Text
The text as parsed from the official Word file. Every paragraph has a link (¶) and can be saved to a project as a passage.
▸Jump to an amendment (171)
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment– having regard to the Commission’s European Affordable Housing Plan which stresses the need to simplify European legislation to boost the supply of social housing, |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment– having regard to its resolution on the housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing, |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionA. whereas taxation is a determining factor in the global competitiveness of EU companies; whereas fair, efficient and simple corporate taxation plays a central role in ensuring long-term economic growth and providing Member States with sufficient resources to meet their spending needs; | AmendmentA. whereas taxation is a determining factor in ensuring fairness and equal conditions for companies competing in the global economy; whereas fair, efficient and simple corporate taxation plays a central role in creating a level playing field in the EU Single Market, including for small and medium enterprises, ensuring social cohesion and providing Member States with sufficient and stable resources to finance public goods and necessary investments; whereas recent research1a indicates that fair and effective corporate taxation can support quality employment and reduce inequality; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment1a https://publicservices.international/resources/publications/corporate-taxation-and-employment-dispelling-the-race-to-the-bottom-myth?lang=en&id=15686&showLogin=true |
Arba Kokalari, Regina Doherty
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionA. whereas taxation is a determining factor in the global competitiveness of EU companies; whereas fair, efficient and simple corporate taxation plays a central role in ensuring long-term economic growth and providing Member States with sufficient resources to meet their spending needs; | AmendmentA. whereas taxation is a determining factor in the global competitiveness of EU companies; whereas low, efficient, predictable and simple corporate taxation plays a central role in ensuring long-term economic growth, encouraging investment and providing Member States with sufficient resources to meet their spending needs; |
Katri Kulmuni, Billy Kelleher, Gilles Boyer
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionA. whereas taxation is a determining factor in the global competitiveness of EU companies; whereas fair, efficient and simple corporate taxation plays a central role in ensuring long-term economic growth and providing Member States with sufficient resources to meet their spending needs; | AmendmentA. whereas taxation is a significant factor in the global competitiveness of EU companies; whereas fair, efficient and simple corporate taxation plays a central role in ensuring long-term economic growth and providing Member States with sufficient resources to meet their spending needs; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | AmendmentAa. whereas corporate tax avoidance and profit shifting have significant distributional impact, erode public revenues and shift the fiscal burden onto workers, SMEs and households, thereby exacerbating inequalities, weakening the financing of essential public services and undermining trust in the fairness of the tax system; whereas empirical research shows that weaker anti-tax avoidance rules and corporate profit shifting is associated with measurable job losses in the operation of multinational companies in domestic EU markets; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionB. whereas direct taxation remains a national competence of the Member States, while international corporate taxation is governed by a complex set of bilateral treaties on the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital, known as double taxation agreements, as well as multilateral instruments to prevent BEPS, and EU directives on combating tax avoidance (ATAD) and reinforcing administrative cooperation (DAC); | AmendmentB. whereas direct taxation remains largely a national competence of the Member States, while international corporate taxation is governed by a complex set of bilateral treaties on the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of tax evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital, known as double taxation agreements, as well as multilateral instruments to prevent BEPS, and EU directives on combating tax avoidance (ATAD) and reinforcing administrative cooperation (DAC); whereas the unanimity requirement for Council decisions on taxation has often hindered progress on common tax initiatives, limiting the Union´s ability to respond effectively to global tax challenges, combat tax avoidance and evasion, and ensure fair taxation across the Single Market; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionB. whereas direct taxation remains a national competence of the Member States, while international corporate taxation is governed by a complex set of bilateral treaties on the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital, known as double taxation agreements, as well as multilateral instruments to prevent BEPS, and EU directives on combating tax avoidance (ATAD) and reinforcing administrative cooperation (DAC); | AmendmentB. whereas direct taxation remains a national competence of the Member States, action at EU level continues to play a key role, notably through directives aimed at combating tax avoidance (ATAD) and strengthening cooperation between tax authorities (DAC), while international corporate taxation is governed by a complex set of bilateral treaties on the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital, known as double taxation agreements, as well as multilateral instruments to prevent BEPS; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionB. whereas direct taxation remains a national competence of the Member States, while international corporate taxation is governed by a complex set of bilateral treaties on the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital, known as double taxation agreements, as well as multilateral instruments to prevent BEPS, and EU directives on combating tax avoidance (ATAD) and reinforcing administrative cooperation (DAC); | AmendmentB. whereas direct taxation remains an exclusive and foundational national competence of the Member States, which must be fully respected; while international corporate taxation is governed by a complex set of bilateral treaties on the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital, known as double taxation agreements, as well as multilateral instruments to prevent BEPS, and EU directives on combating tax avoidance (ATAD) and reinforcing administrative cooperation (DAC); |
Regina Doherty, Arba Kokalari
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionB. whereas direct taxation remains a national competence of the Member States, while international corporate taxation is governed by a complex set of bilateral treaties on the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital, known as double taxation agreements, as well as multilateral instruments to prevent BEPS, and EU directives on combating tax avoidance (ATAD) and reinforcing administrative cooperation (DAC); | AmendmentB. whereas direct taxation remains an exclusive national competence of the Member States, while international corporate taxation is governed by a complex set of bilateral treaties on the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital, known as double taxation agreements, as well as multilateral instruments to prevent BEPS, and EU directives on combating tax avoidance (ATAD) and reinforcing administrative cooperation (DAC); |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | AmendmentBa. whereas interest and capital tax rules, as well as corporate tax rules, are not fully harmonised across the EU, making it more difficult and costly for market participants to be active in multiple EU Member States;13a |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment13a European Central Bank, Financial Integration and Structure in the Euro Area 2026, p. 38 |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionC. whereas the OECD estimates annual global revenue losses resulting from BEPS at between USD 100 billion and 240 billion, equivalent to approximately 4 to 10 % of global corporate income tax revenues, resulting in considerable losses for Member States’ budgets; | AmendmentC. whereas the OECD estimates annual global revenue losses resulting from BEPS at between USD 100 billion and 240 billion, equivalent to approximately 4 to 10 % of global corporate income tax revenues, resulting in considerable losses for Member States’ budgets; whereas, according to the International Tax Observatory, the effective tax rate of multinational companies declined by 2.7 percentage points in the European Union between 2014 and 20222a; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment2a https://taxobservatory.eu/eutax-publication/the-new-face-of-corporate-tax-competition/ |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionC. whereas the OECD estimates annual global revenue losses resulting from BEPS at between USD 100 billion and 240 billion, equivalent to approximately 4 to 10 % of global corporate income tax revenues, resulting in considerable losses for Member States’ budgets; | AmendmentC. whereas the OECD estimates annual global revenue losses resulting from BEPS at between USD 100 billion and 240 billion, equivalent to approximately 4 to 10 % of global corporate income tax revenues, resulting in considerable losses for Member States’ budgets; whereas these losses are often a consequence of the lack of coordination between national tax systems and the complexity of international rules; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | AmendmentCa. whereas high-level indicators of potential BEPS activity have fallen in investment hubs relative in recent years, they remain far higher in investment hubs relative to other jurisdictions, pointing to the continued existence of BEPS activity, according to the OECD 14a; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment14a https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/corporate-tax-statistics-2025_6a915941-en.html |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | AmendmentC a. whereas the vast majority of companies act as responsible corporate citizens, providing the bulk of tax revenues, driving innovation, and sustaining the European social model through job creation; |
Katri Kulmuni, Billy Kelleher, Gilles Boyer
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionD. whereas economic activity has generally and significantly shifted away from physical presence, leading to a mismatch between where profits are generated and where they are taxed; | AmendmentD. whereas economic activity has generally and significantly shifted away from physical presence, along with the changing characteristics of the digital economy, leading to a mismatch between where profits are generated and where they are taxed; |
Arba Kokalari, Regina Doherty
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionD. whereas economic activity has generally and significantly shifted away from physical presence, leading to a mismatch between where profits are generated and where they are taxed; | AmendmentD. whereas economic activity, particularly in highly digitalised business models, has increasingly become less dependent on on physical presence, leading to a mismatch between where profits are generated and where they are taxed; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionD. whereas economic activity has generally and significantly shifted away from physical presence, leading to a mismatch between where profits are generated and where they are taxed; | AmendmentD. whereas economic activity has generally and significantly shifted away from physical presence, and there is a mismatch between where profits are generated and where they are taxed; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | AmendmentDa. whereas growing capital mobility, along with the broader trends of globalisation and digitalisation over recent decades, have progressively diminished the capacity of individual countries to ensure the effectiveness of their tax policy and protection of their tax base —particularly corporate taxes, but also increasingly personal income taxes — thereby eroding public revenue bases;15a |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment15a de la Feria, R. (2023). Pillar 2, Fiat, and the EU Unanimity rule on tax matters. Fiat, and the EU Unanimity Rule on Tax Matters (January 3, 2023), 2-8 |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | AmendmentDa. whereas small and medium-sized enterprises, which typically operate primarily at domestic level, may be placed at a competitive disadvantage compared to multinational enterprises (MNEs) that can exploit cross-border tax planning opportunities, while large MNEs may not contribute fairly and proportionally to societal needs; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionE. whereas