Skip to content

Text · Comparison of two versions

Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report

ECON-PR-784381 → A-10-2026-0186

From
ECON-PR-784381 report parliamentary committee draft of 19 Feb 2026
To
A-10-2026-0186 Plenary report of 26 Jun 2026
Changes
10 changes to the text
Paragraphs
+29 added · −14 removed · 9 changed
More facts (3)
Title (from)
on digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system
Title (to)
on digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026

The report expands on the potential of DLT and tokenisation for EU capital markets, adding calls for regulatory revisions and international cooperation.56 It strengthens language on stablecoin risks and welcomes euro-denominated e-money tokens, while addressing legal certainty for multi-issuance.89 It adds a reference to the new US administration's openness to crypto-assets and its legislative actions.4 Other changes are formal: corrected regulation numbers, updated footnotes, and renumbering.23710

The notes class 6 changes as substance, 4 as formal, 0 as wording only.

Read the changes · Report a problem

Every difference

The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.

Part 3 of 3: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

6 unchanged paragraphs

In this report, we explore the impact of the emergence of digital assets on the financial services sector and what that means for the regulatory framework. Digital assets refer generally to any digital representation of value that is recorded on a cryptographically secured distributed ledger.

Some principles are useful as a starting point. The aim should be a system-wide, activity-based and technologically neutral viewpoint. While distributed ledgers may overhaul the financial infrastructure, it does not change any economic functions in se, such as trading, clearing and settlement. New technologies always come with new challenges. The regulatory framework can hardly be called technologically neutral for all future developments and needs to adapt to changing realities. It needs to find a balance between spurring innovation and preventing too much space for regulatory arbitrage.

The EU has passed legislation that forms a framework for crypto-assets in the Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on markets in crypto-assets (MiCAR). Crypto-assets that qualify as financial instruments under existing Union law remain subject to the relevant sector-specific legislative frameworks.

On the one hand, several risks remain for the digital assets sector. From a macro-prudential perspective, data capabilities need to be strengthened to get a better sense of financial risks and the interconnectivity with other parts of the financial services. Multi-function groups that create links between different types of crypto-assets should be subject of scrutiny. Crypto-assets are also still too often used to evade AML-CFT regulations and sanctions. One aspect of stablecoins in need of legal clarity is the topic of multi-issuance, which only came under attention after the enactment of MiCAR.

On the other hand, the usage of distributed ledgers in the financial services sector could enhance efficiency and connectivity, among other benefits. Tokenisation also allows to use distributed ledger technology for existing financial assets, with the potential of reducing costs and improving transparency. Much trial and error will still be necessary to discover advantages, whereas vulnerabilities will need to be monitored.

Finally, the future of digital finance is not only taking shape in Europe. It is imperative for Europe to be part of the global conversation. Both in terms of risk-management and in terms of transformation of the financial infrastructure, it will be necessary to discuss cooperation, standards, interconnectedness, equivalence and regulatory requirements.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Changes between ECON-PR-784381 and A-10-2026-0186”. Text, 26 June 2026. from ECON-PR-784381, to A-10-2026-0186, reference 2025/2208(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ECON-PR-784381/compare/A-10-2026-0186?all=1&part=3 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2026-06-26,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Changes between ECON-PR-784381 and A-10-2026-0186}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-26},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ECON-PR-784381/compare/A-10-2026-0186?all=1&part=3}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ECON-PR-784381/compare/A-10-2026-0186?all=1&part=3},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Text. from ECON-PR-784381, to A-10-2026-0186, reference 2025/2208(INI). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}