Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report
ECON-PR-757014 → A-9-2024-0063
- From
- ECON-PR-757014 report parliamentary committee draft of 4 Dec 2023
- To
- A-9-2024-0063 Plenary report of 28 Feb 2024
- Changes
- 6 changes to the text
- Paragraphs
- +30 added · −23 removed · 8 changed
More facts (2)
- Title (from)
- on the European Semester for economic policy coordination 2024
- Title (to)
- on the European Semester for economic policy coordination 2024
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 3 of 3: EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Change 6
ChangedThe European Semester is a yearly exercise to coordinate the member state’s economic and budgetary policies and has a wide impact on social policies. The initiativeown-initiative report on the European Semester for economic policy coordination in 2024 expresses concerns about weak economic growth, highlights the impact of energy prices and inflation on purchasing power, and acknowledges the EU’s role in stabilizing the economy during crises. The rapporteur emphasizes the need for coordinated fiscal, structural, and regulatory policies, as well as public and private investments. The employment and social aspects in the 2024 Annual Sustainable Growth StrategySurvey are especially important given the context of uncertainty marked by rising inflation and cost of living due to the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, as well as the ongoing social and economic consequences caused by the Covid-19 pandemic and the situation in the Middle East.
4 unchanged paragraphs
In the report, concerns about weak growth rates in the EU due to the continuous impact of energy prices and inflation on household purchasing power and the performance of EU companies are expressed. The ECB’s efforts to address inflation is acknowledged but suggests that rising interest rates alone are insufficient; coordinated fiscal, structural, and regulatory policies are needed to be able to counteract the crisis-ridden environment. The text underscores that insufficient public and private investments in certain Member States impede sustainable growth, emphasizing the critical role of these investments in enhancing EU resilience, robustness, and competitiveness amid challenges.
Furthermore, the rapporteur discusses issues related to the European Semester, Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), and proposes reforms to the EU economic governance framework, including the need for simplification, enforceability, and support for green and digital transitions. While acknowledging lessons from the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), the rapporteur regrets the lack of similar incentive mechanisms in the proposed economic governance framework reform. Concerns are raised about the financial capacity of some Member States to fund necessary green and digital transitions independently. Further concerns arise concerning the social dimension’s decline due to self-limitation of Country-Specific Recommendations (CSRs) and, resulting from this, a diminishing number of recommendations based on the Social Scoreboard. The rapporteur advocates focused 2024 CSRs, emphasizing their role in enhancing competitiveness, green and digital transitions, and social fairness, considering social vulnerabilities. Concerns about the RRF’s performance-based system inefficiency and bureaucracy are noted. This year’s annual Semester Report supports aligning EU cohesion policies with RRF and CSRs, urging stakeholder participation in National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs) akin to cohesion policy programs.
The rapporteur deplores the insufficient attention given to the interplay between macroeconomic imbalances and fiscal rules, emphasizing the importance of addressing this for the EU’s financial stability, potentially requiring public spending. It recognizes the need to restrain public spending to avoid excessive deficits, suggesting limitations based on objective criteria, with certain expenditures earmarked for necessary investments to be exempted.
Additionally, the strict performance-based financing and the verification system of the RRF are seen with concern, as more flexibility with a view to achieving the agreed investment objectives is needed. This is even more necessary if cohesion policy programmes should be streamlined with RRF investment needs. The reform of EU fiscal rules plays a crucial role in future developments of the economic and budgetary policies of Member States as does the need for more accountability, involvement of national parliaments, and proper instruments for the European Parliament to hold the European Commission to account for the performance of the European semester.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ECON-PR-757014/compare/A-9-2024-0063?all=1&part=3
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 26 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2024). “Changes between ECON-PR-757014 and A-9-2024-0063”. Text, 28 February 2024. from ECON-PR-757014, to A-9-2024-0063. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ECON-PR-757014/compare/A-9-2024-0063?all=1&part=3 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2024-02-28,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between ECON-PR-757014 and A-9-2024-0063}},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-02-28},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ECON-PR-757014/compare/A-9-2024-0063?all=1&part=3}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/ECON-PR-757014/compare/A-9-2024-0063?all=1&part=3},
urldate = {2026-09-26},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from ECON-PR-757014, to A-9-2024-0063. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}