the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS’ Two-Pillar solution seeks to modernise international tax rules through the reallocation of taxing rights to market jurisdictions (Pillar One) and the establishment of a global minimum effective corporate tax rate of 15 % (Pillar Two); | AmendmentE. whereas the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS’ Two-Pillar solution seeks to modernise international tax rules in response to digitalisation and globalisation through the reallocation of taxing rights to market jurisdictions (Pillar One) and the establishment of a global minimum effective corporate tax rate of 15 % (Pillar Two); |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionF. whereas negotiations on Pillar One have stalled at the international level; whereas, in this context, several Member States have introduced or maintained digital services taxes at national level; whereas Pillar Two has been fully or partially implemented by around one third of the 148 jurisdictions participating in the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework, while some Member States have fully implemented it through the Pillar Two Directive; | AmendmentF. whereas negotiations on Pillar One have stalled at the international level; whereas, in this context, several Member States have introduced or maintained digital services taxes at national level; whereas a uniform European digital tax would contribute to greater international tax fairness and better level laying field internationally and within the Single Market; whereas Pillar Two has been fully or partially implemented by around one third of the 148 jurisdictions participating in the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework, while some Member States have fully implemented it through the Pillar Two Directive; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionF. whereas negotiations on Pillar One have stalled at the international level; whereas, in this context, several Member States have introduced or maintained digital services taxes at national level; whereas Pillar Two has been fully or partially implemented by around one third of the 148 jurisdictions participating in the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework, while some Member States have fully implemented it through the Pillar Two Directive; | AmendmentF. whereas negotiations on Pillar One have stalled at the international level; whereas, in this context, several Member States have introduced or maintained digital services taxes at national level; whereas these national measures represent vital and legitimate revenue streams for Member States in the absence of a global agreement; whereas Pillar Two has been fully or partially implemented by around one third of the 148 jurisdictions participating in the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework, while some Member States have fully implemented it through the Pillar Two Directive; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionF. whereas negotiations on Pillar One have stalled at the international level; whereas, in this context, several Member States have introduced or maintained digital services taxes at national level; whereas Pillar Two has been fully or partially implemented by around one third of the 148 jurisdictions participating in the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework, while some Member States have fully implemented it through the Pillar Two Directive; | AmendmentF. whereas negotiations on Pillar One have stalled at the international level; whereas, in this context, several Member States have successfully introduced or maintained digital services taxes at national level; whereas Pillar Two has been fully or partially implemented by around one third of the 148 jurisdictions participating in the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework, while some Member States have fully implemented it through the Pillar Two Directive; |
Jussi Saramo, Martin Schirdewan, Pasquale Tridico, Manon Aubry
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionG. whereas, on the initiative of the United States, an agreement was reached within the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on a ‘side-by-side’ approach (SbS), which establishes a coordinated and simultaneous application of different minimum tax regimes; whereas in January 2026, the US NCTI system was granted safe harbour status under the SbS, which the Commission acknowledged through a Commission notice issued on 12 January 2026; | AmendmentG. whereas, on the initiative of the United States, an agreement was reached within the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on a ‘side-by-side’ approach (SbS), which establishes a coordinated and simultaneous application of different minimum tax regimes; whereas in January 2026, the US NCTI system was granted safe harbour status under the SbS, which the Commission acknowledged through a Commission notice issued on 12 January 2026; whereas the SbS exempts US-headquartered MNEs from the full application of Pillar Two rules, conferring a structural competitive advantage on US-headquartered enterprises operating within the EU internal market and undermining the integrity of the global minimum tax framework. |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionG. whereas, on the initiative of the United States, an agreement was reached within the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on a ‘side-by-side’ approach (SbS), which establishes a coordinated and simultaneous application of different minimum tax regimes; whereas in January 2026, the US NCTI system was granted safe harbour status under the SbS, which the Commission acknowledged through a Commission notice issued on 12 January 2026; | AmendmentG. whereas, on the initiative of the United States, an agreement was reached within the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on a ‘side-by-side’ approach (SbS), which establishes a coordinated and simultaneous application of different minimum tax regimes; whereas in January 2026, the US NCTI system was granted safe harbour status under the SbS, which the Commission acknowledged through a Commission notice issued on 12 January 2026; whereas in February 2026 Brazil requested safe harbour status under the SbS; |
Katri Kulmuni, Billy Kelleher, Gilles Boyer
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionG. whereas, on the initiative of the United States, an agreement was reached within the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on a ‘side-by-side’ approach (SbS), which establishes a coordinated and simultaneous application of different minimum tax regimes; whereas in January 2026, the US NCTI system was granted safe harbour status under the SbS, which the Commission acknowledged through a Commission notice issued on 12 January 2026; | AmendmentG. whereas, an agreement was reached within the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS on a ‘side-by-side’ approach (SbS), including United States specificities, which establishes a coordinated and simultaneous application of different minimum tax regimes; whereas in January 2026, the US NCTI system was granted safe harbour status under the SbS, which the Commission acknowledged through a Commission notice issued on 12 January 2026; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | AmendmentGa. whereas no studies or estimates on the economic impact of the SbS have been released either by the OECD or by the Commission; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionH. whereas recent EU reports stress the importance of tax simplification, the decluttering of fiscal rules and effective tax incentives as key instruments for restoring the EU’s competitiveness; | AmendmentH. whereas recent EU reports stress the importance of tax simplification and harmonization of tax rules as well as cost- effective tax incentives as key instruments for enhancing the EU’s competitiveness; whereas well- designed, substance based tax incentives coordinated at EU level, can be a tool to advance public goals in the Single Market, such as the de-carbonization of the economy, provided that distortions are avoided and opportunities for tax evasion and avoidance are adequately mitigated; whereas governments should ensure that R&D tax incentives schemes include robust anti- tax loophole mechanisms as well as social and environmental constitutionalities, and provide value for money through regular and rigorous evaluation, based on transparent and high quality firm- level data; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionH. whereas recent EU reports stress the importance of tax simplification, the decluttering of fiscal rules and effective tax incentives as key instruments for restoring the EU’s competitiveness; | AmendmentH. whereas recent EU reports stress the importance of tax simplification, the decluttering of fiscal rules and effective tax incentives as key instruments for restoring the EU’s competitiveness; emphasises that domestic, substance-based tax incentives—such as a 0% tax rate on retained and reinvested corporate profits—are legitimate and highly effective economic policy tools for capital formation and growth in catching-up economies; |
Arba Kokalari, Regina Doherty
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionH. whereas recent EU reports stress the importance of tax simplification, the decluttering of fiscal rules and effective tax incentives as key instruments for restoring the EU’s competitiveness; | AmendmentH. whereas recent EU reports stress the importance of tax simplification, the decluttering of fiscal rules and effective tax incentives as key instruments for restoring the EU’s competitiveness, supporting investment and reducing administrative burdens; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionH. whereas recent EU reports stress the importance of tax simplification, the decluttering of fiscal rules and effective tax incentives as key instruments for restoring the EU’s competitiveness; | AmendmentH. whereas recent EU reports stress the importance of tax administrative simplification and the decluttering of fiscal rules as key instruments for harmonised and effective enforcement; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | AmendmentHa. whereas negotiations on the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation are ongoing, with the final text of the convention and two protocols expected to be concluded by 2027; whereas these negotiations present an opportunity to deliver a global agreement through an inclusive process; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionCompetitiveness in international taxation | AmendmentEffective and fair international taxation |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution1. Emphasises the restoration of the EU’s competitiveness as a top priority; recalls that investment attractiveness requires a stable, predictable and easily navigable tax environment, and an optimal level of tax administration; | Amendment1. Emphasises the restoration of the EU’s competitiveness as a top priority; recalls that investment attractiveness requires a stable, predictable and easily navigable tax environment, an optimal level of tax administration, and full respect for the flexibility of Member States to tailor their domestic tax systems to meet national economic conditions; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution1. Emphasises the restoration of the EU’s competitiveness as a top priority; recalls that investment attractiveness requires a stable, predictable and easily navigable tax environment, and an optimal level of tax administration; | Amendment1. Emphasises the restoration of the EU’s competitiveness as a top priority; recalls that investment attractiveness requires a stable, predictable and easily navigable tax environment focused on fostering growth rather than creating undue restrictions, and proportionate tax administration with minimal compliance overhead; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution1. Emphasises the restoration of the EU’s competitiveness as a top priority; recalls that investment attractiveness requires a stable, predictable and easily navigable tax environment, and an optimal level of tax administration; | Amendment1. Emphasises the enhancement of the EU’s competitiveness as one of the Union´s priorities, alongside the green and digital transformation; recalls that investment attractiveness requires a stable, predictable, transparent and easily navigable tax environment, and an optimal level of tax administration; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution1. Emphasises the restoration of the EU’s competitiveness as a top priority; recalls that investment attractiveness requires a stable, predictable and easily navigable tax environment, and an optimal level of tax administration; | Amendment1. Recalls that investment attractiveness requires a fair, stable, predictable and easily navigable tax environment, and an optimal level of tax administration; emphasises the need for cross-border activity for EU’s competitiveness and the role of fair and harmonised taxation in this respect; |
Pierre Pimpie, Tomáš Kubín, Enikő Győri
