Text · Comparison of two versions
Changes from report parliamentary committee draft to plenary report
CONT-PR-772035 → A-10-2025-0088
- From
- CONT-PR-772035 report parliamentary committee draft of 9 Apr 2025
- To
- A-10-2025-0088 Plenary report of 16 May 2025
- Changes
- 1 change to the text
- Paragraphs
- +0 added · −0 removed · 2 changed
More facts (3)
- Dossier
- 2025/0802(NLE)
- Title (from)
- on the nomination of Ivana Maletić as a Member of the Court of Auditors
- Title (to)
- on the nomination of Ivana Maletić as a Member of the Court of Auditors
AI: What changed, in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source · deepseek-v4-flash · 4 Sept 2026
The committee now delivers a favourable opinion on the nomination, removing the alternative of an unfavourable one.1
The notes class 1 change as substance, 0 as formal, 0 as wording only.
Every difference
The full paragraph comparison, packaging included; long runs of unchanged paragraphs are folded. One part of the text per page.
Part 5 of 5: Paragraphs 144–162
19 unchanged paragraphs
In addition, I will continue to fully adhere to the Code of Conduct for ECA Members. I have no business interests or external activities that could raise any doubt concerning my independence and I would never even consider an activity that may compromise the performance of my duties as ECA Member.
13. How would you deal with a major irregularity or even fraud in EU funds and/or corruption case involving persons in your Member State of origin? Were you in this situation during your current mandate?
I can repeat my reply on the same question for nomination for the first ECA mandate, since I was and will remain committed to that: I advocate a zero-tolerance towards fraud and corruption because they are extremely dangerous for any society – they destroy competition and opportunities for growth and development. It is precisely by efficient identification and elimination of corruption that we can provide the best possible assistance to our member states. Rules must be abided by and legality and regularity in using public funds is the foundation from which we should never allow any deviation.
I did not encounter any cases of fraud, irregularity of corruption during my current mandate.
14. The existence of conflict of interests can trigger a reputation risk for the ECA. How would you manage any conflict of interest?
I absolutely agree that a conflict of interest poses reputational risks for the ECA. Avoiding these conflicts is at the core of my work and in line with our Code of Conduct, I avoid any situation that is liable to give rise to a conflict of interest, or that could objectively be perceived as such.
Should such a situation arise, I would communicate the potential conflict of interest in line with the ECA’s procedures and would not accept any tasks for which a personal interest could influence the independent performance of my duties. I have so far not been in any such situation.
15. Are you involved in any legal proceedings? if so, what kind?
No, I am not involved in any legal proceedings.
16. What specific commitments are you prepared to make in terms of enhanced transparency, increased cooperation and effective follow-up to Parliament’s positions and requests for audits?
For me, transparency in the performance of public affairs and the use of public money is a fundamental principle and one of my core values, and I fully support efforts that contribute to greater transparency. Your requirements are crucial in this regard, and I have been and always will be ready to listen to you and respond to any requests you may have regarding our audit work. We have a common goal, which is to deliver results and value for money in the implementation of EU policies and programmes, and it is important that we share our knowledge and experience. I look forward to every invitation from the Parliament to present our reports, or to participate in thematic discussions and any other form of cooperation.
Other questions
17. Will you withdraw your candidacy to a renewal of mandate if Parliament’s opinion on your appointment as Member of the ECA is unfavourable?
I consider that the authority of the European Parliament which results from the democratic legitimacy of elected MEPs must be observed in full and their decisions must be applied. In accordance with that, in the event of the Parliament’s negative opinion on my appointment I will withdraw my candidacy.
18. Being appointed Member of the ECA requires full attention and dedication to the institution itself and to ensure trust for the Union among its citizens:
– What are your views on the best way to assume these professional duties?
I completely agree with you that being a Member of ECA requires full attention and dedication. For me, being an ECA Member means to be devoted and work hard. We lead by example and if we are not motivated and committed, we cannot expect that from others. In addition, we owe it to the EU citizens to perform to the best of our abilities and add value not only for the EU institutions but to them. And this is what I tried to do from the very first day and will continue to do so in future.
– What are your current personal arrangements in terms of number of days of presence in Luxembourg? Do you plan to change these arrangements?
I moved to Luxembourg, together with my family, when I joined ECA. I work and live in Luxembourg and have no intention to change this in my second mandate.
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/CONT-PR-772035/compare/A-10-2025-0088?all=1&part=5
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Retrieved
- 27 September 2026
Cite as
European Parliament (2025). “Changes between CONT-PR-772035 and A-10-2025-0088”. Text, 16 May 2025. from CONT-PR-772035, to A-10-2025-0088, reference 2025/0802(NLE). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/CONT-PR-772035/compare/A-10-2025-0088?all=1&part=5 (retrieved 27 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-text-2025-05-16,
author = {{European Parliament}},
title = {{Changes between CONT-PR-772035 and A-10-2025-0088}},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-05-16},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/CONT-PR-772035/compare/A-10-2025-0088?all=1&part=5}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/texts/CONT-PR-772035/compare/A-10-2025-0088?all=1&part=5},
urldate = {2026-09-27},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Text. from CONT-PR-772035, to A-10-2025-0088, reference 2025/0802(NLE). Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0)}
}