérie Deloge, Antonín Staněk
- Renew
- Jeannette Baljeu, Stine Bosse, Sigrid Friis, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Martin Hojsík, Ana Vasconcelos, Michal Wiezik
- S&D
- Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis, Sakis Arnaoutoglou, Delara Burkhardt, Mohammed Chahim, Christophe Clergeau, Annalisa Corrado, Heléne Fritzon, Alicia Homs Ginel, Javi López, César Luena, Pierfrancesco Maran, Alessandra Moretti, Marta Temido, Kristian Vigenin, Tiemo Wölken
9 · Against
- ESN
- Petr Bystron, Tomasz Froelich, Volker Schnurrbusch
- EPP
- Jessica Polfjärd
- Patriots
- Ton Diepeveen
- The Left
- Lynn Boylan, Emma Fourreau, Catarina Martins, Jonas Sjöstedt
Connections
The dossier, the decisions on this text and its other versions.
No connections found for this item.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2026). “OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869”. Text, 24 June 2026. docId ENVI-AD-786822. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ENVI-AD-786822 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: EP Open Data API: document record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/documents/ENVI-AD-786822 (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-envi-ad-786822,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869}},
year = {2026},
date = {2026-06-24},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ENVI-AD-786822}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ENVI-AD-786822},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. docId ENVI-AD-786822. Data: EP Open Data API: document record (CC BY 4.0)}
}