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution1. Emphasises the restoration of the EU’s competitiveness as a top priority; recalls that investment attractiveness requires a stable, predictable and easily navigable tax environment, and an optimal level of tax administration; | Amendment1. Emphasises the restoration of the EU’s competitiveness as a top priority; recalls that investment attractiveness requires a stable, predictable and easily navigable tax environment, a competitive tax burden, and an efficient, proportionate and business-friendly tax administration; |
Regina Doherty, Arba Kokalari
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution1. Emphasises the restoration of the EU’s competitiveness as a top priority; recalls that investment attractiveness requires a stable, predictable and easily navigable tax environment, and an optimal level of tax administration; | Amendment1. Emphasises the restoration of the EU’s competitiveness as a top priority; recalls that investment attractiveness requires a stable, predictable, competitive, attractive, and easily navigable tax environment, and an optimal level of tax administration; |
Arba Kokalari, Regina Doherty
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment1a. Regrets that the combination of high corporate tax rates in the EU, compliance complexity, withholding rules, limited loss offsets in some countries, and fragmented national regimes create competitive disadvantages for EU firms trying to compete globally; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution2. Welcomes international efforts, such as those undertaken by the OECD, which aim to stop the race to the bottom and create a more level playing field by establishing a global floor for the tax obligations of multinational enterprises (MNEs) through a minimum effective tax rate; | Amendment2. Welcomes international efforts, such as those undertaken by the OECD, which aim to stop the race to the bottom and create a more level playing field by establishing a global floor for the tax obligations of multinational enterprises (MNEs) through a minimum effective tax rate; calls on the Commission and Member States to advocate in the relevant international forums for the progressive increase of the global minimum effective corporate tax rate in line with recommendations from ICRICT and independent economists to a level able to generate additional revenues for public investment, climate action and social spending; |
Pierre Pimpie, Enikő Győri
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution2. Welcomes international efforts, such as those undertaken by the OECD, which aim to stop the race to the bottom and create a more level playing field by establishing a global floor for the tax obligations of multinational enterprises (MNEs) through a minimum effective tax rate; | Amendment2. Takes note of international efforts, such as those undertaken by the OECD, which aim to create a more level playing field for multinational enterprises (MNEs) through a minimum effective tax rate; stresses, however, that fair, transparent and substance-based tax competition between jurisdictions can remain a legitimate tool to attract investment, support employment and strengthen competitiveness, and should not be equated with harmful tax practices; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution2. Welcomes international efforts, such as those undertaken by the OECD, which aim to stop the race to the bottom and create a more level playing field by establishing a global floor for the tax obligations of multinational enterprises (MNEs) through a minimum effective tax rate; | Amendment2. Welcomes international efforts, such as those undertaken by the OECD |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment2a. Stresses that the future of corporate taxation in the Union must remain firmly anchored in the principles of economic substance and real capital accumulation. Maintains that competitive corporate tax models, specifically those utilizing a 0% tax rate on undistributed and reinvested profits, represent highly effective, forward-looking economic tools that stimulate domestic investment, innovation, and long-term capital formation. Rejects any strategy that seeks to transition the European tax framework toward mandatory formula-based consolidation or centralized profit reallocations, which systematically detach corporate tax liabilities from the actual physical and economic footprints of enterprises within individual Member States; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment2a. Welcomes the efforts by the United Nations Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) on International Tax Cooperation to draft a United Nations Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation to enhance international tax cooperation, combat tax evasion, and ensure fairer tax systems worldwide; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment2a. Welcomes UN efforts to create a coherent and comprehensive multilateral agreement on international taxation, including on fair allocation of taxing rights, illicit financial flows, harmful tax practices; supports the goal of aligning the international taxation with human rights and sustainable development goals; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment2b. Highlights that navigating a changing international environment requires a structural shift away from relentless legislative over-regulation toward administrative stabilization and systemic simplification. Calls for future corporate tax policy to strictly prioritize the mitigation of compliance burdens by establishing a moratorium on overlapping reporting requirements and ensuring the immediate implementation of robust, permanent safe harbors under Pillar Two rules. Insists that the actual operational and structural capacities of smaller national tax administrations must serve as a primary baseline constraint for any future EU-wide or global fiscal frameworks, thereby protecting smaller Member States from bureaucratic over-extension and resource exhaustion; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment2c. Warns that any shift toward simple-majority voting mechanisms in global tax standard-setting risks marginalizing smaller, open economies, disrupting established treaty networks, and creating a fragmented, dual-track international tax regime; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution3. Regrets that the global implementation of Pillar Two remains incomplete, with major economies such as China and India not having implemented the reform; is of the view that the coexistence of Pillar Two with concurrent domestic minimum tax regimes leads to fragmentation and weakens its global application; | Amendment3. Regrets that the global implementation of Pillar Two remains incomplete, with major economies such as China, India and the US not having implemented the reform; urges Member States to implement Pillar Two in full in particular the Undertaxed Profit Rule (UTPR); notes that the UTPR is an essential element for a well-functioning Pillar Two ensuring a level playing field for European companies; calls on Member States not to extend the UTPR transitional safe harbour beyond 2026 which would disadvantage EU companies; welcomes the clear commitment to UTPR by Commissioner Hoekstra in his written replies to the Parliament in the context of the appointment hearings; recalls that in 2021 the United States agreed to the OECD minimum tax at G7, G20 and OECD Inclusive Framework levels; |
Pierre Pimpie, Tomáš Kubín
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution3. Regrets that the global implementation of Pillar Two remains incomplete, with major economies such as China and India not having implemented the reform; is of the view that the coexistence of Pillar Two with concurrent domestic minimum tax regimes leads to fragmentation and weakens its global application; | Amendment3. Regrets that the global implementation of Pillar Two remains incomplete, with major economies such as China and India not having implemented the reform; stresses that a global minimum tax can only deliver a genuine level playing field if it is applied effectively and consistently by all major economies; considers, therefore, that the EU should assess alternative and more pragmatic approaches where global implementation remains incomplete, including targeted simplification, reciprocal safe harbours and measures to preserve the competitiveness of EU-headquartered companies; |
Katri Kulmuni, Billy Kelleher, Gilles Boyer
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution3. Regrets that the global implementation of Pillar Two remains incomplete, with major economies such as China and India not having implemented the reform; is of the view that the coexistence of Pillar Two with concurrent domestic minimum tax regimes leads to fragmentation and weakens its global application; | Amendment3. Regrets that the global implementation of Pillar Two remains incomplete, and imposes a significant administrative burden and exceptional costs on taxpayers without corresponding tax revenues, with major economies such as China and India not having implemented the reform; is of the view that the coexistence of Pillar Two with concurrent domestic minimum tax regimes leads to fragmentation and weakens its global application; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution3. Regrets that the global implementation of Pillar Two remains incomplete, with major economies such as China and India not having implemented the reform; is of the view that the coexistence of Pillar Two with concurrent domestic minimum tax regimes leads to fragmentation and weakens its global application; | Amendment3. Regrets that the global implementation of Pillar Two remains incomplete, with major economies such as China and India not having implemented the reform; is of the view that the coexistence of Pillar Two with concurrent domestic minimum tax regimes - such as the US NCTI regime and other national regimes that may get a safe harbour status under SbS - leads to fragmentation and weakens its global application; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution3. Regrets that the global implementation of Pillar Two remains incomplete, with major economies such as China and India not having implemented the reform; is of the view that the coexistence of Pillar Two with concurrent domestic minimum tax regimes leads to fragmentation and weakens its global application; | Amendment3. Notes that the global implementation of Pillar Two remains incomplete, with major economies such as China and India not having implemented the reform; is of the view that the coexistence of Pillar Two with concurrent domestic minimum tax regimes leads to fragmentation, increases the risk of asymmetric competitive disadvantages for European businesses, and unnecessarily complicates domestic tax policy space; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution3. Regrets that the global implementation of Pillar Two remains incomplete, with major economies such as China and India not having implemented the reform; is of the view that the coexistence of Pillar Two with concurrent domestic minimum tax regimes leads to fragmentation and weakens its global application; | Amendment3. Regrets that the global implementation of Pillar Two remains incomplete, with major economies such as China and India not having implemented the reform; recalls that the Pillar Two agreement is a key instrument in ensuring fair taxation, reducing harmful tax practices, and establishing a fairer level playing field for large businesses operating in the global economy; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution4. Notes with concern that the significant structural differences between the US NCTI regime and Pillar Two result in different effective tax rates that disadvantage EU-headquartered MNEs operating in the United States; notes, furthermore, that as a result of the SbS, US-headquartered MNEs are technically exempted from most Pillar Two obligations, thereby putting European companies at a competitive disadvantage; | Amendment4. Notes with concern that the significant structural differences between the US NCTI regime and Pillar Two result possibly in different effective tax rates and inconsistent application across jurisdictions; notes, furthermore, that as a result of the SbS, US-headquartered MNEs are technically exempted from most Pillar Two obligations, thereby reopening incentives for corporate profit shifting and undermining a level playing field for companies and tax jurisdictions worldwide; notes that persistent regulatory uncertainty and recent shifts in US economic and trade policy continue to generate caution among international investors and businesses; underlines that the current international environment is increasingly characterised by geopolitical competition, unilateral policy measures and growing fragmentation of the rules-based multilateral order; |
Katri Kulmuni, Billy Kelleher, Gilles Boyer
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution4. Notes with concern that the significant structural differences between the US NCTI regime and Pillar Two result in different effective tax rates that disadvantage EU-headquartered MNEs operating in the United States; notes, furthermore, that as a result of the SbS, US-headquartered MNEs are technically exempted from most Pillar Two obligations, thereby putting European companies at a competitive disadvantage; | Amendment4. Stresses that the significant structural differences between the US NCTI regime and Pillar Two result in different effective tax rates that disadvantage EU-headquartered MNEs operating in the United States; notes, furthermore, that as a result of the SbS, US-headquartered MNEs are technically exempted from most Pillar Two obligations, thereby putting European companies at a significant competitive disadvantage; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment4a. Expresses serious concerns about the effects of the SbS; notes that, while the agreement aims to bring regulatory stability, it risks harming the level playing field and reignite the harmful corporate tax practices that the Pillar Two framework was designed to curb; |
Katri Kulmuni, Billy Kelleher, Gilles Boyer
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment4a. Stresses that while Pillar Two applies a 15% minimum tax per jurisdiction, the US NCTI’s global blending offsets under-taxed profits, creating a structural imbalance between both regimes; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment4b. Calls on the Commission to release available data or analysis on the estimated revenue loss to EU Member States resulting from the implementation of the SbS; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment4c. Calls on the Commission to further release an assessment on the impact of the introduction, through the SbS, of a new targeted substance-based tax incentive safe harbour in the Pillar Two framework; underlines the importance of analysing the extent to which the permissibility of these incentives, which are mostly used in the United States, undermine the overarching goals of preventing a race to the bottom in taxation and introduce competitive disadvantage vis-a-vis businesses based in the EU; |
Regina Doherty, Arba Kokalari
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution5. Calls on the Commission to analyse and propose solutions on how to correct the structural imbalances created by the SbS, in order to safeguard a level playing field for European companies and the EU’s global competitiveness; | Amendment5. Calls on the Commission to analyse and propose solutions on how to correct the structural imbalances created by the SbS, in order to safeguard a level playing field for European companies and the EU’s global competitiveness, while recognising the principle of subsidiarity and that taxation is a Member State competence; calls on the Commission to take EU economic competitiveness into account at all times and to ensure that its proposals enhance the EU's economic attractiveness, and do not undermine it; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution5. Calls on the Commission to analyse and propose solutions on how to correct the structural imbalances created by the SbS, in order to safeguard a level playing field for European companies and the EU’s global competitiveness; | Amendment5. Calls on the Commission to urgently and thoroughly analyse the impact the impact of the SbS on facilitating global profit shifting and lowering effective tax rates and propose corrective measures and solutions to safeguard the integrity of the global minimum tax framework, prevent a race the bottom and ensure multinational companies operating in the Single Market contribute to a fair and effective level of taxation irrespective of where they are headquartered; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution5. Calls on the Commission to analyse and propose solutions on how to correct the structural imbalances created by the SbS, in order to safeguard a level playing field for European companies and the EU’s global competitiveness; | Amendment5. Calls on the Commission to analyse and propose solutions on how to correct the structural imbalances created by the SbS, in order to safeguard a level playing field for European companies, ensure fair taxation, protect public revenues, prevent harmful tax practices, and support sustainable economic growth and the EU’s global competitiveness; |
Pierre Pimpie, Enikő Győri
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution5. Calls on the Commission to analyse and propose solutions on how to correct the structural imbalances created by the SbS, in order to safeguard a level playing field for European companies and the EU’s global competitiveness; | Amendment5. Calls on the Commission to urgently analyse and propose solutions, including legislative solutions where necessary, to correct the structural imbalances created by the SbS, in order to safeguard a level playing field for European companies and the EU’s global competitiveness; |
Katri Kulmuni, Billy Kelleher
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution5. Calls on the Commission to analyse and propose solutions on how to correct the structural imbalances created by the SbS, in order to safeguard a level playing field for European companies and the EU’s global competitiveness; | Amendment5. Calls on the Commission to analyse and propose solutions on how to correct the structural imbalances created by the SbS, in order to safeguard a level playing field for European companies and the EU’s global competitiveness and actively seek to simplify the Pillar Two rules; |
Jussi Saramo, Martin Schirdewan, Pasquale Tridico, Manon Aubry
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment5a. Expresses concern that the granting of safe harbour status to third-country minimum tax regimes that operate outside the Pillar Two framework sets a damaging precedent of exceptionalism within a system that derives its value from universal and consistent application; underlines that concessions of this nature, when made under the explicit threat of unilateral trade measures, normalise the use of extraterritorial economic pressure as a lever over the EU's regulatory autonomy, a form of coercion that, by its nature, could be extended to any domain of EU policy, thereby eroding the Union's sovereignty; reaffirms that the EU's commitment to combating tax avoidance and ensuring that all multinational enterprises contribute their fair share must remain unconditional; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment5a. Rejects calls for a new EU statistical own resource on company profits; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution6. Calls on the Commission to fully deploy instruments to counter anti-competitive tax advantages that harm European companies, including State aid and anti-subsidy measures; | Amendmentdeleted |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution6. Calls on the Commission to fully deploy instruments to counter anti-competitive tax advantages that harm European companies, including State aid and anti-subsidy measures; | Amendment6. Calls on the Commission to bring forward a proposal for a digital services tax in order to restore fairness in the taxation of the digital economy; notes that certain highly digitalised multinational enterprises continue to benefit from business structures that facilitate the shifting of profits to low-tax jurisdictions, resulting in effective tax rates that are significantly below those of many other economic actors; stresses that, in the absence of a comprehensive global solution, a Union-wide digital services tax would constitute a simple, effective and flexible tool to ensure that value created in the Union is taxed fairly and that competition within the Single Market is not distorted; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution6. Calls on the Commission to fully deploy instruments to counter anti-competitive tax advantages that harm European companies, including State aid and anti-subsidy measures; | Amendment6. Calls on the Commission to fully deploy instruments to counter anti-competitive tax advantages that harm European companies, including State aid and anti-subsidy measures; recalls the need to return to a strict state aid framework once exceptional circumstances have ceased, which would reinforce a healthy tax competition ecosystem within the EU; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution6. Calls on the Commission to fully deploy instruments to counter anti-competitive tax advantages that harm European companies, including State aid and anti-subsidy measures; | Amendment6. Calls on the Commission to fully deploy instruments to counter anti-competitive tax advantages that may result from the SbS; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment6a. Notes with concern that a significant share of profits generated by oil, gas and mineral extraction is shifted to low-tax jurisdictions, with evidence showing that profit shifting increases during periods of high commodity prices; calls on the Commission to put forward a proposal for a surtax on consolidated profits of fossil fuel companies, ensuring fair taxation of fossil fuel rents, redirection of revenues to the green transition, and a shift away from environmentally harmful activities towards a more sustainable environmental tax framework; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment6a. Stresses that a substantial share of wealth is concentrated in corporate assets and profits; underlines the need for fair and effective corporate taxation in order to secure sufficient public revenues, allowing Member States to address the consequences of past crises and prepare for future economic, social and geopolitical challenges; notes that aggressive tax planning and the under taxation of corporate profits distort competition, undermine tax fairness and weaken the level playing field, globally and internally; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment6a. Calls on the Commission to propose a legislative framework to ensure that multinational enterprises that are resident for tax purposes in third countries are taxed within the Union in a manner equivalent to that of companies resident for tax purposes in a Member State when they generate a significant portion of their revenue in the single market. |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment6a. Highlights the role of targeted tax incentives and exemptions in boosting competitiveness and promoting innovation; urges the Commission and the Member States to develop and use EU state aid compliant taxation tools to attract and keep high-value-added activities within the EU; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment6b. Notes with concern that, since the outbreak of the Iran war energy shock, the profits of oil and gas companies have skyrocketed, while energy bills for households and European businesses have increased sharply, and that those profits are expected to continue to grow in the coming years; notes that the five largest oil companies recorder more than 100 billion dollars in profits in 2024 alone; calls on the Commission to put forward without delay a targeted windfall profits tax on the consolidated excess profits of large oil and gas companies, set at a rate of at least 50%, calculated against the average profits made by energy companies in recent years; stresses that revenues from such a measure should be used to provide targeted support to households and SMEs, and to contribute reducing Union’s dependence on imported fossil fuels and accelerating the sustainable energy transition; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment6b. Calls on the Commission to establish a ‘European tax presence’ mechanism whereby third-country companies with a turnover above a certain threshold in the Union are deemed to have a tax presence in the EU, irrespective of their physical establishment. |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment6c. Calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of imposing a supplementary equalisation tax on third-country companies operating in the internal market that are subject to an effective tax rate significantly lower than that applied in the Member States. |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment6d. Emphasizes that access to European funding instruments, research and innovation programmes and public procurement should be conditional on having a substantive tax presence within the Union and on full compliance with EU tax rules. |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionNeed for simplification and clarity in EU legislation | AmendmentNeed for simplification, clarity and an effective and democratic decision-making in EU tax legislation |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionNeed for simplification and clarity in EU legislation | AmendmentNeed for simplification, transparency and clarity in EU legislation |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution7. Notes with concern that the SbS increases legal and administrative complexity, as well as compliance costs for EU-headquartered MNEs operating in the United States; | Amendment7. Notes with concern that the design of Pillar 2 brought a separate, burdensome accounting layer to reporting requirements since, in order to calculate global minimum taxes, financial frameworks (like IFRS or US GAAP) mixed with complex OECD adjustments needs to be applied on top of local tax codes; regrets that the SbS increases even further legal and administrative complexity, as well as compliance costs for EU-headquartered MNEs operating in the United States; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution7. Notes with concern that the SbS increases legal and administrative complexity, as well as compliance costs for EU-headquartered MNEs operating in the United States; | Amendment7. Notes with concern that the SbS increases legal and administrative complexity and creates new loopholes, as well as compliance costs, including for EU-headquartered MNEs operating in the United States, while shielding US headquartered corporations from essential elements of the OECD Pillar Two framework and enabling the continuation of harmful corporate tax abuse1b; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment1b https://thefactcoalition.orgn/oecd-side-by-side-agreement/ |
Katri Kulmuni, Billy Kelleher, Gilles Boyer
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution7. Notes with concern that the SbS increases legal and administrative complexity, as well as compliance costs for EU-headquartered MNEs operating in the United States; | Amendment7. Notes with concern that the SbS increases legal and administrative complexity, as well as compliance costs for EU-headquartered MNEs operating in the United States, thereby undermining the EU’s competitiveness; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment7a. Takes the view that harmonising corporate tax procedures, including the calculation of tax bases, enforcement and definitions, would provide clear benefits for the corporate world, as it would make it easier for enterprises to carry out investment activities in another EU Member State, while also helping to curb tax evasion and avoidance; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the DAC framework; | Amendment8. Takes note of the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise administrative simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and evaluate and improve consistency of anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law whilst simplifying reporting and procedures for reducing unnecessary administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses; calls further on the Commission to resist deregulatory pressure from large multi-national enterprises lobbying seeking to weaken EU tax rules, and to ensure that this exercise does not result in reduced tax transparency or weaker anti-avoidance tax rules; opposes in particular any rollback of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions and any premature , revision of the the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive since its practical effects cannot yet be properly assessed due to its recent implementation; calls instead on the Commission to allow sufficient time for implementation before considering any legislative changes and to carry out an evidence-based assessment of its first two years of implementation and to bring forward proposals to strengthen the framework, including by moving towards a full public disaggregated CbCR across all jurisdictions; further stresses the importance of strengthening cooperation between Member States and national tax administrations in order to promote a more consistent interpretation and application of both direct and indirect tax legislation across the Union; |
Enikő Győri, Tomáš Kubín, Pierre Pimpie
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the DAC framework; | Amendment8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to pursue an ambitious and comprehensive corporate tax simplification agenda aimed at strengthening the Union’s global competitiveness, reducing compliance costs and increasing legal certainty for businesses operating within the internal market; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the DAC framework; stresses that simplification efforts should particularly benefit SMEs, innovative companies and cross-border businesses by reducing excessive administrative burdens, duplicative reporting obligations and legal fragmentation across the Union; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the DAC framework; | Amendment8. Notes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; notes in particular, the need to take advantage of the review process to address current overlapping rules, and to streamline and simplify the application of common rules and concepts; points out in particular that standardisation of terms and concepts is crucial to simplify compliance, since various domestic interpretations may give rise to fragmentation and complexity; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-head-quartered businesses – in particular streamlining ATAD’s provisions with the Pillar Two framework, where possible, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the DAC framework; emphasises that efforts to simplify EU legislation must not lead to deregulation and lowering current standards; |
Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the DAC framework; | Amendment8. Notes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxation; calls on the Commission to prioritise identifying remaining tax loopholes and streamlining overlapping rules; highlights the effectiveness of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) in implementing the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action Plan; recognises that controlled foreign company (CFC) provisions could be simplified by retaining the option under Article 7(2)(a) for non-distributed income; recalls that Pillar II, contrary to the ATAD, applies only to groups that have an annual revenue of EUR 750 000 000 or more; acknowledges the potential for simplification by reviewing the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, and the Directive on Administrative Cooperation (DAC) framework; emphasises that efforts to simplify EU legislation must not lead to deregulation and lowering current standards; |
Jussi Saramo, Pasquale Tridico
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the DAC framework; | Amendment8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses; underlines, however, that any simplification exercise must not come at the expense of the transparency mechanisms and disclosure framework that are essential for effective tax enforcement, the protection of public revenue, and the rule of law; calls on the Commission to ensure that any reduction in transparency obligations is accompanied by a robust impact assessment demonstrating no consequential reduction in enforcement capacity; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the DAC framework; | Amendment8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses, based on a strict proportionality test and the principle that no new tax reporting obligation should be introduced without removing or simplifying an equivalent existing obligation; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the DAC framework; | Amendment8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the framework for administrative cooperation (DAC); |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the DAC framework; | Amendment8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus on taxation; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the DAC framework; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, and by reviewing and potentially simplifying the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, the Merger Directive, the Country-by-Country Reporting Directive and the DAC framework; | Amendment8. Welcomes the Commission’s work in preparing the Omnibus package on taxes; calls on the Commission to prioritise tax simplification by reviewing overlapping reporting and anti-tax avoidance measures under EU tax law and reducing administrative burden on EU-headquartered businesses – in particular by examining the continued necessity of the ATAD’s controlled foreign company provisions, ensuring that smaller Member States and medium-sized enterprises are not disproportionately burdened by overlapping compliance frameworks; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment8a. Recalls that the Pillar II Directive guarantees a minimum effective tax rate in every EU Member State and contains dedicated anti-abuse provisions covering intra-group financing arrangements; observes that ATAD shares the broader aim of Pillar II of preventing base erosion and profit shifting, notably by means of its interest limitation rule, which restricts how much intra-group interest a company may deduct; considers that, once a group is subject to the global minimum tax, that framework already absorbs a large part of the risk that justified the interest limitation rule, so that applying both regimes to the same group creates duplication without added value; calls on the Commission, on that basis, to assess whether groups within the scope of the Pillar II Directive should be released from the ATAD interest limitation rules, or should instead see those rules applied to them in an adjusted form; |
Katri Kulmuni, Billy Kelleher, Gilles Boyer
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment8a. It is particularly important to ensure that burdensome regulation and tax reporting intended for large companies are not extended directly or indirectly to SMEs. With regard to the existing regulation concerning large companies (such as minimum tax regulation), it is justified to maintain the limitations that exclude SMEs from the regulation. SMEs do not have the same resources (such as their own entire tax departments or very extensive advisory resources) to handle the workload resulting from complex tax regulation and heavy tax reporting as large groups, which is why complex and heavy regulation in principle burdens SMEs relatively much more; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment8a. Recalls that empirical evidence shows that weaker corporate tax-avoidance rules and profit shifting have an impact on employment and are associated with job losses; calls on the Commission in the context of the Tax Omnibus package to carry out a thorough assessment of its effects on labour markets, wages and working conditions; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules; | Amendment9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules, in particular, the mismatch between its tax base determination and the GloBE tax base under Pillar Two; regrets that proposal for BEFIT did not provide for a genuine consolidation at Union level, but rather for the aggregation and subsequent allocation of tax results; further regrets that it sought to introduce a Pillar One at EU level trhough a factor-based formulary apportionment despite the absence of an OECD agreement on Pillar one; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules; | Amendment9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, notably regarding the continued risks of profit shifting and tax base erosion; stresses the need to ensure full consistency with internationally agreed minimum taxation standards and to prevent new loopholes that could facilitate aggressive tax planning; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules; | Amendment9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine and adjust its proposal for BEFIT, taking into full account its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules and the need to avoid creating an overlapping, parallel tax framework that increases the administrative and compliance burden for European businesses; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules; | Amendment9. Urges the Commission to withdraw or fundamentally halt its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules, its potential to distort national corporate tax bases through arbitrary consolidation formulas, and the unnecessary administrative burden it introduces; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules; | Amendment9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules and to bring forward, if appropriate, a narrower proposal limited to administrative simplification measures that are fully compatible with the international framework; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules; | Amendment9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules; Takes note of the lack of progress in the Council on this legislative file and of the fact that negotiations remain blocked; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules; | Amendment9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, with a view to assessing and tackling any inconsistencies vis-a-vis the obligations for MNEs in the scope of the Pillar Two framework; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules; | Amendment9. Calls on the Commission to re-examine and withdraw its proposal for BEFIT, due to its fundamental incompatibilities with OECD Pillar Two rules; |
Pierre Pimpie, Tomáš Kubín, Enikő Győri
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution10. Is concerned about the implementation of the SbS system as a safe harbour under Article 32 of the Pillar Two Directive, rather than through a proper legislative process; | Amendment10. Is concerned about the implementation of the SbS system as a safe harbour under Article 32 of the Pillar Two Directive, rather than through a proper legislative process; insists that any material change to the obligations of Member States or companies under the Pillar Two Directive should be made through the appropriate legislative procedure, with full respect for the unanimity requirement in tax matters; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution10. Is concerned about the implementation of the SbS system as a safe harbour under Article 32 of the Pillar Two Directive, rather than through a proper legislative process; | Amendment10. Is concerned about the implementation of the SbS system as a safe harbour under Article 32 of the Pillar Two Directive, rather than through a proper legislative process; regrets that political pressure from the United States has resulted in an arrangement risking undermining the global level playing field and effectiveness of the global minimum tax framework; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution11. Notes that the Member States will apply the Pillar Two Directive from different dates; calls on the Member States to ensure the full transposition of the directive to mitigate risks arising from mutual reliance on tax rulings issued by national tax administrations; | Amendment11. Notes that the Member States will apply the Pillar Two Directive from different dates; calls on the Member States to ensure the full transposition of the directive; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution12. Invites the Commission to explore simplification measures to alleviate the implementation burden of Pillar Two on the tax administrations of smaller Member States; | Amendmentdeleted |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution12. Invites the Commission to explore simplification measures to alleviate the implementation burden of Pillar Two on the tax administrations of smaller Member States; | Amendment12. Emphasises that the administrative burden imposed by Pillar Two on businesses and tax administrations alike risks outweighing its revenue benefits for smaller Member States; invites the Commission to explore simplification measures to alleviate the implementation burden of Pillar Two on the tax administrations of smaller Member States, e.g. by introducing a simplified compliance pathway for companies below a defined revenue threshold and by streamlining overlapping reporting requirements; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution12. Invites the Commission to explore simplification measures to alleviate the implementation burden of Pillar Two on the tax administrations of smaller Member States; | Amendment12. Invites the Commission to explore simplification measures to alleviate the implementation burden of Pillar Two on the tax administrations of smaller Member States; emphasises that the implementation of Pillar Two must not penalize legitimate national tax incentives for innovation and R&D, such as research premiums; calls on the Commission to push within the OECD for permanent and simple safe harbors to protect competitive business locations; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution12. Invites the Commission to explore simplification measures to alleviate the implementation burden of Pillar Two on the tax administrations of smaller Member States; | Amendment12. Invites the Commission to explore simplification measures to alleviate the implementation burden of Pillar Two on the tax administrations of smaller Member States; calls the Member States and the Commission to initiate negotiations within the OECD to explore further simplification opportunities; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution12. Invites the Commission to explore simplification measures to alleviate the implementation burden of Pillar Two on the tax administrations of smaller Member States; | Amendment12. Invites the Commission to explore and rapidly implement robust simplification measures, such as safe harbours and simplified filing procedures, to alleviate the severe implementation and monitoring burden of Pillar Two on the tax administrations of smaller Member States; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution12. Invites the Commission to explore simplification measures to alleviate the implementation burden of Pillar Two on the tax administrations of smaller Member States; | Amendment12. Invites the Commission to explore simplification measures to alleviate the implementation burden of Pillar Two on the tax administrations; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment12a. Regrets that unanimity in tax matters has been blocking meaningful progress towards a harmonised and fairer corporate tax framework, including on corporate tax base harmonisation, minimum taxation and the taxation of digital companies; stresses that this situation has enabled harmful tax competition and distortions of the internal market in the Union, favouring large multi-national enterprises at the expense of public budgets and SMEs; calls on the Council and the European Council to move away from unanimity in tax matters by making use of the passerelle clauses provided for in the Treaties, including measures against tax fraud, evasion and avoidance, administrative cooperation, tax transparency and any other measures necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market; notes that such a possibility has never been used in the area of taxation; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment12a. Stresses that a common framework for corporate taxation through harmonisation will not only significantly cut compliance costs and the administrative burden, but also create a level playing field for businesses operating within the Single Market, encourage expansion, enhance legal certainty, and stimulate investments and growth in the Union; calls on the Commission, in this regard, to remain active in fostering BEFIT-like measures for the harmonisation of the corporate tax base and consolidation, potentially through a step-by-step approach; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment12a. Urges the Commission to exclude loans for the construction, transformation and renovation of buildings for social housing purposes from the ATAD’s interest limitation rules; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment12a. Rejects the proposal for a Corporate Resource for Europe (CORE); |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment12b. Calls on the Commission to present an updated roadmap on a more efficient and democratic decision-making in EU tax policy, with a view to moving towards qualified majority voting and ordinary legislative procedure in defined areas of tax policy, and to assess systematically the use of Article 116 TFEU where divergent national tax rules distort competition in the internal market and an agreement cannot be reached; further calls on willing Member States to use enhanced cooperation where unanimity prevents progress on long-standing tax initiatives; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment12b. Recalls that tax transparency measures, including public Country-by-Country Reporting (pCBCR), contribute to fair competition, enhance corporate accountability and provide greater certainty for investors; stresses that increased transparency helps create a level playing field within the Single Market that strengthens the EU’s attractiveness as a destination for sound and sustainable investment; |
Arba Kokalari, Regina Doherty
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment12b. Recalls the importance of the Once-Only Principle , where tax authorities that already receive information under one directive should not request the same entity again in a different form unless the additional request has a clear enforcement purpose; |
Arba Kokalari, Regina Doherty
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment12c. Highlights that tax fragmentation is one reason why EU firms face higher costs when expanding and scaling up across borders, raising capital, or structuring investment within the Single Market; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionState of the fight against harmful tax practices | AmendmentState of the fight against tax evasion, avoidance and aggressive tax planning |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolutionState of the fight against harmful tax practices | AmendmentStatus of global administrative cooperation in taxation matters |
Enikő Győri, Pierre Pimpie
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution13. Welcomes the contribution of Pillar Two to reducing the number of jurisdictions applying very low effective corporate tax rates and to the introduction of qualified domestic minimum top-up taxes in many jurisdictions, representing a major step towards preventing the tax avoidance practices of MNEs; | Amendment13. Welcomes the contribution of Pillar Two to reducing the number of jurisdictions applying very low effective corporate tax rates and to the introduction of qualified domestic minimum top-up taxes in many jurisdictions, representing a major step towards preventing the tax avoidance practices of MNEs; stresses, however, that fair and healthy tax competition among EU Member States remains an important element of the internal market and contributes to the Union’s global competitiveness by creating a business friendly environment; underlines that preserving sufficient flexibility for Member States in the field of direct taxation helps maintain the attractiveness of the Union as a place for business activity and innovation, thereby supporting the retention of companies, investment, highly skilled jobs and strategic industries within the EU; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution13. Welcomes the contribution of Pillar Two to reducing the number of jurisdictions applying very low effective corporate tax rates and to the introduction of qualified domestic minimum top-up taxes in many jurisdictions, representing a major step towards preventing the tax avoidance practices of MNEs; | Amendment13. Welcomes the contribution of Pillar Two to reducing the number of jurisdictions applying very low effective corporate tax rates and to the introduction of qualified domestic minimum top-up taxes in many jurisdictions, representing a major step towards preventing the tax avoidance practices of MNEs; regrets that, despite regulatory efforts over the past decade, profit shifting to low-tax jurisdictions remains a widespread practice among large multinational enterprises and shows few signs of declining; recalls that in the current international context, it is essential to monitor emerging forms of harmful tax competition, including those arising from carve-outs embedded in the Pillar Two framework and from the treatment of tax credits3a; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment3a https://taxjustice.net/reports/the-state-of-tax-justice-2025/ |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution13. Welcomes the contribution of Pillar Two to reducing the number of jurisdictions applying very low effective corporate tax rates and to the introduction of qualified domestic minimum top-up taxes in many jurisdictions, representing a major step towards preventing the tax avoidance practices of MNEs; | Amendment13. Welcomes the contribution of Pillar Two to reducing the number of jurisdictions applying very low effective corporate tax rates and to the introduction of qualified domestic minimum top-up taxes in many jurisdictions, representing a major step towards establishing global certainty for corporate tax payers and towards more effective administrative cooperation; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution14. Notes that estimated revenue losses resulting from BEPS strategies by MNEs remain substantial; calls on the Commission and the Member States to intensify international cooperation to address this challenge and safeguard their domestic tax revenues; | Amendment14. Notes that estimated revenue losses resulting from BEPS strategies by MNEs remain substantial; calls on the Commission and the Member States to intensify international cooperation to address this challenge and safeguard their domestic tax revenues; stresses that tax revenue losses are increasingly linked to third-country companies operating in the single market without a commensurate tax contribution, which distorts competition to the detriment of European companies. |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution14. Notes that estimated revenue losses resulting from BEPS strategies by MNEs remain substantial; calls on the Commission and the Member States to intensify international cooperation to address this challenge and safeguard their domestic tax revenues; | Amendment14. Notes that estimated revenue losses resulting from BEPS strategies by MNEs remain substantial; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution14. Notes that estimated revenue losses resulting from BEPS strategies by MNEs remain substantial; calls on the Commission and the Member States to intensify international cooperation to address this challenge and safeguard their domestic tax revenues; | Amendment14. Notes that estimated revenue losses resulting from BEPS strategies by MNEs remain substantial; urges the Commission to take a more proactive and ambitious role, together with and the Member States, in strengthening international cooperation and advancing effective measures to address this challenge and safeguard their domestic tax revenues; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution14. Notes that estimated revenue losses resulting from BEPS strategies by MNEs remain substantial; calls on the Commission and the Member States to intensify international cooperation to address this challenge and safeguard their domestic tax revenues; | Amendment14. Notes that estimated revenue losses resulting from BEPS strategies by MNEs remain substantial; calls on the Commission and the Member States to coordinate anti-abuse measures and intensify international cooperation to address this challenge and safeguard their domestic tax revenues; |
Enikő Győri, Tomáš Kubín, Pierre Pimpie
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment14a. Stresses that an effective fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and aggressive tax avoidance remains essential for safeguarding Member States’ public finances and strengthening confidence in tax systems; calls on the Commission and the Member States to reinforce administrative cooperation, improve information exchange and promote effective and efficient tax collection mechanisms across the Union; underlines that well-functioning and enforceable tax systems are necessary to ensure a level playing field for businesses, reduce distortions within the internal market and secure sustainable public revenues while avoiding disproportionate administrative burdens for compliant taxpayers; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment14a. Regrets the withdrawal of the Commission’s proposal of the financial transaction tax, transfer pricing, UNSHELL, allowing qualified majority voting on technical or non-sensitive VAT issues, and debt equity bias reduction allowances (DEBRA) from the Commission’s work programme 2026 and urges the Commission to accelerate actions to combat tax evasion, avoidance and aggressive tax planning, as well as to put forward the proposal for the annual publication of the effective corporate tax rate of certain large companies, as foreseen in the Communication on Business Taxation for the 21st Century4a; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment4a https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-05/communication_on_business_taxation_for_the_21st_century.pdf |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment14a. Recalls that, as Pillar Two is implemented, it is important to monitor new forms of harmful tax competition that may develop, notably as a result of embedded carve-outs in the framework, as well as the treatment of certain tax incentives 16a; |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment16a European Tax Observatory, Global Tax Evasion Report 2024, p. 36.; European Commission, Annual Tax Report 2025, p. 94. European Tax Observatory, Global Tax Evasion Report 2024, p.52-54 |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment14b. Regrets that certain Member States continue to facilitate aggressive tax planning and operate as EU tax havens through preferential regimes, low effective taxation of corporate profits and schemes facilitating aggressive tax planning; stresses that harmful tax competition within the Union distorts the internal market, undermines fairness and shifts the tax burden on workers, households and SMEs; calls on the Commission and the Council to apply objective and consistent criteria to harmful tax practices both inside and outside the Union, and to establish credible countermeasures; calls on further on the Commission and Council to assess the implementation of the 2022 revision of the Code of Conduct on Business Taxation in promoting fair tax competition within and outside the EU and curbing harmful tax practices; calls for a reform to strengthen its mandate, transparency, accountability and follow up mechanisms; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment14b. Recalls Parliament’s resolutions on reforming the EU list of tax havens and on reforming the EU policy on harmful tax practices (including the reform of the Code of Conduct Group); calls on the Council to relaunch discussions on a comprehensive reform of the Code and to implement Parliament’s recommendations; 17a |
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment17a European Parliament resolution of 21 January 2021 on reforming the EU list of tax havens; European Parliament resolution of 7 October 2021 on reforming the EU policy on harmful tax practices (including the reform of the Code of Conduct Group). |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment14c. Notes that ongoing geopolitical tensions have generated significant windfall profits in certain sectors; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that these extraordinary gains are taxed fairly and effectively, and to address the cross-border shifting of windfall profits that undermines tax revenues and thus distort fair competition; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution15. Reaffirms its commitment to the international rules-based order; stresses that internationally developed instruments are effective only insofar as they are backed by a genuine global agreement and effective implementation; | Amendment15. Reaffirms its commitment to the international rules-based order; stresses that certain instruments, such as formula apportionment and digital services taxes, can remain effective even in the absence of universal implementation; |
Jussi Saramo, Pasquale Tridico, Manon Aubry
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution15. Reaffirms its commitment to the international rules-based order; stresses that internationally developed instruments are effective only insofar as they are backed by a genuine global agreement and effective implementation; | Amendment15. Reaffirms its commitment to the international rules-based order; stresses that internationally developed instruments represent the most ambitious and structurally sound framework available for addressing global tax challenges. |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution16. Regrets the fact that the EU’s digital services trade balance has tilted sharply towards other jurisdictions where digital technology and cloud service providers have expanded rapidly; points out that this shift is posing a significant challenge to Member States’ tax systems and requires a rethinking of the reallocation of taxing rights; | Amendment16. Regrets the fact that the EU’s digital services trade balance has tilted sharply towards other jurisdictions where digital technology, artificial intelligence and cloud service providers have expanded rapidly, increasing the concentration of economic power and taxable profits in a small number of multinational digital companies headquartered outside the Union; points out that this shift is posing a significant challenge to Member States’ tax systems and requires a rethinking of the reallocation of taxing rights; calls on the Commission and Member States to develop a coordinated approach to the allocation of taxing rights in the digital and AI economy, with a view to preventing profit shifting and ensuring the profits and rents generated from EU users, data and businesses is taxed fairly where the value is created; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution16. Regrets the fact that the EU’s digital services trade balance has tilted sharply towards other jurisdictions where digital technology and cloud service providers have expanded rapidly; points out that this shift is posing a significant challenge to Member States’ tax systems and requires a rethinking of the reallocation of taxing rights; | Amendment16. Regrets the fact that the EU’s digital services trade balance has tilted sharply towards other jurisdictions where digital technology and cloud service providers have expanded rapidly; |
Regina Doherty, Arba Kokalari
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution16. Regrets the fact that the EU’s digital services trade balance has tilted sharply towards other jurisdictions where digital technology and cloud service providers have expanded rapidly; points out that this shift is posing a significant challenge to Member States’ tax systems and requires a rethinking of the reallocation of taxing rights; | Amendment16. Regrets the fact that the EU’s digital services trade balance has tilted sharply towards other jurisdictions where digital technology and cloud service providers have expanded rapidly; points out that this shift highlights the importance of continued international cooperation to ensure tax certainty, avoid double taxation and provide a stable environment for investment, innovation and economic growth; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment16a. Calls on the Commission to consider the creation of a European mechanism for allocating tax obligations for digital and online services provided by third-country companies to consumers and businesses within the Union. |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment16b. Calls for the establishment of uniform rules to prevent artificial transfers of profits outside the Union through intragroup transactions, intellectual property rights and digital services provided by affiliated companies established in third countries. |
Jussi Saramo, Martin Schirdewan, Pasquale Tridico, Manon Aubry
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution17. Takes note of the United States’ concerns regarding unilateral digital services taxes, which it views as discriminatory towards US technology companies; welcomes the United States’ openness to dialogue on these matters; | Amendment17. Regrets that multilateral negotiations on the reallocation of taxing rights under Pillar One have stalled without prospect of near-term conclusion, and that the question of taxing the digital economy has remained unresolved since 2018 despite sustained efforts by the EU and its partners; considers that the absence of meaningful progress at the multilateral level should not defer the EU's action to ensure that digital economy revenues generated within its internal market are taxed fairly and consistently; calls on the Commission to bring forward without further delay a new proposal for an EU-wide digital services tax, so as to safeguard Member States' revenues based and guarantee as level playing field between digital and traditional business models; notes that a 5% EU-wide digital services tax has been estimated to generate EUR 37.5 billion in annual revenues for 2026, a figure that would be expected to grow significantly in subsequent years, representing a substantial and increasing contribution to EU fiscal capacity at a time of heightened public finance needs; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution17. Takes note of the United States’ concerns regarding unilateral digital services taxes, which it views as discriminatory towards US technology companies; welcomes the United States’ openness to dialogue on these matters; | Amendment17. Takes note of the United States’ concerns regarding unilateral digital services taxes, nevertheless, pending the development and implementation of a comprehensive multilateral framework that ensures a fair allocation of taxing rights over multinational enterprises operating across jurisdictions, reaffirms the sovereign right of States to adopt temporary unilateral measures to protect and preserve their tax bases, including digital services taxes, while recognising that broader international participation in such measures may contribute to reducing the scope for unilateral retaliatory actions; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution17. Takes note of the United States’ concerns regarding unilateral digital services taxes, which it views as discriminatory towards US technology companies; welcomes the United States’ openness to dialogue on these matters; | Amendment17. Takes note of the United States’ concerns regarding unilateral digital services taxes, which it views as discriminatory towards US technology companies; welcomes the United States’ openness to dialogue on these matters; underlines, however, that until a comprehensive and binding global agreement under Pillar One is fully operational, these national digital services taxes remain a justified and essential instrument for Member States to ensure that all digital businesses contribute their fair share to national budgets; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution17. Takes note of the United States’ concerns regarding unilateral digital services taxes, which it views as discriminatory towards US technology companies; welcomes the United States’ openness to dialogue on these matters; | Amendment17. Takes note of the United States’ concerns regarding unilateral digital services taxes, which it views as discriminatory towards US technology companies; welcomes the United States’ openness to dialogue on these matters; underlines that fair and effective taxation of the digital economy remains essential in ensuring a level playing field and safeguarding public revenues; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution17. Takes note of the United States’ concerns regarding unilateral digital services taxes, which it views as discriminatory towards US technology companies; welcomes the United States’ openness to dialogue on these matters; | Amendment17. Takes note of the United States’ concerns regarding solutions under Pillar One and unilateral digital services taxes, which it views as discriminatory towards US technology companies; welcomes the United States’ openness to dialogue on these matters; |
Katri Kulmuni, Billy Kelleher, Gilles Boyer
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution17. Takes note of the United States’ concerns regarding unilateral digital services taxes, which it views as discriminatory towards US technology companies; welcomes the United States’ openness to dialogue on these matters; | Amendment17. Takes note of the United States’ concerns regarding unilateral digital services taxes, which it views as discriminatory towards US technology companies; welcomes a constructive dialogue between the EU and the US on these matters; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution18. Is of the view that unilateral measures or double tax agreements cannot adequately tackle global tax challenges and risk opening the door to retaliatory measures, and that a global solution to digital taxation would therefore be the ideal way forward; | Amendmentdeleted |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution18. Is of the view that unilateral measures or double tax agreements cannot adequately tackle global tax challenges and risk opening the door to retaliatory measures, and that a global solution to digital taxation would therefore be the ideal way forward; | Amendment18. Is of the view that unilateral measures or double tax agreements cannot adequately tackle global tax challenges and risk opening the door to retaliatory measures, and that a global solution to digital taxation would therefore be the ideal way forward, provided that any solution respects the principle of economic substance and does not arbitrarily disadvantage smaller open economies; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution18. Is of the view that unilateral measures or double tax agreements cannot adequately tackle global tax challenges and risk opening the door to retaliatory measures, and that a global solution to digital taxation would therefore be the ideal way forward; | Amendment18. Is of the view that unilateral measures may risk opening the door to retaliatory measures, while recalling that double tax agreements remain a central instrument for preventing double taxation and preserving legal certainty; stresses that any global solution to digital taxation must be based on broad consensus, effective implementation by all major economies; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution18. Is of the view that unilateral measures or double tax agreements cannot adequately tackle global tax challenges and risk opening the door to retaliatory measures, and that a global solution to digital taxation would therefore be the ideal way forward; | Amendment18. Is of the view that unilateral measures or double tax agreements cannot adequately tackle global tax challenges and risk opening the door to retaliatory measures, and that a global solution to digital taxation would therefore be the ideal way forward that constructs a solution on a wider basis; |
Regina Doherty, Arba Kokalari
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution18. Is of the view that unilateral measures or double tax agreements cannot adequately tackle global tax challenges and risk opening the door to retaliatory measures, and that a global solution to digital taxation would therefore be the ideal way forward; | Amendment18. Is of the view that unilateral measures or double tax agreements cannot adequately tackle global tax challenges and risk opening the door to retaliatory measures, and that a global solution to digital taxation would be the only effective way forward; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment18a. Stresses, however, that in the absence of a global solution, regional or unilateral measures can play a role in ensuring greater tax fairness; urges the Commission to review the scope of EU action on the fair taxation of the digital economy in light of recent political developments in the OECD Pillar Two framework; calls for renewed consideration of an EU digital levy that ensures a common approach regarding the taxation of the digital sector, enhances the EU's global competitiveness by establishing legal certainty and a level playing field for digital businesses operating within the Union; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment18a. Stresses that any future international tax cooperation agreement should include reciprocity clauses so that third-country companies enjoying access to the single market are subject to tax obligations equivalent to those applied to Union companies. |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution19. Takes note of ongoing negotiations within the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, which aim to improve tax cooperation and transparency in a global context; | Amendment19. Welcomes the ongoing negotiations within the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, which aim to improve tax cooperation and transparency in a global context; takes the view that this UN Convention on Tax should be designed with a view to ensuring a fair division of taxing rights between nation states, and, while duly considering national tax sovereignty, support efforts to tackle harmful tax practices and illicit financial flows; stresses, in this context, that the EU should play a proactive role in enabling developing countries to mobilise domestic resources, in particular through enhanced tax governance, and that the EU should take the lead in combating illicit financial flows; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution19. Takes note of ongoing negotiations within the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, which aim to improve tax cooperation and transparency in a global context; | Amendment19. Takes note with concern of ongoing negotiations within the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation; strongly opposes draft provisions, such as Article 5, that could be interpreted as requiring the mandatory renegotiation of existing bilateral tax agreements, thereby undermining long-standing legal certainty; rejects any international tax framework that shifts away from consensus-based decision-making towards simple majority voting; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution19. Takes note of ongoing negotiations within the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, which aim to improve tax cooperation and transparency in a global context; | Amendment19. Welcomes the ongoing negotiations within the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, which aim to establish a fully inclusive international tax cooperation, and create a fair, transparent, efficient, equitable and effective international tax system for sustainable development; calls on the Member States to continue to engage constructively in the process notwithstanding the work carried out at the OECD; |
Pierre Pimpie, Tomáš Kubín, Enikő Győri
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution19. Takes note of ongoing negotiations within the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, which aim to improve tax cooperation and transparency in a global context; | Amendment19. Takes note of ongoing negotiations within the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, which aim to improve tax cooperation and transparency in a global context; stresses that any UN-led process should complement, and not duplicate or undermine, existing OECD/G20 standards, should preserve legal certainty and should not create conflicting obligations for Member States, tax administrations or businesses; |
Jussi Saramo, Martin Schirdewan, Pasquale Tridico, Manon Aubry
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution19. Takes note of ongoing negotiations within the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, which aim to improve tax cooperation and transparency in a global context; | Amendment19. Welcomes the ongoing negotiations within the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, which aim to improve tax cooperation and transparency in a global context; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution20. Invites the Member States to strengthen their coordination and to present a unified position in multilateral forums; further invites the Commission to assist the Member States in effectively representing their interests in such forums; | Amendment20. Invites the Member States to strengthen their coordination and to present a unified position in multilateral forums where appropriate, while maintaining their individual right to negotiate and vote independently in accordance with national interests; firmly rejects any attempt to transfer exclusive external competence in tax matters to the Commission; further invites the Commission to assist the Member States upon request in effectively representing their interests in such forums; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution20. Invites the Member States to strengthen their coordination and to present a unified position in multilateral forums; further invites the Commission to assist the Member States in effectively representing their interests in such forums; | Amendment20. Invites the Member States to strengthen their coordination and to present a unified position in multilateral forums that reflects the EU interests, simplifies taxation obligations and ensures coherence within the international tax framework; further invites the Commission to assist the Member States in effectively representing their interests in such forums; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution20. Invites the Member States to strengthen their coordination and to present a unified position in multilateral forums; further invites the Commission to assist the Member States in effectively representing their interests in such forums; | Amendment20. Invites the Member States to strengthen their coordination and to present ambitious positions in multilateral forums; further urges the Commission to take a more proactive and ambitious role to effectively represent the Member States' in such forums; |
Katri Kulmuni, Billy Kelleher, Gilles Boyer
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution20. Invites the Member States to strengthen their coordination and to present a unified position in multilateral forums; further invites the Commission to assist the Member States in effectively representing their interests in such forums; | Amendment20. Invites the Member States to strengthen their coordination and to present a strong unified position in multilateral forums; further invites the Commission to assist the Member States in effectively representing their interests in such forums; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment20a. Calls on the Council to move towards the use of qualified majority voting in certain corporate tax matters concerning the prevention of tax evasion and avoidance, and for the implementation of international tax agreements; stresses that the lack of further tax coordination pressures Member States to engage in a detrimental race to the bottom, while also hampering cross-border economic activities; |
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment20a. Calls on the Commission to draw up an annual report on the tax gap between Union companies and third-country companies operating in the single market, assessing the impact on competitiveness, investment and public revenues of Member States, and to propose corrective measures where necessary. |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment20b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen measures against international tax havens by promoting full transparency of beneficial ownership, supporting the automatic exchange of information, and ensuring the effective implementation of a global minimum corporate tax rate; urges the establishment of stronger sanctions against non-cooperative jurisdictions and calls for enhanced country-by-country reporting requirements for multinational enterprises in order to combat tax avoidance, tax evasion, and illicit financial flows; |
Niels Fuglsang, Bruno Gonçalves, Matthias Ecke, Aurore Lalucq, Evelyn Regner, Jonás Fernández
Amendment: Motion for a resolution and Amendment| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
|---|
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment20c. Urges the establishment of stronger sanctions against non-cooperative jurisdictions and calls for enhanced country-by-country reporting requirements for multinational enterprises in order to combat tax avoidance, tax evasion, and illicit financial flows; |